Previewing Texas Tech vs. Ole Miss: Linebacker
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
LINEBACKER
| Player | Ht/Wt | Class | Position | Tackles | TFL | Sacks |
| Bront Bird | 6'3"/220 | So. | LB | 58 | 3 | 1 |
| Marlon Williams | 6'0"/224 | Jr. | LB | 65 | 3 | 2 |
| Brian Duncan | 6'1"/238 | So. | LB | 90 | 2 | 0 |
| Victor Hunter | 5'11"/256 | Jr. | LB | 20 | 1 | 0 |
| Ashlee Palmer | 6'2"/222 | Sr. | LB | 48 | 5 | 1 |
| Allen Walker | 6'1"/215 | So. | LB | 37 | 3 | 2 |
| Jonathan Cornell | 6'1"/225 | So. | LB | 42 | 4.5 | 3 |
| Patrick Trahan | 6'3"/225 | Jr. | LB | 24 | 3.5 | 1 |
| Lamar Brumfield | 6'0"/224 | Jr. | LB | 20 | 2 | 0 |
| Tony Fein | 6'2"/245 | Sr. | LB | 51 | 5 | 0 |
Texas Tech
![]() |
I have thoroughly enjoyed watching the resurgence of the Texas Tech linebacking corp. At some point during last year's offseason, Ruffin McNeill determined that it was imperative to send out on the field more athletic linebackers than we've seen in the past. The result was the emergence of Brian Duncan, who should have been named to some of the all-conference teams, led the team with 90 tackles, 59 of which were solo tackles. Duncan is by far and away the best linebacker that Texas Tech has had, perhaps since Zach Thomas. Duncan's been on a tear of late as he's had 7, 11, 11 and 5 tackles over his last 4 games and had a huge interception against Baylor.
McNeill prefers to play a traditional 4-3 defense, despite the Big 12's move towards more offenses running the spread. That typically means that Marlon Williams, for most of the season, was covering the opposing team's slot receiver. I think there was a movement towards the latter part of the year to move away from Williams in the slot, preferring a bigger safety or defensive back, which in turn limited Williams time on the field. Against Kansas, Williams had 4 tackles, but over the next 3 games (Texas, Oklahoma State, and Oklahoma) Williams had 2, 2 and 5 tackles, before returning to form with 9 tackles against Baylor. In my opinion, Williams is much better playing the run than the pass and he excels against more traditional teams, which is Ole Miss.
As the season moved on, it seemed like Bront Bird became that linebacker that tended to initially cover a team's tight end or slot receiver. Bird, a former safety in high school, seemed to struggle a bit in pass coverage and much like M. Williams, Bird is better suited playing the run. Bird tends to run very hot or cold in terms of involvement, but I think that's partly because of playing time, not necessarily the inability to make a play. Bird will have one game where he makes 10 tackles and then not show up in the boxscore.
Victor Hunter is the bowling ball run stopper. He is your goal-line stand guy that tries to plug the middle of the field. He doesn't see a ton of playing time (i.e. due to the number of spread offenses), but he's effective at what he does.
Mississippi
![]() |
The SEC is not typically a spread-offense conference, it's more traditional in offensive schemes (for the most part). The difference between the linebackers for Ole Miss and for Texas Tech is that the Ole Miss defensive line does a ton of the dirty work, leaving the Rebel linebackers to make a few tackles each game, which is a good thing.
While perusing the Ole Miss linebacker stats, it's apparent that they each contribute 3 to 4 tackles a game. Leading linebacker tackler Tony Fair's last 4 games were 2, 2, 5 and 2 tackles. Ashlee Palmer: 4, 1, 3 and 0. Granted, 2 of these last 4 games were absolute blow outs, but it's still interesting to note that this is a collective effort. If there is one linebacker that has the ability to take over a game, it's Palmer, who had a very nice stretch early in the year with 5 tackles against Florida, followed up with 9 against S. Carolina an 8 against Alabama. Keep in mind that Palmer was the player that the Ole Miss staff thought might not make it because of grades, but was eventually fully reinstated.
Of course, the difficult part about playing Texas Tech is that the Ole Miss linebackers may be completely taken out of the entire game play because Texas Tech will run 4-wide more times than not. You'd have to think that the Ole Miss staff will have, at the very least 5 defensive backs at any given time, probably more, and as a result, the linebackers may get squeezed.
With that being said, these linebackers are part of the same defense that is #6 in the country at stopping the run, and although the defensive line deserves quite a bit of the credit, I think it would disingenuous to not credit the Rebel linebackers as well. Collectively, these guys get it done.
I'd love to hear from Ole Miss fans to find out what they think we'll see in terms of matchups during the Cotton Bowl.
Conclusion:
I think this is a pretty close matchup and interesting to look at the numbers. Only a few of the Texas Tech linebackers see much playing time, while Ole Miss prefers to rotate, at the very least 6 linebackers, that each make a some impact during every game. Ultimately, the Ole Miss has a better defense and despite my thinking that we may not see the Rebel linebackers receive much playing time, they still get my vote.
Previous Matchups
Quarterbacks :: Running Backs :: Receiver :: Offensive Line :: Defensive Line :: Linebackers :: Secondary :: Special Teams :: Coaching
|
Matchup |
Advantage |
|
Quarterback |
![]() |
|
Running Back |
![]() |
|
Receivers |
![]() |
|
Offensive Line |
![]() |
|
Defensive Line |
![]() |
|
Linebacker |
![]() |
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hate to disagree
but I feel the Tech linebacking is a lot better than people think. They should show this in this game, since Miss runs a more traditional type offense. I would love to see Feheco more in this game because this is the type offense against which he could really shine.
TTpilk
Agree
I’ve been kind of torn this year on our line backers. We haven’t heard as much about them as we have in the past but I think most of that is due to our D Line making things happen. We do seem to have a really good rotation of line backers which helps keep everyone fresh and ready to play. I’m hoping that Trahan can really show what he can do and I am excited to see what he can do next year. He has really grown this year in my opinion.
Not knowing a single thing about tech’s line backers I ,of course, would love to say that our line backers are the better group but I think I would be a little biased on that :)
These guys know how to hit and they know how to hit really really hard. I just hope they know how to play the many types of situations tech is going to throw at them. Hopefully they have a really good showing. :)
Linebacker play
is one of the keys for winning this game, but the ability of the DBs to cover well is THE key. Especially for Ole Miss. Both lines will fight it out while the linebackers and defensive backs must step it up for one of these teams to come out on top by stopping the strength of the opposing team.
Offensively, there is a wide gap, with Tech being almost twice the threat to score. Harrell is possibly the best in college at reading defenses. If he is on and all else is even, I really like Tech’s chances of winning big. If he is average, Tech still wins.
I just am not convinced Snead, while Ok, but not great, can guide Ole Miss to enough scores to keep up with Tech. Ole Miss’ best chance is if tech plys uninspired. ummmmm. NOT! Tech wants this one big time, so they will be stoked and ready to play. At any rate, let’s hope this is a clean and well played game for both sides, with no injuries—no excuses.
TTpilk

by 




















