Recruiting Trends: Quarterbacks and Running Backs
The 2009 recruiting class will be the 6th recruiting class where Captain Leach takes just 1 quarterback on scholarship. Thus far, Leach has recruiting Graham Harrell, Chris Todd, Taylor Potts, Stephan Loucks, Seth Doege, and Jacob Karam in successive recruiting classes. Over a year ago I opined that this was a pretty obvious trend with Captain Leach to take at least one quarterback with each recruiting class, and for how Leach runs his system, this works out well.
It got me thinking about the recent running back classes and it occurred to me that Leach has done the same type of thing at running back.
Below is a handy table along with recruit for the particular year and the Rivals.com recruiting stars.
|
Position
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
| Quarterback | Graham Harrell (6'3"/205) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Chris Todd (6'2"/220) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Taylor Potts (6'5"/218) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stefan Loucks (6'1"/171) ![]() ![]() |
Seth Doege (6'2"/207) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jacob Karam (6'1"/197) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Running Back | Shannon Woods (5'11"/194) ![]() ![]() |
Kobey Lewis (5'6"/166) ![]() ![]() |
Baron Batch (5'11"/200) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aaron Crawford (5'11"/199) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Harrison Jeffers (5'9"/210) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Eric Stephens (5'8"/177) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I should probably note that in 2007 and in 2008 Leach technically recruited 2 running backs. In 2007 Jared Flannel and in 2008 Brandon Reid were each recruited as running backs. This past spring, Jared Flannel was moved to cornerback and just in case you're wondering, he's been an absolute special teams ace this year with 11 special teams tackles. That's good for 17th for the team. Watch out for #34 on special teams, he's usually around the pile more times than not.
Brandon Reid was also recruited at running back, but it was made clear from the beginning that the 6'2"/208 running back would transition to linebacker.
That leaves one quarterback and one running back for each class.
Quarterbacks:
It also got me thinking what is it about each one of these quarterbacks and running backs that Leach makes them "the one" for that recruiting year?
|
|
My initial thought is that the quarterback has to make quick decisions and mentally, they have to be able to handle the thought process of reading a defense quickly. In Leach's offense, it's more important to get the ball off quickly to the right receiver then to have a cannon for an arm. This somewhat explains why Leach doesn't necessarily sign "name-brand" quarterbacks. There must be something that he sees with each one of these guys that makes him think that they have both the size, relative arm strength and mental make-up to be a quarterback for Captain Leach. The exception here of course is Potts, who doesn't fit that mold at all. He is the strong-armed quarterback who has typically held onto the ball a little long, at least in spring games and mop-up duty the past two years, sans last week against OSU.
But the other guys seems to fit that mold in every way. Again, it's not necessarily about physical measurables with Leach, but I think it's about decision making skills. And this in itself is interesting to me because I think Leach does an excellent job of upgrading talent all over the field, but seems content with finding that one guy at quarterback, ratings and 40-yard times be damned.
|
|
Running Backs:
With the running backs, it's a little more difficult for me to figure out just one theory. I would imagine that each of these guys need to be able to catch the ball out of the backfield, but I seem to recall that Aaron Crawford had quite a bit of catching up to do last year in that department. There's really not a real rhyme or reasons as to the actual size of the running back, although I think it's important to note that Woods, Batch and Crawford are not smurf-like running backs, which is probably not in line with many peoples' stereotypes about Texas Tech running backs. Jeffers is also a decent size, but obviously Lewis and Stephens are on the small side.
Although I don't believe it's always about how big or strong a quarterback is for Leach, I think that he's more than happy to recruit the more physically talented and highly rated running backs. That's certainly a trend that I can handle.
Thoughts:
Of course the upside to this type of recruiting is that there's continuity if there's an injury. If one guy gets hurt then there's someone there who has experience to hopefully continue in place of the starter. The downside is that with all of these talented players there's quite a bit more competition and guys are only likely to play one year, two years at the most. However, Leach has shown that he's more than happy to play two running backs and he prefers experienced quarterbacks (see Cumbie, Hodges, and Symons) even if they only play for one year.
I'd love to hear your theories, and as a bonus, vote on which quarterback and running back tandem you think will have the most success at Texas Tech.
1 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
On QBs...
I think it’s good to bring in one per year, so that you make sure you’ve got a guy at all times who can run your offense. I think it’s important in any offensive system, but especially this one. Not just anybody can play quarterback in this offense, cause they need to be able to read the defense quickly, call the play, and make the throw. And you are always going to lose some by transferring, injuries, or finding out he’s a dud. I just think it’s a high priority. Contrary to what many say, you can’t just go down to the local coffee shop and find a Graham Harrell.
by TT4EVER on Nov 14, 2008 10:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I haven't
looked at it quite this way before – as a designed tandem. I need to ponder that a little.
I have thought that Tech would be most consistent and have the most opportunity for success with a QB starting for 2 years. That gives them at least 2 years, maybe 3 to practice and learn the system. Potts looks like he will get to be a 2 year starter. I think that Karam may be the best of the remaining 3 QBs, so it will be interesting to see if he earns the spot as the back-up to Potts. Whoever is the backup to Potts in 2010 will likely get the start in 2011.
I think you have to bring in 1 QB/year, just to make sure that you have the right guys learning the system. As kayakyakr pointed out in my earlier post, not all recruits pan out.
by NM99 on Nov 14, 2008 10:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Chris Todd is now at Auburn. Maybe the plan was for him to start for a year in front of Potts. either way, I like having a guy for more than 1 year.
by NM99 on Nov 14, 2008 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right, they don't always work out
And that’s probably the main reason to always recruit a QB and RB each class — continuity. And Harrell was/is special, which is why he received 4*’s coming out of high school. I think Leach can teach a QB to have success at the position, but to have a high level of success takes time, seeing defenses, knowing what to expect, etc. He tries to simplify it, and I think he does a good job, but you’re right, it’s not that easy.
I too also like the idea of a 2 year starter. However after Potts, Leach is going to have a real decision. Will he go with the experience (lightly recruited Loucks) or with Doege and/or Karam? Thus far, his track record says experience.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 14, 2008 12:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hear that Seth Doege is going to give Potts all he wants this spring, and possibly win it
by TT4EVER on Nov 14, 2008 11:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've heard the same
rumblings about Doege. Although he was injured quite a bit in HS, he is supposed to be pretty good. Honestly, I’m excited about what Potts could potentially bring to the table and hope that he gets the first crack at the job.
I wonder too how much effect it could have on recruiting if Leach were to play Doege over Potts? Would quarterbacks shy away from Texas Tech if they were promised at least 1 year to start and then it didn’t happen. I realize that nothing is ever guaranteed in life, but I wonder if that’s Leach’s pitch — “sign with me and you’ll play at least 1 year because I’m only signing 1 QB to each class”.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 14, 2008 12:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no. it’d say, “if you’re better than the other people there, then you’ll get to play”
Doege has a quick release and the “it” factor, but i think potts will step it up and win out next year. Doege will be the backup to potts, though. Karam will have 3 tries to beat out Doege before himself being the experienced one trying to fight off what will probably be another highly touted QB next year.
by kayakyakr on Nov 14, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
IT factor?
That is a tuff one to define.
In Pott’s two years as starter as AHS he threw for 6052 yards 53 TDs and completed 502 of 604. (83%)
This was in the old district 3-5A (think Friday night lights) arguably the most competitive in the state, making deep play off runs each year. He has been under Leach and Harrell’s wing for three years now, you figure that a National Honer Society Member might be up to learning a few things.
“He is the strong-armed quarterback who has typically held onto the ball a little long, at least in spring games and mop-up duty the past two years, sans last week against OSU.”
I don’t put much stock in the spring games where he was already the established #2, and this year his mop up time has been too limiting for the establishment of rhythm or options.
The one HS game play that really sticks in my mind was when Taylor was flushed out of the pocket, he was chased to the sideline and then threw the ball across his body 35 yards down field to Leong on the other sideline. This was not a lob but nice hard flat screamer.
Taylor may not have IT but he’s got the GUNS and the Brains to over come IT.
VIVA LA FIGA!
by bmaxw on Nov 14, 2008 6:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't put too much stock into it either.
But it’s all I’ve seen thus far. I think he’s going to be fantastic and part of the reason he may have held the ball too long was because he was dealing with the 2nd team line and receivers going up against the 1st team defense (scrimmage). It’s the only times that I’ve seen him play, so that’s all I have to go on, but I think he’s going to be fantastic.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 15, 2008 6:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Regardless
of who starts after this year, the QB will have quite a legacy to follow, re. Graham Harrell. Even though he is not exactly perfect, he is able to quickly overcome those inefficiencies and push this team in a positive direction. Not all QBs will possess that capability, so whoever steps up and demonstrates he can be the leader this team needs will get the nod to start. Even then, the one left behind could concievably learn to be what Leach so desires: a fast-reading, decisive leader who puts all else behind him by the time he lines up for the next play, not after the break or in the next game. Doege and Potts are definately of the type Leach wants. The rest must show that capability come next year, or the next. By the way, Seth, isn’t there a QB named Sheffield on the roster as well?
TTpilk
by TTpilk645 on Nov 14, 2008 12:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yes,
Sheffield is a walk-on quarterback (I don’t believe he is on scholarship), but I don’t think he’s in the equation. Sheffield is also a sophomore, as is Potts, so he might be a backup, best case scenario, but that’s all I see for him.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 15, 2008 6:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Potts
I saw Potts play as a high school senior against my old high school. He lit up the stadium. I think he had around 400 yds passing (Leong was his wide out and he probably had 300 of those yards). If he spends the time to learn the offense and what the opposing defenses are doing the way Harrell has, I think he has a chance to be really good because he definitely has the physical tools. I don’t know much about the other QB recruits except for Karam because I live in Houston. That kid is going to be special.
by Techsan71 on Nov 14, 2008 12:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Any chance any of these QB’s make the switch to another position?
"56,000 screaming crazies in The Jones rockin' as it has never rocked before" - Terry Bowden
If you not having fun....then your not playing the game right.
by texastfan on Nov 14, 2008 2:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I may be a Horns fan
But Potts went to my high school and I have that ol’ six degrees of separation from him. I was friends with a girl whose brother was Potts’ best friends in high school. Or something like that… I’ve actually watched college football with him before.
Thus, I hope the guy succeeds and has a good career there. He has good size and he has a good arm. If I remember, he wasn’t the most mobile guy on earth, but it’s not like Tech’s offense requires it. I’ll probably be among the few Texas fans not screaming for our defense to rip his head off violently when we play him. A gentle sack will do…
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 14, 2008 2:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm right there with you
I hope that Potts gets the chance. More than anything else I’m interested to see what Leach does with a different type of quarterback. He has all of the measurables that NFL scouts would want and the arm strength to make throws that most TT quarterbacks haven’t been able to make.
It will be interesting.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 15, 2008 6:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























