Double-T Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

5 Things // Defensive Players Who Must Improve in 2009

Five Things is a handful (i.e., five) of thoughts about a single topic. Hopefully, discussion ensues.

Defensive Players Who Must Improve in 2009

There are a ton of factors that go into a team improving, but I thought that it might be good to take a look at both offensive and defensive players who need to improve their game for Texas Tech to have a successful 2009. This is going to sound more critical than it actually is, but the truth of the matter is that the Red Raiders need these players to step up their games.

Join me after the jump for a look at the defensive players who must improve in 2009.

Star-divide

1: DE/DT, Rajon Henley

Henley was injured for a good chunk of the 2008 season, and as a result, his 2008 season statistics seem very pedestrian. Only 10 tackles, 1.5 sacks and TFL, and this is your starting left defensive end. With Brandon Williams going to the NFL, McKinner Dixon declaring for the NFL Supplemental Draft, the current grade questions surrounding Brandon Sesay and Jake Ratliff graduating, there's a fairly substantial loss (or potential loss) in the ranks of defensive ends. It's strange to me (and I fall into this category) that Texas Tech fans are depending so much on a guy who, admittedly injured, only managed 10 tackles for the entire year.

What Henley does have going for him is a track record prior to 2008. As a junior in 2007, Henley had 45 tackles, 4.5 sacks and 7.5 TFL. That's what Henley is capable of as a full-time starter, and if Texas Tech can get similar production from Henely in 2009, then I think the Red Raiders will be okay at the end position.

2: DT, Chris Perry

For my own safety, I probably shouldn't pick on two defensive linemen, but I had great expectations for Perry, who found his way to Lubbock a little differently. Perry, originally signed with the Miami Hurricanes, decided to transfer to be closer to home and was given a reprieve from the NCAA and was not required to sit out a year due to normal transfer rules. Perry did play last year, relatively speaking. In 2008, Perry registered 7 tackles, 1 TFL and 1 sack. Of course Perry only saw action in 7 games.

Perry is certainly talented, and in fact, he was a Rivals 3 star and Scout 4 star recruit coming out of high school. The talent is there, but the word is that when Perry arrived at Texas Tech he was not quite physically ready for Big 12 play. I'm incredibly hopeful that Perry and strength and conditioning coach Bennie Wylie got to know each other intimately during the 2008 season and during the summer of 2009 and he's ready to burst onto the scene.

3: CB, Brent Nickerson

Nickerson is one of those incredibly frustrating players to watch. I know he has the athletic ability to play cornerback, but there were too many times last year where I felt like he got behind a receiver. I can't say that I'm privy to everything that's going on in Ruffin McNeill's defense meetings, but I have to believe that one of his tenants is not to get beat deep. Granted, part of the problem may be the safety not getting beat deep either, but Nickerson has his responsibility as well.

There may have been a couple of things that were working against Nickerson, the first being that he wasn't the full-time starter at the right corner spot, which initially went to L.A. Reed. Reed was injured, and then somewat back, but never made the impact considering his potential. The big statistic for me is the passes broken up, which was only 2 for the year, for Nickerson. For comparison purposes, Jamar Wall had 11 and Darcel McBath had 7. The numbers play this out, but there just weren't enough times that Nickerson was busting up a play, and that's a big part of playing cornerback.

Right now, Nickerson, along with Taylor Charbonnet and LaRon Moore, are battling for that right cornerback job. There are pluses and minuses with all three of these guys, and then you have the six freshmen defensive backs arriving in Lubbock looking to take someone's job.

4: LB, Bront Bird

I have a feeling that I may catch some flack for this pick, in part because it's tough to look at Bird's numbers from last year and complain very much. Bird was 4th on the team in tackles and 4th on the team in tackles for a loss. The biggest problem I have with Bird is that there were games where he would absolutely disappear (1 tackle vs. TAMU; 0 tackles vs. Texas; 2 tackles vs. Baylor). Granted, much of this can be attributed to match-up problems, i.e., Bird may not be quick enough to cover certain opponents due to match-up, and that's at the heart of the problem for me. Bird, while wonderful at certain things, has almost gotten to the point due to the increase in size where he's not able to be as versatile as I had hoped, especially because he was a safety coming out of high school. This may be a pipe dream, but the one thing that I'd love to see change on this defense is more speed at the linebacker position. I have a feeling that McNeill is headed that way and as mentioned above, it's hard to complain with the production of the three starters, Brian Duncan, Marlon Williams and Bird, but with the evolution of spread offenses in the Big 12, the more speed that you can have on the field, no matter position, I think the better you are. In fact, if you take a look at the linebackers from the 2009 recruiting class, the two commitments at linebacker that are in Lubbock are Dion Chidozie and Brandon Mahoney, both guys that can fly up and down the sidelines. I'm afraid that because of Bird's increase in size, he is a step slow to be useful in pass coverage and as more teams pass, especially in the spread offense, that's his fate.

5: DE/DT, Brandon Sesay

I hesitated putting Sesay's name here, but there's not doubt that he belongs here. There was a ton of hype following Brandon Sesay from junior college and whether this is a case of Sesay adjusting to a major college conference level or play, or adjusting to a new position, defensive tackle, but 8 tackles and 1 sack for the entire year just isn't going to cut it. Sesay is an absolute physical specimen at 6-6/278 and I think that McNeill made the right call last year, moving Sesay to defensive tackle, especially considering the overall depth at the defensive end position last year (Brandon Williams, McKinner Dixon, Jake Ratliff, etc.). But this year is a bit of a different story. With defections, graduations, and dismissals, Sesay becomes an integral part that defensive end rotation.

This spring, Sesay wasn't at spring practices, he was in the classroom working on his school work. If we can assume anything about Leach, it's that he will give you plenty of opportunity to get your grades up and if a guy is off the team, Leach won't hesitate to announce the move and go forward. Sesay did play in the spring game and finished the day with 3 tackles and 2 sakcs. I get the feeling that Leach wanted to keep Sesay motivated.

With that being said, Leach hasn't made any announcement, and I think it's safe to say that so long as Sesay working on his issues, then he'll be dressed and ready to play in 2009. There's no doubt that with Sesay's attributes, he's got visisions of NFL contracts dancing in his head, and he should. He's that type of talented, but the only way to prove to NFL draft folks that you're worthy of a pick (8 tackles and 1 sack will not do it), then be the guy this year. There's going to be opportunity to play and it's up to Sesay to prove it.

0 recs  |  Comment 21 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I don't think you were too critical

I believe most will agree that the offense will do their part. The big question(s) is all about the defense. As much as I want to say that they will be OK, to your points, there are many questions … we are just not sure about what we have.

The defensive backfield is what scares me the most.

by RR77 on Jul 16, 2009 10:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Counter point the 2 deep view.. they must step up

My 5 players who must improve on the Raider defense. First I agree with the front page but I looked more at those who backup or push the starters..mostly..
My picks – Sandy Riley becomes more than a situational replacement. Like Jake Ratliff a good Div1 DE mind you he seems to either run himself out the play or get tangled up by the Off. Tackle. Plays a lot on special teams as I recall. Better than average straight line speed perhaps?
Brandon Sharpe appears to be speedy; he got a couple of great near misses which would have been sacks last year @ aTm, & Nevada? And ran down Fozzy Whitaker in the Texas game from behind just because he kept attacking. I feel he as a 6th year senior, that he is ready to explode- with lots of desire and wants to contribute in a big way. Might even be a bookend for Sesay or Howard or Henley. I am sure there is formulaic wide side, strong side, opponents’ tendency drill the assistant coaches use to run out D line packages. So it’s going to come down to a pass rush, short yardage run stuff or pass play denial sets which drives the specific player packages pushedonto the field. Like say Henley/ Sesay grouped with R. Jones/ Myles Wade. BTW Wade is at 340 pounds right? Hope Mr. Wade can take the Benny Wylie the wind sprints.
Daniel Howard – He’s a neat guy. I really like watching him launch himself around the passer. Been said before but he is a "flush"guy – sort of bird dog the passer into other D linemen. But like Riley – Daniel needs to be the Left DE not just a situational player. (I think Fehoko takes the "Joker" job from him this year but that’s just me.) Wait all our D line men – except C. Whitlock are situational players darn…
Bront Bird – he seems to be ready to pop on the scene. Say 50 plus tackles right coming in after B. Duncan among the line backers perhaps? I mean he plays well @ the Strong side backer but did we see him redirect receivers consistently last year? (I.e. vs. Nebraska , Mississippi?) And he can improve on his run stuffing. Seth you are correct in some games he’s invisble though we know he’s taking on blockers- hopefully?? I also think he gets pushed by S. Fehoko for reps.
Brent Nickerson looks to be speedy enough but is short of stature?? . Seem to recall he plays short too. However he was the guy who slapped the ball out of bounds in the end zone vs. Baylor – correct?? Allegedly a very savvy player. Guess he’s going to get picked on regardless because J.Wall the senior is opposite from him and he’s got the rep. I would like to see 9 -12 pass break ups by CB Nickerson. Can he do it? I am not sure but we need it especially in Stillwater, Austin and Houston.
To roll this thread up – I picked on the D line but they will set the tone for the Raiders defense. Our sports Media types are bemoaning the loss of Dixon’s and B Williams’ 22 sacks produced last year – so the onus is on them to step up and get at least 20 of those back. I feel good about this defensive scheme; the groups coach ability, and the overall "violent" attitude. We need a constant attacking spirit right out of the gates… Wreck em baby just wreck em.

by centexraider on Jul 16, 2009 11:10 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Weighing in: Henely did have a tough year last year, but his 2007 numbers show his true potential. Keep in mind that those numbers are from a DT position, a spot in our defense that’s more about eating up space than getting to the passer. At DE, it’s going to let him focus more on getting upfield, but being a converted DT, I think that it means we won’t be seeing him getting blown off the line. I think we might see a lot from him.

Seasay was out of shape, as well as Perry. Wade, on the other hand, has come into camp in top shape. I think it was bennie mentioning that he was the most in-shape player that he has seen on day 1 of his TTU workouts. I hope to see big improvements in productivity from the first too and a surprise contribution from the third.

Don’t forget Pearlie Graves coming in (man, I’m glad we got him). He’s a beast and he could see time in the fall. I think that he’s going to play DE for us, though I wouldn’t be surprised if we use him as a combo DT/DE considering our d-line situation for 2010. Pearlie is the freshman that has a shot at playing. The other two freshmen DE are going to be undergoing developmental years, i think and that’s a good thing.

Bront Bird… well, I think he can be something else, just has to learn how to get off of those pesky TE’s. It won’t be Sam Fehoko who pushes him for time, though. Fehoko is being groomed as a MLB. He’s going to push Duncan for playing time. Sonnier, I believe, is #2 behind Bird and rumor has it that he has been living up to his potential over the spring and into summer workouts.

by kayakyakr on Jul 16, 2009 12:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I gotta agree...

that the DLine as a unit has a lotta questions. Hence, three guys make your list. The DLine, however, has a LOT of upside potential.

BUT…arent there a lot of questions surrounding our safeties? I gotta think losing both of last year’s starters is HUGE.

Wreck 'em, Tech!

by Tortilla Pirate on Jul 16, 2009 1:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Questions, sure, but this was about players who had disappointing years last year that have to step it up this year. The safeties are pretty much entirely new.

PS: I think we’re going to be surprisingly good at safety. Cody Davis is playing like a madman, Mitchem is serviceable, and what we lack in experience, we make up for in athleticism.

by kayakyakr on Jul 16, 2009 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

But Seth said he shouldnt pick two defensive linemen and then went and picked three. I’m just saying that I would have left Henley off of the list (for the sake of picking one of the three), and maybe included the tandem of safeties instead.

Wreck 'em, Tech!

by Tortilla Pirate on Jul 17, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

throwing in some thoughts...

guys dont forget about Sr. V. Hunter in that LB mix up… very productive last season, same amount of tackles as B. Williams. I too, hope Henley and Perry come around this coming season to help out the likes of M. Williams, Bird and Sr S. Riley. With the JUCO transfers and upcoming recruits, im liking what i see for 2010 (just this coming season, has quite a bit of question marks). As for the Secondary… Flannel, Charbonnet, and Mitchem had all productive seasons last year. Nickerson, hopefully is getting the best out of the strength and conditioning program set up for the Red Raiders. I’m pretty sure McNeill will start showing all of us what his intentions are in the upcoming seasons. In my eyes, last season and this season were and are to be the “guinea pig” rounds. McNeill just trying to get his players into the positions on which he wants them to be… recruiting the best players for the positions on the field. I think he is doing a pretty good job right now… surely like what i’m seeing. 2010 is going to be a special season for Lubbock and Texas Tech… 2009 though, just alot of question marks.

by txt3ch6uy on Jul 16, 2009 5:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Victor hunter is at Nose Tackle Right now. He figures to be in the rotation as a run stuffer.

by kayakyakr on Jul 16, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have nothing to add to this discussion, just wanted to see my new sweet a$$ avitar on a page. Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

by Plano Jeff on Jul 16, 2009 5:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Self portrait?

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jul 17, 2009 4:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

reprise of the back ups

Folks the feeling I have is that we’re going to surprise a few opponents’ offenses this season.
It’s going to be the Charlie Sadler coached def linemen who get it done.
My purpose for talking about the 2 deep rotaion was really two fold. They the 2nd string – need to get reps for the future, and they need to contribute right now – on around 25 – 30 snaps per game .The D line has – IMO – shown the most progress in the last 2 years. Despite the naysayers who claim we don’t have a better defense these folks our Raider defensive down linemen have shown the most rapid rise in technique and talent. It’s displayed by those 22 x Dixon and B Williams 2008 sacks. 3 games won by Tackles or Def End play (Nebraska, Texas and UT). The 2 best DE’s we have had in the last 15 years are gone. Yet we still have folks like Henley, Sharpe, and Howard and hopefully Sesay, who are arguably the best 3rd team D line unit in the South division – only outmatched by 5 or 6 pre season all Americans playing for OU, UT and North Div Nebraska. Ultimately it is always about the match ups between o linemen and def. linemen. In the upcoming season IAW our all knowing media prognosticators – they say – Only UT and OSU return a preponderance veteran O linemen. This should work to our advantage especially if the Raiders can effect a rapid and effective D line rotation from the 25 yard line of the opponents to the 30 yard line of the Raiders. Ward, Perry, Hunter become key contributors in the effort to stuff up the rushing game and keep Whitlock, R Jones and Perry fresh for the key downs in the Red zone. I.e. forces the opponents Off. Coordinators to go for the FG or face the 4th down conversion gamble. Keep the opposing offense in steady diet of 2nd and long followed by 3rd and long. We get chance to win on defense and force a punt. Good as a take away in my book. Our opponents in the South have impressive offensive weapons our 2nd rotation especially on the D line is going to play a key role in limiting their opportunities for success. I close this comment by citing the points allowed statistic. What was it 27.5 we allowed last year? It’s going to drop to 23 points or less for 2009. It goes without saying we can match any offensive output but add a few forced opponents FG’s, stops or take away’s by the defense and the balance of a 2 or three score margin is magnified. I am psyched by the potential of our D line. I am just saying bring it, baby bring it. Go Raiders!

by centexraider on Jul 16, 2009 9:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow!!!

All the talk about ALL these guys, but Im still a bit confused.

Could someone put up a depth chart for the DLine?

Wreck 'em, Tech!

by Tortilla Pirate on Jul 17, 2009 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

correction

“3 games won by Tackles or Def End play (Nebraska, Texas and UT). " . Meant BU not UT. Sorry.

by centexraider on Jul 16, 2009 9:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

DE's

I think we will pleasantly pleased with the Defensive Ends this year. Speed kills, so they say, and this year we have speed at the DE spots. Ratliffe is gone and that automatically makes us quicker, not that Jake wasn’t a good DE, it’s just that he was not fleet a foot. Now with Howard, Henley, and Sharpe we can really peel our ears back and go, combine that with faster LB’s and it adds up to extreme scheme possibilties. Blitzes from all packages should be prevalent and consistant. This will put added pressure on the QB’s which should result in poor decision making. Capitalize on mistakes and be ahead on the take away situation, should add up to wins. Howard ends up with double digit sacks this year and the rest will not be far behind, watch Whitlock at the DT spot, he’ll be up there in tackles and sacks. I am still 53’s number one fan!!!

by dbled53 on Jul 17, 2009 12:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Can't be worse than '07 right?

All I have to add is that it’s painfully obvios that we’ve lost a great deal of talent. Strange as it sounds, our young D is going to have to rely on our I and Special Teams to put them in a postion where the D can ne successful. This means TP can’t give up interceptions(????) the ball carriers can’t fumble(I think we have a good “grasp” on that. Hasn’t been a problem for BB or any recievers), and we’re gonna have to cover kicks and punts well. I just can’t be as optimistic as some of y’all.

by Plano Jeff on Jul 17, 2009 12:41 AM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

I think there's more overall

talent, especially with incoming guys like the aforementioned Wade and Graves. These guys have serious talent, along with the freshman DB’s and ultra-quick LB recruits. What I’m hoping is that by Leach and Co. essentially having a team of players commit last year (1 QB, 1 RB, 4 WR, 4 OL, 3 DL, 4 DE, 3 LB and 6 DB) we’re never in this same situation. Look for a similar class this year as I think we’ll have all 25 spots.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jul 17, 2009 4:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

this year’s class may be a bit wonky. I’m picking:
1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 3 OL (we want 4-5 but seem to be having troubles), 6 DL, 2 LB, 5 DB for a total of 22 players. Right now, I think we officially will have 18 scholarships available, but more always seem to clear up (lacour’s scholarship, for example).

by kayakyakr on Jul 17, 2009 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have watched the replay of the Texas game several times now. Nickerson definitely needs to step it up. He nearly lost that game several times. Early in the game Shipley blew by him like he was standing still. Luckily he dropped the ball. There was a long pass that was caught right over hime, and then I believe Shipley blew by him again. You can’t let people get behind you like that.

by Raider75 on Jul 17, 2009 2:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Situational players

The days of old are gone and we don’t ask a player to be great at everything anymore. Toaday’s player is more refined, rush ends are ask to get up the field and turn the pocket inside and grab a sack when able. Strong side ends are just that,… strong. Contain and not let anyone get outside. Used to be “skill players” came on the field early in the pre-game, now we see everybody except the interior lineman and the band in early warm-up. Today’s game doesn’t see a player that plays every down. Down and distance dictates the situation, on the field personnell seems to change each snap, so now we see the no-huddle offenses to counter act the packages, more plays called after the package change at the line. OU, OSU, KU, and MU to name a few. Plus the ball is thrown so much anymore not to many players can keep pace. Situational players are a must. Hence the pass rush specialist. Everybody needs a break from the fast pace game of today.

by dbled53 on Jul 18, 2009 10:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

D-Line & Bird

I know we will be young but our D-Line has the most talent at least 2 deep and maybe 3 deep as we have had in a long time if ever. I wish we had Dixon/Sesay as the “studs” but we don’t so I hope Sesay can make it thru and be motivated by $$ down the road. Ruffin needs to adopt a “air-raid” mentality on the Defense. Not stupid but at least give teams multiple looks even if we are playing base. Also, I would move players around for certain situations. Why can’t Bront Bird become a rush end on 3rd down? Again, use your strengths and give different looks. I know it maybe hard to believe but it appears at least by the stats and early looks our D will be alot faster this year and beyond. Wreck’em Tech

by techgolf44 on Jul 20, 2009 9:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Rush End

We have a rush end that can get there a create havoc, Bird needs to stay at the LB spot he’s at and blitz whenever possible. DH can handle the rush end, Sesay needs to play tackle, far to slow to play the end position, but quick for a tackle. His massive frame can be tough to throw over and get around. He needs to focus on playing with-in the scheme and get more tackles, eight is not enough by no stretch of the imagination. Again Bront is fine right where he is at.

by dbled53 on Jul 20, 2009 3:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.
Start posting about the Red Raiders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
ESPiN Classic...
Bettie-page-floating-head_small
My post-game thoughts
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Bettie-page-floating-head_small
Gathering of the Raiders
Small
TTUMAR INSPIRED ME TO MY FIRST FANPOST!!!
Small
Way to REP BIG 12
Music-pirate_small
Doing More With Less: The hole in Tub's armour.
Small
New Boot Goofin'
Small
Leach being Leach?
Crabtree08_small
can we have a contest for a baby james T-shirt

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Michigan State's Kalin Lucas holds his left ankle as coach Tom Izzo checks on him after Lucas was injured in the first half of an NCAA second-round college basketball tournament game against Maryland in Spokane, Wash., Sunday, March 21, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose)

Tom Izzo: '85% Chance' Kalin Lucas Tore Left Achilles' Tendon

Duke's Brian Zoubek, left, and  Miles Plumlee congratulate Kyle Singler after defeating California 68-53 during an NCAA second-round college basketball game in Jacksonville, Fla., Sunday, March 21, 2010.   (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Duke Controls Cal From Start To Finish, Advances To Sweet 16

Purdue's JaJuan Johnson celebrates with the Purdue mascot's hammer after Purdue beat Texas A&M 63-61 in overtime in an NCAA second-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Sunday, March 21, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose) +1 updates

Purdue Rallies In Second Half, Edges Texas A&M In Overtime

More from SBNation.com >


Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Rr_no_mercy_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Small LondonRaider

Official Partner of CBS Sports