Post Game Thoughts :: Kansas Jayhawks Edition
SBN Box Score :: TTU Box Score :: Leach Post Game Quotes :: Player Post Game Quotes
The Result :: Decidedly Defensive: This might be something that the entire fanbase might have felt prior to yesterday's game. Everyone was a tad bit jumpy, defensive if you will, regarding the current state of this team. I thought before the game that the defensive MVP would be Ruffn McNeill and that's probably a good place to start. Kansas hasn't been the Kansas of prior years, but they've still be pretty good. The Kansas that Texas Tech beat yesterday was dominated defensively, and you can argue over whether it was Kansas or Texas Tech that did the dominating, but 6 sacks, 8 tackles for a loss, 2 forced fumbles, and 10 pass break-ups isn't a bad afternoon defensively.
Join me after the jump for storylines and MVP's.
The Storylines ::
Leach is Emotional: With Saturday's win over Kansas, Leach tied Spike Dykes for the number of wins at Texas Tech. I never thought I'd see the day where our very Captain Mike Leach showed any emotion at any press gathering, but if you ever thought there was a disconnect between Leach and the man that he replaced then I'd encourage you to watch this video of Leach after this win. Here's the text, but the words on paper don't do Leach's emotion justice:
Well, Spike's, you know, it's funny. I think the young guys don't do maybe as good a job of thanking the older guys as they really ought to. You know, when I was coming up in coaching, Spike's a guy that I always really admired. I think that I learned a lot from Spike like all of us do. Well I just really want to thank him, you know. But, you know, there's no new guys without the old guys. The old guys are what made it happen.
There's not much there with those words, but watching the video along with reading the words, you know that Leach respects Dykes and the things he was able to accomplish at Texas Tech. Leach is a fan of history and his comments lend to the idea that he respects the history of his own company.
Who Is Calling Those Running Plays: An absolutely dominating performance from one RB Baron Batch. I think there's this misconception that the lack of running game is a direct reflection on Leach and his willingness to run versus the quarterbacks checking down into a running play. I think the only thing we do know is that I believe that Leach gives his quarterbacks quite a bit of latitude offensively and if the running game isn't working, it's not always a reflection of Leach not wanting to run the ball. If you look at rushing statistics from 2008, the one constant during the 10 game winning streak was that this team ran for over 100 yards every game. That means two things: the quarterback isn't losing a ton of yards on sacks and the running backs are getting the ball.
If my math is correct, Batch ran 8 times for 7 yards in the first half. Perhaps this is a situation where QB Seth Doege didn't check to the running game in the right situations. Complain all you want about QB Taylor Potts, but there's something to be said for his ability to make the right reads and Batch acknowledged that after the game:
Q. How did it feel to rack up so many touchdowns today on a team that's kind of known for passing?
BARON BATCH: I mean, it's nice, but the touchdowns I score is a reflection of everybody doing what they're supposed to. Receivers blocking down field. Linemen doing a great job blocking the quarterback. You know, Potts did a great job checking into those runs. I don't think many of those, maybe two of the plays that we scored on were called in the huddle. But every other run, pretty much, was checked into. That's a great job by Potts just doing what he's supposed to, and recognizing what they're giving us and being a smart player.
Potts didn't have a great passing game, and we'll get to being a leader later, but I hope like hell you're not one of those people who refuse to give credit to a player for making the right calls and the right reads during a game. I have high hopes for Doege, but to me it was clear that Potts had a better command of the offense on Saturday and I think a big part of that command is repetitions. Doege will have that soon enough, but we might all think about giving Potts some love after previous week criticisms from a fanbase. His recognition of the defense may be the reason Batch rushes for all of those yards and touchdowns.
How to Dominate Defensively: Right now, I'm not sure which defense shows up for each and every game, but if Texas Tech gets the same performance last week, then the game is at the very least quite a bit closer.
Yesterday, the entire unit just looked cohesive, all on the same page. I thought McNeill utilized good stunts, blitzed a few times and was successful, pressured Kansas receivers, etc. Generally speaking, the defensive line was active and it was nice to hear DT Colby Whitlock's name more than once during a game. The hits that KU QB Todd Reesing took were sometimes brutal, especially the hit from DE Daniel Howard that caused the fumble. Rajon Henley stepped up his play. But the true difference maker on Saturday was again DE Brandon Sharpe. More about his play below, but there is a distinct difference when Sharpe plays and opposing offenses have to account for him. Sharpe was ready to move forward after last week:
Q. Did what happened last week have an effect on you guys just from a private standpoint, make you mad? Want to come back out there and show that you were a different team today?
BRANDON SHARPE: Yes, I mean, any time you have a loss you have to just fight back and build yourself back up. You don't just sit there and wander on and pout about it. You just have to beat yourself up, go play hard, and comes in the morning. I just want to thank the D-line and the defense because we all work as a team. We make things happen.
I think the linebackers and secondary need some mention here too. LB Marlon Williams has been relatively quiet for most of conference play. His play early in this game was a big part of this team's success and there was that late hit in the dive for that fumble in the 4th quarter, the 4th down and 1, that caused the ball to squirt down the field. Not a huge play, but Williams was going for the ball all game long. I think you also saw the relative strength of Brian Duncan and his ability to stop the run. Just outstanding from that repsect.
The secondary was huge all game long. There were certainly breakdowns, but the hits that S Cody Davis and S Franklin Mitchem had were big. Those two ran down plays all over the field and it was apparent as Davis had 10 tackles and Mitchem had 8 for the game. And CB Jamar Wall's hit on Kerry Meier Jake Sharp (thanks to kayakyakr) does not require a comment:

Doege vs. Potts: First and foremost, QB Seth Doege was in a tough position. The offensive line was an absolute mess in the first half. The problems he suffered were not always related to his play. Doege certainly wasn't perfect and he missed on more than a few throws, but Doege was under a tremendous amount of pressure for the entire 1st half. Leach isn't throwing anyone under the bus, here's Leach on Doege:
I think that he's -- I think Doege's well ahead of schedule. I think that Doege, you know, the toughest thing is there is this area where experience, you know, meets confidence and all those things. And I think that, you know, the biggest thing is that more reps, you know. I think that you know, practice played real well this week. And I think in the game as it started moving faster, you know, he's a conscientious guy, too. He didn't want to make a mistake. So I think things moved slowly, and our tempo was slower than it should have been.
With that being said, I was shocked to see QB Taylor Potts enter game in the 2nd half. It was painfully obvious that Doege was having a tough go at it, and I think Leach made the right decision. The Texas Tech passing offense only managed 253 yards for the game and Potts averaged a measly 4.9 yards per attempt with 1 interception that he threw behind his receiver. But Potts managed the game and I thought he managed the game well during the second half. Go read the entire post-game quotes from Leach, where he goes on a ramble that will eventually make it's way to some highlight reel, but the point that sometimes gets lost, and I would guess that Leach struggles with this issue as well, is that quarterback is a tough position to master in his offense.
Doege will be fine, but the offense certainly did respond in the 2nd half.
Offensive Line Mess and Eventual Rebound: The offensive line started C Shawn Byrnes, LT Marlon Winn, LG Lonnie Edwards, RG Brandon Carter and RT LaAdrian Waddle. Carter pulls a hamstring on the 2nd play of the game and things get messier. Mickey Okafor took over at right guard and then things started to get messy. It only took Doege getting pounded a couple of times to realize that this wasn't working. Relatively early in the first half, Wynn was moved back to right tackle after getting Doege annihilated and Chris Olson was moved to left tackle and things actually started to settle down. It wasn't until Carter made his way back to right guard that the offensive line truly clicked and the running game picked up. If there's one thing that the offensive line can say is that they persevered. It wasn't always pretty, but at the end of the day, the offense persevered.
The Offensive MVP :: RB Baron Batch: A special and well-deserved MVP for Batch. At the end of the day, Batch finished with 131 yards on 17 carries and 4 touchdowns.
The Defensive MVP :: DE Brandon Sharpe: As mentioned above, the guy is a difference maker and makes things happen defensively.
The Special Teams MVP :: Coverage Units: I think everyone one of these guys that play on this unit deserves some credit. For the day, Kansas averaged 15.2 yars per kickoff return and 0.5 yards per punt return. Not to mention, Texas Tech almost blocked a punt, and looked pretty good doing it. I think we need to see more of this aggressive type of play, but there's no doubt that from a coverage perspective, the special teams were outstanding and really limited the Jayhawks.
0 recs |
65 comments
|
Comments
As I and my brother watched the first half, we both became quite irritated as the Tech offense kept making errors. I was one that wanted Seth Doege to be given the opportunity to show what he could do. As was very obvious, he needs more seasoning before taking the reigns again in the future, but I think he will take a lot of knowledge earned from this game with him and improve on future performances greatly. When Potts came out to start the second half, I knew the offense would become better. However, I think the thing that really turned the tide into Techs direction was the return of an injured but determined Carter. Even though he was obviously in pain, he managed to do what was needed without complaining and help lead the offensive line to recovery of their ability to dominate the line of scrimmage. Without his return, tech may have had difficulty in doing as well as they did in the second half. As Seth said, Potts was great at making the right calls and settled in to a great rhythm in the 4th quarter. The defensive domination throughout kept Tech from falling behind farther than they did as they stepped up, especially in the second half, whenever the offense stumbled. Overall, a great team effort to pull out a hard fought win when everything seemed to be going wrong. With the upcoming bye week, Tech should be well healed and ready to close out a really difficult year, hopefully with four strong wins. Good job, Red Raiders. We fans are very proud of the way you all stepped up and delivered in the crunch this week.
TTpilk
by TTpilk645 on Nov 1, 2009 9:07 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That was the same
Defense I saw in Lincoln…….how does last weeks game happen? The O line is a mess, we really need to fortify there. With quite a few in the NFL , we should be able to recruit depth there. I’m happy for Potts, but can’t wait for Sticks to come back.
by oldschoolraider on Nov 1, 2009 9:07 AM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Also
I want to thank the fans for showing Carter the love when he did leave the game late in the 4th quarter. A fine tribute to a great warrior. And I despised the offhanded remark by the crew that was calling the game when they said Carter was pretty good, but not really a dominant type player. Where in the heck were they that second half? He was awesome and the fans knew that and responded well. Not only his physical attributes were displayed, but his leadership along the line. We really need him healthy the rest of the year.
TTpilk
by TTpilk645 on Nov 1, 2009 9:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
yeah I have no idea what the commentators were talking about with b carter. He certainly is dominating and his performance was the story of the game for them to talk about. However they totally missed it. And at the end of the game when we began to capitalize all they talked about was KU messing up and no credit to us for persevering through all the QB problems and B carter through the hammy and such. The storyline of the game was us making it through all that stuff and finally breaking ahead. It just seemed like they wanted KU to win. Typical though.
by logan5555 on Nov 1, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's Interesting.....
we began to capitalize all they talked about was KU messing up and no credit to us for persevering through all the QB problems and B carter through the hammy and such. The storyline of the game was us making it through all that stuff and finally breaking ahead. It just seemed like they wanted KU to win. Typical though.
The Nebraska game this year, was the same, they lost it we did not beat them.
What is interesting is that most of the comments about Potts on Double T Nation this year are just like this.
VIVA LA FIGA!
by bmaxw on Nov 1, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I have no problems with Potts.
Ge is a very good qb, as long as he isn’t throwing off his back foot. I didn’t see him doing that Saturday, so I will give him his props for a job well done.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Nov 1, 2009 9:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ge=He
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Nov 1, 2009 9:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He did look good sat and didn’t seemed to be rattled at all. The int wasn’t all his fault. The pass was a little high, but it should have been caught or atleast bat the ball down.
by ST04 on Nov 2, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's awesome that Leach has so much respect for Spike.
The poor guy was so fidgety trying to keep from crying. :(
by VirtuaCory on Nov 1, 2009 9:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I know.
That video was awesome. I didn’t think Leach had it in him to ever display emotion. It’s good to see that out of him…it’s refreshing.
by techtom4 on Nov 1, 2009 6:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it is just another chapter in this crazy unpredictable season.
i’m done making predictions. i’m just gonna watch Tech play and hope that the right team shows up for the last 3 games + bowl.
by pcrawttu on Nov 1, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone who thinks Leach doesn't really want to coach at Tech
should probably watch that video.
by mojavereject on Nov 1, 2009 8:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Most (all?) long time Tech fans love Spike...
And that apparently includes coach Leach. I’ve been a fan since the Jerry Moore days. I can tell you Spike elevated the Tech program when he took over from McWilliams. And coach Leach has done the same after taking over from Spike.
There aren’t many that love Texas Tech football more that Spike Dykes. I appreciate coach Leach showing him so much respect.
by imisswesttexas on Nov 2, 2009 9:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, the question asked was in terms of Coach Dykes, but the answer was in terms of young guys giving credit to old guys. Of course that includes Coach Dykes but I bet Coach Leach was thinking also about a number of other coaches who have helped him in his career, Coach Mumme, for example.
He clearly expressed his passion for the game and for the coaching profession.
by TallMike on Nov 1, 2009 10:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Kudos to Potts in managing the offense in the second half...
I love the insight provided by Batch’s comments…
It’s nice to get a glimpse of what’s really going on out there, rather than a bunch of speculation and complaining about who’s not doing what, or whatever….
We have been spoiled at quarterback… We have 3 functional guys who have the potential to light it up, but can also make critical mistakes at any point in a game… I’m sure they all can get better with more experience and reps… We really need the defense to show up like this (and Neb) every game… That’s going to be the difference in how we finish out this season…
Wreck ’Em
by Houston Raider on Nov 1, 2009 9:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It's always good...
to see a player of his character redeem himself. He actually looked more calm than I’ve ever seen him. Great effort by all of our players in this game.
by Raider1992 on Nov 1, 2009 12:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sweet gif
but that was Jake Sharp that Wall knocked into next week, not Kerry Meier
by mojavereject on Nov 1, 2009 9:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Meier fumbled on the next play and I’m staying consistent that it was this hit that caused the fumble on the next play.
by logan5555 on Nov 1, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wall hit Sharp so hard it caused Meier to fumble?
powerful stuff.
by mojavereject on Nov 1, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I think so. When a receiver feels like the secondary is just destroying people and that those guys might be about to demolish him then it can certainly cause dropped passes and fumbles. dwayne slay is the perfect example of this. Also Roy Williams in his hay day at Dallas. I certainly think it played a factor. Meier is very sure handed. Big hit jitters are real.
by logan5555 on Nov 1, 2009 10:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know from experience...
When the defense has a corner that can lay the wood, you don’t want to run a route near him. When you catch the ball, you want to go down to the turf by yourself, not by getting destroyed. Meier was trying to get that knee down and didn’t focus on holding the ball. It’s happened to me and my teammates. Luckily, rugby has alleviated that problem for me. I was thinking, when the D has a bad tackling day, Leach should make them play rugby in the sand pit. I know Leach is already a rugby fan, since he went to Wales over the summer to watch a match. Rugby really increases your toughness mentally and physically.
by techfan5730 on Nov 1, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Scattershooting.....
Take a look at the big 12 north standings, what an absolute mess.
I love all the mentions of last years Tech UT game.
Baron Batch sounds like a guy that could go into the TV or radio profession, how sharp is this kid?
Glad we don’t have to see Birkhead run against us the next two years, he will be a hoss for the Skers.
Why don’t we see more Jeffers and Batch together in the backfield? Better dump and protection opportunities.
by oldschoolraider on Nov 1, 2009 9:49 AM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it's impossible to understate how well the defense played
Limiting Kerry Meier to his lowest catch and yardage total of the year is huge, as anyone who’s watched KU work the last three years knows that Reesing to Meier is basically how they’re going to try to move the chains, 9 times out of 10. It was a combination of very stout play by the DB’s and the great pressure the line was bringing against Reesing, but the overall effect was, for me, delightful. The only legitimately blown coverage I saw against Meier was when J. Howard came in as a nickel back and got caught looking into the backfield. Superb job all around guys, group-hug.
by mojavereject on Nov 1, 2009 10:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Great game
Defense played lights out, it was great to see. Tipped balls, hard hits, few big plays, forcing turnovers. It was great.
I thought Potts did a good job of managing the game in the second half; doing what we needed to do to win, and not trying to do more than that. He was the better guy for that kind of game and consistently made good decisions. I have more confidence in him as a backup as a result of that game… our QB situation is still troubling though. Potts’ hands must taste like candy, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone lick their hands so much.
Most of the credit for our points in the second half has to go to the defense and special teams. Very short fields on two possessions = points. Our RBs are outstanding, nuff said.
by merrik on Nov 1, 2009 11:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This game could have been 42-7.
Doege fumbled twice giving up 14 points. The defense really only gave up 7 points (since they had to go out there on the goal line after Doege’s second fumble). Just throwing it out there.
by techfan5730 on Nov 1, 2009 11:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
nice balance from the offense and some solid play calling yesterday…defense was outstanding…this has to be the strangest season Tech has had in years. I can’t figure this group out. One week they are world beaters the next they are Hofstra. Who knows what we’ll get against OSU in two weeks, but I’m happy there is a bye. Maybe the group will “lay the egg” during the bye week and hold serve in two weeks : )
by Tech92 on Nov 1, 2009 1:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
"There's no new guys without the old guys, the old guys make it happen."
Could this be Mike Leach’s best quote ever?
by RdrPwr on Nov 1, 2009 1:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The quote about.. well we had a bunch of buys who wanted to win the football game, but they didn’t want to play the football game..is still my favorite, currently.
That video was great though, I look forward to hearing more from Leach on what he feels his legacy with Tech is over the next few weeks.
by merrik on Nov 1, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to talk about refs because its often used a cop out but there were some strange calls and no calls yesterday as well as way too many reviews. Did it look that way on tv too? I haven’t had a chance to watch the game on DVR yet.
Cody Davis is a headhunter in the secondary! He’s definitely not looking for picks. Also, does it seem like Jeffers has been used less and less these last few weeks? He probably took some licks for the fumble last week but they have kind of turned him in to a one trick pony with the end around. Maybe its just a case of everyone doing their job and at this point his job is to be a decoy and run a few sweeps. However I think he was in on punt coverage unless I mistaken.
Take care guys.
by Remington870 on Nov 1, 2009 1:47 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Agree about the Refs
Number 74 got away with holding Sharpe all day, Sharpe would have had AT LEAST 10 sacks on the day had he not been wrapped up. But, we won by a comfortable amount so neither side can put it off on the refs, so oh well right?
by RdrPwr on Nov 1, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The number of reviews was terrible. I understand, and support, wanting to get the calls right. But at some point, you have to wonder if the replay official was acting as a sort of auditor for the on-field officials. There were some plays that, while close, were not close enough to require more than one extra look at it; yet the replay dragged on for minutes. The NCAA and/or Big XII needs to address this. I really don’t know exactly what can be done, beyond put a stopwatch on the process and set a time limit. If the replay guy can’t make a ruling in that time frame, the call on the field stands. Seems fairly reasonable…
by Tech92 on Nov 1, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s what the announcers were saying also. Give them 90 seconds and if they can’t tell by then don’t overturn it. It seems to me that it shouldn’t take more than one look at each replay angle. If it has to be indisputable that should mean it is completely obvious it was a blown call at first glance from one slow motion replay. Beyond that, just let the play stand and move on. Than one review that took 2 minutes in the first quarter was a real momentum killer. It turned out alright for us, but you could hear the difference in the crowd once they were finally ready to let them play again.
by jdeeTTU on Nov 1, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was at the game so didn’t see the game day comments [yet]. Did Jeffers even touch the ball until mid-third qtr or later? Was he even on the field? I may have missed him but don’t remember seeing him. And Torrez was pretty much MIA too until the third. That was a great sideline catch he made when he showed up, though. The game was still in doubt at the time and that catch was big. Other than a false start and some drops, Britton didn’t do much all game. Maybe he got some blocks I didn’t see. Who was it that tipped the ball that got intercepted? It was a little high but it hit him in both hands.
What’s the story with Waddle. Looked like he was playing okay, but when Winn went back to RT, Waddle left the game and stayed on the sidelines for almost the whole second half (replaced by Olsen). Is he completely unfamiliar with LT? Or just not as good as Olsen (who has been on the sideline most of the last several games)? In any event, looked like Batch was getting most of his holes on that left side in the 2nd half.
The O-line troubles have hurt us bad all year, but at least several of the new guys are getting plenty of reps to get a head start for next year.
by TechFirst on Nov 1, 2009 3:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Waddle
did not have a good outing. Maybe I just happened to pay attention to him in particular on his mistakes, but he was at fault for a few of the sacks on Doege. He would just watch his guy run past and stand there and watch Seth get hit. At least find someone else to hit! And I believe it was Detron that tipped the pick, it was behind and above him, tough to blame him there. And how in the world does Britton manage to get a false start from the edge called every game? I dont understand….
by RdrPwr on Nov 1, 2009 4:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Waddle
His play might not have been great, but I think he got pulled more as a result of Winn moving back to the right side. Winn was HORRIBLE on the left so Moore had to move him back to the right. I’d guess that Waddle has just enough experience to be servicable at RT, but not an option at LT, hence Olsen filling in on that side. Sucks we burned his redshirt and he isn’t getting much playing time because Winn can’t hold up his end of the bargain on the left side.
I remember the tipped pass being Lewis also… not 100% positive though.
by jdeeTTU on Nov 1, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
currently Waddle doesn't have the footwork to play at LT
just my observation from watching the game
There was one play where he struggled to get out of his stance and get his feet set under him, think it might have been when he gave up a TFL.
by Beergut on Nov 2, 2009 2:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd agree
with that Beergut (as much as it pains me to :) ). I was pointing out that it’s a shame he lost his redshirt to play RT but Winn isn’t playing LT well enough so Olsen got put back on the left, Winn back to the right, and Waddle to the sideline redshirtless.
by jdeeTTU on Nov 2, 2009 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I agree it sucks that you burned his redshirt
we’ve had some issues of our own having to start true freshmen on the OL the last two seasons. We pulled the redshirt on Joe Villvasencio last season just to let him play a few games at guard. We’re redshirting him again this season, though, although he’ll come in at center if something happens to Kevin Matthews.
I’m surprised they didn’t just move Waddle inside to guard; he issues with his weight and his feet won’t hurt you as much there.
by Beergut on Nov 3, 2009 3:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was #8 Jacoby Franks. The throw was a little high but very catchable. These WR are young but they need to learn that if they aren’t going to catch it to knock it down so that the defender doesn’t have a shot at the pick.
by ST04 on Nov 2, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Runners
I think Jeffers and Stephens are seeing what Batch is doing and getting it into their young skulls that to be an effective runner, you must complete each and every play. So many times he has gotten yards after the first tackle attempt. He refuses to go down easily. If the young studs learn anything it is that. Consider also, Kansas was among the national leaders against the run. To tear into one of their team strengths says a lot about how well this team can play when they put their mind to it. Had the defense played as hard all year, Tech could be looking at an undefeated season, even with all of the injuries and problems they have had to endure. I am really pleased by how they played through the tough parts of the game and was still strong at the end, still taking it to the Jayhawks late in the game on all sides of the ball. A much more amazing game than one would think at first glance, but the sum of it all was quite amazing.
TTpilk
by TTpilk645 on Nov 1, 2009 3:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Tech "woke up" this game
They had their epiphany moment with this game. Realizing that it is TEAM and not individuals that matter. This time too the coaches showed why they are worth everything they are payed. Resetting them mentally and focusing them on only what each player can control individually. Simple yet genious. I really beleive they win out.. End up in top 20 or 15 and get to a significant bowl game. And watch out next year!!
by Raiderit on Nov 1, 2009 5:05 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
For the Record
My prediction was right in some ways. At least 3 rushing TDs=check. Reesing doesnt finish the game=check. Kansas scores 21=check. We score 56=fail.
by RdrPwr on Nov 1, 2009 4:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree was the 49er leading receiver today. 6 catches 81 yards, but he also had a fumble.
by pcrawttu on Nov 1, 2009 4:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
must be the system
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
by Seth C on Nov 1, 2009 7:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha! You’ve been waiting to use that since he decided to turn pro, haven’t you!
by pcrawttu on Nov 1, 2009 7:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Media Perception
As much attention and love that Tech received last year, the media is down on Tech this year. The FOX SW Big12 sportscasters have an obvious dislike for Tech this year. They were downing Leach last night for the “Little fat girlfriends” comment and it was taken out of context and offered as a reason why recruits might want to avoid Tech.
I don’t typically say anything about media bias because the media is generally only displaying their ignorance, and that may be only a bigger problem this year. I believe the media types decide before the first game is played who they think is going to be in the Big12 and NC race and they bone up on the frontrunners and it angers them when upsets occur. They want Texas and OU and the OSU and USC to cruise through undefeated and justify the anti-competitive BCS set-up. They want their pre-season pickes to play to form and they do not like unpredictability. It is only going to get worse with ESPN having sold their souls to get the exclusive SEC coverage until the end of time. I’m starting to want the opportunity to push a handful of their BS down thier throats. I hope Tech keeps winning and it continues to piss the media off. Guns iup!
by EPRAIDER82 on Nov 1, 2009 7:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
media
I have to live around austin but media in austin was calling Tech the second best team in the big 12 before the a&m loss. Tech was starting to get positive coverage around the nation entering the top 25. The blowout loss to a&m hurt Tech as far as national coverage goes. I know that every time media gets on the Tech bandwagon they have a bad loss (We all know about the bad loss).
If we did not fall to a&m we would be ranked around #15. The media does not like being wrong on their picks so when everyone picked us to blow out a&m and that did not happen it was bye bye Tech. Tech has to earn the respect by winning the games they are picked and should win. I am as big of a Tech fan as the next guy but we have to earn the respect of the nation. We all saw what happened to Tech after last years win over ut and osu. The media was all over Tech until ou. Tech has to have staying power and be able to win the games we are picked to win just like vs KU. Just a thought I had on Tech and the media.
Go Tech.
by GPD on Nov 1, 2009 8:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
The NFL Network keeps ESPN’s substandard knowledge/understanding and ignorance in check with a legit network devoted to all things NFL. We need a College Football Network with unbiased, open-minded individuals at the helm. People who will root for the Boise States and TCUs and sympathize with, not disown them when they lose. People who will realize that last year’s win over UT wasn’t a fluke (and that Tech dominated 55 minutes of that game). People who appreciate the unpredictable nature of the sport of college football and welcome entropy to spice up the season. People who don’t (blatantly) favor the Floridas, OUs, UTs, USCs, Ohio States, and Alabamas over BCS newcomers and Cinderellas. People who see the flaws in the system and do their best to expose them. So what if the anchors aren’t Brad Nesslers or Kirk Herbstreits in terms of talent. We need a 100% fair and honest network full of fair and honest people. People who realize that there’s this team in Lubbock called Texas Tech, who is really good year in and year out and can duke it out with the best of ‘em in one of the toughest divisions in one of the toughest conferences in the country, despite not having a roster full of blue chip recruits. Here’s to hope for a “College Football Network.”
by techfan5730 on Nov 1, 2009 8:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FOX SW...
are a bunch of amateurs that matter little. ESPN still gives Tech a great deal of attention and it will only get better after Leach visits Bristol this week.
by Raider1992 on Nov 1, 2009 8:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t have a lot of complaints about the media’s perception of Tech. It is what it is…winning consistently cures all that stuff. Bosie, Utah, TCU, Oregon…all these teams who are now considered really good year in and year out had to earn their way into the national spotlight. One 11 win season isn’t enough. Getting our doors blown off at least once every year since 1999 doesn’t help when the media has plenty of other teams who consistently win to discuss. Losing close games, you can get away with. Getting killed at home, not so much. Keep in mind, too, that nation media guys are talking to a national audience, not a Texas audience. We don’t hear a lot about 6-2 Rutgers; 5-2 Arizona; 7-1 Pitt; 6-2 Wisc; etc etc. There are too many really good teams to talk about than the next rung guys.
Now, the garbage that spews forth from Fox Sports SW…meh…I’ve actually only watched those guys two or three times this year. It’s just too painful…bad production, bad graphics, bad analysis.
by Tech92 on Nov 1, 2009 9:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, but being good in a mediocre conference doesn't do it for me.
TCU, Boise and Utah all compete in a conference that could be dominated year in and year out. The Big XII is a lot harder to dominate every year. Just ask Oklahoma and Texas. They dominate for a year then take it on the chin the next. Tech will get there, I have seen more
Tech games since moving to Kansas, than I did the whole time I lived in Lubbock. Which was about 30 years.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Nov 1, 2009 10:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to break from the pack, but I think this pro-Potts speak is simply the product of a post-win high. Batch, Carter, and the D won this one. The kudos go to them.
I was disappointed to see Kansas checkout of the game with roughly 9 minutes to go. It really looked like they just gave up once they got behind.
by Quatroux on Nov 1, 2009 9:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I dont know about them giving up
It seemed to me someone on the sideline got our boys pissed off in that fourth quarter. KU didnt slow down, we stopped them. And I dont think anyone is saying Potts is great or played great for that matter, just that he did what he had to do to win and nothing more. Compared to previous outings he definitely did better though!
by RdrPwr on Nov 1, 2009 10:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree on Potts comment
Quatroux – All due respect, I disagree with the Potts comment. My view is everyone here is happy to see him be able to bounce back and have some level of success.
Was he great? No. But there was an obvious difference in our offense from the first half to the second. I was happy to see Potts get the opportunity to get in the game.
I hope for good things from Doege, but it just didn’t look like he was comfortable all day. Most of that was due to the awful play of the O-line. But there were 2 or 3 times (maybe more) where he seemed to hold the ball entirely too long. At one point his stat line was 10/21 and I commented to my brother I can’t remember the last time we had a QB go 10 for 21. Again, no disrespect to Doege, he didn’t much of a chance back there and he’ll get better.
My main point is I don’t think we win this game if Potts isn’t put in for the second half. No way to know for sure. But the offense seemed to play much differently and he should get some of the credit for that. The running game and o-line should also get some credit as well as the defense for getting us great field position.
by imisswesttexas on Nov 2, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I Understand MVP for Batch, he made the runs.
And the O-line made the blocks, but I would give Taylor Potts at least honorable mention for seeing the calls and for being smart enough to make them.
The int that will be credited to him went through Franks’ hands, it could have been caught even if it was behing him a bit, Potts did not make that bad a through, nor did he make a bad decision. Franks was not able to pull the ball in.
by TallMike on Nov 1, 2009 10:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
post game thoughts
I really liked that we didn’t give up on the run in the second half. We literally kept pounding it out until Batch broke open, and if we do this, Batch will eventually break it open. Kinda like a Emmit Smith style.
Much better D play, kudos to Brandon Sharpe! He came in as a juco and we didn’t hear much from him, but he steps up makes it happen.
Good to hear from Rajon Henly. If both he and Sharpe can keep a high motor, watch out.
At the start of the game the announcers stated that Whitlock would be moved around because he was drawing so many double teams. Great idea! Keep it up. This was a good adjustment by Ruffian.
Our special teams coach gets 5 years to put his group together, but it won’t take that long to make an impact. So far this year hasn’t been too stellar, but things will change, I can feel the attitude adjustment from Austiin.
by CoachT on Nov 2, 2009 2:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Glad the offense got it together
Because the way it was looking at the end of the 3rd quarter, I was thinking that the Baylor game might be our only chance to avoid a losing season and become bowl-eligible. Maybe with SS back, we can hope for 9-3. Neither OU nor OSU looked all that hot yesterday.
Looks like atm could end up 7-5. We’d have to beat BU and one of the OK schools in order to beat that. Don’t know if I could bear the shame of ending up tied with them.
by TechFirst on Nov 2, 2009 10:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















