Part 3: Assessing the First W (in context)
(Sorry for the Parts 1,2,3. I think the graphs take up too much memory and there's only so much memory allowed for each post!)
But you know, I gotta have more cowbell charts!
Defensive Performance
The defense held up its end of the bargain and performed well.
|
Year |
Opponent |
Points Allowed |
Yds Allowed |
|
2000 |
New Mexico |
3 |
167 |
|
2001 |
New Mexico |
30 |
|
|
2002 |
Ohio State |
45 |
477 |
|
2003 |
SMU |
10 |
280 |
|
2004 |
SMU |
13 |
322 |
|
2005 |
Florida Intl |
3 |
349 |
|
2006 |
SMU |
3 |
189 |
|
2007 |
SMU |
9 |
270 |
|
2008 |
East. Wash. |
24 |
364 |
|
2009 |
North Dak |
13 |
207 |
|
|
Averages (ex OSU) |
12 |
269 |
Conclusions: I am already on record and will continue to be a ready critic of the Texas Tech defense for the rest of the year. Despite, the progress we were alleged to have made as a defense last year, we still ended up being ranked just 79th overall (94th against the pass). I’ll save my breath on this for later, as I (unfortunately) expect that there will be ample opportunity to expound on this topic as the season progresses.
Having said that, I thought our defense played pretty well, despite giving up some longish possessions. After our jaw-droppingly poor performance against Eastern Washington last year (or were you so traumatized that, like me, you erased giving up 360-odd yards to the E-Dub Eagles from your memory), I felt we contained North Dakota well. It was the defensive unit’s third best performance in an opening game for which it deserves credit.
You might argue that North Dakota is the worst cupcake we’ve played to date, but I bet that the 2009 Fighting Sioux squad would give 2005 Florida International, 2008 Eastern Washington and some of those SMU teams a good run for their money.
For those of us who have followed Tech for awhile, we know that Tech is not the kind of team that goes out every night and does what it’s supposed to, especially early on.
It’s disappointing that we didn’t dominate this one from start to finish. The Team, Leach and his coaches know they have a lot to prove this season, and game one was just the first step.
Go Red Raiders!!
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Cowbell
We certainly need more cowbell. Sometimes it’s not the winning or losing it’s leaving some in the tank. Since Leach got here he has always preached going out with all guns blazing and leaving nothing left. All shells, peg legs, and plank shards should be left on the field. This is always his philosophy. Do your job. Do your job. Tell me if the O-line, running backs, team feel they gave this kind of performance. This is why we “do more with less”. If it’s possible we win. I sounds like an emotional wreck at this point in the post but there is a lot of truth to this for 18 to 21 year old dudes. And they failed. Ask the veterans about the Cotton Bowl last year. They left half their stuff in the hotel room. As a fan base, coaches group, and team I know everyone demands more. With Potts we will give more. Potts is the key and his remarks on himself after the first game say a lot. He knows where we were and hates it. As timid as people are in there public remarks he hated this.
As context I am listening to 80 metal right now.
by logan5555 on Sep 7, 2009 5:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I need more cowbell too. Great analysis LR. You’re a quality front page guy. Plus I LOL everytime I picture Will Ferrell dancing around, gut hanging out, banging on that cowbell.
by Plano Jeff on Sep 7, 2009 9:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Excellent analysis. Good stuff, as always.
by Campeador on Sep 7, 2009 9:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















