Texas Tech Monday Morning Notes - Go Out And Win Edition
Double-T Nation News:
I won't go into all of the gory details, but let's just say I've been a little under the weather the last 24 hours (i.e. tethered to a toilet), so I've missed quite a bit. I'm still not 100% so please take everything I write this morning with a grain of salt.
Texas Tech Football:
LAJ's Don Williams writes that the Red Raiders are not feeling sorry for themselves with the BCS situation. Senior quarterback Graham Harrell with a little perspective:
"It’s a great conference," Tech quarterback Graham Harrell said, "and when you have this many great teams in one conference, things like this happen. You come up with three-way ties."Oklahoma State, who I think is good enough to win a lot of conferences, has lost two games (before the Cowboys lost Saturday night to Oklahoma) and aren’t even getting mentioned. They’re kind of left behind, and they’re a great team.
"We would like to have won last week and gone undefeated, but we didn’t. We want to go to the best bowl and want to go to the best game, want the best turnout, but whatever happens happens.
"It’s been an exciting year, been an exciting conference — I think the best conference in the country right now. It’s crazy at the top, but that’s the way things are."
And as far as I'm concerned, running back Baron Batch has the right attitude (emphasis mine):
"It was nothing that I could say, ‘Poor us. We’re getting messed over,’’’ Batch said. "All we had to do was go out and win, and we didn’t."

ESPN's Pat Forde on Graham Harrell's injured non-throwing hand:
Texas Tech football spokesman Chris Cook said that coach Mike Leach's policy is not to comment on the specifics of players' injuries. But he confirmed that Harrell did have surgery Sunday morning.The source said Harrell was X-rayed at halftime, and the Tech medical staff told him he was done for the day. Harrell responded, "Tape my hand up. I'm going out." Harrell finished the game with black tape around the two fingers.
And DMN's Brandon George on Michael Crabtree's ankle:
I received a text message late last night from the father of Michael Crabtree. And he said that Crabtree's injury is "not bad" and he called it a right ankle sprain. That's good news for Texas Tech fans. Crabtree looked like he could have been seriously injured when he came down and had his right ankle twist underneath him along the sideline in the second quarter against Baylor.

His team was clearly flat coming into the Baylor game, a result of their draining and emotional loss to Oklahoma last week. Tech was forced to play without likely All-Big 12 safety Daniel Charbonnet from the start. Michael Crabtree suffered an ankle injury that left him in street clothes along the sidelines for the second half. And Graham Harrell suffered a finger injury to his non-throwing hand that likely will require surgery early this week, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal reported.Despite those handicaps and a two-touchdown deficit, Leach kept the Red Raiders focused as they persevered for a gutsy victory over the Bears and claimed a share of their first Big 12 South Division title. It likely won't be enough to get them into a BCS bowl, but still showed why Leach is an underrated motivator to go along with his clear offensive genius.

I'm not going to link to all of the BCS mess, but I'll simply point you towards the SB Nation BCS Hub. There are good cases made all three ways (Texas Tech, Texas and Oklahoma) and as I wrote yesterday, the problem with this system is that it just stinks that it never should have come down to BCS ranking to determine the Big 12 South Champion.

The Abilene Reporter profiles quarterback Graham Harrell who has West Texas roots.

I found some video of Texas Tech's game on the Versus website.
Texas Tech Basketball:
I haven't intentionally tried to ignore the basketball team, but it probably appears so. During this Thanksgiving Holiday the Red Raiders lost to Pittsburgh 80-67 (boxscore) and beat a decent Mississippi State team 77-73 (boxscore). LAJ's Jeff Walker has some thoughts in his blog Above The Rim and feels that the Mississippi State win was a pretty good win.
I'm going to try and work on a weekly basketball report sometime tonight or tomorrow.
Texas Tech's next game is against Wichita State on Wednesday, in Lubbock @ 7:05 and should be telecast on TTTN.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Texas fans should take a massive lesson in humility from Harrell in the quote posted above about the quality of the Big XII. It’s a great outlook and it’s the only way to view the situation. He also makes a good point about OSU. Any four of the top south teams this year would have in contention for the title in just about every conference this season – and would have outright won several of them. But it is what it is…we are in the Big XII south where there is no room for the squeamish.
by Tech92 on Dec 1, 2008 7:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Statistics
Someone did a fan post about OU vs TTU number crunching for games against similar opponents. I wonder if we could get one of those done to compare TTU, UT, and OU against similar opponents…
by raider05 on Dec 1, 2008 8:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The BCS ranking tie-breaker
is totally fucking broken. It’s been demonstrated time and again that the most-punished loss in the BCS rankings is the last one, so you’ve put together a system that has the tiebreaker shaking out in exactly the same order as the team’s losses occurred. OU’s loss was earliest, giving them enough time to repair their standing in the computers and human polls to edge past the team they lost to, UT comes in second, with enough time to claw their way into the top 4 and an automatic at-large bid, and Texas Tech, totally screwed because they had the bad sense to lose the second to last game on their schedule. I’m not one for statistical analysis, but I am willing to bet all the money in my pockets against all the money in your pockets that if and when another three-way tie occurs in the Big XII, it shakes out the exact same way. To the (earliest) loser goes the spoils.
by mojavereject on Dec 1, 2008 9:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Before someone jumps on this
I’d just like to point out that I’m not whining for poor ol’ Texas Tech- we just happen to be on the fuzzy end of the lollipop this time. Replace anything you might get a kneejerk reaction from with “Team A/B/C” if you so desire. The thesis remains the same.
by mojavereject on Dec 1, 2008 9:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The way we lost
was a factor too. The computers didn’t consider it, but the voters did. If we had shown up and at least kept it close I think we might have stayed in the top 5 and possibly finished ahead of Texas. Then, who knows what could have happened. It was more than the “L” that dropped us so far.
by djollie111 on Dec 1, 2008 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What if . .
Tech opened the season with the 44-point loss and finished with a victory over Texas and the demolition of Oklahoma State?
Tech is currently ranked 8th in both polls. I’d bet a lot of money that they would be ranked higher than that if the order of games was changed as above (even with the 44-point shellacking at Oklahoma).
I sense Tech would have at least been in the conversation this past week (at worst).
by DoubleB on Dec 1, 2008 5:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re both very much correct. The loss isn’t what killed our chances, it was the margin of the loss. And yes, if OU had beat us before the UT and OSU games, we would have obviously moved back up. Timing really hurt. We couldn’t re-impress voters.
by Tech92 on Dec 1, 2008 5:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Should Tech be heading to a BCS bowl?
Now that the Big XII conference situation has been resolved, it leaves Texas Tech and Texas in the mix for a BCS bowl. Since Texas Tech has beaten Texas in the regular Big XII game shouldn’t we win the tie breaker for a BCS bowl? I have a feeling that Leach and company are going to make a case for this. If the system works correctly, Tech should be able to beat out Texas for the BCS invite, simply because we beat them in the conference play and have the same record. It will be very satisfactory from a personal stand point because this will lead to the Longhorns whining all the way to the Cotton Bowl and face a very dangerous Ole Miss team. Infact this be like a little bit of dejavu for Mack Brown since Texas was chosen for a BCS bowl ahead of a higher ranked Cal team and then Cal came whining to the Holiday Bowl and got blown out by Texas Tech.
by jef on Dec 1, 2008 10:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
There is no tie to break
in the way you’re suggesting. Tech, OU, and Texas are tied for the South Title, but that has nothing to do with anything beyond OU going to the conference championship. Past that point, the BCS at-large bids are determined solely by BCS ranking, an area in which UT has Tech soundly beat.
by mojavereject on Dec 1, 2008 10:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
both of you are a little wrong.
1) UT was ranked #4 while Cal was ranked #5. The #4 spot is a key value here which I’ll explain in a bit.
2) The BCS, after automatic qualifiers from conference champions, mid majors, and #1and #2, has a condition: A team ranked #3 goes to the BCS. If they hold an automatic qualifier, #4 goes to the BCS. Later, the BCS rules state that a team ranked #4 goes, if there’s room. What does this mean?
UT’s ranking does put them in above TTU but only because they’ll be the #3 ranked team after this coming weekend. In fact, TTU, were USC and Florida to lose, could climb up to the #4 spot before the bowl games and we STILL wouldn’t make it into the BCS.
by kayakyakr on Dec 1, 2008 11:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
The “two teams from the same conference” BCS limit (barring #1 and 2 being from the same conf) is what eliminates us.We are very eligible for a BCS bid by virtue of being in the top 8. UT and OU being ahead of us makes that irrelevant at this point. If OU loses, Mizzou gets the automatic bid and UT will likely play in Miami. If OU wins, OU will get a chance to play in Miami and UT goes to the Fiesta.
by Tech92 on Dec 1, 2008 5:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















