Double-T Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The USA TODAY/Bloody Elbow Top 50 MMA Fights Ever, I


Texas Tech Wednesday Morning Notes - Too Much Up And Down

DTN's Top Five:

  1. Corn Nation on why Thursday's night game does not determine conference heirarchy, just the national championship.
  2. Uncommon Sportsman with yo-yo geniuses.
  3. I've quietly been thinking that this is the guy I would want as my head coach should Leach leave. It's in a completely different direction
  4. So, you cannot vote your team #1 if you're Texas or Utah.
  5. Mark Cuban on buying the Cubs.

Someone was asking about the Texas Tech hockey team . . . well, they've defaulted on their first payment and will be playing in Odessa.

I thought this was pretty interesting, from TFY Draft, they projected the professional prospects that played in this year's Cotton Bowl between Ole Miss and Texas Tech. The number of first-round talent on Ole Miss' team is pretty amazing and is perhaps a better indicator of why Ole Miss won, just more talent, especially along the lines, where games are typically won or lost.

Mississippi

Full NamePosNumberYearRound

Peria Jerry

DT

98

4Sr

1-2

Michael Oher

T

74

4Sr

1-2

Greg Hardy

DE

86

3Jr

1-2

Mike Wallace

WR

2

4Sr

3-4

Marcus Tillman

DE

92

3Jr

4-5

Jamarca Sanford

S

13

4Sr

5-6

Tony Fein

ILB

47

4Sr

6-7

Maurice Miller

T

79

5Sr

6-7

Dustin Mouzon

CB

12

5Sr

7-FA

Ashlee Palmer

OLB

11

5Sr

7-FA

Codera Eason

FB

25

3Jr

7-FA

Jason Cook

FB

44

5Sr

7-FA

Texas Tech

Full NamePosNumberYearRound

Michael Crabtree

WR

5

3So

1st

Brandon Carter

G

76

4Jr

3-4

Louis Vasquez

G

74

4Sr

3-4

Graham Harrell

QB

6

5Sr

4-5

Marlon Winn

T

67

4Jr

4-5

Brandon Williams

DE

84

3Jr

5-6

Darcel McBath

S

7

5Sr

FA

Shawn Byrnes

C

51

4Jr

5-6

Rylan Read

T

74

5Sr

6-7


SAEN's Mike Finger with more on conference vs. conference pride:

All of this is part of a phenomenon of communal smack-talk peculiar to college football, and maybe to rap music (unfortunately, the Big Ten has no hand gesture comparable to the West Coast "W"). For some reason, coaches, players and fans think a victory for one member of a conference is a victory for the entire league, even if the teams share nothing more in common than a schedule and a commissioner.

This shared sense of pride among rivals does not exist in many other places. When Barack Obama is sworn in as President later this month, John Cornyn will not make any grand pronouncements about how the U.S. Senate has been proven superior to governors and the House of Representatives.

If Mickey Rourke wins an Oscar for "The Wrestler," it will not automatically raise the stock of other Roman Catholic actors raised in South Florida. And if the New York Giants win another Super Bowl in February, it is unlikely that any of the fans in Tampa will be singing the praises of the NFC East (unless, perhaps, Wade Phillips is in attendance).

Ugghh.

Last night, Texas Tech lost to TCU, 85-80 (boxscore) and this was an incredibly frustrating game on so many levels. I really wanted to do a report card last night, but decided my time would be better spent sleeping.

My gripes aren't with coaching, to an extent, they're with players not moving their feet on defense and not being patient on offense. I didn't think that Junior Knight coached a bad game last night, except that he played Darko Cohadarevic for 11 minutes. I know that he was short-handed and without the services of Trevor Cook and Damir Suljagic, but Darko has a long ways to go before he's a competent Big 12 player. Although Darko only put up 3 shots, I thought his defense was awful and his shot selection was even worse. He's got to figure things out before you put him on the floor in Big 12 play.

Overall, the perimeter defense was really good at times, jumping out on passes and really defending the 3-point line, however, the entire team struggled when TCU took any Texas Tech defender off the dribble. It didn't matter if it was the on-man defender or any help-defenders, no one stepped up and as a result, allowed too many TCU layups.

Offensively, I thought was okay, but the biggest problem is that this team settles for jumpshots and 3-point shots. It's obvious that Texas Tech is more efficient when they work inside-out, and it was so evident when Texas Tech was mounting it's 2nd half comeback attempt when free throws as a result of taking the ball inside helped the team get back, not the give-up offensive sets where Roberson, Okorie or Voskuil just heave up a 3-point shot.

This team has to work inside-out and with Lewandowski manning the middle, it should be so much easier than in previous years.

LAJ's Jeff Walker writes that the team had more downs than ups and had this from Pat Knight:

"It was definitely up and down," Tech head coach Pat Knight said, looking severely worn down after the Red Raiders lost their first home game of the season in their non-conference finale. "… It was just too much up and down to think you can beat good teams playing like that. You just can’t turn it on and off whenever you feel like it."

DT's Alex Ybarra also has his game story and there's a Pat Knight comment regarding the defense:

"Especially with what we've been doing in practice, that's what people don't see in practice," he said. "I just get tired of hearing about it from so-called people that think they know what they're talking about.

"Come to practice, see what we do. See how we break down. These kids gotta get it sometime. It's not like we just roll the ball out there."

I tend to agree with Knight here, in that there's no way that he's not coaching his players to move their feet, cut off an opposing player heading into the lane, but for whatever reason, it's not happening.

I'm hopeful that this team turns the corner when conference play starts on Saturday against Baylor in Waco (tip-off 12:30 p.m., TV: Big-12?).

0 recs | Comment 10 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Double-T Nation

Upgrade/Downgrade // Defensive End

Jul 2009 by Seth C - 15 comments

DTN Basketball Report:  01.09.09

Jan 2009 by Seth C - 1 comment

Comments

Display:

I only caught bits and pieces of the game, but I recorded it and plan on watching it tonight. I had it on in the other room, and I think the camera shot of PK where I could read his lips saying “f__ me” pretty much sums it up.

by NM99 on Jan 7, 2009 8:33 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Coach

I wouldn’t mind Strong as a new head coach. We could always get Dana or one of the old assistants back to run the offense. I don’t want this to come across as racist because I am not one, but a “black” head coach might help with recruiting.

by ST04 on Jan 7, 2009 9:24 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah, i’m not jumping aboard the pat knight sucks train yet. His team’s got problems, but I don’t pin them on him.

I mean, really, our team isn’t really losing much in sticking by Pat and if he succeeds here, I think we’d have a coach-for-life with him (as a “reward” for loyalty). We all know how important stability is to building a successful program. If he can’t improve in a few years here, then maybe we can go looking for someone else, but I think it’s vitally important to find someone without a wandering eye, someone who isn’t going to use our school as a stepping stone (think former player/alumni). Or someone that’s strange enough that we are his only option (see Mike Leach). Not firing coaches for poor performance after a short amount of time, these days, may be attractive to some much better coaches.

If that means that our men’s basketball program is doomed to be no better than middle-of-the-road, then so be it. We’re not exactly a basketball school.

I would like to see us make a good hire when it comes to Volleyball coach and I’m looking forward to seeing if our soccer and softball teams can continue to improve. Most importantly, I’d love to see Women’s Basketball retake a position of dominance. These are sports where I think we can go hunting for coaches because in each case, we can compete with the dominant forces as an attractive stopping point.

by kayakyakr on Jan 7, 2009 9:39 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’d rather not spend the money needed to field a big winner on volleyball, soccer or softball. There might be 400 people interested in those sports – and those sports provide nothing to the university as far as exposure or revenue. They exist at Tech only because Title IX requires them to exist. I’m sure it’s a big deal to the participants – and it should be. But as for where it ranks for most fans…I’d say the design of the Jones Stadium endzone paint scheme probably holds people’s attention more than women’s volleyball, soccer or softball.

by Tech92 on Jan 7, 2009 10:36 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

it’s all a building process. the better the university looks, the better things are for everyone involved within the university. women’s teams that can compete are just another way for the university to look better

by kayakyakr on Jan 7, 2009 12:48 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

next head coach

I think whether Leach likes it or not he is staying, and I am definitely ok with it. He must not interview well at all. I love how “he took himself” out of the running for the Washington job, that’s like breaking up with the girl first because you heard she was going to break up with you.

If leach does leave give me Todd Graham (tulsa’s coach)…… Tech won’t have to change the guys we recruit and he will give us the same thing leach gives us every week, at least a CHANCE to win every single game

by allknowing on Jan 7, 2009 10:55 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i’ve gotta give a resounding no to todd graham. that guy’s a nick saban-quality asshole without the nick saban resume.

by kayakyakr on Jan 7, 2009 12:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Strong

I thing Strong could be great on bringing us D but I would rather have Briles…a Tech guy, a plus and can recruit Texas kids. Graham just signed a 10 year! Yes, 10 year deal and Mahzlan(?) is going to be Auburn’s OC I thought. I could be wrong :)

by Plano Jeff on Jan 7, 2009 11:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what’s wrong with being an asshole, look what he did at rice and now at tulsa. The dude can raise money for his program and he is a winner as well as bring the greatness of Gus Malzahn with him. I just have a feeling that Leach is going to throw his name in for the Boston College position now.

I’m frustrated as hell at this whole process of resigning Leach and his staff. The admin. needs to throw us a stinkin bone and let us DONATING ALUMS know a little bit about what is going on.

by allknowing on Jan 7, 2009 5:45 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Football JR's

Please tell me those Jr’s are not leave Tech for a shot at the NFL 5th or 6th rounds.
Crab is the only under classman that can leave Tech now.

by GPD on Jan 7, 2009 6:41 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.
Start posting about the Red Raiders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tech2_small
Thanks DTN...
Tech2_small
Maybe it's the musician in me...
Gnome_small
Don't tell the Aggies, but...
Small
Recruiting
Small
A little lengthy, but...
White_small
I Hate Blowout Losses
Small
#25 "GUNS UP"
Small
Rivals Joe Yeager ..asst Coaches are suspect ..
White_small
Jamar Wall and Marlon Winn Featured on Fox 34
White_small
Relation of our Scoring to Opponent's

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Rr_no_mercy_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Official Partner of CBS Sports