Kayakyakr's Week 3 Report Card
Texas Tech v. Texas
As I mentioned when I got home last night, I am happy with the moral victory after that game. As a quick rundown, we hung with the #2 team in the nation for 4 quarters, held their offense to its lowest home output of 340 yards since 2007 against KSU (also 340 yards), and I really saw something out of this team that I hoped for but wasn’t sure of. I really don’t want to sound like I’m just trying to spin sunshine, but I honestly have to believe that this TTU team is better than a lot of people picked them to be.
Read on after the break for my positional breakdown
| Position | Grade |
|---|---|
| QB | A |
| RB | F |
| WR | A- |
| OL | D |
| DL | A |
| LB | A- |
| DB | B |
| ST | F |
Offense
QB
Taylor Potts had a great day, considering. I think that a lot of the grades that I’m giving are based on expectations vs performance and Pott’s grade is. Next year, if he has a 3 td, 1 int day against UT, I’d probably grade that a C, but this year, I’m ecstatic with that state line. That was one of my biggest question marks going into this game, "How will Taylor Potts handle his first road start in a hostile environment?" He handled it great, especially since he was being hit pretty much every play and was bouncing right back up. I think I’ve officially joined the Taylor Potts fan club.
If I have any complaint about the QB last night, it’s that he displayed a bit of a lack of situational awareness. I’m mainly talking about that set of series to start the 4th quarter where nothing really happened. I felt that Taylor failed to recognize that UT was bringing all-out pressure at that point and that before then, we had been tearing holes in the UT defense with the dink and dunk offense. It seemed like Potts was looking to go deep, 15+ yards down the field on his pick, fumble, and over half of the other plays in that series. Take what the defense gives you and we take advantage of the stop and punt or McCoy’s pick.
All that said, I still give Taylor an A for his performance on the night. Well deserved.
RB
All I can really say about the RB’s is that they were pretty much completely ineffective on the night. There was 1 18 yard run by Baron and a 12 yard run by Stephens, and outside of that, they never got going. It may have been the oline’s fault, but they’re also getting a poor score on the evening. Even in the passing game, the backs did nothing. And Batch, on the two catches where he looked like he had some room or at least a one-man-to-beat situation, he fumbled, losing one. I’m most disappointed that we didn’t see any of Harrison Jeffers. I’m not sure if he was held out for effort/disciplinary reasons or just because Stephens and Batch are much better in pass protection than him, but I was not happy to see him on the sideline.
I think we had the most room for running from the 2 back set. I really like the concept of handing off to one back while the other one leads. We ran from that set twice that I can remember, each going for short yardage, but I thought I saw the potential for bigger gains from there. I don’t like the 2 TE set anymore because, in order to run from that set, we have to also have a threat to throw. We just don’t have the personnel for that to be an effective formation and we won’t until we get a TE that can block and catch.
I think this is going to be the #1 thing for our coaches to figure out, how do we break open holes in our running game. Yes, it’s called the air raid and we live and die by the pass, but I don’t believe that our offense will play to its best potential until we can consistently gash defenses when they only have 6 men in the box. I give the unit an F and it makes me very sad to do so
WR
We have a very young crew of receivers. I’m pretty sure Lewis was still hampered by his hamstring and he didn’t see many reps, yet I don’t think our receiving corps missed a beat. I loved the constant rotation of receivers and that combined with our no-huddle we ran all night, caused headaches for UT all night long. I think Eddy B had a great makeup game for his drops and had the block of the night on a Zouzalik out route. Leong just knows how to score TD’s and Torres had his high in receptions for the year. I also don’t see what the vitriol for Jacoby Franks is. He had a drop (one of only 2-3 I can remember) early and he had the PI call late (that I think was just as phantom as Crabtree’s PI last year), but aside from that, he turned in his career performance in catches and yards.
I must reiterate that we have an incredibly young group of receivers. I’m giving them a score of A- on the night. The minus is because they did allow themselves to be bumped off of their routes, held up, or gave up on their routes once they felt they had been interfered with.
OL
I think we saw 3 different types of offensive lines last night. The first, was the line that was being blown up and unable to create holes in the defense against a 4 man front. This was also the line that was unable to get out and deliver blocks in front of the backs on screens. We only saw them about 12 plays, but they didn’t do much for us.
The second OL we saw was the OL that was able to withstand 5, 6, and even 7 man rushes to give Taylor just enough time to get the ball into the hands of his receivers 5-15 yards down the field. I like this line.
The third line that we saw was the line that committed false starts and missed blocking assignments and got blown by on speed rushes. This line only reared its ugly head when we were backed up deep near the north endzone or when we were approaching that same endzone going the other direction. While the first offensive line certainly contributes, this is the line that earned a D for their performance.
I’m still impressed with the youth and depth of our line. Oakafor and Edwards are both sophomores and are both solid, despite their false start mistakes. I think Olson’s future is at center (an odd change from LT to center), so the questions next year will be at LT and RT and I’m confident we’ll have that figured out.
Defense
DL
We started this season with 4 DE’s. We took 1 of those to Austin with us. Your 4 DE’s for last night’s game (as determined by the DE warmup group): Daniel Howard – DE – 6’3" 240#; Jonathan Brydon – LB – 6’3" 220#; David Neill – DT – 6’5" 280#; Britton Barbee – DT – 6’2" 296#. Now, in the game, I think we saw the most of Bront Bird playing 3-technique or stand-up end, and Richard Jones, a DT, also lining up at end. I must say that this line unit did an exceptional job considering. Early in the game we stopped up their running game very well and got fair pressure on the QB once we started running stunts and twists in the line. Only one sack but 8 tackles for loss including 3 by Bront Bird.
I have to hand it to the coaching staff. They did the best with what they had and it worked until the 2nd half when UT finally figured out that we were backing our ends to make up for our lack of depth there and leaving the middle of the field without a 2nd level of defender. For what we had and what we were missing, this unit is deserving of that A grade.
LB
The linebackers did a solid job all night. I can only recall them getting outright beat 2-3 times, once on the long Chiles run and twice by Buckner, the Longhorns pseudo-TE. Good game by the backers and very little that I can say about their performance
For a solid night, they get an A but they get a minus tacked on for the missed plays and lack of stops in the 3rd and 4th quarters and a plus for Bront Bird’s ability to play end respectably. So again, A.
DB
On the one hand, our DBs didn’t get beat deep all night. On the other hand, we gave up a lot of underneath catches and 3rd down conversions because of how soft we were playing. I know that was a coaching decision, but I think that it was the wrong one. Our defensive line wasn’t going to be able to come up with the big play and so I don’t see why we shouldn’t try to put our backs in positions to force pass breakups and ints of their own. We pulled down 2 picks off of tipped balls, but because of the yards given up underneath, the unit earns a B.
Special Teams
I’m going to break this up by play type. Kick returns get an A, and I think this is the aspect of the game that Stephens made his greatest impact (not to downplay his in-pocket blocking). They kicked to Stephens every time and every time he took the ball up to the 35-40 except one. Unfortunately, half of those were called back on holding, but we’re close, and Stephens was close to breaking a few of those.
Kickoffs get a C for the night. We gave up about 30 yards per return which is not great, but acceptable. We also had that onside kick attempt that was in and out of the hands of, I think, Ed Britton. If it had worked, that would have evened the difference in the game, so I don’t mind the gamble in the least. I think the biggest keys for our kickoff team will be for Carona to continue to kick the ball deep in the endzone like we know he can (he had one touchback, one kick about 5 yards deep, and the rest of his kicks came down inside the 5), and for the coverage team to continue to get down the field even if Carona is booming kicks out of the endzone.
Punting gets an F for the night. This was the difference in the night, with Carona laying down a poor kick in the middle of the field that was returned for the only TD of the first half. The rest of the night, Erxleben punted for us, kicking a long of 46 but only an average of 38. On the other hand, he also kicked away from Shipley who only got 1 more return for -2 yards.
Punt returns get an incomplete for the night seeing as we never touched one of his punts. It seems like Eric Russell has just as much trouble figuring out that rugby punt as Clay McGuire did. UT has one hell of a punter, though.
Overall, this unit was the difference in the night. UT had that punt return for a touchdown and that was basically the difference in the game. On the plus side, Matt Williams kicked his career long of 41 yards. Way to go Matt. F for the rest of them, though.
Refs
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agree
Kind of. The main change would be to give Potts a B. He needs to improve his abilities to read the defenses as far as to when to and not to run the ball. And call more running plays, say in the 25 to 30 range of carries. We have to give the runners a chance to make a difference. That means calling for the run when it is there for the taking. If Potts can improve in this area he will be able to earn an A or better for his efforts. But, he must make that improvement. The rest is pretty close to what I saw. Bird and the rest of the defense was great. They ran out of gas late and were getting beat more often, but overall the overall defensive effort was above what I think anyone expected. Good job.
TTpilk
Not just us
I noticed a lot of comments on the Okla St forum where they are really starting to sweat our trip to Stillwater after watching the UT game. Much like Texas (and everyone else), they had pretty much written us off as a non-threat after we lost so many players last year.
Was It Me or...
was Detron Lewis and Batch MIA in the second half. Does anyone know if they were disciplined or did coach see somethign we didn’t?
Jeffers is not happy with his lack of playing time last night. His facebook page tells it like he sees it. I too wondered where “Lightening in a Bottle” was all game.
I hope there is no letdown going into to Houston next week. THey have had two weeks to prepare.
Agree
First half Potts was throwing off his back foot again and retreating in the pocket. Second half he was stepping forward in the pocket and letting the outside rush go wide. I would also give him a B+ but agree with everything else. RB & OL have to do a better job in the running game, thats all that can be said. Tech has to put this loss (good felling or bad) behind them and get ready for a really good Houston team that will treat this home game as one of the most important ones in their history. Funny how UT fans are calling that Helmet to Helmet sack a great play but last year cried about holding even before this years game it was montioned by UT coaches.
Tech's 4 RB's
What happened to Crawford, he was great in 07 before his injury in 08.
Crawford appears to be a casualty of Eric Stephens' success
since he’s not as explosive a runner as either Jeffers, Stephens, or as consistent as Batch, his niche would have been as a blocker in max protect- but Stephens seems to have already stepped into that role.
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
agreed, but
the fundamental problem with our running game right now is that the O-Line isn’t creating any holes for the backs to run through. A few more newtons of force as the RB collides with Brandon Carter’s backside won’t really solve that.
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions
fair enough. Biggest problem I see with the running game is that there is no movement up front. or rather, it’s movement in the direction that the DL wants to go. We’ve gotta start getting either a push of our own or take advantage of whatever way they want to go to create cutback lanes. I’ve also been seeing, though, that every time there is a hole, there’s also a linebacker filling that hole. That’s where the bowling ball helps.
I've watched a few Boise St games this year
and one unique thing they do with their shotgun running game is send the tailback behind the QB, who turns around to make the handoff, rather than handing off to a stationary RB at his side, or in front as the back moves forward toward the line of scrimmage. It appeared to alleviate a few of the disadvantages of running out of the shotgun, namely the lack of forward momentum a RB gets in comparison to running out of an I or Ace set. It also gives the RB a few more steps of time to see his blockers and select a lane. Call me crazy, but I think this technique might have a place in Tech’s running game. Simple to implement, but could potentially spice up our admittedly vanilla base runs.
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions
It could be, I was noticing that as well. It’s the same concept as the pistol, really, giving you a shotgun snap with a back still behind the qb. Would make play action a bit more natural as well.
absolutely
I actually considered posting an addendum to mention that, glad you pointed it out. When the QB turns around for the handoff he can obscure the ball from the defender’s view, vastly increasing the credibility of a play fake. The one thing it does not do that the pistol does is keep secret the direction of the run pre-snap. Just like a normal shotgun handoff, it’s a good bet that the run will be going to the opposite side of the line from where the tailback is set up.
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions
would it be out of the question to see the back lined up directly behind the qb? You can also motion the back to the opposite side if you need.
I like it, now how do we tell mike?
next time I see him rollerblading
I’ll run it up the flagpole
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
encouraged
footballs are great roughage for free-range wildebeest like Sergio Kindle
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions
so i mean they took my picture down...
Wreck 'Em Tech!
J.T.H.
by redraidersax on Sep 20, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions
if profanity is suddenly not allowed around here
I am in serious trouble
by mojavereject on Sep 20, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions
maybe because it was in a picture????
i didn’t think it was a big deal… otherwise i wouldn’t have posted it…
Wreck 'Em Tech!
J.T.H.
by redraidersax on Sep 20, 2009 7:28 PM CDT up reply actions
I think that however he hosted the picture killed it. this is why we don’t leech!
use a site like TinyPic
I used twitpic from twitter… I’ll just use my own website and put it back up when I go home lol
Wreck 'Em Tech!
J.T.H.
by redraidersax on Sep 20, 2009 11:28 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Here we go... hosted on my site lol

Wreck 'Em Tech!
J.T.H.
by redraidersax on Sep 21, 2009 4:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Just Wondering
Was just wondering what the criteria you have for grading the positions? As mentioned last week when most were just hoping we “wouldn’t be embarrassed” that there was not a player on either team that did not think they were going to win. As far as Potts (who I tried to free two years ago-check it up) or the offensive line, have you ever stood on the field while 60-100000 fans filled up the stadium in anticipation? Have you ever stood in the middle of a freeway while cars zoomed by you at 70 miles per hour and tried to make decisions? Have you ever stood in a jet engine testing facility and tried to communicate with the person five feet from you? If you have then you would not be making silly comments about “throwing off the back foot” or taking “too many silly penalties”. As mentioned last week this program now reloads not rebuilds. We have terrific players up and down the line that are going to do nothing but get better including the ol that I believe started a number of new players. Again I say, expect excellence. I don’t care what the other teams do. I just want Tech to take care of their business and there will be great results. Two years of Potts and then no later than the third round of the nfl draft. Enjoy it while you can and quit talking about throwing off his back foot. Would really like to know your critiquing qualities or are these just opinions from a bar stool like most .
Are you speaking to my grades or those in the comments? I base my grades, usually, off of expectations vs. outcome, with a heavy mind to statistics to measure defensive productivity and a light mind to offensive statistics. I post the writeup because I enjoy looking at the teams performance and figuring out what I thought about how they played. I figure that through posting these grades, others will be able to critique my own opinions and through this process, we will be able to come to a sort of community consensus on how our team played and thereby will be able to overcome our amateur status.
My only qualification in posting these write-ups is that I have watched and studied a lot of football, 6-20 hours worth pretty much every weekend since I was 5 years old. I watch the games with mind to what’s actually going on and don’t drink, so my memories are never clouded by alcohol. I try to remain fairly unbiased, but I can’t help it if my memories at times are slightly clouded by the rose-tinted glasses that I wear. I promise you that I’ve never posted any opinions from a bar stool, though that may be only because I’m so rarely in a bar stool.
If you guys feel this is a waste, I’ll gladly stop posting my writeups. Will let me pay more attention to the late NCAA game or the early NFL games. I enjoy writing this, but I enjoy doing a lot of things.
Don't "Tickle My Ears"!!!
Your posts are usually right down the middle. I don’t like to read posts that “tickle my ears” if you will. I like to hear somebody’s honest opinion, wether it’s good news or bad. I don’t always agree, but it’s always good to hear other peoples opinions. Who knows, I may learn from it.
And I don’t think anyone’s opinion here effects the team in any way. Maybe we should check Florida’s comentary from last season and see if there were any doubts or questions amongst there fan base. I’m guessing there was…
I know that Ed Britton and Baron Batch have a good internet presence, it’s possible that they do read this blog. For two reasons, when I post, I avoid tearing into players, first because I know that I could never do the things they can do and I’m a pretty big fan of theirs and secondly because I know these players are great guys (because TTU has been recruiting character players and based on their actions off of the field) and I know that they don’t deserve that sort of treatment.
Pointing out that Potts threw off his back foot (which is a self-admitted mistake he makes when he has pressure coming up the middle) or that the O-Line had multiple false starts going into the endzone, on the other hand, doesn’t really fall into the category of unnecessary critique and falls better into the category of factual observation.
factual observations
Kayakyakr – you present one man’s opinion, and you do it well. I enjoy your input and your insight into the team. Its a fine line of rooting for the home team and presenting unbiased opinions.
All of the guys on the TTU team are about 10,000 X better athletes than most of us – and I appreciate that – and I support them 100% (especially as you pointed out – we recruit men of character and get rid of bad apples).
But I also want to know what the real Tech fans are thinking. Keep up the good work.
by beantownraider on Sep 21, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I like to agree with Kayakyakr in that I do gripe/complain and rant about penalties, but these guys are “amateur” athletes and will/do make mistakes.
The only big thing I am disappointed in this year so far is the lack of the run game. I think it could have made a huge difference against UT and forces defenses to play us honestly. Saying that it might be a down year for the run game because of the change up on the O-line. I think we will eventually get back into the groove though.
You're doing fine, kayakyakr
Ignore the “silly” criticisms of others and please continue what you’re doing. I don’t bother addressing or concerning myself with others’ silly comments in any aspect of life and neither should you.
by jeffinhouston on Sep 21, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd have to agree...
most of us who participate as fans on DTN or any other blog have NO IDEA what it is really like to be a Big 12 college football player in a big game, or in any other situation. Former Big 12 athletes, (if any) might be able to give qualifed opinions, but I doubt that they would. If any of the TTU football team read our comments, especially some that get crictical, I hope that they laugh their heads off and think of how unqualified we are to pass judgment on their performances, generally speaking.
Like many of you, I was simply hoping that Tech would show up and play a respectable game against UT. I was hoping to NOT repeat last year’s OU game. As a team, they did that and MORE! They had a chance to win until late in the game. As I fan, I can really ask no more than to be fully entertained and engaged in the game. On Saturday night, the Red Raiders did NOT disappoint, and they earned a great deal of respect, I believe.
They made mistakes ( the players and the coaches) but football is a game full of mistakes – when one team succeeds on a play, one team usually contributes by making a mistake. The ‘problems’ that the Raiders experienced while playing the Longhorns certainly had something to do with the 11 players from UT who were bound and determined to do everything in their power to keep Tech from succeeding. This is physical contest, not a SAT test.
I’m proud of the effort. In light of the hostile environment, the big TV stage, ( and I’ll say it, the arguable calls by the refs), the missing defensive personel, and the first extreme challenge of this young season, I think our team performed well.
Until I’m willing to let them watch everything I do at work and judge my performance, I’ll leave the “grading” to their coaches. And if any Red Raiders are reading this – I say keep giving it your best, and you will be proud of the results.
If having some sort of resume other than having a seat on a barstool is a requirement from you to have an opinion about a sport, then you should never listen to our head coach, seeing as he’s never played football either.
I absolutely hate, and I mean hate this argument, that you have to have played the game to have an opinion. I barely played football, and I’m not involved with football in any other way other than the fact that I watch a shit-load of football, especially Texas Tech. I don’t think that makes me any more or less capable of having an opinion.
As far as criticizing players, I have no problem with that, and as long as it’s done in a fashion that’s intelligent and not meant to be personally hateful towards that player, then I’m okay with that. I don’t think you have to play a down of football, that Marlon Winn took a play off when Kindle took down Potts. I think you’re inappropriately speaking for kayakyakr when you think that he’s not enjoying himself by having a few, and I mean a few, harsh words about a few players. And I think to call his words “harsh” is an overstatement.
I don’t want this site to turn into a sunshine pumper website and I don’t want this to be a website where players are constantly demeaned. If we criticize a player I’m not criticizing him as a person. I’m criticizing his play. I don’t think that makes me a bad fan.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Not to mention by assuming that the only people who know a thing about football are old-school institution guys
leads to dudes like Al Groh and Dennis Francione coaching your football team
by mojavereject on Sep 21, 2009 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Grading
i am of the opinion that “grading” is just another tool for sports conversations. if people didn’t have opinions about teams, players and all that… this site wouldn’t be in existence. Football is an entertainment sport. it is successful because people watch it, get into, and put some of themselves into it. UT wouldn’t fill a 100,000+ stadium if there weren’t people who had their own opinions about the team… from the Die-hard fan to the ones that bought a t-shirt at wal-mart on the friday before, everyone will still have an opinion, educated or not and that’s why they get into games!
this Grading system that Kayakyakr uses is one of the more “educated” ways to discuss games that happend last week in order to look at the future. that’s what “tests” are… progress reports… and having someone look at what you’ve done, based on expectations and experience, and talk about what went well or not, is how you learn what to improve on as you go.
no, we don’t expect mike leach to be coming to DTN (how cool would that be?!?!?) and get his coaching tips from us based on our feelings about the game. but it’s part of how we as fans put ourselves into the game. we can think, surely, if we can see what needs to be fixed and worked on and what went well… those guys getting paid to do it can too! and it’s how we as fans, as a community, can have “intelligent” conversations about the team. if this blog were a bunch of “kool-aid mixers” then i wouldn’t read it every day like i do, if at all. We also wouldn’t be respected at all by other blogs and readers. you have to call out your weaknesses to show that you have proper perspective on your strength. this is all how we as fans become smarter and more into game that we love.
Kayakyakr- don’t stop! WRECK ’EM!!
Wreck 'Em Tech!
J.T.H.
by redraidersax on Sep 22, 2009 5:41 AM CDT up reply actions
I like seeing the reviews very much. Some areas of the game (DBs) I’m vaguely familiar with, others (line play) I’m not so much. The reviews from the various authors here give me a chance to see if I’m on track or out in left field. We may not always agree, but I’m not about to fault anyone who puts all his time and effort into something I read religiously. Just the number crunching often involved is something very few of us would have the time or aptitude to do. Grades don’t bother me either. A single letter saves a lot of words. If a players sees anything critical here, we can be sure he’s already heard worse from the coaches. Either that or he’ll know we’re wrong.
I love the reviews
I may not remember the whole game but when I read a review it jogs the memory and I like comparing what I think and because of this post you and everyone else who post here views of the last game.
Just like this last game I didn’t get to watch or listen to it. The only highlights are of TU.
So I get a pretty good idea of what I would think of the game from fellow Tech fans.
Keep up the good work
If you not having fun....then your not playing the game right.

by 
















