Leach: "Right now, we're nothing special."
Most of the articles this morning are focusing on Captain Leach being unhappy with the offense for 2 1/2 games. We have Don Williams from the LAJ, Kate Hairopoulos from the DMN, and DT's Alex Ybarra with essentially the same story, and most of them one or more of these quotes:
"What we've done, quite honestly, for 21/2 games I don't consider acceptable,'' Leach said. "I don't know at what point they think we arrived. This group of quarterbacks and receivers, we haven't done anything impressive. I don't think it's impressive at all other than some numbers inflated by some explosiveness and the efforts of others. As far as any steadiness, there's nothing impressive."How can (receivers) drop the ball when you throw it as much as we do? When you come away from a practice where you throw 270 to 300 balls and drop two? The fact that we've had a little success in the past, it gets candy coated. Oh, they'll come along.' Baloney.
"When it hits you in the hands and you drop it, when you get re-routed out of bounds. When you throw the ball short and out of bounds all the time. ... Right now, we're nothing special, not at quarterback or receiver.
"We've got big heads and we're not tough enough to go out there and make plays," he said. "I don't know if it's big heads or we're scared. I'm kind of curious; are they scared or do they have big heads? Right now they're nothing special. And it's a byproduct of my coaching and other people's coaching. We're nothing special, not at quarterback or receiver. We can pretend we are."
As I said yesterday, it's somewhat comforting that he sees the same thing that we see, a quarterback who looks uncomfortable, and receivers who are dropping passes.
There's so many delicious things here, I'm not sure where to start. This is going to be a bit of a ramble:
- For those of you who have criticized this team and coaching staff for what could be termed as a lack of urgency, Leach sees it too.
- Leach is obviously tired of seeing receivers knocked off their routes, something that has plagued this offense for some time (see Missouri v. Texas Tech) and now he's calling them out.
- So, dropped passes are inexcusable?
- I'm trying to remember who dropped all of those passes, and the early Britton passes stand out to me as well as a Todd Walker drop (I think?), which makes sense because at halftime, Leach said that he didn't have an X-Receiver who could catch the ball. According to the last depth chart that we did before the start of the season, which I think is still holding up, Rashad Hawk was 3rd string behind Britton and Walker. As of Saturday, that may not be true. Both Hawk (4 receptions for 44 yards) and Tramain Swindall (4 receptions for 31 yards) are more than capable receivers, but more importantly, I don't recall them dropping any passes.
- Leach wants Harrell to act like a senior quarterback. It's obvious to us that Harrell is taking way too many chances down the field, he's got to do a better job of taking what the defense gives you. I watched quite a bit of the first half of the Missouri/Nevada game and that's all that Daniel did, took what the defense gave him. Of course this works in conjunction with the receivers staying on their routes and not getting knocked off early. In order for Harrell to be efficient, the receivers have got to get to their routes as quickly as possible.
- I think Leach is saying all of this now because last year, against Missouri and Colorado, all of these things happened. Harrell pressed, receivers weren't getting into their routes, and the offense struggled. Leach sees those things now, but rather than wait for a really bad game, he wants to address it now.
- I've got no problem with Leach doing this publicly. I'm guessing that he's done it in the locker room and in film sessions for the past two weeks, but obviously, things haven't changed. Perhaps this will.
- Remember how when you were a little kid and you were fighting with your brother or sister in the back of the car, your mom turns around and says, "Don't make me stop the car and come back there and spank you." I get the feeling this same type of conversation is going on right now in a much different setting and circumstance.
Link Dump: DT's Texas Tech v. SMU slidshow . . . DT with fans enjoying RaiderGATE . . . Texas Tech legend Dave Parks is recognized at halftime for his induction into the College Football Hall of Fame . . . KCBD11 with highlights from the win against SMU . . .
0 recs |
11
comments
Read Related
Comments
Hmmmm
Not sure I agree that this something you do publicly. Especially after you destroy a team by getting nearly 700 yards of offense. Room for improvement? Absolutely! And he should say something like that…but it’s hard for most people, players included, to take him very seriously when he goes off like that after this kind of game. Doesn’t make much sense and it’s not fitting, so it’s not really listened to. Think about that..
Also, you’d never see Mack Brown or Bob Stoops do this sort of thing. He will chew ass behind closed doors or at practice, but tell the world he loves his team and he’s proud of their effort. Those coaches are their teams biggest media cheerleaders. It’s one reason (among hundreds) that teams like that are consistently rallying around their coach. I don’t think you see much of that with Tech teams.
by Tech92 on Sep 15, 2008 8:29 AM CDT 0 recs
I knew that you would not like Leach bringing this up in public (I’m beginning to really learn everyone’s personalities) and I think you’ve always been consistent on that point. I’m guessing that Leach has pointed this out the past few games and some of the same mistakes are still being made. Personally, I’ve got no problem with Leach doing this, but I’m afraid we’ll have to agree to disagree
Go Raiders . . .
by Seth C on
Sep 15, 2008 7:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Ha! That’s funny that you say that. I am fine agreeing to disagree. And I actually would have less problem with it if he chose his spots more carefully. I mean, hammer the players after they actually play poorly like the Nevada game. But after SMU, it was time (in my opinion) to say job well done, my good and faithful players. : )
by Tech92 on
Sep 16, 2008 9:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Hawk dropped that long ball that he had to adjust his route to try to catch. It could’ve been a better throw by Harrell, but it hit Hawk right in the arms as he was falling to the ground.
After all is said and done, more is said than done.
by ayleein on Sep 15, 2008 8:40 AM CDT 0 recs
I forgot that pass. I need to go back and watch the game and count the drops.
Go Raiders . . .
by Seth C on
Sep 15, 2008 7:15 PM CDT
up
0 recs
It is somewhat comforting
to see that Leach is at least aware of and acknowledging that there’s a problem between the QB and receivers. Whether or not it should be aired publicly is certainly debatable, but also certainly Leachs style. There’s definitely a disconnect between Harrel and the receivers, I didn’t see a single receiver get a pass in-stride, and the two shots at the end zone to Crabtree near the end of the first half were ugly. Waaaaay too many throw-it-up-for-grabs passes. But I don’t want to dwell on the short comings, I’d rather celebrate the positive performances.
And that has to start with the running backs!! Woods and Batch were both outstanding. The speed and vision they displayed was phenominal!! Yes, our O-line was able to overpower SMU pretty handily, but it was the explosiveness and downfield running that really impressed me. All of the INT’s were impressive, but I can’t help but think that most of them were more the result of some incredibly poor passing from the SMU QB. Still, give the D-backs credit for reading the play and being in position.
One other observation, why did Harrel and Crabtree not dress like the rest of their teammates?? Seems to me like they were making a statement that they’re different from the rest of the team. NOT a very good plan. IMHO
There’s no doubt in my mind that this team has some growing to do. We’ll all find out soon enough. Anyways, I get to go to the game this weekend (first one in loooong time) and I’m really pumped. Actually, I’m really pumped just to visit Lubbock and Tech!!!
GO RAIDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you." Woody Hayes
by cityman on Sep 15, 2008 9:19 AM CDT 0 recs
Are you talking about Crabtree’s and Harrell’s cleats? Maybe they find them more comfortable. Some of the lineman were wearing different shoes, too. I think that’s a little over analytical. If the new shoes from UA aren’t comfortable or aren’t breaking in properly, then they shouldn’t wear them.
After all is said and done, more is said than done.
by ayleein on
Sep 15, 2008 9:36 AM CDT
up
0 recs
The cleats
Yes, I’m refering to the cleats. Not the brand but the color. I didn’t notice anyone else w/white cleats. My bad if I missed that. It just really stuck out (the white shoes) to me. I remember very clearly when Joe Namath first wore white shoes. Not even everyone on his own team was impressed w/them. In fact, many thought that he shouldn’t wear them. My memory is a little cloudy on the exact date of when he first wore them, but I’m thinking it was post-Super Bowl. (fill in the blank Eddie) Maybe it is a little to analytical, but I believe that football is the ultimate ‘team’ game. Seperating yourself from the team in any way, shape, or form divides the team.
"There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you." Woody Hayes
by cityman on
Sep 15, 2008 1:30 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Nothing special - but a win...
I was at the game and then watched it at home from the TIVO on Sunday. Interesting performance – 3 ups Running backs looked fired up and preformed, defensive front 4 collapsed the pocket several times (and hurried the passer), a lot fewer penalties (still some though and the referees looked kind of tentative). 3 downs accuracy in throwing – at one point in the 1st Qrtr we were 19 of 26 or 27 , the Raider secondary let receivers get behind them or catch sideline passes in front of them – many times ( did I say pressure on the QB as an up? – oh well ) special teams could go either way a neat return by EMO then allows several long SMU returns (okay we are kicking off after scoring- that’s an up) but kicking game a so so effort 2 x missed FG’s and an Extra point ouch. Execution on the kicking game has got to improve before the conference starts – take a look at the USF vs. Kansas game. We don’t want to be lamenting 1- 2 points in the OU, TU or Ku games. Overall excellence in execution I would grade us out at a solid 79.9%. Or a high C+.
Overall cool to beat down a team and nearly notch a shutout. Bonus up the 2nd team offense was pushing on as if they had to score the go ahead TD. Note they appear to fear the head coach’s wrath.
Anybody want to dispute my completely arbitrary grading system?
by centexraider on Sep 15, 2008 12:43 PM CDT 0 recs
Good Points Centex.
Won’t completely dispute, but I don’t quite agree w/everything. I agree w/you that the running backs performed. I disagree w/you on the D-line, I didn’t see that many pressures, in fact their D-line probably had more ‘hurries’ than we did. They even had a sack w/a fumble..we didn’t. I agree there was improvement in the penalty area. I disagree on the passing accuracy. Too many up-for-grabs passes and not hitting the receiver. There were some dropped passes , but in my estimation, more were poorly thrown. I agree on the kicking game, Leach has to be wondering by now. I also agree on the 2nd team offense. I think 79.9% is generous, I’m thinking more along the lines of 69.9%
I just can’t get by that we’re (allegedly) a top 20 team playing an unranked Div 1-A school. Heck, we better win, and we’d better win big! Bigger than we did. With the number of turnovers we should have rung up 60. Oklahoma had no problem hanging 60 on Washington without the turn over help. We just have too many weak moments and inconsistencies that will haunt us when we play Texas and Oklahoma and Missouri. Heck, Kansas and Baylor might be able to take advantage of our shortfalls. I have to wonder if the big stats are intoxicating some of our players. It sure seems like we swing for the fences waaaaay too much. Maybe that’s just Leachs play calling, I don’t know,
"There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you." Woody Hayes
by cityman on
Sep 15, 2008 4:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I’m wondering if Tech is developing a habit of playing down to the competition. We’ll see what they produce when they play higher quality teams starting in a few weeks at KState. I, too, would like to have seen a 60-spot at some point against at LEAST a I-AA school (and they may against UMass, but I am not too confident – they are ranked higher than Eastern Washington in that poll, though the Minutemen got pasted by James Madison who put up more than 50 on them Saturday).
by Tech92 on
Sep 16, 2008 10:04 PM CDT
up
0 recs













