Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Preview and Open Game Day Thread: Texas vs. Texas Tech

Texas Longhorns
(12-4, 1-1)

vs.
Texas Tech Red Raiders
(10-6, 0-1)

January 17, 2009

3:00 p.m. CST
TV: Big 12
Game Cast: Fox Sports

The Numbers:

 

Texas Tech
Statistic
Texas
112
K.P. Rank*
30
102.7 (134)
Adjusted Offensive Efficiency*
107.1 (73)
97.2 (106)
Adjusted Defensive Efficiency*
87.4 (13)
81.8
Points Scored
72.3
77.7
Points Allowed
61.9
38.9
Rebounds
40.6
16.4
Assists
13.6
14.9
Turnovers
12.4

 

Probable Starting Lineups:

Texas Tech Ht. Wt. Pos. Yr. PPG RPG APG
John Roberson 5-11 165 G So. 14.4 3.6 6.1
Alan Voskuil 6-3 181 G Sr. 14.4 4.8 2.2
Michael Prince 6-7 208 F Sr. 3.9 3.2 1.0
D'Walyn Roberts 6-7 194 F So. 7.6 4.8 0.6
Robert Lewandowski 6-10 240 C Fr. 5.1 3.1 0.8
Texas Ht. Wt. Pos. Yr. PPG RPG APG
A.J. Abrams 5-11 161 G Sr. 17.8 2.4 1.6
Justin Mason 6-2 194 G Jr. 6.7 3.8 5.2
Damion James 6-7 222 F Jr. 14.7 8.3 1.2
Connor Athley 6-10 228 F Sr. 6.4 3.7 0.5
Dexter Pittman 6-10 298 C Jr. 9.1 4.7 0.3

 

Keys to the Game:

  1. Maybe There's A Chance: I'm not real confident heading into today's game and I feel that the biggest thing that Texas Tech as going for them is that UT's leading scorer, Abrams, is in one heck of a shooting funk (8-27 vs. OU; 2-10 vs. ISU; and 3-16 vs. Ark). It would be really nice if that shooting touch lasted at least one more game.
  2. Keep Them Off The Boards: I'm probably going to just leave this as a key for the rest of the season, and Pat Knight mentioned it in this morning's notes, but Texas is an awfully good rebounding team and I'm extremely happy that Suljagic and Cook will be back for this game.
  3. Play At Your Pace: I'm not going to try and convince you that the turnovers weren't a killer last Saturday against Baylor, but the Red Raiders had 15 in the first half and were still in the game. If Roberson, Voskuil and Okorie can just be selective when running and take care of the ball, I actually think Texas Tech can win this game. Lose the turnover battle, and I think it's an "L".

GO RAIDERS . . .

*Stats can be found at Ken Pomeroy: K.P. Rank = the Ken Pomeroy Rank; Offensive Efficiency = the national rank in terms of points scored per 100 possessions; Defensive Efficiency = the national rank in terms of points allowed per 100 possession. Numbers in parentheses are national rank.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No chance.

I am not convinced this team can beat anyone in the conference except through just good luck. Junior has not proved a thing, yet. That is all…..

TTpilk

by TTpilk645 on Jan 17, 2009 9:09 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah,

it’s not good when my first point is about the struggles of the opposing player.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 17, 2009 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

25 point loss

unless UT has a game in which they can’t score, which is possible

they struggled against texas state and a fewothers in that fashion

by Freneau on Jan 17, 2009 2:26 PM CST reply actions  

first game I’m getting to watch. came in late because of the baylor game’s overtime. So far… we look really, really undisciplined. I can see what everyone means, we don’t have anyone available to help inside, we’re committing dumb fouls and we’re jacking up ill-advised shots.

by kayakyakr on Jan 17, 2009 3:21 PM CST reply actions  

Texas defense is pretty bad, no way they’re as good as their ranking. If Tech’s open shooting didn’t suck so badly, this would’ve been at worst a close game.

I don’t think I have enough toes to count all the missed or passed-up open looks by the deep shooters.

Yeah, the officiating was terrible, but should we expect anything more from Big XII refs? Bad calls cost Tech points early, but not 22 of them. Pat Knight needs to teach the guys how to shoot. Stop practicing dunks in pre-game and start practicing defense and contested shots.

After all is said and done, more is said than done.

by ayleein on Jan 17, 2009 5:30 PM CST reply actions  

Tech isn’t real good at this whole basketball thing just yet.

by Tech92 on Jan 17, 2009 7:55 PM CST reply actions  

Texas Tech has taken a step back from last year

 I understand that this is Pat Knight’s first full year and all that. But, what concerns me most is that not only has he not improved the team, but instead the team appears to have taken a step back. It looks like an awfully coached, terribly undisciplined team. I am not sure if we would win another game in the BigXII. I am wondering how long do we give for this Pat Knight experiment and at what cost!

by jef on Jan 17, 2009 10:03 PM CST reply actions  

team looks better than it did earlier in the season.

by kayakyakr on Jan 17, 2009 10:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Pat Knight

needs to really stop being publicly critical of his players. It won’t make them better shooters. These are kids HE helped recruit. If he doesn’t like the result, he needs to focus on coaching them, not criticizing them in the media. He’s an ass….sorry, but I just think he is. He has exactly ZERO coaching skins on the wall to get on a high horse about performance,

by Tech92 on Jan 18, 2009 12:08 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU