Red vs. Black, Spring Position Battles: Linebacker

A position-by-position look at the Texas Tech Red Raiders heading into spring practice. "Classifications" are based on entering school next fall. "Probable Roles" are merely guesses and welcome comments, thoughts and suggestions.
LINEBACKER
Middle |
Brian Duncan |
Sam Fehoko |
Victor Hunter |
| Height: | 6-1 | 5-11 | 5-11 |
| Weight: | 238 | 236 | 256 |
| Classification: | Junior | Sophomore | Senior |
| Probable Role: | Starter | Second String | Run Defense Specialist |
Ruffin McNeill has said that he's going to give Sam Fehoko a ton of time this spring to figure out if he's going to be a major player in 2009. Personally, I love Brian Duncan and I think he has a world of potential, especially considering what he did as a sophomore (he did redshirt in 2006) is pretty impressive. I'm a big fan of competition, and when you watched video of Sam Fehoko in high school (which I cannot seem to locate) he was a play-making defensive end that didn't have any responsibility other than to rush up the field. He had ability, and he made plays, but Fehoko's problem was technique and that seems to be his biggest stumbling block thus far. With that being said, this may be where the coaching staff is with the Duncan/Fehoko conundrum. Duncan is technically a very sound player, but he doesn't make a ton of plays, but he's incredibly solid. Fehoko makes plays, but isn't technically sound, or at least not yet.
Victor Hunter is only a run-stopping specialist and goal line player. He's too big and too slow to do much else, which creates liability questions in pass defense. He's very good at what he does, but this is all he is.
Strong |
Bront Bird |
Tyrone Sonier |
Chris Wallace |
| Height: | 6-3 | 6-2 | 5-11 |
| Weight: | 226 | 215 | 208 |
| Classification: | Junior | Sophomore | Senior |
| Probable Role: | Starter | Second String | Third String |
I think there are a lot of people that are very high on Bront Bird, but I'm a little cautious. I think he's talented and I think he's the unquestioned starter, but I'm not sure that he's an absolute lock. McNeill mentioned on Tech Talk that Sonier has added 20 pounds, so go ahead and push him up to 235 or so, and from I recall about Sonier, he was also in the mold of a pass-rushing defensive end that made plays, and with the addition of some strength, I think Sonier pushes Bird for playing time next year. Bird's biggest attribute is that he's a big guy that can play the run, but as teams in the Big 12 move towards spread offenses, I think it serves McNeill better if he has options rather than see Bird, who I believe was pushed out at times with a safety or covering a slot receiver. I don't know much about Wallace, other than he had a good spring last year and will probably be just a backup and an emergency plan.
Weak |
Marlon Williams |
Blake Collier |
Julius Howard |
| Height: | 6-0 | 6-2 | 6-1 |
| Weight: | 224 | 211 | 210 |
| Classification: | Senior | Junior | Junior |
| Probable Role: | Starter | Second String | Third String |
Much like the other two positions, I see Williams being a guy that can be pushed. He too was oftentimes covering the opposing team's slot receiver and that was not a matchup that I thought favored Texas Tech. With Collier taking off of all year with the redshirt, I'm hoping that he can play that hybrid safety/linebacker position and be a better option. I know the staff likes Williams and I do too, but the point of all of this is to push a guy that was an incumbent last year. Collier has superior speed and was at safety before being moved to linebacker last year and I'm a huge fan of putting speed out on the field, again as a result of teams going 3 and 4 wide. Howard has all of the athletic ability in the world, but this hasn't translated to significant playing time. Look for Howard to back up most, if not all positions if there's a significant injury. I sort of see him as being a versatile player that could be moved around if needed.
Feshmen |
Dion Chidozie (W) |
Brandon Mahoney (S) |
James Scott (M) |
| Height: | 6-1 | 6-2 | 6-3 |
| Weight: | 190 | 210 | 220 |
| Classification: | Freshman | Freshman | Freshman |
| Probable Role: | Redshirt | Possible Redshirt | Needs to Qualify |
I believe that there's a good chance that Scott doesn't qualify (I don't know this other than what I've heard) and Mahoney still has some work to do. Scott is an incredibly talented athlete and if he could ever get qualified, or spend a year or two at a JUCO, that could serve him well. Mahoney is one of the players that was originally committed to Oklahoma and I think he's much closer to qualifying than Scott, he still has some work to do, but it's not as much of a stretch. Chidozie is the wildcard and he's got great speed, but needs to put on weight to play at this level. I love his athleticism and McNeill mentioned on Tech Talk that he wants athletes and then he can coach them up. Chidozie fits that mold.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Competition is the key this spring and although there are three starters returning, the key will be how much, if at all, the second string guys can push the starters.
Thanks to kayakyar for helping out.
Previous Battles:
Quarterback :: Running Back :: Receivers :: Offensive Line :: Defensive Line ::
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Bird
If memory serves, he is a converted Safety. I think he spent a lot of time learning how to play LB last year, and consequently either ran himself out of plays or was too slow to make the requisite reads. In games that he was able to focus on fewer things, he excelled (your job today is cover Pettigrew). I think he gets the start, though Sonier may see significant snaps, especially situationally.
ESPN's Grifffin writes
that he does not expect Tech to have but 7 or 8 wins this year and finish 4th in the South behind OU, UT, & OSU. What does everyone else think? Does Tech post his statement in the locker room as just one of the incentives to do better this year? He just is not sold on this program yet. Time to turn some heads, Raiders, and win the South.
TTpilk
I think fourth is a fair prediction as of now. We lost a lot more than those other three teams did. That doesn’t mean we can’t overcome it, but it will be a tough November to weather.
I think we get 9 wins, though, including the bowl game. I worry most about NU and OSU. UT and OU are crap shoots with this team. Either we eke one out or get destroyed…no in between, historically.
9 regulars season wins + bowl for a 10 win season
History tells us that we are going to put up enough points – even with a new QB. The question, in my mind, is can we do as well on defense as last year and drastically improve on special teams. in addition, I think Leach has “cracked the code” on how to keep the team focused – winning the games we are supposed to win. I really feel winning 10 games is possible.
play to our strengths
It’s been a while since I posted, but I wanted to comment on the LBs. I still look forward to Sam Fehoko getting on the field more. He’s just too talented not to get out there. But where? Brian Duncan is so solid at MLB that I don’t think Fehoko has a chance to unseat him. Watching Fehoko this year, he looked a little overwhelmed at times. I wonder if the MLB position is too complicated for a DE who transitioned to MLB and is having to learn the entire defense? I also know Ruffin tore in to Fehoko for screwing up plays, so Sam may be having mental errors. But we have to get him out there. I think he could transition to the SLB, leaving Duncan in the middle. This would cut down on the play calling mistakes and give Fehoko focus. Bird got pushed around alot last year and I think Fehoko would be better stopping the run. I think Ruffin needs to stop sliding the LBs and just make personnel changes for the down and distance at hand. I’m not a big fan of Marlon Williams. He just got blown out way too many times, and when he was in the middle, we got run on badly. I’d love to see Collier take over this position with his speed.
Duncan, Whitlock, and Dixon need to be on the field at the same time and all the time. Duncan needs to stay in the middle, no sliding LBs. My front 7 would be Dixon, Perry, Whitlock, Sesay, Fehoko, Duncan, and Sonnier.
I agree with you, RR77
I think the new benchmark for wins at Tech has gone from 8 to then 9 and now 10. I actually believe anything less than 10 wins next year (including a bowl win) would be disappointing. I think we probably lose to UT, OSU, and either NU or OU, one or the other. The UH game scares me, but it should be a win. Their offense is so ridiculous, but then again they do play in C-USA so that may have something to do with it. K-state and KU should be easy wins and Baylor could be tough with RG3 at the helm, he is a stud.

by 




















