Post Game Thoughts :: Stanford Cardinal 87, Texas Tech Red Raiders 100
SB Nation Box Score
The Result :: A Good Rebound Win: The game was tight through much of the first half, with the Texas Tech Red Raiders taking a four point lead into halftime against the Stanford Cardinal. After halftime, the team truly responded and the game seemed in-hand for most of the second half. Part of the reason the game was in hand was that the Red Raiders shot an astounding eFG% of 60.9% (this is really off the charts) and held Stanford to 45.3% (again, pretty good defense). All in all, it's nice to see how the Red Raiders have been able to put away three Pac-10 teams in non-conference play and as this team continues to build a resume, next Tuesday is perhaps this team's biggest challenge to this very young season: New Mexico Lobos.
The Storylines ::
Well Played: There are so many statistics that you could point to which would lead you to the conclusion that the Red Raiders, despite giving up 87 points, played an excellent game on both ends of the floor. Here's the evidence: The Red Raiders made 58.3% of their three-point shots, out-rebounded the Cardinal by five (40 to 35), had only 10 turnovers with 18 assists, and shot 48 free throws for the game. Typically, if you have one of those things happen, the team ends up winning, but in this case, the Red Raiders were playing really well for a good part of the game.
More storylines after the jump.
Falling in Love With the Three: I really want SF Brad Reese to be a big part of this team, but I also want him to ease up a bit on the three-point shot. Last night Reese was 2 of 5 from beyond the arc and right now, Reese is only 10 of 31 for the year. Reese has a lot to offer this team, and it seems as if he wants to be a three-point shooter first and a mid-range guy second. Personally, I think Reese will have cleaner looks in and around the basket if he works on his mid-range game and then the defense will be a bit on their heels and the three-point shot should open up a bit.
Tairu is Incredibly Efficient: I keep talking about it thinking that I'm going to jinx Tairu, but I don't know that I've seen a more efficient scorer than G David Tairu. Last night, Tairu took only 7 shots, made 4, made 9 of 10 free throws and finished with 17 points. With G Nick Okorie injuring his shoulder last night, Tairu should get even more time and personally I think this is a good thing. It will be interesting to see whether or not Tairu starts next Tuesday and if he does, I think it could really work in Texas Tech's favor.
Four Factors, Player Impact and Game Flow: I love these graphs from StatSheet and I hope you do too:
Four Factors:
Player Impact:
Game Flow:
The Offensive MVP :: SF Mike Singletary: Singletary returned to form with an excellent rebound game. Singletary shot incredibly well (9-12) and finished with 28 points, 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal and ZERO turnovers. There were a number of times when Singletary was bringing up the ball on a fast break and I was nervous about a potential turnover, but perhaps it's just a matter of Singletary focusing a bit more.
The Defensive MVP :: Perimeter Players: It would be really tough to just single out just one player, but I thought the perimeter players, which would include Roberson, Okorie (until he was injured), Tairu, Reese, and Jenkins all did an excellent job of switching on the outside. The Cardinal still shot 38.9 above their season average on three-point shots, but it just seemed that the length of the team was a problem for Stanford.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
nice win
Much like Seth, I didn’t get to watch the first half until i found a website streaming the video. I like the way the team came out strong after the half, but I find it disturbing that after we built a nice lead, the defense pretty much went on christmas break – and there was still 10 minutes to go. Way too many easy baskets for Stanford. We may have held them to 45% shooting, but that number was boosted by a lot of easy baskets in the second half. I really like the play of Tairu and think he is going to be a great asset if Okorie is out for any period of time. In addition to Singletary and Roberts having a good game, they seemed to play pretty smart while being in foul trouble most of the second half.
It was a good win considering Tech was able to finish with 100 pts. It shows this team can play offense when it needs to. I’m still a little dissapointed with Tech’s defense though. They really can’t be giving up 70-80pts a game (like they have done the past 4 games). They should have held Stanford in the upper 60’s in terms of points.
idk…it was a nice win and all, but Tech really needs to play spectacular D against New Mexico in The Pit (who holds the nation’s longest winning streak). Tech needs to break that streak to gain the confidence they need to perform well in the Big 12.
Next game is make or break time. Either Tech gains two wins against ranked opponents in non-conference play, or they leave it just a mere one win against Washington in overtime.
Singletary said it best early in the season. “We’re hungry”
I guess we’ll see how hungry they really are, because looking at New Mexico’s record it seems like that team is more than hungry, but rather blood-thirsty.
New Mexico Lobo Recruiting
Here is a thought for you.
I have often read in recruiting discussions that TTU has some kind of disadvantage recruiting because Lubbock is located where it is.
How does that reconcil with NM Lobos’ ranking and their talent and location ? They are ranked about 12 or 13 currently.
Good coaching
As a mid-major it is probably even tougher for them to recruit than texas tech. They get to fight off arizona, arizona state, and utah (and occassionaly tech – i.e. ronald ross) for their players. But Steve Alford is a good coach (learned from a great coach) and has the ability to attract quality players. They should have recruiting in the state sewn up, take Alex Kirk for example. 7’-0", 4-star high school player who wants to stay in state. They are not going to field an all star team like kansas or unc or duke that can recruit from a basketball hot beds, but they will get good, solid players and make the most out what they have (kind of like our football team, right?). And kind of like our “ranked” team, who have has new mexico REALLY played to deserve the no. 13 spot? A couple of mid majors, smacked a&m around (always fun to see), and a pac-10 team (who hasn’t this year)… and they lost to Oral Roberts on the road last night – so there are chinks in the armor. Not to take anything away from either team, the lobos should be a tournament team this year if the first half of the season is any indication and they will definitely be tough at home in the pit (let’s hope everyone drinks too much nog and stays home). But tech obviously has the tougher schedule to finish out the year – I don’t see many top 10 teams remaining on their schedule.
Just a reminder to everyone:
Tech and New Mexico are very old rivals, having been adversaries during the old Border Conference years. As a result, Tech and New Mexico have continued the rivalry off and on for years in football and basketball. That is why there always seems to be more electricity in the air than against , oh say, Iowa State. No matter the record of each team, expect a battle, with very few lopsided games from either. Maintaining this type of competition is healthy for both organizations, as is the similar type competition other schools and conferences may have. We have like situations when Tech plays against Rice, TCU, SMU or Houston. It is fun and adds to the level of interest for the teams and for the fans. This should be another close game, with UNM having the upper edge at home in the Pit. But, I like the competitiveness of this year’s version of the Red Raiders and anticipate a surprise win, maybe in OT. GO TECH!
TTpilk

by 



















