5 Reasons Texas Tech Will Win: Oklahoma State Edition

Reason #1: Light At The End Of The Tunnel
I like to stay a little more grounded when it comes to these reasons, but we'll get a little unconventional with the first one. Leach has really had to work this team this year. Even early in the season, there have been a few bumps in the road, including seeing Harrell struggle so mightily against Nevada, giving up too many yards to a FCS team in Eastern Washington, struggling to stop Nebraska's ball control offense and a few other hurdles. The point here is that Leach has kept the team very focused. His players are repeating his mantra, "Do Your Job," which means that after a number of years, they understand what they are supposed to be doing. Not only that, it seems that this team is focused on the task at hand, which bodes well for the remainder of the season. I don't think Leach has to tell the players that the glimmer at the end of the tunnel is what we and they have been waiting a long time to see, but there's quite a bit of walking to get to that light, just stay focused.
Reason #2: We've Got Jamar Wall, They've Got Dez Bryant
Oklahoma State has one of the most productive receivers in the Big 12, with apologies to Mr. Crabtree, but Texas Tech has one of the better man cornerbacks in the conference in Jamar Wall. Now it's easy to submit that Wall is inferior to Bryant, given Bryant's statistics, but as Wall struggled slightly in the beginning of the season, he also began his improvement. Some of this can be attributed to scheme and the talent lever surrounding Wall getting better, but without a doubt Wall has been flat out dominating for the last 4 weeks. I'm not about to say that Wall is superior to Bryant, but what I can say is that Wall can more than compete with Bryant and if given any safety help, whether that be from McBath, Hines or Charbonnet, then he'll be fine. I'd be remiss if I didn't also mention that Oklahoma State's 2nd leading receiver is Brandon Pettigrew with 21 catches, and he and Bryant account for 60.44% of Oklahoma State's receptions. Although there's talent around Bryant, there's no doubt that Robinson looks to Bryant 3 times more than Pettigrew and 6 times more than any other receiver.
Reason #3: Cannot Rush The Quarterback
I mentioned this yesterday, but if you had asked me where Oklahoma State might be ranked in sacking the quarterback nationally, I'm pretty sure that I would have guessed somewhere in the top half. Wrong. Oklahoma State is 102nd in the nation in sacks, which means that they just aren't bad, they're awful. As a team, Oklahoma State is only averaging 1 sack per game (1.22), while the Cowboy's best pass rusher is defensive Jeremiah Price, and he has 3 sacks, one coming against A&M, Missouri and the final one against Iowa State. Compare that to Texas Tech only allowing 0.56 sacks per game, going up against one of the more talented defenses I've seen in Texas. I'll take my chances with this offensive line, that's probably feeling pretty good after having so much success against Texas, and what appear, at least statistically, to be a far inferior Oklahoma State team.
Reason #4: I Can't Pick The Right Offensive MVP
I've pretty much whiffed on every attempt to pick the offensive player to have a break out game in the weekly prediction thread. That's a good thing, not that I can't seem to pick the right guy, but rather it's near impossible to have a true sense of who it's going to be because it's someone different from week to week. I think one of the problems last year was that at some point, the offense became so reliant on Michael Crabtree that stopping him meant slowing down the offense. Not so much this year. What I think we've learned this year is that Michael Crabtree is an incredible talent that can absolutely make plays, but there are more players on this team that can carry the offense. In just the last two weeks, Ed Britton has shown that he's not going to drop the ball and he can get past a defensive back or two. Just as I mentioned above, that it's essentially the Bryant and Pettigrew Show that make up 60% of OSU's passing offense, at Texas Tech, that's not the case. The following is the percentage of total receptions for each receiver.
- Michael Crabtree: 23%
- Detron Lewis: 16%
- Eric Morris: 15%
- Ed Britton: 9%
- Tramain Swindall: 11%
- Baron Batch: 9%
- Shannon Woods: 5%
- Lyle Leong: 4%
- Adam James: 4%
I think this accomplishes two things: 1) Texas Tech is no longer reliant on just one guy; and 2) Texas Tech is well served to prepare for the impending departure of Mr. Crabtree to bigger and better things.
Reason #5: You Hear That? That's the Defense Pressuring the Quarterback.
I'm pretty sure that this Texas Tech defense is putting pressure on the quarterback in their sleep. I cannot for the life of me recall a time when there was the absolute depth amongst first and second team linemen at Texas Tech. This is just unprecedented to see the quality, and this is all without Rajon Henley. Right now, Texas Tech is sitting at 2.67 sacks a game, which is good for 21st in the nation. Consider that Brandon Williams already has 10 sacks for the year, while McKinner Dixon already has 6 and Daniel Howard, somewhat of a forgotten man, has 3. Last week, McNeill decided to utilize Howard quite a bit in the Joker package, but rather than just let him loose, Howard was in a delayed rush, waiting for the weak spot in the line to open up and help contain McCoy. Considering the fact that Robinson is a dangerous runner, I would expect a heavy dose of this again.
Check back tomorrow for "5 Reasons Why Texas Tech Will Lose: Oklahoma State Edition".
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
Once again...accepting any reasons Tech will win
Seth – Great stuff. I’m right with you on reason #3. I had no idea OSU was so far down the list on QB sacks. That was a great find which I am sure most people don’t know until now.
It seems like this year more than others the offense is embracing the ball distribution coach Leach is always mandating with his QB’s. Probably b/c Graham has matured so much, but also due to the quantity of talented receivers.
Great post as always. Give ’em hell Red Raiders!
by imisswesttexas on Nov 5, 2008 12:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
OSU rebuttal
- I’m not sure I see the light…even with a win over OSU, Tech would certainly be a road underdog at Oklahoma. It will be very hard for Tech to maintain the emotional level that they had against Texas. OSU on the other hand, caught a decent break with the schedule makers: A&M, @ Mizzou, Baylor, @ Texas, Iowa St, @ Tech, @ Colorado, OU. Notice the pattern? warmup…big game…warmup…big game….etc. And to OSU’s credit, they were able to remain focused enough in the down weeks to win each game convincingly without getting caught looking ahead, and elevate their play the following week (for Mizzou and Texas). As much as Tech has all of their dreams in sight, you could very nearly say the same thing about OSU.
- Pettigrew’s reception totals are skewed in that he missed a month of the season with an injury. Texas was able to take Bryant away by rolling a safety over the top, but that allowed Pettigrew to have an 8-83 day and the lack of a safety in run support led to Kendall Hunters 161-yard performance. Against Missouri, with Bryant again being schemed out of the game, Damian Davis had 85 yards and 2 TDs, and Kendall Hunter ran for 168. Much like Tech’s offense, OSU’s is also a case of pick-your-poison. Taking Dez out of the game just slows down the inevitable, much like playing an umbrella D does against Tech. You attempt to lengthen drives, in the hopes that the offense will make a mistake.
- OSU had 2 sacks in 4 non-conference games (2 vs Wazzu, and 0 vs Troy, Houston and Mizzou State) in a very vanilla scheme. They have had 2 sacks in every Big 12 game, except Texas, when they sacked McCoy once, and also stripped him of the ball just past the LOS on a scramble. OSU ranks 7th in the Big 12 in sacks during conference play, which is safely in the middle of the pack. But then, OSU leads the Big 12 in conference play in interceptions with 8…most of which have come as a result of the QB being forced out of his comfort zone. I would rather have an INT than a 5-yard sack in nearly every circumstance imaginable.
To Harrell’s credit, he does not throw many picks. But he did have 2 against A&M (have not seen the tape), and we all know how Saturday would have turned out had the UT freshman held onto the ball on the penultimate Raider offensive play. Harrell is great, but not flawless.
- No argument. You guys are definitely loaded at WR. For OSU, if teams focus too much attention on Dez/Pettigrew, it just leaves Hunter one-on-one at the second level, much like a single-covered Tech slot WR with a step on an OSU LB.
- We’ll see. Zac was only sacked 5 times all of 2007 and looked to run much more. This year, the coaches seem to have pulled in the reigns, which didn’t hurt him until Texas, when he appeared to wait too long before taking off. I know Iowa State sucks, but it did seem that Zac looked more like the 2007 version last week.
Finally, I’ll throw an OSU stat in there…
Over the past 5 season (59 games) when Texas Tech holds opponents to less than 4 yards per rush, they are 29-4 with an average margin of victory of 26 points.
When they allow more than 4 yards per rush, they are 14-12 with an average margin of victory of 1 point.
Over the past 2 seasons (22 games), OSU has been held under 4 yards per carry three times. This season, OSU has averaged 5.7 yards per carry, including 5.86 at Texas.
The key for Tech will be to shut down the running game. If they can do that and still leave a safety over the top of Bryant, hats off to them.
by wino1618 on Nov 5, 2008 12:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting rebuttal
Wino1618 – you make a pretty good case for OSU. I would have to say I would expect this game to be close just like last week, but higher scoring.
I guess I would just say that we’ve kinda gotten used to people underestimating Tech’s defense and yet they continue to rise to the occasion each week. Until that isn’t the case, I’ll remain confident that they will have an answer for each opponent.
Also, Harrell has been much more protective of the ball this year. I could be wrong, but it seems like one of his int’s was a deflected ball off one of our receivers. Still counts in his stats, but not really his fault. Up until the 3 errant passes he threw last week, it had been a while since he had made any bad throws.
Interesting stat on tech’s record when viewed based on our run D. Didn’t know that…Thanks
by imisswesttexas on Nov 5, 2008 1:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see a shooutout
Like you said – everyone underestimates Tech’s defense. The same should be said about OSU.
I think the average Joe remembers last year and 2003, and thinks first one to 50 wins. But those have really been the only 2 true “shooutouts” in recent memory.
2006: OSU blows a 17-0 lead, Tech wins 30-24
2005: OSU blowks a 17-0 lead, rallies to win 24-17
2004: OSU leads 15-14 after 3, Tech rallies to win 31-15
2002: OSU makes it 28-21 early in the 3rd, then Tech pulls away to win 49-24
2001: Les Miles’ first team. Tech jumps out to a 35-10 lead and coasts to a 49-30 win.
2000: Bob Simmons lame-duck season. Tech wins 58-0. The low point in a 3-8 season.
I see a score with the winner in the low 30s and the loser in the high 20s.
by wino1618 on Nov 5, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i like the way you think wino
you see everything through a fan’s eyes. I was at every one of those games starting in ‘02 and didn’t see it the same way. I watched your team rip my still beating heart out with a slow drive eating ALL the clock to win in ‘05. Saw your team blow a lead you barely protected in ’03, and watched the track meet last year (All in Stillwater-right up there with Manhattan as best College towns).
I have no hot sports opinions, but I love the way fans see through the team’s eyes. BTW you made some good points and backed them w/ stats. Thanks for visiting. I defended OSU on another thread this morning because MOST OSO people are like you and not like the links you’ll see on the right side of the page.
by Plano Jeff on Nov 5, 2008 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really great stuff
you should start an OSU blog.
One other stat, Texas Tech since 2005 is 30-3 when the running back gets 20 touches a game. I think the key for both teams will be shutting down the running game.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 6, 2008 6:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely the most
substantive rebuttal to an opposing team’s blog I have ever seen. Outstanding…..every single point made was viable, and so many things I didn’t realize. After reading some of the posts at some OSU blogs, I didn’t think it was possible. This week’s matchup looks to be Tech’s biggest challenge of the season; not that Texas wasn’t, its just that emotionally everyone was so pumped up for that game that it will be difficult to duplicate this week. Also, Tech has seen a rushing offense like OSU’s all year.
In the end, I think Tech wins in a real nail-biter….I just think the way the Tech defense is playing right now will be enough to offset two outstanding offenses.
by 2001Raider on Nov 6, 2008 7:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
#5 defensive disruption of the opponents scheme
Fellow Pirates
Expect to see the unfamiliar beast – the defensive front 7 manhandles opposing offensive lines. The defensive unit is gaining a steady dose of confidence. They expect to make a play. The speed of the assault with a few wrinkles to halt what our opponents like to do like the “Joker" rushing specialist. It’s a pleasant surprise when the August "crystal" ball prognostications starts happening i.e. The great depth in the D Line. No appreciable drop off in skill between 1st and 2nd units. It would again as said in earlier post not surprise me if we have 1 or 2 defensive linemen with 15 -20 sacks totaled up at season’s end. Correct me if I am wrong but the record for a single season is 20 and 1/2 sacks in a single campaign? It’s a compounding effect one guy (read B. Williams) disrupts the opponents offensive scheme and the other D-End (read M Dixon/Sesay is freed or up against the weaker blocker. Doesn’t hurt to force folks to keep the TE or back in to block.
We may see a mauling in the "Jones” Saturday evening.
by centexraider on Nov 5, 2008 1:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Terry Bowden has a great PRO -Tech article
and i didn’t wanna waste a fan post on it since it was yesterday. So this is where i’ll put it. it’s on rival if my link fails. Title: Bowden: Texas Tech’s Win Was No Upset.
http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=871954&PT=4&PR=2
by Plano Jeff on Nov 5, 2008 2:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
What is the deal with Rajon Henley??
Is he out for the season?
by HoustonTechster on Nov 5, 2008 2:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
nah, just about 90%. he played some against UT. McNeal used a lot of 3 man fronts against UT either in a joker or a 3-3-5 nickle (the difference being that in one there’s a LB, in the other Howard as a stand-up rusher), using primarily whitlock and a bit of sesay and perry, i believe, at nose tackle.
by kayakyakr on Nov 5, 2008 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















