Double-T Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

DTN's Basketball Report:  12.2.2008

 

 

Double-T Nation takes a weekly look at a number of issues surrounding the basketball team and the progression of Pat Knight as Texas Tech's head coach.  The issues to be discussed weekly include the following:  a summary of the past week's games, the Pat Knight uptempo offense, continuing the defensive work of Robert Knight, the improvement of the sophomores and how the newcomers are adjusting to the college game.

The Games

  • Southeastern Louisiana: Win 74-63
  • Pittsburgh: Loss - 67-80
  • Mississippi State: Win - 77-73

All in all a pretty productive week for Texas Tech. A win over Southeastern Louisiana, a loss to #4 Pittsburgh and a solid win against Mississippi State. You would prefer that the SE La. state game not be so close and the Pitt game was a little closer, but considering the number of new faces with this club and acclimating to Junior Knight's faster pace, I'll take a 2-1 record. I've only been able to watch some of the earlier games so I don't have any frame of reference for the Pitt and MSU game, thus I have no idea how well or how poorly the team played, but anytime you can go on the road and play well I'll take it.

Playing Uptempo

Texas Tech is playing at a faster pace, there's certainly no doubt about that.  The key of course is not just playing faster, but being efficient all at the same time, utilizing the motion offense but running when opportunity knocks.  Thus far, and it's a work in progress, I'm pleased with the results.  Putting up 167 against East Central Oklahoma isn't an indication of where the offense it, but rather that ECU is a team on a much lower level (only scheduled as a result of being part of the Legend's Classic).  According to KenPom the 2009 version is much more efficient than the 2008 version (see the adjusted offensive efficiency), but it's also important to keep in mind that the 2009 numbers are without the benefit of going through conference play.  Alan Voskuil started slowly, and he's probably the key to the season.  Consistent scoring from Voskuil will mean that this team is going to be successful.  I should also mention that the multiple scoring threats (Roberson, Voskuil, Okorie, Singletary and Cook) are all scoring in double-figures and having multiple options makes it more difficult for opposing teams.

Continuing the Defense

I always loved the defense that Bob Knight instilled at Texas Tech.  The defense was typically pretty good, but last year it was not.  Personally, I think that had more to do with personnel than effort, but this year Junior Knight is implementing some of his own ideas while still carrying over what his father started.  From the games I've seen, JK is using the zone more freely, but I haven't been able to watch the team against the best competition.  Of course the biggest concern is the 117 given up to the aforementioned ECU, but thus far the defense has been pretty good.  Individually, D'walyn Roberts offers up something his RMK didn't have, which is a very athletic small forward who can man-up against almost anyone on the floor. 

The Sophomores

This is my own personal idea, but I've thought that how the sophomores (D'walyn Roberts, John Roberson and Mike Singletary) progress will be telling of where Junior Knight is as a coach.  Thus far, I'm very happy with the progress of Roberts.  He's added weight and confidence and having a guy like him can be huge for the program.  Mike Singletary continues to be a scoring machine, although he may tend to be a defensive liability at times, his post-up game is second to none.  Roberson is leading the team in scoring and in assists and right now his assist to turnover ration is at 2:1.  Much improved.

The Newcomers

This can encompass quite a few players, but we need to keep an eye on all of these guys as we move forward.  First and foremost, Nick Okorie is the type of guard that can be a great complement to Voskuil and Roberson, and although he's slowed as of late, he's going to be just fine.  I love his game and think he's going to add quite a bit to this team.  Darko Cohadarevic is still adjusting to Division I basketball, but he offers a unique skill set, much like Trevor Cook's and his versatility will be very useful in conference play.  True freshman Tyree Graham isn't afraid to shoot, which is something that I like in my guards (11 shots against Mississippi State).  He's got something.

Top Three

  1. Trevor Cook: 24 points against Pitt along with 5 blocked shots for the week.
  2. John Roberson:  8 assists and only 2 TO's against Pitt while scoring 20 against SE La. and 13 against MSU.
  3. Alan Voskuil:  A rebounding machine (7 - SE La.; 8 - Pitt; and 4 - MSU) and as a result is finding way to contribute other than just scoring.

0 recs | Comment 4 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I noticed the remark about the ECU defense

“Of course the biggest concern is the 117 given up to the aforementioned ECU”
Actually, if you think about it, that number is of very little consequence. Tech scored 167 points! That means they were racing up and down the court at light speed. AND the ECU shooting percentage was about 38, compared to Tech’s 50 (I think). I think the defense was fine. When you run around that much, you and your opposition are getting a whole lot of shots off. I can’t understand why you and everyone else is making so much ado about the points allowed here. It is simple physics for crying out loud. Now, go on with some really pertinent information and leave this dog to lie, please!

TTpilk

by TTpilk645 on Dec 2, 2008 12:15 PM CST   0 recs

I tend to agree with Seth

regarding ECU. We should have significantly out rebounded them (they had 26 offensive rebounds and we had the same number of defensive rebounds). They got a lot of 2nd chances they shouldn’t have. We had a lot of fouls (they had 32 points on free throws). Also, we let them control the pace of the game.

by NM99 on Dec 2, 2008 1:33 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

correction on the rebounds – we had 26 offensive and they had 26 defensive. They had 25 offensive rebounds.

by NM99 on Dec 2, 2008 1:35 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I wasn't trying to make it a harsh criticism,

of the team, but I would think that Texas Tech could do a better job of controlling the tempo through the defense.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Dec 2, 2008 8:28 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

7431104_7_2_small
Early look into 2009 rankings! Mark Schlabach's thoughts...
Crab_and_harrell_small
ESPN reports Crabtree to NFL
Gnome_small
Tech #12 in AP and Coaches polls
Small
America Voted
Img_0748_small
In response to recruiting improvements.
Piratedog_small
Penultimate Pick'em Post
Royalsreview_small
When Will Bob Knight Return to Coaching?
Small
A little at a time....
7431104_7_2_small
Despite the Cotton Bowl loss to Ole Miss all is not lost......Here's why. Keep your heads up Red Raider fans.
Small
Could be worse - Texas A&M

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Rr_no_mercy_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

ad

Site Meter