Double-T Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Want to help build SB Nation? We're hiring! Bar-right-arrows



Rooting Guide for Texas Tech Fans on Saturday

Ok so as everyone is probably aware by now, Texas Tech has almost no chance to make it to the BCS game. Almost you say? Yes there is still a chance Tech could make it as the BCS at large bid. So since you might be confused on who to root for on Saturday, here is what Tech needs to happen to have a shot at going to a BCS game and not the cotton bowl.

Saturday December 6th

3 pm Florida vs Alabama (SEC championship)
Florida has to win this game but win ugly. Alabama needs to be winning by 14 or more going into the 4th and Florida makes a last minute win or tie and eventually pull it out in like the 5th overtime.

3:30 pm USC vs UCLA
USC needs to win and win big. I'm talking 63-3.

7 pm Oklahoma vs Missouri (Big 12 championship)
I have heard some talk about wanting OU to lose this game. No no no. OU cannot lose. If OU loses then they will drop out of the BCS games and probably push Tech out of the cotton bowl and into the holiday bowl. A Missouri win puts them into a BCS game and Texas would most likely go to the NC game. So we need OU to win and most likely win big so the loss to Texas earlier doesn't look as bad.

If and only if all three of these things happen then here is how the BCS standings might look like:

1 Oklahoma
2 Florida
3 USC
4 Alabama
5 Texas
6 Texas Tech (would also have to jump Utah but another week should do that)

So this would put Texas out of the top 4 and Texas Tech could be selected by the Fiesta Bowl because they would consider head to head in their decision. So start praying!

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors.

0 recs | Comment 59 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

One flaw

USC won’t jump Texas, even if they do win big (UCLA is terrible).

45-35

by Hook'em13 on Dec 2, 2008 4:09 PM CST   0 recs

Get Lost

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 7:45 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I give it a 1% chance of success.

I just don’t see it playing out that way. I think chances are 96% we go to the cotton bowl. Holiday bowl? 3% chance. Only because OU will crush Mizzou I think. No offense, Tigers.

Go Tech!!!

by jwhitettu on Dec 2, 2008 4:50 PM CST   0 recs

You guys actually do have another shot...

And this one is a longshot, but not as much as the scenario posted here. The Big 12 can get 3 bids, but only if Texas and OU meet in the MNC. Impossible you say? Well, personally I don’t think its possible either. But, people much smarter than I have gone through the math and it is possible.

Texas is so far ahead of Florida in the computer polls, and close enough in the human polls, that it is possible that Florida can beat Alabama and still fall behind Texas.

See this thread…

Florida is way behind in the computers. A win over Alabama will certainly help, but who knows how much. If Florida and OU split the #1 human vote (so that each is effectively ranked 1.5, while Texas is ranked a solid number 3 (or a little bit higher by some who still have Texas above OU on their ballots)), then it’s possible that Texas will retain enough of a computer advantage to lead Florida in the BCS. It’s unlikely because I think Florida will make up enough ground in the computers to take the BCS lead, but it’s not a given that Florida will be above Texas even if it beats Alabama.

For this to happen, you would need to cheer for:

1. Florida to win over Alabama.
2. Oklahoma to destroy Mizzou and eat up as many #1 votes as possible.
3. If USC struggled it would help (Or if they lost). USC could steal some #3 votes that would all need to go to Texas.

This is a longshot, but more likely than Texas falling from #3 to #5.

by the1austin on Dec 2, 2008 7:31 PM CST   0 recs

39-33

We won, you lost. Too bad.

What’s the difference between losing and almost winning?

Nothing…

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 7:43 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

that’s only if 2 non-champions from the same conference are in the national championship game.

  1. and #2 would get in and also the conference champion. In this case, it won’t happen because OU is in the conference championship.

The only way that happens is if UT winds up #1, TTU is #2 and Missouri is the conference champion.

Losing to OU hurt too bad for this to happen, though.

by kayakyakr on Dec 2, 2008 8:30 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

You're right...

Forgot about the non-championship thing.. I thought it was in the event any 2 teams from one conference finished in the Top 2.

by the1austin on Dec 2, 2008 8:34 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Scoreboard!

Yea, that’s right. You lost. Too bad. Now go play somewhere else.

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

...

You’re acting like an aggie

i like your spirit, but the bickering is over. it’s not worth your time. don’t be like the others…

stop it…

Wreck 'Em Tech!

J.T.H.

by redraidersax on Dec 2, 2008 9:05 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I did...

I made some a-hole comments on here for a few days. But, I don’t think there is anything wrong with my posts since then. I thought Tech did have another chance to get into the BCS. Kayak pointed out that I was mistaken. That is all.

by the1austin on Dec 2, 2008 10:05 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Yes,

You are an ass hole. Thanks for admitting it.
Now, why are you here?
To rub our nose in it again?
Haven’t you done that enough already?
How much more of you do we have to endure?

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 10:12 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

10forTech

Again, very close to the line, if not past it. Just as I pointed out on another comment, we welcome guests from other sites/teams, and we welcome spirited conversation. Yes, we expect our guests to behave, but we expect the same from everybody.

by djollie111 on Dec 2, 2008 10:20 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Not here.

We’re not calling people names.

As chippy as the1austin has been the last few days I’ve let it go because he’d go from rational to trying to pick a fight.

I’ve tried to err on the side of letting people speak their minds and the1austin is the same as you, but there’s no place for name calling here.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Dec 2, 2008 10:24 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I agree

Not all of your posts have been offensive, per se. But you know what they say about first impressions. You can’t really expect us to welcome you with open arms after the way you started. Plus we have been hit with a series of you guys over the last several weeks. About time one goes away, here comes a couple more. I think you can see our patience is about gone.

by TT_ on Dec 2, 2008 10:20 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I can tell you

Between all of the moderators, we have been monitoring most of the posts on here. We are very careful not to censor opinions unless they are egregiously offensive or profane. Attacking others, though is very heavily frowned upon (i.e. not allowed). We have ways of dealing with trolls. If you’ve got a concern, feel free to flag comments and we’ll check them out. Please keep it civil.

by djollie111 on Dec 2, 2008 10:27 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

oh, so

thinly veiled offensive or profane is OK? So, instead of calling him an ass hole, I should have maybe called him an A-hole? And your way of dealing with trolls is…
Let them talk as much crap as they want as long as they say something nice every once in a while?

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 10:43 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Yes

To a point. I cannot moderate everything and there’s a fine line between being an absolute troll and having some rational sense of discourse. Although I might not like someone, I’d rather err on the side of letting them speak their peace.

I hope you don’t think that this is an easy thing to do because I struggle with it.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Dec 3, 2008 5:11 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

And you should know that

I welcome you here, but just don’t act like a jerk. I believe it was intentional before and I let it go and probably shouldn’t have.

There’s a difference between trying to have a rational conversation and picking a fight, and IMO I think you were trying to do the latter, as you have admitted.

But you’ve also said some complimentary things as well and they haven’t gone unnoticed, at least by me.

Long story short: Be cool.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Dec 2, 2008 10:27 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Who

are you talking to? Me or the troll?

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 10:33 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Both

Just need to be cool. Certainly enough fault to go both ways. Let’s move on from it.

by djollie111 on Dec 2, 2008 10:42 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

He's a Troll
I saw yesterday on BON where Mr. Austin admitted he had lost control and was trolling our sites.

If you’d have taken care of it in the first place, it wouldn’t have come this far.

Wes Welker can't be stopped.

by 10forTech on Dec 2, 2008 10:51 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Seth and Djollie111

Your points are very well taken. I didn’t realize the hostility this post would generate and I apologize for making you waste time having to police this board.

Regards.

by the1austin on Dec 3, 2008 12:28 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

10forTech

in reference to you, we’re just asking you to be the bigger man. if you go in for the arguments (we all know it’s easy to do with this emotional sport, part of the reason college football is so awesome) it is just a spiral… if they’re pickin’ a fight… whoever they are, austin or someone else in the future… serve tech proud and be the bigger man. or else… i’ll call you an AGGIE! :-P

Wreck 'Em Tech!

J.T.H.

by redraidersax on Dec 3, 2008 2:56 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

the1austin

wouldn’t this have only worked if Tech, Texas, and OU were 1, 2, and 3 in the BCS, then had the #1 lose in the big 12 title game, have 2 & 3 move up to 1 & 2, and also have the north champion in the BCS?

45-35

by Hook'em13 on Dec 2, 2008 10:42 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Yeah, I got confused.

I forgot that this scenario required for OU and Texas to move in with Mizzou taking the auto-bid. 2 teams from the same conference going to the MNC has never happened, I thought that if they did (under any circumstances) the other bowls could take another worthy candidate to fill the original Big 12 slot (Fiesta).

by the1austin on Dec 3, 2008 12:30 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I think the1austin is right...

This is more realistic than the other scenario, and that ain’t sayin’ much! Both scenarios are pretty doubtful. Cotton Bowl I’ve been sayin’. I’m just trying to avoid feelings of despair b/c of it. We had a great year. That’s all that matters.

Go Tech!!!

by jwhitettu on Dec 3, 2008 9:34 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

CHEERING

So we find ourselves wanting OU to win……how best do we make ourselves OU fans?
Well, just like most other OU (and UT) fans…..I didn’t attend OU, so no worries there. I guess then I am suppose to bitch about any calls that don’t go our way.
Does anyone else’s skin crawl if you had to wear maroon, burnt orange or Crimson?

by oldschoolraider on Dec 2, 2008 10:40 PM CST   0 recs

the way i see it

 i just don’t like OU and UT simply because they’ve been good… i will gladly cheer for Big XII domination in whatever game we play in now that we’re done playing each other (cept mizzou and OU game… and there i prefer to cheer against Mizzou who has ruined things for us the last couple years… sortta like the texas a&m game…. i didn’t cheer for them… just hoped UT lost…)

Wreck 'Em Tech!

J.T.H.

by redraidersax on Dec 3, 2008 3:01 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

My parents went to ou

but they’re gone now and I can’t imagine rooting for the Sooners after the way they treated us so rudely. Besides, I’m part Indian and paleface land thieves don’t rate very highly with me. :-)

I plan on being just an interested bystander, saving my energy for the Cotton Bowl.

by TT_ on Dec 3, 2008 12:14 AM CST   0 recs

Does not matter if Texas is ranked in the top 4 or not

The rules for selection of the replacement for the Fiesta is that the Big 12 team has to be ranked better than 12th.

You guys can not do simple reading and comprehension! Here is the rules! http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/eligibility

The one everyone is pointing to is rule 5 which talks about the top 4 and their automatic bids. That is true to a point. But you all failed to read the next sentence!

5. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

Did you get it? Let me make this clear! " Provided that no at large team from the same conference qualifies for the National Championship game"

What this means is the because Oklahoma goes to the National championship game that the BCS 3 and 4 does not matter!

It only matters when the conference does not have a National Champion qualifying team.
Then the 3 and 4 are guaranteed a bowl.

But because Oklahoma can go to the NCG, then Texas Tech HAS EQUAL RIGHT IF NOT MORE RIGHT TO THE FIESTA!

by Pablo M on Dec 3, 2008 6:18 AM CST   0 recs

The scenario is this

BCS rankings after Saturday if OU and ‘Bama win don’t change. Currently, they are:

1) Alabama
2) OU
3) Texas

Rule 5 for AUTOMATIC eligibility states

…an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

Texas qualifies automatically. There is not a choice.

Scenario #2

OU loses (SEC game doesn’t matter). BCS standings are:

1) Alabama/Florida
2) Texas

The rest doesn’t matter. Texas goes to the MNC, Mizzou goes as the conference champ.

Scenario #3

Florida wins, OU wins

BCS Stndings:

1) OU
2) Florida
3) Texas

Texas is an automatic qualifier.

Scenario #4

Florida Wins, OU loses. Final BCS Standings are;

1) Florida
2) Texas

Again, the rest doesn’t matter. An OU loss and Mizzou gets the other big XII spot as the conference champ and they go to the Fiesta.

If OU wins, they are the conference champion, so they are not an at large qualifier. This really only applies to conferences like the Pac 10 and Big 10 that don’t have a CCG, such that (had Oregon State won the Pac 10), USC could still qualify for a BCS game automatically.

by NM99 on Dec 3, 2008 9:02 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

But wait a second Pablo

Wouldn’t Oklahoma go to the NC as a conference champion NOT as an at large team…..

"Once in awhile, a pirate can beat a soldier"

by crabtreeforheisman on Dec 3, 2008 8:09 AM CST   0 recs

Geez People are just plain blind and ignorant here on this board!

For NM99 and Crabtreeforheisman.

NM99, No you are totally off and wrong! Why? Answer for Crabtreeforhiesman.

What is the definition of an at large team. Well at the link the at large team is defined under the heading at large elibility.

Its a team that has more than 9 wins within a conference and ranked 14th or better in the final BCS standings.

Here is the reason why Texas Tech is equal up with Texas straight from the Rules!

BURN IT INTO YOUR INGORANT BRAINS!

From the rules of at large elgibility!

(1) if any conference has two or more teams in the top 14, then two of those teams must be selected

There is no rule saying that BCS position is in play.

Because the term at large is defined as a team which has 9 or more wins and ranked in the to 14.

Thus Oklahoma is both a champion of the Big 12 and an at large team.

Texas and Texas Tech are also at large teams.

The bowl selection section then picks up with:

If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick.

After completion of the selection process as described in Paragraph Nos. 1-4, the conferences and Notre Dame may, but are not required to, adjust the pairings taking into consideration the following:

  A. whether the same team will be playing in the same bowl game for two consecutive years;
  B. whether two teams that played against one another in the regular season will be paired against one another in a bowl game;
  C. whether the same two teams will play against each other in a bowl game for two consecutive years; and
  D. whether alternative pairings may have greater or lesser appeal to college football fans as measured by expected ticket sales for the bowls and by expected television interest, and the consequent financial impact on Fox and the bowls.

The pairings may not be altered by removing the Big 10 Champion or Pac-10 champion from the Rose Bowl.

Thats the rules concerning the picking for the Fiesta Bowl. Texas does not get an automatic pass to the Fiesta by being ranked #3 or #4.

The Fiesta Bowl gets to decide based on ticket and TV viewing audience which teams would have the greatest appeal to the national audience.

Thus we the Tech fans need to stop acting like whipped dogs and hype it up about how much Tech is loved and respected around the country and how Tech games have gotten high TV ratings this fall even before and after the Texas game.

In fact, the Tech OSU game got more ratings than the Oklahoma Texas red river shootout.

Something we can point to.

But stop acting like we lost when we have not!

by Pablo M on Dec 3, 2008 2:57 PM CST   0 recs

Maybe I am mistaken, but I believe that the rules for at large eligibility only come into effect AFTER the rules for automatic eligibility are exhausted.

by NM99 on Dec 3, 2008 3:30 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

From the intro paragrah to the at large qualification rules:

If there are fewer than 10 automatic qualifiers, then the bowls will select at-large participants to fill the remaining berths

Texas becomes an automatic qualifier by virtue of the fact that they are in the Big XII (a conference with an automatic bid for the conference champion) assuming they remain ranked #3 and OU wins, sending OU to the MNC game.

by NM99 on Dec 3, 2008 3:50 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Need edit button for posts

The post did not come out as I had originally posted. I had two sections. One for two posters and a section for the board as a whole.

Thus I did not specifically call anyone by name ignorant. But rather spoke to the general idea that Tech cannot be selected for the Fiesta which is untrue.

The Fiesta Bowl will make it choice based on total economic reasons which I posted which was put into the rules. Where a bowl can refuse a team because they would not be economically viable for a bowl if they were not an automatic team.

Texas is not automatic because, Oklahoma is going to the NCG provided they beat Missouri. Thus Texas Tech needs an Oklahoma win to get to a good bowl.

The bowl choices right now are Fiesta and cotton with an Oklahoma win.

If Oklahoma loses, then Tech has cotton or Holiday.

Its far better for Tech to have Oklahoma beat Missouri but beat Missouri by a massive margin.

by Pablo M on Dec 3, 2008 3:05 PM CST   0 recs

Sheesh People Need I have to spoon feed it to you?

There will be less than the 10 qualifiers for the bowls this year!
 Because two conferences will send its champion to the NCG.

Causing the autobids to two BCS bowls to become void. Thus you will have only 8 teams which qualify under the general BCS rules.

Thus why the section for replacement teams become important!

Because if Oklahoma beats Missouri, then Oklahoma can not go to the Fiesta. Thus that position is vacant. Not automatically filled. Because the winner of the Big 12 conference send its champion to the Fiesta. But should the Champion go to the NCG then the Fiesta has no team. Thus the position is vacant. The SEC will also send its Champion to Sugar. Thus if Alabama beats Florida, then the Sugar loses its auto.

Its not a given if Florida beats Alabama that they achieve the #2 spot though everyone wants that to happen. Its very possible for Florida to end up at #3.

But the point is that currently the SEC and Big 12 is expected to have vacant positions in their bowls Thus giving only 8 of the 10 qualifiers to their perspective bowls. Texas is not an automatic qualifier because they are not the Big 12 Champion nor can they be.

The best Texas can be is an at large replacement team.

Thus one of the reasons why the BCS sucks. You have #3 Texas not being an autobid to a BCS bowl because they are not a Conference champion.

Because of the rules, The Fiesta gets to choose first its replacement for Oklahoma from the at large teams which qualify for a BCS birth from the Big 12.

That is Texas and Texa Tech. The Fiesta then chooses the replacement based on economic reasons not necessarily on record or BCS position.

Remember California lost out to Norte Dame on that very ground and its still in the rules as that has not changed one bit.

Thus you guys need reading comprehension because your all goo goo gaga for Texas to go to the Fiesta when Texas Tech has the same shot at it as Texas does.

by Pablo M on Dec 3, 2008 4:29 PM CST   0 recs

Please, before insulting my reading comprehension, check your spelling and grammar.

by NM99 on Dec 3, 2008 5:24 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Man, no kidding!

And no, contrary to what you may want to believe we do not, “have the sameshot at it as Texas does.” Technically? Yes…but not in any scenario, realistically, will Florida not become at LEAST the number 2 team if it beats Alabama. Human vote is 2/3 of the BCS and they’ll make it so. You know it, I know it.

Next, if the Fiesta has choice of Tech or Texas due to an OU loss, there is NO WAY they pick Tech over Texas for reasons I’ve explained here many times (national fan base…travel party…tv appeal…you name the category that matters, and Tech is trumped by UT, head to head be damned).

by Tech92 on Dec 3, 2008 6:11 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I'm so confused....

Or maybe I’m just blind and ignorant….
Seems that I have read other “rules” that stipulate that tu is an automatic qualifier for a BCS bowl based on beng ranked in the top 4….
Too many contradicting stories burned into my ignorant brain….

by Houston Raider on Dec 3, 2008 9:16 PM CST   0 recs

I'm certainly blind and ignorant.

I also need things spoon-fed to me, I guess. Pablo, make your point without being insulting. That’s not how a gentleman with honor conducts himself sir. You represent your school and yourself, act like it. Just say what you would like to say to the other gentlemen on this blog sans harshness. Ok? Please? Thank you. Sincerely, jwhitettu

Go Tech!!!

by jwhitettu on Dec 3, 2008 9:45 PM CST   0 recs

ditto

I think the confusion is whether or not OU would go to the NC game as an at-large team or as a conference champion with an automatic bid, or are they necessarily mutually exclusive. The way I read the rules, OU would have an automatic bid either under Automatic Qualification rule #1 (as a #1 or #2 team) or rule #2 (as Big 12 champ). Once all the automatic bids are filled, if less than 10, you step to rules #5 then #6 which give an automatic bid to an at-large team if ranked 3rd or 4th provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game. I interpret that to mean if a conference has a champion that is not in the top 2 and a non-champion that is in the top 2, then there is no automatic bid for another team from that conference at #3 or #4 because an at-large team from that conference qualifies for the NC game.

Or I could just be blind and ignorant….

by natkcole on Dec 3, 2008 10:16 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Exactly correct

And the absolute limitation against having more than 2 teams from a conference ends the discussion there.

by jeffinhouston on Dec 3, 2008 10:35 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

True I need to spell check rather than post super fast.

But that is a flaw of mine when I get angry at stupidity.

The Issue, As I pointed out so I can spoon feed some more is very plain.

The issue is who gets the autobid and what happens when the autobid can not be applied by the base rule.

The assumption here is that Oklahoma has to beat Missouri and that an SEC team is one or two in the BCS.

If Oklahoma finishes in the top 2 in the BCS, the autobid for Oklahoma is for the Fiesta unless Oklahoma is either one or two.

In the case where Oklahoma is both the autobid to the NCG and the Fiesta. The rules for replacement team comes into effect for the Fiesta. There is no autobid that just replaces Oklahoma for the Fiesta.

By definition, the Big 12 Champ goes to the Fiesta unless the champ goes to the NCG. In the case where the Big 12 sends a team to the NCG, then the team Team replacement selection rules apply!

Because the Fiesta has no auto because its team went to the NCG, then there is not 10 teams auto. Because Oklahoma was the Fiesta auto. There is no BCS standing replacement from the Big 12 when the Fiesta loses the Big 12 Champ to the NCG.

That is the flaw you guy are missing. Its in the darn rules. It even defines the terms including what is an at large team.

Also, you guys seem to forget that the Fiesta gets to choose its replacement first over the other bowls choices for a team. According to the rules, The Fiesta gets first choice for replacement in 2009 as the bowls are in rotation as to who gets first choice at replacement.

Thus the rules for replacement for Oklahoma comes into effect. The rules only say that from the at large group within the Big 12 only those teams which have at least 9 wins and are ranked 12th or better can be selected for the Fiesta as a replacement for Oklahoma.

That is as basic as it gets. It does not matter if Texas is #3 or #12. Any team which has 9 wins and is ranked in the BCS with 12th or better can be selected for the Fiesta.

That is what the rules say concerning what happens when the Big 12 champ also goes on to the NCG.

So Texas Tech ranked at either #6 or #7 has an equal shot with a #3 Texas.

Too many people just assume that because Texas is at #3 that it gives Texas the autobid. It does not. Why? Because how the Fiesta selects its replacement

Granted that Texas Tech has an up hill battle for the Fiesta. But what makes me mad as hell and sick is to see other Raider fans abandoning ship and sinking what little shot the Team has by going all out and pulling for Tech to go to the Cotton when its is still possible to go to the Fiesta.

Even in the Texas Blogs, they are scared to death that Texas Tech could be selected over them for the Fiesta putting them into the cotton. Why are they that scared? Because the choice of replacement is in the hands of the Fiesta Selection board who has two choices of a replacement for Oklahoma should Oklahoma go to the NCG.

Its also why the Cotton has not given any team an offer yet because the Big 12 Championship game is key along with who the Fiesta takes as a replacement.

Texas Tech has a legit claim to the Fiesta. But its up to the Fiesta Selection Board to decide on which team they want. Texas or Texas Tech when the time comes to make their selection.

What pisses me off is that the Fiesta Selection Board may see a Tech fans so whipped and so down that they will choose Texas because it will be what they are seeing from the Fans.

If we the Fans were demanding the Fiesta and making a massive effort with good stats to back it up, then the Fiesta could be swayed to select Texas Tech.

But when you see uninspired fans for their bowl, then its a given that Tech will not be selected and it will be the fans fault for hurting the Teams chances at a BCS birth.

Because the Selection is based on economic concerns. Go back and read the section in the rules which discusses economic considerations which the bowls can use to deny a team a birth.

The truth is that Texas Tech has a legit shot no matter how much many of you want to deny and destroy or take away from our 11-1 team!

by Pablo M on Dec 4, 2008 1:05 AM CST   0 recs

Followup

There are several sports networks which are pointing out the Fact that Texas Tech can be the at large replacement for the Fiesta over Texas.

CBSsports, ESPN, Scout, USAToday all have had articles which repeat what I have been saying.

I hope you guys do not need more spoon feeding!

by Pablo M on Dec 4, 2008 1:17 AM CST   0 recs

I went to all of the sites

Every article that I found states that Texas will go to the fiesta bowl.

You are re-arranging the rules in the selection process. First you must determine which teams are automatic qualifiers. According to 1st paragraph on the selection procedures:

The bowls will select their participants from two pools: (1) automatic qualifiers, all of which must be selected, and, (2) at-large teams, if fewer than 10 teams qualify automatically

Once you determine which teams qualify, then you assign them to bowl games.

If Texas was 5th or below, they would be an at-large qualifier, like Tech. Then the Fiesta bowl could chose between the two. Just because OU goes to the MNC and the Fiesta has to chose a replacement, doesn’t mean you immediately skip all of the other rules and then go find a replacement. As it stands, they are bound to select FIRST from the automatic qualifers, of whom, Texas is one.

I don’t like it. But I can read.

by NM99 on Dec 4, 2008 7:20 AM CST   0 recs

Agree

The first thing that happens is all automatic bids are handed out. That’s out of 6 BCS conference champs, #1 & #2, the small conference champ and Notre Dame for a possible 10. If 10 don’t qualify, which is the case this year, step to automatic bid rules #5 & #6 which award auto bids to the #3 or #4 team UNLESS that conference already has 2 automatic bids via conference champion and an at-large #1 or #2.

That gives UT, if ranked 3rd or 4th, an automatic bid. The 2 team per conference limit is then met for the Big 12. The Fiesta bowl must pick it’s replacements from the automatics and at-large, but all automatics must be selected. So, yes, technically the Fiesta gets to pick it’s replacement. But the pool includes UT and not Tech.

by natkcole on Dec 4, 2008 7:55 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

choose, not chose.

by NM99 on Dec 4, 2008 11:39 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

NM99 and others more spoon feeding time.

You are reading only the projected of who will go to the bowls.

Like all the pundits and Texas Fans they see a number 3 getting the nod over a Number 7 as an automatic choice.

The truth is that its not automatic. The Fiesta can decide to take Texas Tech over Texas if they so choose. Its their right should they want to do it.

The issues you keep pointing to is not in the rules when the Big 12 Champ also qualifies for the NCG game. Go back and read it.

The Number 3 and Number 4 team could be left out of the BCS in a replacement choice.

See #4 playing who? our Texas Tech in the Holiday as they were passed over in a replacement choice for the Rose Bowl. When USC when the the NCG.

The replacement rules have not changed!

Its just Amazing that despite the written rules and the fact that it has happened before in a BCS bowl choice that people ignore the truth and the facts.

Texas could be passed over should the Fiesta wish to select Texas Tech over Texas.

Its the Fiesta Bowl’s right to select any team from the Big 12 that has 9 wins and is ranked in the BCS better than 12th.

Granted that Texas is an attractive choice at number 3, but its not a given for Texas to be selected as the Fiesta Replacement.

Texas will go to the Orange Bowl should Missouri beat Oklahoma as an autobid being No.3

The truth is that because the Fiesta gets to choose who they want over all other bowls this January, Texas Tech can send Texas to the Cotton if and only if the Fiesta wishes to pass them over for Texas Tech.

Here is the rules one more time: http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/eligibility

Pay attention here. There is no where listed that Number 3 or Number 4 get an autobid to anything anywhere in the rules.

In the section of at large elgibility, and auto bid qualifications Look closely at what it says!

Texas Tech is ranked in the top 12. So Tech does qualify for a BCS birth under the autobid. However, Only two teams can go and Oklahoma or Missouri gets the Big 12 auto to the Fiesta.

However, should Oklahoma be ranked in the 1 or 2 spot, then they go to the NCG.

Then the rules specifically say that the Fiesta must choose its replacement from the At large qualifications section.

The famous rule 5 you guys keep pointing to says : If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

Texas is not the conference Champ thus does not qualify for the automatic bid to the BCS. That is the rule concerning a team ranked 3rd.

The section about higher ranking in the BCS gets an autobid to the BCS has nothing to do with Texas. It has everything to do with Utah. Because:
No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: a second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.) If two or more teams from those conferences satisfy the provisions for an automatic berth, then the team with the highest finish in the final BCS Standings will receive the automatic berth, and the remaining team or teams will be considered for at-large selection if it meets the criteria.

Thus Texas can not claim a higher BCS position to get the automatic bid. Thus the section as to who qualifies as a replacement at large team rule comes into effect!

Thus the rule says:
If there are fewer than 10 automatic qualifiers, then the bowls will select at-large participants to fill the remaining berths. An at-large team is any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible and meets the following requirements:

  A. Has won at least nine regular-season games, and
  B. Is among the top 14 teams in the final BCS Standings.

The issue is if Oklahoma wins the Big 12 championship, it leaves open the slot for the Fiesta making 1 team short of the 10 auto qualifers. Texas does not get the automatic because they are not the Big 12 Champ who gets the auto to the Fiesta. That is why this is important to understand!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Under the Team Selection section of the rules:

If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick. If the Rose Bowl loses both the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions to the NCG, it will receive two replacement picks.

Ok Now who are the automatic qualifiers as defined by the section 1. Any team who has 9 or more wins and is ranked in the top 12. Go back and read it! It what it says!

Texas Tech and Texas are both 9 plus and in the top 12.

SO what is the next step? Rotation of replacement selection by bowls who can select from the at large. January 2009 games: Fiesta, Sugar, Orange

This brings us the the other No. 5 that some point out.

5. After completion of the selection process as described in Paragraph Nos. 1-4, the conferences and Notre Dame may, but are not required to, adjust the pairings taking into consideration the following:

  A. whether the same team will be playing in the same bowl game for two consecutive years;
  B. whether two teams that played against one another in the regular season will be paired against one another in a bowl game;
  C. whether the same two teams will play against each other in a bowl game for two consecutive years; and
  D. whether alternative pairings may have greater or lesser appeal to college football fans as measured by expected ticket sales for the bowls and by expected television interest, and the consequent financial impact on Fox and the bowls

As you see, there is nothing there which denies Texas Tech from being selected. Section D is where Texas Tech can shine over Texas.

SO I challenge anyone here to show where in the rules and then copy paste that section of the rules which deny Texas Tech!

You will not find it! It does not exist. The choice for who plays in the Fiesta is based solely on who the Fiesta Selection committee want to pick from those teams which are ranked 12th or better in the BCS. A number 6 or 7 Texas Tech who beat Texas playing against a Utah or a Texas.

There is nothing in the rules which deny Texas Tech the right to go to the Fiesta!

Its time for the ignorance to Stop!!!! Its time to demand that our team be given a fair shot even though it seems many ignorant fans are resigned to the cotton.

by Pablo M on Dec 5, 2008 6:07 AM CST   0 recs

One more time!

Texas Tech is an automatic qualifying team. Being qualified does not mean that that team gets an automatic Bid to the BCS.

It just means that they qualify for the right to go to a BCS should the need for a replacement team be needed.

Thus Please look at the rules and stop trying to be negative!

by Pablo M on Dec 5, 2008 6:18 AM CST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

7431104_7_2_small
Early look into 2009 rankings! Mark Schlabach's thoughts...
Crab_and_harrell_small
ESPN reports Crabtree to NFL
Gnome_small
Tech #12 in AP and Coaches polls
Small
America Voted
Img_0748_small
In response to recruiting improvements.
Piratedog_small
Pe