Sticks should start.
1. Efficiency. Look at the stats.
2. Footwork. Look at your TV screen.
3. Leadership. The team seems to prefer him.
4. Production. 7 TD's. 1 pick. 490 yards.
5. Appearances. We simply look so much better with Gloves in charge.
Look, Potts is good and all.. but he's got another year to improve. Sticks is ready for the reins. He has outperformed Potts in one crucial area.... game production. The only logical choice is to go with proven game production. Gloves has shown that he is the man. Pure and simple. Potts is good, but he falls short of SS in one crucial statistic, real-time, game production.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Leach said Sticks will start next week. They reported it on the Shiner post-game show. It still kinda surprises me, inspite of all the reasons you speak of. Just cuz Leach can be set in his ways sometimes.
Potts is still dazed...
If you saw him on the sidelines tonite, he still didn’t look good in the eyes. I think he really got hurt against ut. I give him credit as he is a tuff dude but right now with his head still recovering, his mechanics off, and the team rallying behind Sticks, Leach really has no choice. I think Potts needs to be ready because if Sticks does stuggle think Potts may be put in to me that’s ok. I know all about this starter getting hurt and not losing his job stuff but if he can’t be effective then get someone in there who can. Nothing personal about anyone. But remember against nm it was 7-7 and we looked bad when Potts got hurt. And just for the record if you go back to the 2 sacks Potts took @ nm he held ball for 5 seconds on both of those plays. So the O line isn’t last years but…. Wreck’ Em Tech
UT and UH
We might have been undefeated had we had Schef’s energy and maneuverability on the field for the UT/UH games…
I really hate to think about that.....
It was possible. The fact that Sticks can still make a play even though the pockets collapses and a portal of hell opens up is refreshing. It’s something that we need to adapt and work on in order to further the spread offense. IMO.
" Answers -- Become Resources."
Without Questions; There are limited Resources...
Leach's call
As much as Sheffield has shown in the last two games, and the fact that Leach has named him as starter against Nebraska, Leach could still eventually name Potts the starter, again. It is his call, regardless of how we fans want it to go down. I feel either QB, and even Doege if need be, can get us a win against Nebraska. I really like Sheffield’s mobility, though, and hope Leach will consider that when finalizing his choice for starting QB. One reason Sheffield is going to start against NU may be that Potts is still too groggy to put out there as a starter. If he is ready to play, he will probably get in next weeks game only in mop up duty, just to see how he has healed. Bottom line is that the Raiders have a great QB to lead them, regardless of choice. With Carter back, the O-Line will protect whomever Leach sends out there. GO TECH!
TTpilk
I know this is kind of irrelevant but,
I didn’t want to take an entire fanpost with it either.
Scenario – Sheffield, Potts, Doege, Karam?
Is that the so-called depth chart right now? You can swap Potts and Sheffield back and forth if you want. One thing that caught my attention is the fact that Karam has a sub 4.5 40 yard time. Freakin WOW!!
" Answers -- Become Resources."
Without Questions; There are limited Resources...
Karam
still has redshirt status, he could become our next three year starter if can pass up doege on the chart. With his potential it is a definite possibility. Karam can play, way to early to say (as we learned with Taylor “dish” Potts) but this kid could be texas tech’s future. Furthermore, if sticks keeps playing well, Leach will begin to like mobility again and use it to his advantage. Karam is basically another RB back there, expect Leach to have some designed runs similar to VY for texas in ’05.national championship contention is a definite possibility for the next few years. Cant wait to see how it all shapes out.
Decision could be a medical one.
Leach, of course, wouldn’t say but Potts may not be medically cleared to practice and/or play just yet. Remember, Tebow required game time medical clearance to play 2 weeks after the concussion. If Sticks is ready for the preparation week of practice, seems like the logical choice.
In a little more than 5 quarters of work, 10 TD’s / 2 Int’s, and 728 yards passing. wow.
Including his mop up duty earlier in the year, here is his statline:
Att. Com. % Yds. YPA Td’s Int Sack Rating
Steven Sheffield, QB TTU 70 53 75.7 780 11.1 11 2 2 215.5
Now I do remember the subpar competition, but these numbers are just gaudy. The current leader in QB rating is Notre Dame’s Clausen at 179.3. 215 blows that out of the water. Backups are not supposed to put up these kind of numbers.
I hear that Leach will be starting him against Nebraska and their top notch defense on the road. This is good. We have already seen Potts on the road against a quality conference defense in UT (after a couple of warmup games to inferior teams), so then both will have fairly had their rehearsal under similar circumstances.
If Stix comes back down to earth and makes some goofy mistakes, then it would make sense to open back up the competition. If he continues to pump energy into the team and run the offense at top efficiency for another 4 quarters with more td’s and less int’s and sacks as Potts, it would be foolish to put him on the bench and hopefully Leach knows that. It is nothing personal, but you have to put who is best for the team out there.
Go with who is the most consistant, effiecent
The Leach O is all about consistancy & effeciency so I don’t care which one but someone must do both if we want to win so this week SS but if he struggles and Potts is ready go with him against atm. TTech should care only about winning not worry about who is or is not the starter at any given time. Wreck’Em Tech
I loved Sticks' game
but…
This is KState we’re talkin about. You have to believe that whatever Captain Leach saw in The ’Stache Potts to give him the starting job since spring practice he still has. You cant seriously believe that ’Stache couldnt have had a similar performance behind a successfully reassembled and reconfigured OLine and a nonexistant KState pass rush.
I agree with the probability that ‘Stache hasnt been quite right since that Kindle hit. Let him get better and take the job back when he’s able to.
What I see in Sticks is a Graham Harrell type guy who is firey and maybe offers a marginal improvement in mobility and arm strength. WE have too much riding on Stache (Potts). Before the season we were ALL talking about “wait and see what happens when Cap’n Leach installs a true prototype QB into his system”. We owe it to the Cap’n and the ’Stache to let the season play out.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Oct 11, 2009 10:10 PM CDT reply actions
Re:
I think I owe it to Mike Leach to support the team and will do so regardless of his decision. But I don’t owe it to anyone to reserve judgment on who is better and, despite being a complete Taylor Potts fanboy at the season’s start, I’ve seen enough now to conclude that it is Sticks’ job to lose on 10.12.2009. It really has not been close between the two.
We can argue until we’re both blue in the face that it “is KState we’re talkin about” but the rejoinder is: it was PRACTICE or it was N. Dakota/Rice/half a game against New Mexico we’re talking about. What data do we have that says Potts is better, besides the fact that Leach picked him to start the season? If the on-field data had not been so dramatically in favor of Sticks thus far, that might matter. But unless and until Sheffield looks as bad as Potts did against N. Dakota or New Mexico, then I’m going to stay on the Sticks bandwagon.
Nebraska, with its talented defensive line, provides a perfect opportunity for Sheffield to return to earth. But until he does so, he’s the starter.
by Skin Patrol on Oct 12, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
He’s the starter because I dont think The ’Stache is “right” yet. And yes the Huskers may bring Sticks back to earth.
That being said, I genuinely believe that ’Stache will again be the starter at home vs A&M. I also believe that the Stache would have looked just as good vs these Mildcats.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Oct 12, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
how soon they forget
Potts was leading the nation in passing and put up these numbers in the game he oooh’ed and aaaah’ed everyone in Austin after taking that vicious Kindle hit. A play that earned him the respect of all his teammates.
T. Potts 46/62 420yds 3tds 1int
Remember we didnt establish either our OLine and subsequently our running game until KState
The touch pass argument is moot, I think. The Capn knows that Potts didnt have the touch Sticks has and still he went with Potts. Are you seriously trying to tell me Potts couldnt have made that throw for a TD to Torres at the end of the 1st half?
I think you guys are jumping ship way too soon. Besides the statistical argument I think having a prototype QB at the helm is huge for the program.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Oct 13, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
I believe Potts would not have even approached the numbers Sheffield put up against K-state. Why are you so certain the two are of equal skill? I dunno, to me it just seems to blatantly obvious that Sheff is on a totally different level. I don’t think Potts would’ve had the accuracy and touch to connect on about half of the passes Sheff made against KSU.
I might add...
that Potts probably would have thrown at least 3 interceptions against a not so bad K-State secondary.
WOW
Thats really going out on a limb there and unfair the the ’Stache.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Oct 13, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm with you, Tortilla Pirate
I don’t mind all the Sheffield love, I just don’t like the Potts disrespect.
I'm not worthy. Really.
There's a UT analogy that fits this situation
Potts is Chris Simms. The NFL prototype in size and arm strength. But when he plays the game against live defenses he just doesn’t have it. He plays scared. Sheffield is Major Applewhite, nobody’s idea of the physical specimen of a major college quarterback. But put the ball in his hands in a real game and magic happens. Mack Brown’s dumbest move was benching Applewhite for Simms & throwing away a chance at a national title in 2001. I hope Leach doesn’t make the same mistake.
by mbrown603 on Oct 11, 2009 10:15 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
D'oh!
you beat me to this analogy.
But there were a lot more things at work than simply “Sims is prototypical”. My bro and sis in law being UT alums, I can tell you there was a HUGE booster angle being played. Sims provided name recognition. If Chrissy Sims daddy hadnt been a Super Bowl winning QB he would have lost his starting job.
It was obvious that Mack Brown let the booster issue continue to influence his decision way after it was obvious that Sims’ ceiling had been reached. I certainly dont think Potts’ ceiling has been reached.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Oct 12, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
GREAT analogy
Applewhite was the Man, thats when I began to Hate UT football because of that move (pretty QB). Only been two games but I can see SS along that same line.
I look at SS’s deep passes and yep, notvthe se pop and you think, that COULD have been intercepted, but for the most part they’re not. They’re right on the money with TOUCH, something TP apparently lacks and it’s not Luke TP WASN’T throwing picks with that 1st round cannon. I guess what I’m sayin is, GH didn’t have an NFL arm(obviously!) but he put the rock where our studs could catch it, and this dude “Gloves,” I love that name, really puts the pig where our thouroughbreds can get YAC. Isn’t that what this scheme is all about? I want TP to be the next Matt Stafford folks, but I’d rather have that perfect Cody Hodges pass over the defender in the back of the endzone to beat Nebraska AT Nebraska! I still remember the crowd shot after that deflating TD. I’ll take Major Applewhite.
The Big Controversy Brewing Now...
… is which nickname to use. I like Sticks myself, but I’m sure you will say that Gloves just fits better(lol). Actually, as long as he keeps playing well, I don’t care what people call him…
Leach said on his show tonight that he feels like Jeffers plays best when he’s mad. Mike said Jeffers needs to be hit in the head with a 2×4 to get him going, but he’s tough to stop once he gets there;)
CAPTAIN STIX
Named captain by team —-per Chris Level
Potts has no touch.
Or none that I’ve seen.
We have a bunch of players on our team accustomed to catching balls thrown with touch. We hand them a Brett Favre type quarterback (in so many ways — he is over-confident in his ability to place the ball into coverage) and wonder why we aren’t getting as much production out of them.
by Skin Patrol on Oct 12, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions
Logical choice against Neb
Sticks is the right choice if you consider the Neb d-line. Hopefully our O-line figured some things out last weekend and will play well against Neb. But it is going to be a big, big challenge.
With Sticks mobility vs Potts, it seems the logical choice. And I agree with NatK that it could be a medical decision. Either way, we’ve seen this year that teams are 1 play away from needing a solid back-up QB (God forbid). So having both ready to step in is probably a good idea.
Makes you wonder if Mizzou had a solid back-up whether they would have had a better outcome against Neb. It was pretty obvious their starter was injured after the 1st qtr…
I too wanted Potts to succeed....
But for what ever reason Potts seems to lose concentration( his own words) and is not consistant or effecient and unfortunately that is what this O is all about. And say what you want but Potts has played against the same competition and yes he did throw 7 td’s against Rice but again was that a complete game? I think not, and I guess if he can find consistancy then he can really go but when will he get there? I do believe we win @ uh with Sticks and I don’t think it is really close. Again in 5 quarters with Sticks we are averaging 75 pts. a game and that ‘s not bad who ever you are playing in DI !!!!!!!!! Wreck’Em Tech Beat Neb.
Now we have hope...
with SS. The kids a leader and has a better delivery than Potts from where I stand. SS has the ability to move and throw an accurate ball. Potts not so much. I like Potts as a person and all but he’s not at all what I expected as the starter QB. Now I feel like Tech is reborn again with some hope of salvaging what could have been a really bad season.
by Raider1992 on Oct 12, 2009 2:57 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
I think it needs to be stated that a vote for Sheffield is not a vote against Potts. If Potts really is the best we have, then he should play. But Sheffield brings something that is beyond mere anecdotal evidence. It’s there on film. His passes are pin point, his deep throws are about as on the money as possible (receiver does not break stride at all), and his movement is what will keep him alive with our not so stellar line play. And the entire team seems to play better. That’s more important than anything: Can the QB elevate the play of those around him.
Maybe it'll be a wakeup call for Potts
Regardless of who gets the call in the following weeks, maybe this will jar Potts out of his ’I’m a silent leader’ role and see what a difference an ‘uptempo’ and ‘motivational’ leader can be. This could be the thing he needs to turn him into that quarterback that we’ve been looking for all year or at least give him a kick in the pants to heading in the right direction. I’m not turning my back on Potts by any means, he’s just missing that little umph that Sheffield is bringing to the team right now. Who knows? Stix may have a horrible game against Nebraska and we’ll be clamoring for Potts again if Stix plays several bad games in a row…

by 











