What I'm Worried About: The Defense
So we're two weeks into the fall practice campaign and being overly pessimistic, I'm still worried about a few things. Let's go in order of position, I did the offense on Monday and the defense is today.
Defensive Tackle Depth and production. I know that most of these guys are returning starters, and I get that they were improved, but I want to see it for myself. I want to see these guys consistently put guys down for a loss and occasionally get to the the quarterback. I'm pretty comfortable with Colby Whitlock, although there were times he was pushed around pretty good, but he was a true freshman playing a position that's incredibly difficult to have any success at such a young age. I'm guessing that he's gotten bigger and stronger, has an even better idea as to how to use his leverage and can consistently make plays. Henley bothers me a bit because of his size. I get that he's quicker than most of his counter-parts, but size matters on the defensive line. I actually like Richard Jones backing up Henley and feel pretty comfortable with him there. I am still a little worried about Chris Perry and perhaps this is a case where I need to temper expectations rather than a player, who redshirted all of last year, exceed those unrealistic expectations. My hope was, when Perry transferred, was that he might just be an immediate starter behind Whitlock, giving Texas Tech a formidable and physically imposing defensive front. That may not happen, at least not this year and I should be okay with that. The point being, is that behind Whitlock, Henley and Jones there's not that much there, and just remember, as painful as it is, that this is the same defensive tackles that gave up 177 yards a game last year. I know, these guys were a year younger and have had a year to mature, but it was 177 yards. David Neill and Joey Fowler are complete unkowns at this point. Neill, was recruited as a defensive end, redshirted last year and has bulked up to play defensive tackle. Fowler has been on campus for the spring workouts, but I believe he's also nursing an injury, so he's not a factor at this point.
Defensive Ends I really want this to be a collective effort this year. I want all 6 or 7 guys who are going to contribute, to play a part in creating a special defense. I worry a little bit about egos, but more than anything, much like with the defensive tackles, I worry about production. If these guys are as talented as we all think, and the defensive tackles are improving as well, then there's no excuse for this group not to perform. Statistically speaking, these guys were 5th in the conference last year in total sacks at 26 (OU led the way with 32.5), but it appears that the biggest difference maker is total sack yardage where defensive leaders Oklahoma had 239, Mizzou had 260 and Texas had 245. Meanwhile, Texas Tech had 188 as did Kansas State. Pushing in that pocket and pushing back that quarterback, that's where the difference is made. There's a chance that this is where it all comes together, Ratliff, Howard, B. Williams, Riley, Sharpe, Sesay and Dixon are all going to contribute this year and perhaps that's the problem. There isn't one absolutely dominating player that can take over a game (at least we haven't seen it on the field yet), but that might be the catch. If you can't beat the opposing offensive lines with just one guy then three guys at each side going full speed isn't a bad option. Especially when you consider that Sesay and Dixon might be that third option and I'm interested to see what those two can do once opponents have to wrestle the other five for a while.
Linebacker I'll say the same thing about these guys that I did about the defensive line . . . 177 yards a game. There seems to be a little bit of chirping from this group, whether it be Bront Bird and Marlon Williams having something to say to or about Mr. Crabtree or Marlon Williams questioning Brandon Sesay. My two cents, do it on the field and you can talk all you want. And that means playing as a team and as a group . . . together. The relative youth bothers me quite a bit, although the top three guys do have plenty of experience, which is most important. There's plenty of guys to fill lots of rolls and I would guess that if one guy isn't getting it done, no matter who it is, there's a capable back-up ready to take your place. I'll say it one more time . . . 177 yards. You are all better than that.
Secondary With the recent injury to L.A. Reed at cornerback, it appears that Marcus Bunton will get the nod at the right cornerback. I feel the same about this group as I do the receivers, these guys have a pretty good track record of stopping the pass and 188 yards a game through the air isn't bad. Granted, a big part of that equation is that opposing offenses were able to run the ball efficiently, but this group is solid. Darcel McBath is underrated while Jamar Wall is really good. Not to mention, Daniel Charbonnet is going to surprise a lot of fans if he gets the opportunity to start, which it looks like he will and Anthony Hines, Jordy Rowland, Brent Nickerson and Pete Richardson aren't bad players and could start for a number of Big 12 teams. Add an athletic freak like L.A. Reed, who hopefully stays healthy through the rest of the year and you've got a really diverse group that can do a lot of different things on defense.
Special Teams Inexperience. At least in the kicking game. After the year that Jonathan LaCour had punting the ball away, espcially some dicey situations in the Gator Bowl, I'm not worried about him in the least. But I am worried just a tad about the kicking game, especially consistency. Although I normally don't like to talk about it because Trlica was so good at the end of games, he only made 13 of 21 field goals (62%) which was only good for 7th in the conference. On the sunnier side of things, I suppose we could say that if either Carona or Fowler make that percentage of kicks Texas Tech will be fine.
0 recs |
10
comments
Read Related
Comments
The Raider Defense is Salty but...
Defensive Tackle Depth and production.. These guys get hit every play. It’s their job to strip away blockers and create piles for the Line backers to slide off of and make tackles. I am cautiously optimistic about these folks. Right Seth they were pushed around last year. But we saw flashes of great solid play as well. I’d say the bit is in their teeth. They will be better.
Defensive Ends I really want this to be a collective effort this year. The ends are a force. Look for them to be the key component to the entire team getting more take aways. 4 of our big 12 opponents have excellent to superior O lines – in rank order OK, Texas, Kansas and TAMU (forget about the inexperience rants for UT and TAMU ) – all these units are well coached, well conditioned and big (maybe not fast but large).That being said it wouldn’t surprise me that the Ends start to dominate opponents with good to excellent play. This position as in years past will get the most sacks partly by design and partly by the athleticism intangible. This appears much improved. I expect the defensive ends to create some chaos this year. Fast off the ball because Coach Sadler has them ready to run and get their hands on backs / QB’s. We may even see Texas and OK leaving backs in to block based on their improved rush. Matter of fact I will so be bold as to say certified Raider killer Colt McCoy is going to be pulled or augmented by (see the Austin Statesman sports section) in the 2nd half of the 01 Nov game – for John Chiles – because of the Def Ends sustained pass rush. Why ? Speed – Chiles is a very fast scrambler and trust me it’s coming a – UT QB option ala WVu style play. All that being said I am most optimistic about this unit. They are the most talented and soundest technique wise.
Linebacker I’ll say the same thing about these guys that I did about the defensive line . . . 177 yards a game … Linebackers tackle. When the Tech linebackers start tackling it’s going to be a good day. Last year’s arm reaching, attempted arm tackling, falling down and generally not too dominating play is hopefully part of the past. These guys are the most worrisome piece of the unit – team. No other set of folks can be as debilitating as ineffective or inconsistent linebacking play. The not much talked about statistic of forcing 3 and outs is a key element missing – consistently- from the Raiders game. Poor tackling by LB’s factors into it. Raiders need to lead the Big12 in this category. Like its cousin the take away nothing else will do. Either stuff someone or we risk getting into a track meet. 3 and out(s) / third down stops is the one aspect of play which I believe can influence the game far out of proportion to any other series. Summary: I too need to see the tackling production by this unit.
Special Teams Inexperience. Ditto.
by centexraider on Aug 21, 2008 1:51 PM CDT 0 recs
Chiles
They say the most popular guy in Austin is the back-up QB…
I agree that the tackles are going to have to get off their blocks better against the run. I think some of the poor tackling by the LB was due to the tackles getting tied up. The LB was having to shed the fullback and still try and make a play. When the safety is making tackles against the run, the linebacker is getting blocked. 5+ yard running play. The defensive tackle needs to shed their blocker and plug the hole so the fullback has to block a lineman instead of a linebacker.
by NM99 on
Aug 21, 2008 3:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Depth and Conditioning
Based on Tech’s ability to score quickly in prior years and the experience on the other side of the ball, my biggest concern is that the Defense is going to spend a lot of time on the field.
With the new clock rules and the speed at which offenses are going to try to play, defensive substitution is going to be difficult, and there will be less time between plays to catch your breath. I’m worried about the second half of every game against any team with an offense that has a pulse. There are going to be a lot of guys with their hands on their hips in the 4th quarter if they haven’t spent enough time during the off season working on conditioning or if the 2nd in line on the depth chart isn’t capable of successfully sustaining a full series on the field.
I think the clock is also going to produce lower scoring games (faster clock = fewer possessions). Tech hasn’t faired well historically in close games. The last thing Tech needs is to be in a close game with a team that can grind it out, keeping the Tech defense on the field, and the Tech D not have enough stamina (either through conditioning or quality subs) to stop them late in the game.
by NM99 on Aug 21, 2008 3:32 PM CDT 0 recs
have to disagree: the faster clock is going to move teams into quicker snaps, increasing the number of plays. A number of teams are moving to no huddle and a team like tech already tries to maximize plays in a game.
I don’t think that the average score is going to move at all: some teams may be able to run off more clock, but most teams will use less.
by kayakyakr on
Aug 21, 2008 4:04 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Number of plays
The new clock rules are basically the NFL clock rules. For comparison, according to this ESPN article, the fastest teams in college last year were pushing 80 plays per game (Tech averages 78). I ran the numbers on all 32 NFL teams, and the team with the most plays per game was Tennessee at almost 66 per game (the slowest was San Francisco at just over 54). Even teams that passed a greater percentage of the time didn’t run that many more plays than teams that ran more. This is the best indication of what the college game will look like. I figure that the 14 play difference is probably 1-2 possessions, which means fewer chances to score.
by NM99 on
Aug 22, 2008 7:17 AM CDT
up
0 recs
couple of corrections/postulations:
Include Sesay in the DT group as well as the DE group. They’ll be getting him on the field in a number of ways this season and he has been going through practices in both spots.
Brent Nickerson and LaRon Moore have been taking snaps as the first team corners. Bunton has remained lower on the depth chart. LA could be back in time for the first game, but more than likely he sees his first college corner action in the last half of the game against SMU or UMass. It’s a shame that he can’t seem to stay healthy, he’s got enough potential, just no luck.
by kayakyakr on Aug 21, 2008 4:09 PM CDT 0 recs
just to clarify, you have Nickerson listed with the safeties while he plays corner
by kayakyakr on
Aug 21, 2008 4:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I was trying to list Hines, Rowland, Nickerson and Richardson as the second secondary group, and not a part any one position, sorry if I wasn’t clear.
Go Raiders . . .
by Seth C on
Aug 22, 2008 5:21 AM CDT
up
0 recs
The Sesay-factor could be huge, he’s such a big guy that DT could be a perfect position for him.
Go Raiders . . .
by Seth C on
Aug 22, 2008 5:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Repeat concern
If there is one area that scares the dickens out of me, it’s linebacker coverage play. If anyone hasn’t yet repressed the memories of the Missouri and Colorado games last year, you’ll remember that their tight ends KILLED us (Colorado? Really?). And, in fact, on aTm’s first drive they used the tight ends to their advantage and I never figured out why they never went back to them in subsequent drives (thank goodness!). Tackling in practice doesn’t translate into coverage on the field. Until we play a team with a strong QB-tight end hook-up that we actually stop or slow down with a linebacker, I’ll be very weary. If this causes problems then the safeties will be pulled in and we’ll be more susceptible to downfield strikes. Please, please prove me wrong.
by TracySaulRulz on Aug 21, 2008 10:13 PM CDT 0 recs












