Five Reasons Texas Tech Will Lose :: North Dakota Edition
This weekly feature considers five reasons why Texas Tech will win and five reasons Texas Tech will lose to each opponent. Check back tomorrow for "Five Reasons Texas Tech Will Win :: North Dakota Edition".
Reason #1 :: Big Game for North Dakota: This is absolutely a big game for North Dakota, although this isn't meant to diminish UND's other opponents, but the likes of Northwestern State, Stephen F. Austin, South Dakota, Stony Brook, Sioux Falls, Southern Utah, Cal Poly, Southern Oregon, UC Davis and Central Arakansas doesn't scream huge game. UND has had an entire spring and fall practice to ready themselves for this game and it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see the Fighting Sioux be as sharp as could be expected for a first game. I don't think there's any doubt that the North Dakota coaching staff is telling their players that if they want to be a part of one of the biggest upsets in NCAA history, this would be a prime example.
Reason #2 :: Abundance of Penalties: Who remembers the opening game last year where Texas Tech had an astounding 18 penalties for 169 yards. Texas Tech needs to be sharp. It's been mentioned more than it needs to be mentioned, but the Texas game is merely two weeks away. The Red Raiders have two games to be on their best behavior. Gone are the days where the Red Raiders can rely on an All-American at receiver and a quarterback that routinely passes for over 5,000 yards to pull you out of any hole the offense or defense puts you in because of silly penalties. The offensive line needs to be absolutely sharp, which may be one reason why Terry McDaniel is not getting the initial start at left tackle. The offense needs guys who will not make mistakes. Those mistakes may not hurt you against teams like UND (no offense) but they will be drive and touchdown killers against the likes of Texas.
Reason #3 :: Looking Ahead: I don't know if you can blame any player for looking ahead, especially when the players know the circumstances surrounding this game and the relative inexperience of UND playing on a high level of football. It's only natural for players to look ahead, and I've said this before, but I think it deserves mention again in that no opponent deserves to be dismissed. Just ask Michigan and Appalachian State. Look past an opponent and you'll be sorry that you did. I have a feeling that this may have happened a bit last year against Eastern Washington where the Eagles came ready to play, looked sharp, made sure tackles on defense and put 17 points on the board in the second quarter. And as we speak of looking ahead, this can also be a symptom of . . .
Reason #4 :: Over-Confidence: This type of thing plagues teams all of the time. Players know what they're up against on a week-in and week-out basis. I'd like to think that this Red Raider team respects each and every opponent, that each game is an opportunity to do your job. Putting it simply, if Texas Tech simply does their job, then the idea of being over-confident is completely irrelevant. Doing your job each and every play erases the need to consider the quality of your opponent.
Reason #5 :: Time of Possession: One of the best equalizers in football is time of possession. If the North Dakota offense can keep the Texas Tech offense off the field, then there's a much greater chance for an upset. Last year in the aforementioned Eastern Washington game, the Eagles held onto the ball for 30:34, which certainly affected Texas Tech's chances of putting points on the board and putting this game away more than 49-24. The key will be whether the defense puts pressure on the UND defense, forces three-and-outs and how the defense can create turnovers, much like Darcel McBath and Daniel Charbonnet did all of last year.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice job Seth
Thanks for trying Seth but as we all know unless we have to play ND with the girls golf team this will be an absolute rout! Do you really want to be the first team to play Taylor Potts as the starter? Talking about incentive, Taylor will be “gunslinging” all game long. And Harrison Jeffers playing, I think he will score 2 or more TD’s from over 40 yards. 65-7!!!! Wreck’ em TECH
On the other hand....
I wish the UND pass offense would play WAY over their heads so our inexperienced D secondary can get more game reps. I’d rather the secondary get the experience now than in Austin. Or against Houston.
a Class "A" beat down would be much appreciated
Ditto Seth. The Raiders cannot get into a penalty fest. They could, should, need to start fast and grind these folks up pretty good. The Fighting Sioux need to be pretty chewed at the end of the game. I’m on record wanting a shut out in the season opener. IOT accomplish this a 4 pack on defense needs to be established. One – a pass rush which pressures the QB. Not just hurry him down right harass the signal caller. Chase him all over the field to encourage bad or ill advised throws. Number two a quartet of D-Backs needs to break up 6 – 8 passes. All the starters get hand on a pass. The sack versus tipped pass competition best scenario in my view 3 sacks and 3 tipped passes is about right to set the tone in an opener. Stop all first and second down rushing plays. Nothing over 2 yards allowed on a NDSU rush gets the whole team hopped up.
On Offense the 4 x opener statistics are pretty simple. Like the SMU opener in 2007 multiple receivers need touches. Best case the 3rd string wide receivers are catching first downs in the middle of the 3rd quarter. (a sneaky desire is to see Sheffield throw 3 TDs after Potts finishes up a 4- 5 TD tossing effort) On two – O lines should dominate on run blocking & get to the second level and give the running backs 6 plus yards a pop. I would like to see a first down, second down, first down type rhythm. If the Raiders get into a 3rd down I want it to be 3rd and short every time baby. Fourth a 200 plus yard RB effort and the 3rd string breaks a long run in the 4th period. How cool would it be to have Batch go over 100 yards right out of the shoot.
Special teams this is where we are going to get giddy. No misses on a Extra point tries or Field goals (sneaky preference no FGs required as TTU scores a TDs on every possession). The # 2 item block a kick and get it back. Just that simple prove to NE, UT and OU that the days of lining up for a punt or FG and kicking with impunity are over. Three – Return game = score on a Punt/KO and get over 200 yards on in/ all phases of the return game. Do it without using J Wall or another starter (double sneaky thought Jeffers or Zouzalack is breakout returner). #4 No kick returns over 5 yards by the Fighting Sioux. No charge for an extra thought – how cool would it be to see strip or two of a ND return man on a kickoff of course. Fellow Raiders what say you?
"do routine things routinely"

by 

















