Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Texas Tech Offensive Line v. Minnesota Defensive Line

Texas Tech Offensive Line

Position Player Height Weight Class
T Glen January 6-6 298 Sr.
T Gabe Hall 6-4 293 Sr.
G Louis Vasquez 6-6 341 So.
G Manny Ramirez 6-4 335 Sr.
C Brandon Jones 6-3 314 Sr.

Nationally, the Red Raider offense ranked 113th in rushing offense and 3rd in passing offense, while ranking 11th in the Big XII in rushing offense and 1st in passing offense.

As most Tech fans know, the offensive line is not geared towards blowing teams off of the ball, but creating lanes for runners and a pocket for the quarterback. Considering the few times that Tech actually ran the ball, usually less than 15 times each game, 76.33 yards a game isn't all that bad.

The one issue which always worries me is the lack of ability to force the issue on the goal-line or on 3rd or 4th down. Despite the fact that logic tells me that it shouldn't be that hard to score a touchdown when it's 3rd and 1 from the 1, it actually can be for Tech. Tech converted a measly 35% of its 3rd downs, which isn't necessarily indicative of the offensive line, but there's something there. However, in the redzone Tech was also able to convert 60% of the time for touchdowns, which is a pretty amazing rate for a passing offense.

Minnesota Defensive Line

Position Player Height Weight Class Tackles Sacks
DE Steve Davis 6-2 230 So. 46 4.5
DE William VanDesteeg 6-4 235 So. 36 9.0
DT Neel Allen 6-3 285 Jr. 34 2.0
DT Todd Meisel 6-4 255 Jr. 18 2.0

Without a doubt, the Minnesota defensive ends appear to be the real playmakers of the defense. Davis's and VanDesteeg's size is not all that impressive, but 4.5 and 9.0 sacks certainly is. By the way, VanDesteeg's 9.0 sacks is good for 22nd in the nation. It will certainly be interesting to see how January and Hall are able to match up against linemen who appear to geared towards a speed rush. Allen and Meisel appear to have average stats, and neither one of them are larger defensive tackles.

As we have already detailed, Minnesota's rushing defense is something left to be desired as they ranked in the bottom half of the Big Ten throughout the year and rank near or close to 100th nationally.

The Tech offensive line would seem to have a clear advantage here as Tech is simply bigger. I also believe that Tech linemen are accustomed to playing out in space against pass rushers and it has not posed a problem before so the fact that VanDesteeg appears to have some real speed is not a real concern for me.

ADVANTAGE: Texas Tech.

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i think....
Tech will have going for them the fact that the Gophers havent really faced a similar offense this season

Minnesota hasnt even played Northwestern (the Big 10's most similar team, probably) since 2004

a game which, incidentally, they won 43-17

by Freneau on Dec 15, 2006 12:19 AM CST reply actions  

i couldn't agree more,
I think the Tech WR v. the MN DB's is next in line and MN's pass defense is pretty pathetic, statistically speaking.
Go Raiders . . .

by Seth C on Dec 15, 2006 5:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU