5 Things // Biggest Questions Heading into Fall Practice

Five Things is a handful (i.e., five) of thoughts about a single topic. Hopefully, discussion ensues.
Biggest Questions Heading into Fall Practice
Practice is mere days away (Saturday actually) and I thought that it might not be a bad idea to ask what are my biggest questions heading into fall practice. These are obviously my biggest questions, but I'd like to know what's bothering you as we start the season?
1: Who will play left tackle?
I think we've discussed the options ad naseum, but it appears that the two options will be reshirt freshman Terry McDaniel (6-7/335) or junior Chris Olson (6-5/296). From my very untrained eye, I think McDaniel is ready to be the guy this year, but I can understand, especially with some early games against difficult opponents, that Olson may be the safer option. McDaniel has all-conference talent, right now, but there's no doubt that Olson knows the blocking schemes backwards and forwards, perhaps better than anyone on the team as Olson is prepared to play a number of positions this fall if he doesn't lock into the left tackle spot.
2: Who will step up as the third and fourth receiver options?
Looking back in past years, the top four receivers usually account for about 69% of the yardage and 72% of the touchdowns in the Texas Tech offense. A lot of this talk about fifth and sixth guys stepping up sounds nice, but history tends to lean towards four guys. Right now, we're looking at Ed Britton at the split end, Tramain Swindall and Detron Lewis at the inside receivers and a mix of Jacoby Franks, Alexander Torres or Lyle Leong at the flanker position. I'm pretty comfortable with thinking that Detron Lewis is more than capable of being the lead guy and I'm slightly torn that as to whether or not the second guy is going to be Britton or Swindall, but I'm thinking that Swindall has a break-out year. That means Britton has to be the guy that steps up the consistency of his game. He's great at a lot of other things that make this offense click, but the dude needs to catch four to five passes a game. That leaves the flanker position completely up in the air, at least right now. And don't get me wrong, I'd love to see guys like Austin Zouzalike or Cornelius Douglas or someone else get some burn at any receiver position, but history is not on their side.
3: How quickly will the inexperienced safeties adjust?
It's not a stretch to think that Cody Davis is going to be pretty damned good for quite some time. He has good size, not great speed, but all you hear about the defense rave about with Davis is his ability to take good angles making tackles. If anything, this somewhat demonstrates his ability to understand how the game is played. I must say that I'm a bit concerned about Davis' counterpart, Franklin Mitchem, only because he's really not getting the same type of recognition that Davis is. Mitchem didn't do anything during the spring game to make me think that he couldn't play, but he didn't stand out either. If it's not Mitchem, then you can look for one of the freshmen defensive backs to make a splash, and if I had to guess right now, it would be Will Ford or Terrance Bullitt.
4: Will Ruffin McNeill be more creative in his defensive philosophy?
This is the $64,000 question, isn't it? I think Ruffin is at a crossroads with the defense and he's slowly but surely building it into what he's envisioning, which is lots of speed, and then some extra speed, just in case. The lone remaining position that needs some upgrade is the linebacker spot, and there are guys that have speed, but they haven't quite yet cracked the top three spots . . . yet. And although this bit is focused on the linebackers, I think there is something to be said about how the defensive line and the defensive backs are athletically and how McNeill perhaps changes scheme to be more aggressive. This is going to be a big spring for guys like Bront Bird and Marlon Williams. They're going to need to step up and make some plays, all over the field, if they're going to keep their jobs on a full-time basis. That means moving sideline to sideline, and McNeill has recruited guys that can do this in Brandon Mahoney and Dion Chidozie. That's not to say that guys like Sam Fehoko, Tyrone Sonier or Blake Collier are positioning themselves to be right in the mix as well, but the philosophy is changing, it's just a matter of time.
5: Will a second cornerback step-up?
Another defensive back question, and much like the safety position, there's the incumbents and then there's the freshmen. Last year, the hasty L.A. Reed experiement failed, for a variety of reasons, but mainly because he couldn't stay on the field. Brent Nickerson struggled to keep receivers in front of him, which I think is one of McNeill's big tenants in playing his defense. During the spring, it was a neck-and-neck-and-neck race between Nickerson, LaRon Moore and Taylor Charbonnet. I'm almost at the point that I know what Nickerson can do and I know what Moore can do, but I'm getting to the point that I'd like to see more out of Charbonnet. I know that he's a bit undersized, however, he has put on about 15 pounds since last fall and is up to 175. That's respectable and if speed is his biggest attribute, then perhaps that speed can be a bit of a neutralizer. Then again, if none of those three can step up opposite Jamar Wall, then perhaps you see one of the freshman back here. Maybe Yashua Williams is the best choice, and D.J. Johnson is probably too raw at this point.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
DJ Johson is way too raw, though I think he’s a lock to crack the rotation next year.
I think our LB’s have been in Ruffin’s preferred mold for a while, Our top 6 is made up of rangy guys, either tall or fast, and I think we’ll see all 5 of the guys you mentioned plus Brian Duncan splitting time a lot this year. It’s really sounding like Ruffin’s started to trust Sam Fehoko more as the guy at MLB, so I wouldn’t be too surprised to see him stealing reps from Brian Duncan or, if Bird or Williams can’t cut it, taking MLB and letting Duncan move to the outside for some time every game.
I like our depth at LB, though, and I really like our options there. While there’s only one player that must be on the field (because he’s too good not to be, I’m talking about Mr Duncan), the rest of the group should not disappoint.
If we are talking linebackers, defense, and speed, then lets talk blitzing. Blitzing is that risky thing average defenses can do to make them appear more than average for short periods of time. (yeah you can get burned too but if they are scoring anyway then why not try) Does Ruff understand this? I know he likes to play it safe and thats fine when we are winning, but it seems like he never tries anything different in games until we are down 14 points. I just want some blitzing!
As long as
They do not give anything away to UT, trysome new defensive packages in the first two games to ensure they will work, then work them into more difficult games as needed. Surprise is a nice ally.
TTpilk
As I recall
every week last year they talked about surprise and how Ruff was holding some back for the big games. That was even the excuse for lack of adjustment against Nebraska and a few other points in the season. I’m no expert, but I don’t remember any of that coming to pass in any of the big games. I am fine with holding some defensive looks back until the big games… as long as they end up getting used. Otherwise we are just a stagnant, predictable defense with somewhat decent players.
i agree jdeeTTU
I agree that if you have something special you don’t have to show it. But how special is rolling a linebacker around and up the middle on a blitz? Or what about pretending you are going to blitz and then pulling back. These are basic things that can confuse a QB. However if you are pretending to blitz 100% of the time obviously that doesn’t affect much. I know this is a tired arguement but want some blitzing!!!!!! Defensive intensity and blitzing is awesome and exciting. People love it. Give the people what they want.
I mean if you are up 7 and the aggies have a 3rd and 10 on their own side of the field, blitz!!!! Yeah they can get 20 yards sometimes, but they can also get sacked for a 10 yard loss and momentum changes. I just love exciting football. Its strange our offensive philosophy repeated over and over by the Captain is that no bullets are left in the barrell. Everything is thrown out on to the field. But on defense the philosophy sit back and wait to get beat. Hopefully we can play percentages. Maybe we just don’t have the players and I’m wrong.
Its about depth..
1: Who will play left tackle? Either one will be great but I think it’s likely Olsen will see time at Center before the end of the season. He is so well versed in the O line techniques, philosophy and positions. Not trying to jinx or downplay anybody but he’s backing up a fifth year senior. He’s got to play IOT help the team in 2010. Just a thought.
2: Who will step up as the third and fourth receiver options? Just based on statistics its not likely anybody gets significant touches beyond the #1’s and couple of #2’s – but I could see Rashad Hawk, Franks or Torres making a mark especially In the games where the team jumps on folks say K state, aTm or say Kansas U. I Recall that Todd Walker got in quite bit in the beginning of last season. But he seemed to drop a lot of balls or they were just out of reach. (timing with G Harrell?) Felt like he sort of drifted to the back of the rotation. So I can only speculate that Coach Riley or Simmons was downgrading him. I suppose the guy with the most upside who has played the least is Adrian Reese. In a game where you have perhaps 65 – 75 offensive touches (and this best casing it) you have got to figure the starters will be on the field at least 70 percent of the time. And TTU needs to run it 20 plus times. Subtract those possible touches from a non starting receiver. So the max any 2nd string receiver would get chance to make a reception is 8- 15 throws / attempts. Meaning get on the field. The back of the envelope math says you won’t see any non starter and or 3rd string getting more than 5 – 7 looks/reps per game. And you know this doesn’t translate into attempts by the QB to hit him. That being said Captain Leach does focus in on plays that work. – Gets back to the hot hand theory. And a receiver corps without a "star" is going to by its nature rotate more folks into the mix. Based on the Leach theory that someone will be in a position to exploit a mismatch. So you see a game like the UT in 07 where E. Britton gets 7 plus receptions. 08 K state game Leong’s 3 x scores? Plus anybody who becomes certifiably hot becomes a front runner to replace the starter. So anybody want to help me with possible ‘touches formula for 3rd string receivers?
3: How quickly will the inexperienced safeties adjust? Just based on Coach Mainord’s track record pretty darn quick. Slay to Garcia to Charbonnet..
4: Will Ruffin McNeill be more creative in his defensive philosophy? Not likely. More to follow no time to do justice to this thread.
5: Will a second cornerback step-up? Yes but it will be painful in places like Austin.
Re Wide Receivers
I’m dooming him by saying this, because I’ve been wrong for so long, but this is Lyle Leong’s year. He has rapport with Taylor Potts and he’s too damned fast, too damned talented, and too damned knowledgeable of our offense not to be a #1 or #2 guy.
He’ll get four and two digits, I said it.

by 






















