Red vs. Black, Spring Position Battles: Receiver

A position-by-position look at the Texas Tech Red Raiders heading into spring practice. "Classifications" are based on entering school next fall. "Probable Roles" are merely guesses and welcome comments, thoughts and suggestions.
RECEIVER
X |
Edward
|
Rashad
|
Aaron
|
Derrick
|
| Height: | 6-1 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 6-1 |
| Weight: | 174 | 183 | 175 | 170 |
| Classification: | Senior | Sophomore | Freshman | Freshman |
| Probable Role: | Starter | Second String | Probable Redshirt | Definite Redshirt |
I'm a little curious as to exactly how this is going to work, on all four positions. In any event, I think this is Britton's spot without a doubt. Britton does a great job of stretching the field and there were games where he simply disappeared and he cannot afford to do that without a Michael Crabtree complimenting him on the other side. I would really like to see him work on his mid-range game.
I love Hawk's natural ability and this is the perfect position for him, especially with his height and general athletic ability. Hawk needs to make a name for himself this year, he needs to assert himself.
Maybe it's just me, but I see Fisher as being a guy that has the game of an inside receiver, but the body of an outside receiver. I know that I have him outside for now, but I could envision where he moves inside at some point in his career and Ward moves outside (more on him later). I know that suggesting Fisher goes inside and Ward moves outside goes against conventional thinking, thus far, but Leach & Co. generally put the guys on the field where they feel like will perform best and I just see Fisher being a great inside receiver target.
Mays is a burner in the mold of Edward Britton. I have no doubt that Mays will sit this year out, but he has the potential to step into this role in due time.
H |
Eric
|
Cornelius
|
Adam
|
Adrian
|
| Height: | 5-11 | 5-9 | 6-3 | 6-7 |
| Weight: | 190 | 190 | 217 | 207 |
| Classification: | Freshman | RS Freshman | Sophomore | Senior |
| Probable Role: | Battling to Start | Battling to Start | First Tight End | Second Tight End |
Part of me thinks that there's no way that Ward starts, especially as a true freshman, but Ward is talented enough to do so. So, right now, I have Ward as a slot receiver, but traditionally, Texas Tech's most talented receiver plays the "X" position, and I think that Ward grows into that role in due time. When we learned that Crabtree was a little over 6-0, I started thinking that Ward's dimensions are similar and although I can't verify that Ward's 40-time is actually 4.4, that is a bit better than Crabtree's listed 40-time of 4.5. We're all expecting that Ward stays inside, but is it possible that to truly utilize his speed, he needs to be on the outside? In any event, Ward is an incredible talent and it would not surprise me to see him on the field immediately.
Douglas is an interesting guy. He played quarterback, cornerback and returned punts for his high school squad. No one really knows that Douglas can do, other than those who have watched Thursday night practices. The biggest question mark is if Douglas is ready to produce as a starter after only one year at the position (sound familiar?). If there is one thing that we know, it's that he's a football player, and he makes plays. Guys like that get on the field.
I've lumped James and Reese here together. Initially I had James starting and was talked out of it, although I think that part of Leach would like to see what happens if he had a blocking tight end starting at the slot receiver. Would this open up some running lanes, create some mis-matches on the field with James probably going up against a smaller defensive back? I may be alone on this, but I think it's a possibility. It's been a long time since Reese caught a pass and I wonder if he's physically big enough to play the tight end position. Hopefully, he's gained some weight, and if he's at all competent catching the ball, he could be a tremendous red-zone target.
Y |
Detron
|
Jacoby
|
Austin
|
Landon
|
| Height: | 6-0 | 6-1 | 6-1 | 6-1 |
| Weight: | 209 | 194 | 181 | 200 |
| Classification: | Junior | Sophomore | RS Freshman | Senior |
| Probable Role: | Starter | Battling for Second String | Battling for Second String | Fourth String |
This is another position, where I think I'm going against conventional wisdom after Lewis. There's no doubt that Lewis starts and he's projected to be the star of the receiving corp. He has the most returning catches and yards of the returning receivers, but only managed 3 touchdowns this past year. Lewis has to focus on figuring out how to get in the endzone because 3 touchdowns just isn't going to do the trick. There's no reason why Lewis can't improve those numbers and a big reason why they were so low was because Crabtree was simply gifted at getting in the endzone.
I think most folks have Franks as an outside guy, but he's got similar size to Lewis, and is actually a bit faster than Lewis. I could see Franks moving inside just to take advantage of a relative lack of experienced depth at both inside receiver spots, especially if it takes Ward a little longer to adjust to the college game. Franks is someone to watch this spring, without a doubt.
Zouzalik is another former quarterback turned slot receiver. Supposedly, Zouzalik may be the fastest guy on the team (electronically timed at 4.38) and if Leach was looking to really run the wildcat formation with a legitimate passing threat (2,908 yards passing his senior year) and running threat (971 yards rushing his senior year), then Zouzalik is your guy. Much like Douglas, Zouzalik is a playmaker and it would not surprise me to see him on the field in some capacity this year, whether it be in punt or kickoff coverage, returning punts or kickoffs, or catching passes.
Honestly, I don't know much about Hoefer and if he played it would be generally in mop-up duty.
Z |
Lyle
|
Tramain
|
Rashad
|
Eric
|
| Height: | 6-1 | 6-3 | 6-4 | 5-11 |
| Weight: | 165 | 175 | 183 | 190 |
| Classification: | Junior | Sophomore | Sophomore | Freshman |
| Probable Role: | Probable Starter | Battling for Second String | Battling for Second String | A Possibility |
Keep in mind that Leong and Potts were high school teammates and Leong's best attribute is that he catches everything, a trait that I'm sure Potts and every other quarterback is well aware. Also a tremendous high-jumper, Leong has the ability to go get passes and this is another attribute that will come in handy for a first-year quarterback. Leong doesn't have break-away speed and I believe that there was a time during 2008 that Leach pushed him back to the scout team, so putting Leong first isn't an absolute, although he may have the most talent of the candidates.
Swindall is similar to Leong in that he doesn't have the speed of Crabtree, but at 6-3, he should be a guy that excels at the outside receiver position. Coming out of high school, Swindall needed to add quite a bit of weight, but he's a guy that should excel out the outside simply because he should normally have a distinct size advantage over his opponent.
I've got Hawk backing up on both outside positions and think that the staff will decide on one position or another, but for now, I could see where he might play both at first.
This is a contingency plan, although I realize that there's quite a few players who are capable of playing outside and putting Ward here may be a bit redundant. My general thought is that if Ward is your best playmaker, and by all accounts, he is the highest rated player at receiver, and the X receiver is traditionally your best playmaker, then perhaps this is the position that he should play.
FINAL THOUGHTS
There's probably quite a few arguments about where a player should be slotted and we'll more than likely have quite a few answers after spring practice is completed. There's a ton of athleticism at the receiver position, perhaps more than any other time that I can remember at Texas Tech.
Thanks to kayakyakr for helping out.
Previous Battles: Quarterback :: Running Back ::
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good writeup, Seth.
If Ward is as good as advertised, he will play, possibly start after a few games. Finding his niche will be the challenge for the coaching staff. Britton and Lewis should be the leaders because of their experience and abilities. Leong needs to be used a lot more. He is just an awsome receiver that will move the football down the field as much as anyone. I would like to see James emerge as a force in the “H” position. He has great size, is strong, blocks very well and is faster than one might think. That elusive speed could mean a lot at times during a game where tough yards are needed. I like this core of receivers and feel that there will not be one major standout. I feel there will be at least three of the receivers with about 90 catches each and gaining close to 1,000 yards each. If the RBs can add a 1,000 yards total, the field will be really spread out and defenses are going to have difficulty stopping this team, especially if the RBs can gain about 1,800 total yards running as well. This quality is exactly what will make this the best “Spread” offense in the nation this year, as well as the best in Leach’s time at Tech.
TTpilk
I'm real interested to see what Leach
does in terms of variations of the offense this year. He has some options in the Wildcat formation (but I would take Potts out, opposed to last year when Harrell would stay in shotgun) with Zouzalik and Douglas, as well as the possibility of doing some different things with James. I would like to see some innovation from Leach.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Fixed a little X/Z problem.
I still think that Leong and Britton should be used in the same slot based on field position. It was amazing how much more effective Leong was in the red zone than Britton and vice versa.
I’d like to see Swindall in the outside positions. He’d be the guy that I’d pick as a sleeper on this team and he can play the on the inside or the outside. He’ll see the field a lot in some capacity.
And just because Adam James is slotted as #3 in the H doesn’t mean that he won’t be on the field a lot. In fact, I’d create a second slot for him and put him on the field almost as much as the #1 H receiver.
I know everyone has Swindall slotted below Leong, but
I really like Swindall as a “possession” reciever. I think he really has the ability to make the catch when it counts. One play comes to mind; OSU, 3rd or 4th and mid-long. He had room to make a few yards if he’d caught it in-stride, but it was a really important possession and he caught that dang ball and went to the ground with it in a death grip, while falling to make sure we kept possession. That said alot about him to me, though I do understand Leongs up side in re physical ability and great hands. I’d just love to find somewhere on the field for Swindall.
Every time Swindall touches the ball...
I think he is going to turn it over. I just don’t get warm fuzzies over his ball security and nearly coughed it up 3 times for no reason in the UMass game. I get that he is young and very talented, its just that he seems to have the worst handle on the ball on the team.
by oldschoolraider on Mar 4, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks
And yes, although James is #3 on the depth chart, I think he has the potential to catch 30-40 passes next year. Good be really good in the redzone.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
James
I would like to see Tech bring back some of the TE sets they had with Bristol Olomua, or maybe play him like Mizzou did with Chase Coffman.
Seth said,“I love Hawk’s natural ability and this is the perfect position for him, especially with his height and general athletic ability. Hawk needs to make a name for himself this year, he needs to assert himself.”
PJeff says, “Hawks height and weight have my ‘sports pants’ going crazy.” Is there ANY WAY he has the potential to be a Breaston/Edwards/Ginn type guy? You know, those guys who have 5’ long legs who look like gazelles, who only the Michigans and Ohio States of the world are fortunate enough to have?
Seth and Kyakyakr, I really appreciate this write-up. It looks like we are so “loaded” at the thoroughbred position, and we have some good quarter houses for the short track races. I hope we can become the “Reciever U” of the world, where our alumni show the league that our guys get the best instruction on crisp routes and catch the ball with their hands. Thus cutting the learning curve to the pros and giving scouts a feeling that a Tech reciever has a leg-up on a guy with equal measurables.
Sports Panties
agrees with your assessment. The 2007 class, in terms of receivers was an amazing class, and that even considering that Amie didn’t qualify. It could have been outstanding. But with a class of Franks, Swindall, Hawk, Lewis, and Leong, that’s pretty amazing.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
What I like about this particluar group of WRs is that there is not one single, clear-cut guy that has to be accounted for yet. The “spread the ball around” philosophy will really be on display next year. With the experience gained this year and the awesome mix of classes (sr through frosh) it sets up nicely for a great run of consistency across the board for a few years.
The only thing that slighly concerns me is this group is relatively light. Only a few guys who will see playing time top 200lbs and two of them are TEs. Not a huge concern, though.
Last year I looked at
the distribution of passes amongst the top receivers with the available stats and it appears that Leach tended to rely on his top 4, for the most part. There is not one guy that you can say is going to light the world on fire, but each one is pretty talented.
We need some bigger receivers in this year’s class, and had Texas Tech signed Blake, that would have taken care of the need for at least 1 bigger receiver.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Not since 2005...
Face it. We have been spoiled for the last three years in terms of QB and WR. Now we have the dual issue of breaking in a new starting QB and for the first time since, I don’t know when, we do not have have a Wes Welker / Amandola / Crabtree on the roster who can be depended on to keep drives alive. Leong has good hands, but has failed to rise to the top. Detron Lewis is our closest thing to a sure thing, but he disappeared at times.
Don’t get me wrong – I have high hopes that someone or multiple someones are going to step up to that next level and be the next star(s). I just want to inject a little reality into the discussion and say that it has been awhile since we have been in this position. Things could go very well or very bad. Eric Ward, come on down!
Out of that group, I am confident at least two guys will develop into stellar WRs. I’d LOVE to see our TE involved a whole lot more if possible. That would really add a tough-to-defend dimension. I’m sure the coaches are aware of that, though :)
And I think there
was talk during Cotton Bowl practices of moving Omar Castillo to tight end. I’m interested.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Yes, it would be
tough for any one player to duplicate what Crabtree did, but perhaps that’s a saving grace as opponents won’t be able to focus on just one guy, they’ll be forced to defend the entire field.
Each one of these guys disappeared to an extent, but that may be a testament to the overall depth. 9 players caught 15 or more passes. That’s ridiculous.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
We always find someone. Could James be next year’s Eric Morris (the guy that shows up and makes that important, drive moving catch)? Swindall?
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the offense is more consistent next year than it was this year. Nothing like the Nevada game where the group struggles all game. Maybe not the match BJ Symmon’s squad, but enough to get the job done.
I could see this group getting production like the Symmons group. We have all the pieces they just need to mesh. Well all the pieces except another Welker, maybe the biology dept could get to work cloning him. This group of receivers almost mirror glover, welker, peters, and francis. We also have a better running game and o-line than that team.
suprise!
With all these "great"players that are there,I would think that it is going to be hard for other teams to defend.They(other teams) will not know who Potts will be going to.Mixing it up even more confuses them.I look for James and Swindall to have a productive year.Ward will explode and keep heads shaking.
In other words -rotation nation! I am so high on Potts it is not even funny.I look for more chemistry between Potts and numorus players.I hope it works like a well oiled machine…..Britton, Hawk..You look at these players and can’t help get excited…..Come on guys make this work…..even moreso than last year….And that will suprise many!
My hot sports opinion.....
Is that our overall receiving group is going to be better than last year, and I don’t have a crack pipe in my hand. I love Crabs and his talent, but Leach’s offense is all about distribution and it may have been since Filani, Hicks and Olamua (SP?) that we have had this broad ability in all positions. For two years, my blood pressure would rise if Crabs didn’t get a grab in the first possession….I think you could see 5 different receivers be the leading receiver for a game this season. They are all very talented, knowledgable of Leach’s offense and all have pretty good size and speed. I think that they are all very good blockers as well (good size and strength).
Add the way that I love Batch and Crawford run the screen, and I have big hopes for passing yards for Mr Potts. Batch just runs balls out (Marion Barber style) and Crawford seems to have some inner sense of waiting for his blocks on a screen. This wil be a huge weapon for us this year.
+1 oldschool
Yeah I also wanted to mention Batch.I hope he evn gets stronger in conditioning over the next few months

by 




















