Initial post-game thoughts
First, let me say to Ole Miss...wow, what a dominating game! Very well schemed and executed by coaches and the players. Congrats on a great, great win.
I will probably put something together later this weekend talking about my thoughts on the season as a whole - and the state of the program. But for this, I'll focus on the Cotton Bowl from a general perspective.
To say Tech looked uninspired and unprepared is a massive understatement. Even with a quick 14-0 lead, the players never showed their trademark excitement. Because of that, Tech looked just a half step slow and a half a shade disinterested.
It's always tough to pin a game like this on just one person or one unit. But the coaches didn't help the players out with their lack of adjustments. For the life of me, I'll never know why McNeil doesn't at least fake a blitz. You don't have to do it on every play, but to show the same standard front all game long is astonishing. Especially when the Rebels moved the ball seemingly at will for long stretches at a time.
Offensively, I'm disgusted that Baron Batch ended with a grand total of two carries. Huh? The most energetic, high-motor skill player we have doesn't figure at all into our game plan? Even with a lead? Unacceptable.
I won't harp on Harrell here. He had a stellar career and gave us many more highlights than head scratchers. But today, he was simply off. Yes, Ole Miss did an okay job of pressuring him. But nothing that forced him out of the pocket very often. Yet he continually short-hopped passes, threw behind guys, and generally just didn't give them a chance to make a play after a catch. I'm disappointed for him that his last play as a Red Raider was a blind side sack and fumble on a two-point conversion. For him, that really sucks.
Crabtree was basically a non-factor. His ankle is clearly not healed. He was slow in and out of breaks and just didn't have his usual pop. That hurt us, but shouldn't have stopped us. If it did, we are in massive trouble next year.
Tackling. Wow. Did we tackle anyone today? I've heard my entire life that tackling is effort. If that's true, then our effort wasn't there at all. Some people think our defense improved. And I guess in some categories, technically we did. But is going from one of the very worst to just one of the bad units count as improvement? We were exposed the last three games as a VERY average to below average unit. Today, it came full circle. Ole Miss abused our LBs and DBs. On almost every play. Did Brian Duncan play today? Did Bront Bird? I couldn't tell you because I never heard their names called.
In the end, Ole Miss wanted it more. Coached with a goal in mind. Played with a sense of urgency. Had a definite plan. Had the right mentality. Earned it. Game over. Season over.
I realize this was our best record in a long, long time. 11-2 is nothing to cry about. But why do I feel like we just finished a blah 6-6 campaign? Yes, the sun will rise in the east tomorrow and I'll be fired up to see what we can do on signing day...and will be excited to see the 09 version of the Red Raiders in the spring game...and will be on pins and needles opening night against the North Dakota Fighting Sioux next Sept. But for now...I'm pissed...and more than a little disgusted with our coach.
But it was cool to see another kickoff from the seven...
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors.
0 recs |
55 comments
Comments
I loved watching the Ole Miss D play because they blitz and play more then a base D the whole game. We need new life as far as D coaching goes. Why is TCU’s D so good and Tech’s is not. Not because of better players just better game planning
(blitz). Great season but feels empty after the last three games.
by GPD on
Jan 2, 2009 7:36 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I called this game in another thread.
But I have said it for more than half a season, Defensive coaching staff needs to be reorganized and I can name two to three coaches who need to be given a pink slip.
I too am extremely disappointed in the McNeil lack of a defensive game plan. Basically, There was no game plan!
Playing straight up neutral defense is not a game plan for a bowl game. It sucked more than anything.
How the hell can our secondary get beat time and again in 2 and 3 deep zones? My God that was pathetic! Please Fire the secondary coaches now. No need to wait till January 15th because they suck worse than a 6 man loony bin blitz defense where there is no one in the secondary because all six are rushing the QB! ( saw that once with a game i went to see)
Mike Leach needs to hire new blood secondary coaches and hire 1 coach who will teach proper tackling and technique. Diving at the legs is not tackling and throwing out an arm is not tackling either! Good players run through that lack of effort in tackling. The coaches obviously are clueless about it because it has been there all season long and it hurts and shows up more in a bad loss where people often forgive it in a win game.
The season ened on a sour note because the game looked bad and the lack of a coordination of some form of a proper game plan on Defense made it look worse.
Now We are the laughing stock because we allowed a #20 8-4 team beat us a #7 11-1 team. Thus it sucks!
The question I have is we have to not allow this to continue into the future. Its about the program right now. Eventually we will get there.
The good news is that We are within 4 years of a Big 12 championship and national title.
The bad news is that in order for us to achieve that goal, we need some new blood on Defensive coaching staff who can actually inspire and teach our boys to do the job! Because right now its not there.
We have the players to win a National Championship! We are at the level to be a National championship team. But we need better coaches to help the players.
I will be looking extremely close at the spring game to see if Potts has learned how to throw the touch pass or if Dogie gets the nod. I kind of think that Leach will give it to Potts next year then have a three year run with Dogie. But one never knows.
Because if Potts still throws the 90 mile and hour fast ball 7 yards instead of the touch then Dogie will have to be the selection. Nothing against Potts. He just has never learned to throw the touch pass and has used his cannon of an arm to impress people with his strength. But the truth is that 80% of passes are touch in the NFL and 90% with Tech. So Potts better learn quick.
I am disappointed in the coaches but I am proud of the boys for the season as a whole. A loss is always bad and it hurts worse when everyone knows that effort was left unplayed and unused for the game by both players and especially the coaching staff.
by Pablo M on
Jan 2, 2009 8:33 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Until Tech commits to defense in some way shape or form, this will be standard. This year’s team is NO different from last year’s. The key difference is we didn’t lose the Nebraska/A&M game like we probably should have and we found a freak show way to knock off Texas. Other than that, what really makes this any different than any other Tech team in the Leach era?
Here’s what we have…
Massive ass whipping during the season, maybe two? Check
Unprepared team in the bowl game (only this time it’s a loss instead of a fluky win)? Check
Absolutely terrible defense that folds in the end? Check
Two-hand touch tackling all season? Check
Attrocious in-game management? Check
Decided lack of in-game tactical adjustments? Check
To me, the ONLY thing was actually very different this year was a noticable effort to incorporate the run game. And then we decided not to bother with it, or to get our most punishing back involved in the bowl game. Brilliant.
Face it. We are what we are. This is a very decent 9-4 team disguised as an 11-2 team. Nothing more.
by Tech92 on
Jan 2, 2009 8:52 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
This year’s team is NO different from last year’s.
Huh, no different? Well, we won 11 games this year and went 7-1 in conference. Those are two differences.
Are we usually unprepared in bowl games under Leach? Then at least we are successfully unprepared (5-4), right?
We are an 11-2 team no matter what you have to say about us REALLY being a 9-4 team. We won 11 games and lost 2. We beat some good teams, we lost to good teams, and we got blown out by a really good team. The season doesn’t disappear after one bad game and, by the way, what the fuck is wrong with being 9-4? That’s a lot better than most teams in the country can claim.
by Skin Patrol on
Jan 3, 2009 10:40 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t have an issue with us being 9-4, if that’s the type of team we truly are. I think I have not done a good job of conveying my thoughts here on this topic. I am trying to say that there 11-2 teams that people view as really good (UT, OU, Floriday, USC, etc), and then there are 11-2 teams the world looks at through the lenses of fluke city. I think that’s this team. We are not viewed as a really, really good team. Yes, us Tech fans like to think we are. But all the perceptions we ALMOST changed this year went right out the window with OU, Baylor and Ole Miss. We as well have been 9-4. Any idea where you think we’ll end up ranked? My guess is right around 16-20. How many 11-2 teams will be that low? Or 10-3? So in reality, our record, as shiney and bright as it appears, is really no better than last year’s when you look at the perception of the team.
Not sure I explained that well, but I tried.
by Tech92 on
Jan 3, 2009 11:13 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
UT isn’t 11-2. Florida isn’t 11-2. USC isn’t 11-2. If they were, teams would view them precisely as that; 11-2. Some 11-2 teams are better than others, but that doesn’t mean we’re the worst of the 11-2 teams (maybe we are?) or no better than, say, 9-4 Georgia Tech.
It doesn’t make a difference how the rest of the world views this team. Whatever lense they look through, we’re 11-2. They can call us fluke city. Very few teams win all their games convincingly. Very few teams that win all their games convincingly find ways to lose more than one game.
Some Tech fans have an unreasonable expectation regarding this team. That doesn’t mean we’re worse than 11-2 or better than 11-2. Bill Parcells loved to say that a team is as good as it’s record, and we aren’t unique snowflakes regarding that fact. Tech, like every other 11-2 team in the entire history of CFB, is only as good or as bad as it’s record.
Looking at the rankings, it’s probably the case that the other 11-2 teams are just flat out better. TCU is probably better. We have a better win (Texas) but their losses are much better, as they only lost on the road to OU (in the MNC) and Utah (much better after beating Alabama, yah?). If Texas loses to OSU, they will remain ahead of us for all the reasons they were ahead of us at 11-1 tied. If OSU beats UT, they’ll have done everythin we did this year and more, pretty much. Penn State was already ahead of us… so what have we done to leap frog them?
That pretty much covers all the 11-2 teams in the league, right? Is their shame being ranked behind TCU or Texas or OSU or Penn State given their impressive seasons? Do you think we should be ranked behind Georgia Tech? Cincinnatti? Oklahoma State? What about Oregon? Is 10-3 suddenly better than 11-2? Same question regarding Georgia? BYU lost. Pitt lost. Michigan State lost.
Everyone ahead of us currently has a better record, so let’s presume they stay there. I see Boise State moving ahead of us. I think Texas will beat OSU, and in virtue of that I think we’ll stay in front of OSU, but let’s say they leap frog us (in a loss?) as well. That leaves us behind TCU at 12 before we start getting into teams like Cincy, Okey State and G. Tech, all lost. We won’t move behind them. I doubt Oregon gets to leap frog us at 10-3. I doubt Georgia does, too, but let’s say ONE of them does. we’re still at 13th. Then it’s BYU, Pitt, Michigan State all teams that lost. WE won’t move behind them. I doubt Ole miss gets in front of us, either, though they probably earned the right to be in front of us.
In any event I think you’re wrong, I believe we’ll be around 13-15th or closer to that range than 16-20. But it doesn’t really matter. We’re only and exactly as good as our record, no better, no worse. It FEELS worse because of what just happened, but the season, viewed holistically, is still a resounding success relative to the usual fate of your average FBS team.
by Skin Patrol on
Jan 3, 2009 12:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Cotton Bowl: A tale of Two Coaches
The level of preparation was the difference in the game today. While Tech looked like an ‘elite’ but rusty team, Ole’ Miss looked like an ‘average’ but well oiled machine. Sort of like comparing a rusty Lexus with may be a Toyota Corrolla. Yet in the end it comes down to the commitment of two coaches. One coach (ours) went on a holiday vacation visiting presentation ceremonies and begging for coaching jobs at schools that have performed inferior to Tech in the recent times and spent time haggling over a few million dollars of compensation for a job in which he has never taken the team to a BCS bowl or even won the Big XII ever. On the other hand was Huston Nutt, who prepared his team, got them motivated and did more with less today. Congrats to Ole’ Miss. Tech remains same old Tech. Crappy defense and an opportunistic coach ready to ditch the ship whenever his agent finds a chance. If we have to dish out the kind of money that he is asking, we can actually get a coach who will take us to a BCS bowl or win the division once in a while for that money.
May be I am griping because it was frustrating to see Tech play today and I hope I am wrong, but it just seems so obvious to me at this point.
by jef on
Jan 2, 2009 9:02 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Unless I'm slow getting the news...
this was probably a statement by Mike Leach to Gerald Myers for not getting a contract finalized. I did see the news that Rice signed up and coming coach David Baliff to a 5 year extension. I saw Baliff when he was at Texas State and, though he royally screwed up Texas State’s semifinal game, I thought he was going to be “one to watch,” similar to Billy Gillespie when he was at UTEP. Now if Leach bolts — to whom is a mystery — well, at least Tech won’t be forced to hire Lane Kiffin.
by Jason Roberts on
Jan 2, 2009 9:16 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
The suggestion that Mike Leach threw the game is ludicrous…
Wes Welker can't be stopped.
by 10forTech on
Jan 4, 2009 9:53 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It seems we peaked
with the Texas game and started coming down off the BCS mountain-top.
I am tired of concentraing on offense. This just in, the offense works. It has for years and will for more. However, when Stoops says that he knows what we are running before we run it, it is time to change the game plan.
We need a new DC. Someone who wll grab attention of these players and has experience stopping offenses. Tackling is not taught that much anymore. If it is, people are not doing it. While we did not tackle today, if you will watch even in the pros tomorrow, you will see piss poor attempts at tackling. Everyone seems to want the ESPN highlight with a shoulder shiv.
I would start my search for a new DC at Penn State and look for an assisstant defensive coach who wants to make his bones by creating a real defense in the Big 12. Or get an assistant from Utah, as they seem to be handling Alabama as I write.
I tend to agree that we seem to have been caught up inside the hype. The 60 Minutes piece Sunday will be interesting to watch.
If holding out to get assisstants more cash is the only reason Leach has not signed, then today’s game did not do anything to help his cause. While I don’t think Leach threw this one to make a point (the recruiting potential was too great to lose this one on purpose), I do think that he squandered a month of preparation by allowing the 11-1 accolades to seep into the entire team’s psyche. Before this game, I would have been upset if he went. Now I realize that if he left, we’d be okay.
If I were Leach, I would decide tonight whether I wanted to stay or not. Then tomorrow morning, I would either sign my freaking extension and say a humble thank you, realize that I need to keep my current contract, or tender my resignation.
Also, I was very embarrassed by the behavior of our guys near the end of the game. All of that crap by the O-line was stupid. Boys, look at the scoreboard. You got your asses handed to you. Shut up and get back to the huddle. The time to get that fired up was three quarters ago.
I wasn’t high when I wrote this. Just really, really pissed at our performance today. Why did I feel better about a loss to Alabama in the Independence Bowl than I do about this loss today?
by Red Raider in South GA on
Jan 2, 2009 10:10 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
All posts are right on, I’m watching Utah against Bama, Utah looks just like we should watch replay of game if you missed it.
by DR.MARK on
Jan 2, 2009 10:28 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ruffin needs to get a tape of this Utah game to see what an attacking defense really looks like. Those Utes are everywhere and coming from every angle. Very impressive.
by Tech92 on
Jan 2, 2009 10:28 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ruffin has pretty well demonstrated that if there's a defensive problem that he can't solve by tweaking the alignment in his base set
he doesn’t want any part of it
by mojavereject on
Jan 2, 2009 10:32 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As long as we are changing things
What about a new AD?
by Red Raider in South GA on
Jan 2, 2009 10:36 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Damn I looked forward to that Tech game all month
by DR.MARK on
Jan 2, 2009 10:48 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep
I was counting the days. I was so pissed that my wife was on call and I couldn’t go to the game. I have so much respect for those of you who endured that game. I have to say that my temper is more like Carters and while I think it makes me good at my job, I couldn’t hold MY tongue if some hotty toddy made a smart comment on the way to the parking lot. I just sat there in my den feeling like we lost the whole season. Watching Bama get handled feels a little better.
by Plano Jeff on
Jan 2, 2009 11:18 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep and spouse lost job right before Christmas so being there stung real bad. :(
by bleedredblack on
Jan 3, 2009 8:11 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm really sorry to hear that man.
by Plano Jeff on
Jan 3, 2009 10:40 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks, Jeff
I am optimistic there is another Metroplex job for him out there. Meeting tomorrow.
Sorry you had to miss. My 10-yr. old was thrilled to ride the train from Plano into town. Even talked me into painting his hair and face red…his scalp is still VERY red and face is a little pink after several washings. Fair warning to other parents about hair paint. ha
Wreck ’em!
by bleedredblack on
Jan 5, 2009 2:03 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So many glass half empties…
Wes Welker can't be stopped.
by 10forTech on
Jan 2, 2009 11:35 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
4th and 4 and a QB run up the middle, what f-ck was that.
by GPD on
Jan 3, 2009 12:22 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Before this season began, I had been a much more casual fan for years decades. I watched the games if I saw one scheduled on TV (or on radio) and looked for the score the next day if it wasn’t, but I never let myself get invested emotionally in the team. Why? Because for more than 40 years I had been nothing but disappointed. Sometimes more and sometimes less, but always disappointed. Frankly, I had accepted the notion that we were just a less-talented team from a less-dedicated and funded program that could never compete with the big boys.
In my casual fan status, I admit that I was somewhat disgusted that we had settled for a somewhat ‘gimmicky’ coaching philosophy in recent years that was destined to always be second-best. All offense and no defense was the overall impression I had of Leach’s teams. Kind of like running the veer, it was what you had to do if you simply did not have the talent. To me, it seemed the program itself had given up on taking the next step.
When I saw the pre-season rankings this year and read about an improved defense and running game, I got excited for the first time since I was a student. I drank the whole glass of Kool-Aid. While I am happy we had a better than usual season, I’m not sure if it was worth the emotional toll of the late-season collapse.
As I sit here now, I feel we had the same general level of talent as Ole Miss, and Utah for that matter. But those teams have a much more solid coaching staff on both sides of the ball. I don’t think I ever realized before how important that was. Earlier this year I studied the recruiting patterns at A&M compared to us and I was shocked to see how poorly a team with 5-star talent can play when the coaching situation is screwed up. IMO, that lack of coaching is our present limitation as well. Only it is much more crucial to us because we don’t have the 5-star talent. Today’s game and the OU game made that clear as a bell.
I agree completely with the comments above about McNeil. He’s better than what we had, but he is definitely not DC material – not if we want to move forward. And Leach is far from the complete OC or HC. We need serious help on the sidelines or the talent we have in place for the next couple of years will be wasted.
Texas Tech: No. 1 in football graduation rates among NCAA Div-1 public universities
by TT_ on
Jan 3, 2009 12:28 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
This is my one and only defense of Mike Leach. I have been watching this program very closely since the year Mike Leach was hired (I’m a youngin’) and every year he has become a better overall coach than the year before. This year, he’s finding out that a great team can have a down day and he has to be able to get them up to play the perfect football that executing an air raid against a good defense requires.
I would have to say that they last lessons that he needs to learn are some of the hardest. He started his lesson on loyalty that only gets you so far (in the sense of Lyle Setencich) last year. Now it’s going to be interesting to see what he does with the defense this year. Is he going to stand beside Ruffin McNeal and let him continue what he’s doing or is he going to meddle and ask McNeal to become more aggressive or is he going to go all the way to bringing in new people to do this.
Personally, I think that McNeal should have another year without meddle by Leach. I hope that he integrates more of this zone blitz scheme that he thinks highly of, but even if he doesn’t, I just want to see results. (Of note, he brought more than 4 players many more times than a lot of people realized. I even saw a corner blitz.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 3, 2009 12:41 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What has Ruffin done that give you optimism? Just curious…
by Tech92 on
Jan 3, 2009 8:40 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What has he done? Contrary to popular belief, he didn’t play base d the entire game. He brought some guys. If you saw how badly our secondary was torched yesterday, though, I don’t think you would have brought the house and put it all on your secondary if they didn’t get there either.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 3, 2009 12:31 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re-reading this…I have no idea what you’re trying to say in the first half of that post…
by Tech92 on
Jan 3, 2009 12:31 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m saying that Leach is growing as a head coach and getting better at it every year. That’s all.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 3, 2009 1:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Day 2
Today I’m more disgusted. Ugh.
Go Tech!!!
by jwhitettu on
Jan 3, 2009 11:51 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
My thoughts on this day:
1) I’m betting that the first thing Mike Leach does this weekend is sign his contract extension. He’s not that hot commodity that he thought he was will nor will he ever be due to his lack of game-planning in big games. I’m his biggest fan, but if he does not want to be here long term, I would rather have a coach who wants to be with Tech down the road.
2) I’m giving Ruffin one more year, before I’m calling for a change. I like his fire and passion—just maybe Leach will be a head coach and get involved too. Plus, let’s get some guys in here who fit Ruf’s scheme.
3) Looking forward to Potts or Doege—I’m hoping one of them has some mobility along with that canon arm.
4) I hope as a fan base we are just as passioniate and enthusiastic about our Red Raiders next year. I definitely feel we have some some momentum going into next year and we are a team on the rise.
Thanks again Seth for all your work with the site. Spend some quality time with your wife and looking forward to further posts.
by WreckerRaider on
Jan 3, 2009 12:42 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
1. I agree. My only issue with Leach is his inability as a head coach. Well, that’s everything, right? Not so sure. He would be an amazing offensive coordinator if a HC let him have free reign. I’m not convinced he can compete schematically with the heavyweights like Stoops, Brown, et al. He’s not very adept at adjusting to what the defense allows him to do. I appreciate his philosophy of having a small playbook and executing to perfection. But where he falls woefully short is if the defense on the other side happens to be executing to perfection. No shifting from his ‘plan’. That doesn’t work very well against the very, very good teams. He needs to look in the mirror to fix that. Of course, he’ll never settle for being just an OC, so we’ll have to hope he grows as a head man over the next nine months.
2. I love Ruffin as a person, and apparently, so do the players and coaches. That’s all fine and dandy. But I just didn’t see the improvement I was hoping for. We went from absolutely terrible to just real bad this year. That’s not what I think we were all looking for in our defense. In his defense, I just don’t think our defensive talent is all that great to begin with – especially the seconds – so he may be playing with a short deck. But I’d prefer Tech give up points by being super aggressive and paying for it, rather than getting beat by being vanilla and exceedingly predictable and fundamentally weak – and maddening.
3. Yep. Should be interesting to see if our offense has a new dimension next fall. Our next guy will need to be able to move around a bit considering the heavy losses we’ll experience on the line. They won’t be a seive, but they’ll be a slightly weaker in 09.
4. I don’t know…I think I found myself too heavily invested this year. It honestly affected me in a way I didn’t expect. I think we will all always love our Red Raiders. In my case, that love got the best of me this year. I REALLY wanted to be able to join the elite of college football this season. Didn’t happen and I have become a bit more angry. Some of you would be surprised to learn that I’m not really a pessimist by nature. But the team drew out a side of me I didn’t like this year. My unmet expectations took an ugly turn. All that to say that, yes, I’ll still go to the requisite 3-4 games next year, watch them all on TV and track their stats with gametracker. But I don’t think I’ll let myself get so wrapped up in their success/failure as I did this season. Honestly, what should have been the most fun season I’ve experienced in being a Tech fan (since 1984) turned into a way too stressful season. My wife kind of called me on the carpet about this…and the wife is typically right on stuff like this.
I deem this season a success. It’s hard to knock 11-2. I guess the last three games really cast a pall on the year – for me. After the amazing stretch against KState, Kansas, Texas and OSU I really felt we turned the corner. I think in some respects we had. But that OU, Baylor, Ole Miss stretch really confused the situation for me.
by Tech92 on
Jan 3, 2009 1:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right there with you.
Especially on your points 2 and 4. Thanks for writing that.
Go Tech!!!
by jwhitettu on
Jan 3, 2009 3:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
-1
…really confused the situation for me.
Don’t be confused. Like so many Red Raider fans, your expectations for the team were too high.
Try being a little more pragmatic.
Wes Welker can't be stopped.
by 10forTech on
Jan 3, 2009 9:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m not satisfied with 8-win seasons anymore. Especially after the coach, who is supposed to be some football genius, has had nine seasons to do more than that. Shoot, Spike even got us to 7-9 wins fairly regularly in the 90s. So yes. I had higher expectations.
I read the thread you posted by the way. I would look like Nostradamus if Leach had left for UofW – calling that back in July : )
by Tech92 on
Jan 3, 2009 10:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I want more, but I’m just happy that we don’t have a 4 win season. Look at Michigan, Notre Dame, Nebraska, Washington, etc.
As long as leach is winning 8-9 games a season, consistency and certainty is so much better than the alternative.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 4, 2009 1:58 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can appreciate point number 4...good for you!
Same thing happened to me in ‘03 I think, we were ranked really high and Texas came to town and infuriated me to no end by the way they pushed us around on our own field…I left just after halftime(which I had never done before and never since)…I chose right then to do whatever it took to keep it from happening again(selfpreservation I guess), but I consider it a good thing, cause now I am alot more dettached and my identity is not wrapped up in whether 18 to 22 year old kids succeed on a football field…this loss to Ole Miss hurts and I’m still pretty passionate, but I can step back at any point, even in the middle of a big game and do the dishes or visit with a friend down the street, without being distracted by the thought of missing out on something lifechanging(lol)
by TT4EVER on
Jan 4, 2009 1:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
All the distractions
This game could have been won had the been focused when the Cotton Bowl was offered to Tech. After the OK loss and the Leach contractual dispute thing went to hell in hand basket. Leach deserves a great deal of blame for this one. The defense was way off and looked weaker than usual. The offense was marginal at best. Harrell’s 4th down keeper was just stupid in a word. I am really concerned that Ruffin may not be the guy and this will was evident all day long. I’m sick about this season and just can’t get excited about next year yet. I think a good vacation from football is warranted right now. My wife will be happy about that. To conclude the season we had I’m just not sure how good we really were. I know that may piss people off but I’m really confused how OK destroyed us so badly and we lose in a non-bcs bowl game game to a number 25 team. Next season will be a tough one but at least we won’t have the hype to deal with going into it. Leach needs to evaluate the whole defensive staff if he wants this team to be a contender.
by Raider1992 on
Jan 3, 2009 2:28 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Big Mistake!!!!!!!!!!!
Not using our running game to give Harrell a chance. It’s Football 101…run the ball, so the defense can’t just pin their ears back and come after the QB.
There is no excuse for what Leach put Harrell through the entire game. I’ve never been so frustrated with Leach. It was Francione like! Even the best QBs to ever play the game get rattled if they have no time to settle in the pocket. The sad part is this year we had the horses to carry the rock.
If I were Batch, at half time, I would have yanked on Leach’s ear and said “IF YOU WANT TO WIN THIS $&##% GAME, GIVE ME THE &%$?# BALL!!”
by TT4EVER on
Jan 4, 2009 12:51 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Note, playcalling goes like this:
1. Leach sends in 2-3 plays to Harrell. This year, last I heard, it was 3. The new quarterback might only get two, that doesn’t matter.
2. Quarterback makes reads at the line and sends the routes to the receivers. Chooses play to run.
3. Quarterback executes plays.
I had heard that this year, with the resurgence of the running game, that of the plays sent in, one was always a running play and at times, two were. It stands to reason that most of the time, a running play was sent in. So, in effect, Mike didn’t put Harrell through anything; it was Harrell that was putting himself through it.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 4, 2009 1:55 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yikes. I am not a fan of a college QB calling the plays. I know that it looks to have worked, but the responsibility for that needs to be on the coach. NFL quarterbacks don’t shoulder that responsibility…and for good reason. A player can get caught up in the emotion of the game a bit more than a coach. Trying to prove a point sometimes becomes the goal of a player.
But what do I know…
by Tech92 on
Jan 4, 2009 9:06 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
NFL quarterbacks do, in fact, shoulder that load a great number of times. I think there are a lot of times that Peyton doesn’t even get a play sent in to him.
At a decision-making level, Tech quarterbacks are at an NFL level: they go through the same pre-snap reads, have full ability to change the play at the line, and always have a full bevy of receivers to choose from during the play. This is why, when the offense is sputtering, I am usually cursing the quarterback, not the coach.
There’s another area that Mike Leach’s coaching can improve: if his quarterback is rattled and not making good decisions, he needs to be able to take back control.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 4, 2009 12:07 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“At a decision-making level, Tech quarterbacks are at an NFL level…”
I will assume you mean mechanically, not practically. If that were the case, we’d have at least one on a roster somewhere today.
by Tech92 on
Jan 4, 2009 3:09 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
decision-making. the knock on Tech QB’s in the nfl has been both arm-strength and mobility, not their ability to run an offense.
by kayakyakr on
Jan 4, 2009 3:56 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Injuries
I agree with a lot of what has been said and like everyone else wishes that the season had finished on a win. I thought the Cotton Bowl exposed how thin our depth is after Winn, Crabtree, McBath and Wall got injured. Part of this may explain why Ruffin didn’t take more chances on defense because of the loss in the secondary plus Tech couldn’t tackle to save their lives so what’s to say a blitz package would have helped. It is a little concerning that after a month of preparation it was the fundamentals that were Tech’s undoing.
After all that, it still has to be said that 2008 was a good year for the program.I am already looking forward to the 2009 Season
by ttu_porters on
Jan 4, 2009 1:18 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs









