Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Keys to the Game: Texas v. Texas Tech

I've been thinking waaayyyy too much about the Texas Tech - Texas game this week.  I guess it's a good thing my boss went to Tech as well.  It occurs to me that writing keys to the game may make it sound like Tech is over-matched.  I don't think that is the case.  But I am counting on Texas not giving anything.  The team that wins will have to play their very best football.  So here are 3 things on offense and 3 things on defense that I think Texas Tech will have to nail to counter the punches that I think Texas will throw at them.

Wes_welker_can_t_be_stopped_medium

Star-divide

On Offense

Don't let Texas play their dime defense all night.

 

Texas has a very good defensive line.  They have been 30% more efficient at stopping the run than Tech (69 ypg v. 101 ypg) against some pretty stiff competition.  They also have a couple of good pass rushers.  They lead the conference in sacks per game and sack yards.  Texas would love to line up with 3 lineman, a stand-up rusher, and a MLB in the box with 6 DBs all night long.  Tech needs to make good use of the screen to take advantage of the aggressive pass rush.  Tech also needs to be patient with the running game.  If Batch can pick up at least 3.4 yards per carry, Harrell should check to the run and keep moving the sticks and make Texas play the run honestly.  Some running plays out of the 2 TE set should do the trick.  Eventually, this will wear Texas down.  I think Muschamp himself has said that when the big guys are done, they're done, so he will make adjustments to stop it and keep his guys fresh.

 

If Texas can get pressure with the their dime package and only 3 lineman, they may concede a lot to the run as long as Tech isn't marching down the field and scoring.  The Tech OL needs to communicate well and recognize where the blitz is coming from.  From what I have read, I think Texas will try to move their stand-up pass rusher around and bring the pressure though the gaps in the middle versus around the outside.  Though I foresee problems if they overload the outside against Reed, as he will have his hands full with Orakpo, and that is Harrell's blind side.  If Tech is able to run the ball and protect Harrell with Texas in dime, Texas will make adjustments and it will open other things up.

 

Don't pull a Mizzou.

 

In their game against Texas, Missouri tried to run the ball first and then pass.  Texas crammed it down their throats.  I think our OL is better than Mizzou's, but we have to set up the run with the pass.  I know that sounds counter to what I wrote above.  Tech should look for Texas to double Crabtree with their best CB and a safety and to man up on the other receivers with the other safety playing center field.  We need Britton going deep to draw the help of the other safety.  With the exception of Morris, I think that the Tech receivers have a significant size advantage, which should be good for some short stuff over the middle.  I'd also like to see James in as H-back instead of Morris in any situation where we need less than 7 yards. Texas is going to be physical, and we could use James's size when we need to move the chains.  Good use of the screen and the 2 back set (dedfisher at Tortilla Retort has an excellent article on this) could also force Texas to bring in an extra LB as Mackelroy will be stretched thin trying to watch the run and help out over the middle.  This will open up the run later in drives and in the second half.  We still need Batch and Woods to pick up at least 100 yards on the ground to keep the Texas D honest, but we need to be careful to not put ourselves in a hole like Mizzou did.

 

Get rid of the ball

 

Graham needs to trust his gut and make sure he is getting rid of the ball quickly versus waiting for plays to develop.  At the same time, if Tech can get Texas to commit 4 down lineman and move to a nickel or 4-3 set, we will need a Woods or Batch to help pick up the blitzing LB to make sure Graham has time to get rid of it.  If the OL is picking everything up or there is no blitz, whoever is back there becomes the safety valve.  As I mentioned above, the Texas defensive line is good.  If Harrell is taking more than about 3 seconds to make a decision, Tech will be prone to some holding calls that will bring anything he completes back. 

 

On Defense

Force McCoy to throw to someone besides Shipley or Cosby

 

Forget that we've ever heard of zone defense.  Texas Tech has shown that it can be very effective using its nickel defense, playing man-under. Our DBs need to hitch a ride in Shipley's and Cosby's jocks if they have to and force McCoy to go to his other receivers.  He is not as comfortable with them, and Tech needs to take advantage of miscues that will result in drops and incompletions.  Tech won't be able to hang with Texas if they allow McCoy to continue to throw to Shipley and Cosby almost exclusively and keep up his 80% completion rate.  Texas will also come out with 4 wide a few times.  Our base 4-3 personnel can't handle that set.  Put the nickel D in the game and either force McCoy to make amazing throws into man under Cover 1 or force Texas to try and run the ball.  Whittiker is potentially back this week, so Texas may do just that (run), but I trust our DL to plug some holes and our two LBs + McBath to clean up.  Texas will be trading at least a couple of FGs for TDs if they are forced to run.

 

Keep McCoy in the backfield

 

This Texas team is different from any that Tech has played.  They don't have a go-to running back this year.  So far they have been reliant on the pass and Colt's ability to scramble for yards.  Kind of like Kansas.  Tech was very effective with its nickel defense, keeping a LB home to shadow Reesing.  As I said earlier, Colt is in a whole other league, but this is our best option for keeping him from scrambling for 8-10 yards a play.  The Dixon and Williams will have to be disciplined to contain first at defensive end and then rush the pass and trust the coverage to give time to get to McCoy without taking too many chances.  I think bringing Sesay in as the Joker would be good as it will give Whitlock the chance to be one on one instead of double teamed and we can try to get to McCoy up them middle.  But first we have to contain.

 

Contain the Option

 

Honestly, this is the thing that scares me the most.  Last week we allowed Kansas to move the ball pretty effectively with the option.  Colt McCoy is a good running QB. With a pitch man in the backfield, Texas running the option could be dangerous.  The containment by our ends will be key.  I expect McCoy to go to his right, which means it will be Dixon's job to get off of his blocker and force McCoy to pitch the ball.  Last week, the LB was forced to take Reesing, and the corner was off covering a receiver.  So when the pitch was made, there was a lot of running room before someone could pull of their pass coverage and get to the running back. 

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Last week, the LB was forced to take Reesing, and the corner was off covering a receiver.

that was a pretty good pop on the QB how many times do you think they would really
try the option if a LB was popping McCoy all day long?

If you not having fun....then your not playing the game right.

by texastfan on Oct 29, 2008 5:57 PM CDT reply actions  

McCoy has been one to lower his head all season long. I don’t think they’ll blink.

by NM99 on Oct 29, 2008 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excellent work.
I expect McCoy to go to his right, which means it will be Dixon’s job to get off of his blocker and force McCoy to pitch the ball.

The only problem with this is that Ratliff may see quite a bit of time there at the beginning of the game. Thus, much like last week (and I’ve have to go back to the tape to verify, but Reesing had his best success early, and Ratliff in the game worries me.

I think some credit also needs to be thrown the way of Sesay, Whitlock and Jones, who have a pretty good job of getting pressure up the middle, while still containing in the pocket.

Do you think Bird sees as much time as he did last week?

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Oct 29, 2008 8:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks. I have thought that Dixon has been doing a better job and that he would see most of the playing time, but that is just my opinion and I’m not the coach.

Bird had a good week last week. I thought that he went out injured a couple of games back, and I don’t remember him playing much against A&M, so I don’t know if they were just tring to get him back in the rotation or what. I will say that whatever we did personnel wise last week throughout the middle of the game was pretty solid, so if it ain’t broke don’t fix it.

I really want to see Sesay used in the Joker package. In talking about contain, I started to say something about Whitlock in particular. I think he could log a sack and a couple of hurries if the DEs do a good job of not letting McCoy escape. Dedfischer indicated that he thought Whitlock would draw a double team. If we use the Joker in the middle, that would almost certainly leave him 1-1 which could be huge.

by NM99 on Oct 29, 2008 8:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Never thought about using Sesay

in the Joker package, probably because I just don’t remember seeing it. If it were you, would you roll out Whitlock at DT, Sesay and Dixon at DE and Williams/Howard as the joker?

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Oct 29, 2008 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’d keep Dixon and Williams in at DE, Whitlock at DT and Sesay as the joker. I haven’t seen him used in that way, but I think I recall McNeil commenting on using him that way at the beginning of the year. He’d be a handful.

by NM99 on Oct 29, 2008 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sesay is more of a bull-rush DE. the joker is often a speed rusher.

by kayakyakr on Oct 29, 2008 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sesay

Is faster (on paper) than a couple of out LBs. Granted, that’s on paper. I think given the opportunity to move around and shoot the gap as a stand-up rusher, his size and strength could be a real weapon.

by NM99 on Oct 31, 2008 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU