Stix/Potts,TwitterGate,Fat Girlfriends, Leach is Gone...Let's connect the dots!
With the exception of a sloppy pirate poem, I have tried to remain quiet these last weeks. Don't get me wrong, my blood has boiled, and I have taken the same emotional progression as most of you to be sure. That said, I just had a sneaking notion that as more information was released, much of the stuff that really made no sense, would start to come together. True to form, the last week has not only shed light on the Leach debacle, but has also connected the dots for the entire season. The following post represents my attempt to connect the dots, and put bookends on the "Real 2009 Season".
Disclaimer: For the record I support Tech Sports with a fervent zeal, and obsessive passion that would make the Taliban envious. Although I have never been scared to be critical when I felt it was warranted, I support Mike Leach 100%. Furthermore, I am skeptical as to whether any new coaching combination will allow us to put the "lightening back in the bottle". I also add that I am convinced that this entire situation should have been handled drastically differently, was an embarrassment to our proud school, and that blame falls squarely at the feet of what is at best an inept adminisration, and at worst a corrupt bunch of moneychangers. If at anypoint you feel I have strayed from the Leach party line, or given the admin a pass, please refer back to this disclaimer.
The Touchstone: Back in October I was happy to participate in the many heated debates here at DTN. At midseason we were discussing Potts/Stix, TwitterGate, Fat LittleGirlfriends, and the "bad losses". I can admit I was simply lost as to why we were losing games we should win and star players were being suspended, why Leach was pushing Potts but the team was pushing Stix, and our girlfriends were fat and senior linebackers were flaming their coach on Twitter. The general opinion at the time was that Coach knew what he was doing, these are natural growing pains of a young team, it was unpopular to criticize anything that was going on, and to consider whether coach had lost the team was a laughable joke at best. I'll be the first to say I was confused as hell, but that explaination just didn't sit well with me. Some where along the way I had an epiphany (along with Tortilla Pirate or Centex, can't recall) that something was wrong inside the team. Months later, facts and player admissions from as recently as Saturday night have shown how this was not only true, but actually far more serious than any could have imagined. More importantly, it explains much about what we all agreed was a very strange season, even before we lost the great Pirate.
Carter...TwitterGate....Bad Loss #1 (UH): For non-insiders like myself, this was the first sign of trouble in RaiderNation, and considering it was only week 4, it was pretty early. A senior All-Everything Lineman whose face became a national phenomenon (even it was childish to paint your face), speaks out against the coaching staff and is suspended. A senior linebacker Twitters his frustration with the head coach. Questionable playcalling leads to the first proverbial bad loss to a team who later losses to UTEP and AirForce. Connect the dots: This was not growing pains, this was not a senior trying to motivate his team in the locker room. IMHO, this was evidence that even at this early point in the season tensions between Coach Leach and his players had deteriorated to the point it was now a public matter.
Potts/Stix and bad Loss #2 (A&M): It really makes non difference where you come out on who you would like to see win this battle in the Spring. What has become appearent to me is that this controversy was part of a bigger issue with the team. On one hand you had the coach giving more reps, ultimately the starting job, and later his constant support in the face of bad play, to Potts. On the other hand you had every player interviewed saying publically that Stix had earned the starting job. Connect the Dots: Potts was Leach's QB, Stix was the teams QB. This was evident in their play, and proven in their own public statements. However, this divide only went so far. Once Potts earned the ire and mistreatment of the booing fans, the team began to bring him back into the fold. An example would be Barron Batch's praise for Potts after the Kansas game. You see, the team was willing to speak out against Potts as a referendum on Leach. But the moment we the fans then attacked Potts, a "family" member (a term the team uses often now, but always excluding Leach), then the team was quick to bring Potts back into the fold, but not Leach. After Stix goes up to Lincoln and embarrases NE at home, the team is now validated in their support for Stix, and their discontent with Leach's judgement. Then, in a cruel twist of fate, Stix is out for the next game with A&M. The players get down as they are forced to accept Leach's QB and return to the staus quo. The result, maybe one of the most head scratching games of the Leach era, atleast until you connect the dots.
Adam & Craig James: I can summarize my opinion of the James clan by pointing out that they are not just tools, but rather a entire 2500 piece Craftman Tool Set. Adam represents every spoiled, talent-less coaches son who was undservingly played ahead of you in sports. His dad was every overbearing father who bought his kid evey shoe, bat, pad, or warm-up suit Nike made. Just like the dad who showed up at every practice and game, annoying the coach, cussing the umps, and ultimately succeeded in having his son in the spotlight just to shut him up. If Craig James has proven anything it is that SMU taught him nothing, and he taught his son even less. Connect the dots: all this being true, these two are nothing more than pawns. If Craig's complaint goes to any other Big 12 coach not on the hotseat with administration, it results in a very discreet appology to the family, and a very quiet shame on you to the coach. The bottom line is given what we now know about how this admin and boosters felt about Leach (emails), we can conclude safely that these coniving stooges were simply waiting with a catcher's mit for just this kind of fastball. I can imagine that admin generally receives numerous complaints over the years on nearly every coach in the country. With over 100 kids on each team, every team has one Craig James on the parent list, just like we each had one on every little league team we ever played on. This was enevitable. To that end, my punishment of the James clan ends today. They did not bring down Mike Leach. They just did what they do, and thousands like them do from the stands all across the country. Difference being that not every other team has the line-up from the Salem Witch trials waiting for the beachball pitch, right down the middle.
Our Administration: Speaking of the Salem Witch Trials. In all seriousness. Can we all, if we are honest, agree that Meyers, Hance, Bailey, Regents, and Boosters love Tech University? Of course they do. I will even go out on a limb and concede that they have all, in their own way, done something or many things that improved both sports and academics at our beloved school. All of that said, they work for us. We pay taxes, we paid tuition, we buy tickets, we buy the merchandise, we send our kids to do it all again. Among their many jobs as our employees is to ensure that by their action or inaction, they not allow the university to be embarrased publiclly. They must protect or better yet build the brand of Texas Tech. For that reason, and given what has occured, some if not all of these leaders, our employees, need to be fired immediately. In fact the much needed healing and page turning that must occur cannot and will not happen until this is done. I add that these leaders should not be fired for releasing Mike Leach or working with the James clan. They should be fired because they proved unable to do so without embarrassing the school and the brand. They willfully chose to make this a public matter as part of playing their hand. They gambled, won the pot, but lost the game. They chose to carpet bomb the school, when a precision guided missle would have don the job, and now Tech is burning circa Paris WWII. What happens to a military commander who publiclly kills 40,000+ civilians to knock off one insurgent? The answer, a trip to Levinworth (sp). I say again, that I am sure these leaders are good people, who meant well. But in the end, for all of their accomplishments, they should be fired for the same reason Mike Leach was. They are bad employees......it's time to fix the glitch.
Mike Leach: Mike Leach was the greatest football coach in our team's history. An offensive pioneer. Our coach with the most wins. He brought argueably the best recruits, the most money, and respect to a mid-market school in the middle of nowhere. He took me from Zebbie and belly flasks, to Duane Slay and pride. From something to do on Saturday to I'm a part of something special. Mike Leach made me proud to say I am a Red Raider. By all accounts every year before this year he has been one of the best to coach the game, and worthy of our love and sorrow. But this year was different. Brandon Carter put it well this weekend when he gave us the insight that coach was a good coach, but it went down hill this year. After not getting a contract extension before the 2008 season, Mike began to shop. Whether it was real or for leverage, he did it, and it was noisy. This led the administration and a small but evil set of boosters who already did not approve of pirates and passing, to begin the plot of his demise. Then in another cruel twist, Mike takes the team to it's best season ever, beats Texas & A&M , and at one point was ranked 2nd in the country. The court of public opinion spoke, Mike Leach was a savior, and he used it against the admin to get a fatter deal, when no other option presented itself. But the damage was done. Mike was sour, the admin was threw with Mike, and the contract extension was about as real as ESPN's credibility. In the end, both Mike and the admin did what you do with a worthless piece of paper, you wipe your butt with it. Mike returned to coach the team in 2009 with angst in his heart, and a working relationship with his school that makes Washington D.C. look like a pillow fight. His players felt it, his coaches felt it. It cooked and festered behind the scenes, and then exploded over and over all season long, until it's final erruption. Mike Leach should no longer be our coach. Not because he told the admin to f*&$ off. I would have done same given what they put him through. Mike leach should have been fired because he did the one thing a coach can never do. The one thing that is even worse than loosing. Mike Leach lost the hearts and minds of his team. He let his career aspriations and his relationship with his school seep into the day to day job of coaching. If you don't believe me, just pick up a paper and read his player's comments. I know what your going to say, "it's just the bench players and problem children". Barron Batch may be the most talented, intelligent, hard working player on that squad. His advice to the team and fans? It's time to move forward. With all my heart I love you coach Leach, thank you for all you have done, too much to list here. I'm ready to move on.
The Next Coach: As with this entire post, this is only my opinion. There are many others here like Seth, Kayak etc. whose football smarts exceed my own by factors of 100. That said the only choice that makes sense is to keep Ruffin on as HC. The first reason is recruiting. This may very well be the best class in program history, they were all recruited by these coaches, and many have said their commitment depends on seeing these coaches continue. The second reason is culture. We are not an I-formation, run first, defend second, pass last team anymore. We are the Air Raid. We redefined college football. We are feared and respected for what we do on the field. I am not ready to say we cannot continue to be that. Ruff is our best chance at seeing that culture through. Lastly, the future is uncertain. In todays game, it is rare a coach stays at a program for 10 years. Just ask Michigan, ND, WV, LSU..etc. Ruff gives us a chance at every thing I listed above, but if he doesn't work out, there is no reason we can't shop for a replacement in a 2 years. Laslty, Ruffin McNeil loves to coach football at Texas Tech Univeristy. If Tech let him, I truly believe he would like to do it till he dies. Given our current situation, I think we need a coach with love in his heart, that can bring us back together as fans and players. He needs to be a face guy. The recruits, players, parents, and admin love him. He is our Mack Brown. He needs to bring in the real statiticians as coordinators. This is the model that has made OK and UT elite, and it may be just what we need to take the next step.
I say again, these are simply my humble opinions. My eyes have been opened in the last few weeks, and I have what I need to move on. Thank you to DTN an all of it's members for an amzing site and culture. Have a great 2010, and Wreck'em Tech!! AAAAARRRRRGGGGGG!!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Double-T Nation's writers or editors.
90 comments
|
11 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
+10000000000000000000000000000
This is the way I feel……If you don’t think Leach is a pioneer then just look @ the Offenses in the Big 12 in 1998 and them now….who is the constant? Also, look @ how 4th down is viewed today(N.E Patriots) again who change the perception…really only one man….But TTech had a good 10 year run but it doesn’t have to totally end….Cause at least the Pirate culture can continue under Ruff and after a couple of years…..Wreck’Em Tech
"Mike Leach lost the hearts and minds of his team."
Please provide your evidence, links or sources…
LOSS TO HOUSTON???
That can be placed at the feet of the Big XII crew that worked the game. Official got whistle happy on the goal line play. He called the play dead to soon….he didn’t let it develop or Tech would have scored.
BRANDON CARTER WAS ONE PLAYER....give me more evidence
Brandon Carter, is and always will be a ME FIRST player. Nothing wrong with that, it’s his personality. However, that tyoe of person is not a TEAM LEADER. He’s glad Mike Leach is gone for the same reason Adam James is. He got his hand slapped for NOT being a TEAM PLAYER.
by JBTX68 on Jan 9, 2010 11:30 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Well Covered
We always need to look at both sides and this post does it well. I remember John Madden saying that 10 years is long enough to coach one place and then become stale (ok when will Mack Brown become stale?). I do think two other coaches can continue the Air Raid tradition but, it depends on the Administration acting “quickly and decisively” and willing to pay marketprice for the stability. That at this time is a big question mark.
EVERY COACH GETS STALE
Tom Landry said it best. “Every coach has been, or will be, fired…”
Give Mac a couple of years of not being in the Championship game and the Horns will get restless. They have the largest football budget in the NCAA. What would Tech (or any other school) do with that much cash? One thing they DIDN’T do….have a chiropractor on staff when McCoy pinched a nerve. I’ll bet they will now.
Shallowater, really?
This premise here is the Brandon Carter speaks for the entire team when he says “Leach lost the team”… But one of your other posts went this way
“Brandon Cartoon is irrelevant.
Meaningless. We’re supposed to respect the word of a radical who paints his face black?
I would have more respect if he used green paint and called himself The Great Kabuki.”
I’m all over the place on this myself. So that’s why I’m asking for people who may know, have specific info from all of the team to post it, it makes a difference. Did Leach loose his frikkin mind this year or did the players fat little girlfriends poison the entire team, or just a few players?>??. I’m all for opinions, but damn lets find out what is really happening.
by raider realist on Jan 4, 2010 3:26 PM CST up reply actions
I hear you.....
Carter is not a model citizen by any means. That said, the fact that upper classmen, guys that have been with leach for years are speaking out against him is very telling. It tells us we didn’t really know what was going on. Carter, Batch, Williams, Perry, both Charbonett brothers, Swindall, they all have spoke out about a season of questionable coaching. Leach’s own trainers and doctors, appointed by him are siging documents etc. Even Lincoln Riley, a Leach insider has quickly softend his stance of support. It’s all there if you willing to read it.
Let's not forget the words of support from Graham Harrell et al who have come out openly in the their support of Leach
Not forgotten....
But Harrell did not play for Leach in 2009. He also publicly stated last year that he hoped Leach would stay at Tech but thought he would move on. Looking back, Graham saw the writing on the wall back in late 2008.
Why do you bash Carter as not being a Model Citizen? I think an All American O Lineman and three year starter is a pretty good example of a good guy
What do on the field honors...
have to do with character? I in no way feel Brandon is a bad kid, just not a model kid. I won’t list my reasons here, less the same be done to me.
Yes, and here's why
Check out my post on the Concussion Charade thread—
Too Big for Their Britches
I think many of the teams’ problems this year stem from the players’ (and maybe the coaches’) inability to deal with the instant fame they received last year as the result of the dramatic defeat of Texas, the rankings, and the primetime coverage.
From a performance standpoint, this was a pretty dismal year for Tech. 8-4, including 3 losses in conference (Big 12 South) games, a loss to Houston (who went on to lose to UTEP), and a near-loss to Baylor.
TTUMAR’s theory takes all of this into account. It was clear that Leach was having problems keeping the team on track. This theory would explain it. Plus, it takes the dismal season into account. I think most people here were discounting the Raider’s disappointing record, holding that it did not factor into the decision. I don’t buy that.
I beleive there is some credibility in that the team may not have been able to deal with the instant fame. And looking at it another way…Leach had to navigate and manage the team as well as the "new’ expectations from all around him, while placating an administration with narrow vision and even less sophistication
That's a lot to handle
and it’s well within reason that Leach could have been able to handle it much easier and better next season with a bit of a gut check that this year’s record produced.
It’s called growing pains.
Pirate for life...
by Damien Franco on Jan 7, 2010 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
8-4?
There was time that we (Alumni) were ESTATIC for an 8-4 season. THAT is how far the program has come! 8-4 isn’t good enough and THAT IS GREAT!!!
Personally, I think that Leach loved the TEAM…but his war with the Administration, and add in pussies like James (and perhaps a few more prima donnas) wore on him. That would ware on any of us. I’m sure that there is a story behind the “fat little girlfriend” statement. Perhaps the players were getting VERY full of themselves. He kept trying to keep them focused, but everywhere they went, (in class, frat parties, lunch, around Lubbock, in the sack with their girl friend) they were being told how good they were. In an old school term…they were reading and believing the press clippings. The ability to get past that comes with YEARS of experience and MATURITY. For example, the OU game in 08. They beat TU and THINK they can conquer the world. You still have to play the game!
It’s not just Tech and Leach. I think it happened to TCU this year against Boise State. EVERYONE in Fort Worth was telling them how good they were…but they had never been to the big show. Boise had, and KNEW what that big spot light was going to be like. No matter what Gary Patterson did or said, the players had it in the back of their mind that Boise was “beneath them”…that they "deserved to play Florida…or Texas…or Alabama.
So who runs the team?
The players?
The admins?
The booster?
No!
The head coach!
But our head coach had his legs taken out from beneath him by the players with the backing of the admins and boosters!
That’s what stinks of this whole thing!
Tip for the next sucker… er, coach, watch your back!
i agree to an extent
But if the players are not buying what your selling anymore, the game is over. You can loose games, but you can’t loose your team. Why Leach didn’t smell this out in camp or certainly in Oct is a mystery. Regardless, he wasn’t able to keep the team. You heard them, they are a united family, and ready to move on.
by TTUMAR on Jan 4, 2010 4:03 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
How do you go from #2 with the program's signature "win" and Coach of the Year
to losing the team in 12 months? Don’t the players want to win? How could anyone question that Leach was a winner? Maybe the players weren’t executing to their potential and are using this as an excuse to deflect accountability.
great question...
But it happened, if you have a theory as to how it happened, I’m ready
by TTUMAR on Jan 4, 2010 4:24 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Yes, I read it
Just my opinion that all of the externalities could not have led to the destruction of the very intimate relationship between the winningest coach in program history and his players that quickly. I haven’t followed your season nearly as closely as you guys, but I would suggest an alternative theory that this is just player frustration from a rough season. I’m sure the Captain was all over their asses this year.
You loose the team
Easy when you see your coach playing games with a below average player and his ESPN Daddy. Eveyone knew the kid was no good except Leach was the only supporter of the James family. He wanted Adam around Leach enjoyed the attention. The players and other coaches could see the compromises Mike was making just for the attention.
You ever work somewhere and the co-worker eveyone know is worthless gets attention from the boss.
Good stuff...
..though I think the link between Coach Leach “losing the team” and the ill effects and pressure from the administration pressing Leach after the administration was forced by public opinion to give him the extension was not explored in this analysis…
The administration was pissed about losing this PR battle and was looking for ANY way to get Leach back….this “pressure” is why coach Leach may have caved in and was not himself(as evidenced in the nine prior years of his leadership/tenure and comments from past players and coach’s).
So in short I firmly blame the leaders of our fine institution for the events that has lead to us losing not only our best coach ever, but a " Contrarian and outside of the box thinker" or a coach that is the opposite of our administration !!!
Agree, but this post is about Leach loosing the team
And what “questionable coaching” means.
And if Tech has another smoking gun as they say, proving that Leach is some kind of freaking lunatic that abused players this year.
About 60,000 Team Leach members have a T-Shirt to send back it that’s the case.
by raider realist on Jan 4, 2010 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
And if one more person tells me "There are things nobody knows about this"
Blood is going to shoot out of my eyes.
Somebody PLEASE let this poor cat out of the bag…
by raider realist on Jan 4, 2010 4:11 PM CST up reply actions
And if someone uses "loose" instead of "lose"
I’m going to smack every one of you with a grammar book.
The team shook loose from the grasp of Coach Leach.
Leach will lose his job if he doesn’t apologize.
See the difference everyone?
Give me team chemistry and emotion over stats any day. Do you think 34,000 Ranger fans were screaming their asses off over Pudge and his .275 OBP?
Thank you, Ace
It was starting to make my eyes hurt. Th’e onl’y thin’g wors’e i’s misus’e o’f th’e apostroph’e, or when speaking to use the verb “to go” as a synonym for “to say.” Well, that’s not the only thing worse. Getting sent to the shed is obviously a lot worse, but a little hyperbole never hurt anyone.
Next week’s sermon: How the word “like” is killing the language.
Sure. For basic usage:
Choose is present tense.
Chose is past tense.
I choose not to support Myers and Hance.
Last week, Coach Leach chose to give the Board of Regents the middle finger.
There are a certain exceptions, but in most cases, you can use that as a guide.
Give me team chemistry and emotion over stats any day. Do you think 34,000 Ranger fans were screaming their asses off over Pudge and his .275 OBP?
See, that's why it's confusing.
Choose rhymes with lose.
Choose is pronounced the same as Chews?
Chose rhymes with rose.
Hmmm…..He chose a rose. He chose a rose. He chose a rose.
I'm keeping mine
I’ve got my team Leach shirt, and I’m keeping it. But I also am ready to move forward for the reasons above
by TTUMAR on Jan 4, 2010 4:14 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Whatever happened inside the team happened this year. Even so, I don’t buy that the team is largely against Leach until I hear it from a sourse I trust. So far I have only heard it from a few players that seem to have no problems with breaking the rules. Batch is the lone exception. It isn’t always good to be alone.
There are too many players from last season that seem to be on the opposite side of this.
I also think that the boosters, administratiuon, and James family could have more to do with the team’s problems than Leach.
Well stated...
Excellent Post! I believe your connection of the dots is thorough and insightful. I hope Coach Leach gets a fair settlement and goes on to future success. Personally, I would love to see the guy in the NFL. His pioneering spirit and innovation would be fun to see there.
I also hope to see some house cleaning with this administration. They certainly have damaged the brand.
Finally, I especially agree with your reasoning as to why Ruff is the guy we need right now. I think he would be a better HC than a DC anyway. He makes a great Mack Brown. Well said, from start to finish.
Good post I am irritated by ego’s getting in the way of the protecting the Tech "product
Wrote this earlier but it fits here as well:
It’s a real shame that the administration got scared of success. Was Mike Leach tough to "handle" probably but high performers usually are. I for one could see the shadow of the Masked Rider growing larger. Its architect was a driven nut job coach. Now we wait to see how far the slide back to mediocrity will be. It’s a real shame the “powers” that be" the boosters and other self appointed worthies couldn’t have expended energy finding funding for the university and its many worthy endeavors. What a colossal waste of time booting someone who makes you look good. Focus on the success people (Tech Administration) – go get more money – not trying pinch out a few bucks by downsizing your precious compensation model. You don’t win by retreating from the competition. So am I damning the so called "expert" TTU personnel and management team you bet I am.
As far as losing the team- I don’t have enough evidence. Every team has someone who has to be coaxed into buying in. But there is the rub having the leadership to deal with all the human frailties and still focus on the bigger task, mission or event.
"do routine things routinely"
Would we be here is Tech played in a BSC bowl?
People seem to get a little less principled around money and poer. I think it is sad when you think that the administration would have probably told the James family to walk the plank if the team was in the national spotlight. The players would have been unifed (assuming they were really divided). Leach would be a hero to all of us, not just those of us that commit the time to read all of the sources.
TTUMAR, Another Constructive Criticism
of your article.
Regarding Adam and Craig James, they were certainly part of the problem, part of the reason why ML lost control of the team. Adam James exuded a certain attitude which was detrimental to the team, an attitude that said, “I don’t have to do what the coaches say.” That type of attitude can spread like a wildfire across a team. Mike Leach certainly thought so. If Leach didn’t think Adam’s casual, disrespectful attitude would infect the other players at practice on December 17th—if he thought Adam was harmless—then Leach wouldn’t have reacted so strongly to the disrespect.
Certainly Adam enjoys somewhat of a Rock Star status on the team, what with his father’s contacts to important people in the sports industry. He would not be a person you would want to ignore or piss off, for the very reason that you might obtain a lead on a nfl position in the future, or a sponsorship, or whatever. Conversely, if you tick of the Jameses, it might come back to haunt you if you achieve success in the future: one negative word from CJ could kill a shoe deal, for instance.
i agree with that..
My analysis of the James clan was not thorough, and his impact on the team as a slacker seems real, and was addressed by his position coach. But I also believe that a coach of ten years has to root that out before it becomes a problem. In this case, unfortunately for us all that didn’t happen.
by TTUMAR on Jan 4, 2010 5:05 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Clean House: A Change for the Better!
The Tech Administration (Board of Regents, Chancellor, President, Athletic Director, etc.) failed Texas Tech University. Besides publicly embarrassing the school, it appears they were all involved in questionable activity. Because a select few had personal issues with Mike Leach, they used the Adam James incident to fire him. Rather than use best practice business principles to resolve this issue, they acted in a willful negligent manner. No matter your opinion, and n0o matter your side in this controversy, as a result of their misdeeds and actions TTU will pay the price. Most certainly we will be forced to pay several million dollars in an unlawful termination lawsuit, and the school will suffer financially as a result of lost future donations/contributions, revocation of committed pledges, cancellation of season tickets, and lost merchandise sales. Besides the public humiliation Tech suffered, there’s risk of losing some of the athletes that made the 2010 Recruiting Class the Tech’s best ever.
Throughout this entire controversial issue, I have not seen a single shred of evidence that anyone with the Tech Administration feels contrite, has offered an apology, or that a complete independent investigation will be completed to determine what, if anyone, acted inappropriately and improperly. The fact remains that this Administration has a certain fiduciary responsibility to the school, the fans, students, boosters and loyal supporters. They work for the Red Raider Nation!
A petition has been circulated seeking an immediate investigation in this matter, with those acting improperly to be held accountable. I read it, supported it, and signed it. Please click on this link, or cut and paste it into your web browser and give this some consideration as well. The Red Raider Nation must demand that we initiate a thorough house cleaning within the Texas Tech University Administration and Board of Regents and install a more progressive group of leaders that has the best interests of Texas Tech University in mind, and make it our goal that we want to be the elite school in the Big 12 with an elite athletics program. Failure to cause change will result in this school dropping back to mediocrity.
The Petition Link is: http://www.petitiononline.com/Pirate/petition.html
Excellent read, TTUMAR!
Probably the least biased piece of writing that I’ve seen in the past week. Shared it with a few Sooner fans who I have to endure day in and day out at work. Thankfully, they are Leach fans. Good job!
Very good thoughts...
That’s about the most reasonable explanation of the A&M game that I’ve ever heard… (maybe better than the FLG theory…)
However, I’m not convinced Leach “lost” the team.
It is an unusual cast of characters who have made any negative comment about Leach publicly. Out of the group, Batch is the only one I consider to not have some kind of personal baggage re Coach Leach. And if you look at his comments carefully, he didn’t say anything negative, but took a pragmatic approach to moving forward… very reasonable for someone in his situation…
But there was, in hindsight, obviously some dissension within the team. And it was significant enough to cause problems even if it wasn’t at a level I would characterize as having “lost control” of the team…
As a note, under these circumstances, the type of character and influence that Adam James may of had is an even bigger issue… Did the Raider receiving corps measure up to anyone’s expectations this year? (with maybe the lone exception of Alex Torres…)
Leach also "lost" the team in 2006...
I’ve been visiting this site for several years and finally decided to dive in. Grew up in Lubbock, graduated from Tech and have been living & dying with the football team every Saturday in the fall for 30+ years. My question is- does everyone remember the turmoil in 2006? Robert Johnson suspended a few times, horrible losses to TCU, Colorado and Mizzou, blew a 21 point lead to freshman Colt McCoy and had “ice cream socials” replace Sunday night practice. The season was saved with a huge comeback in the Insight Bowl. What is the similarity to 2009? A lack of team leaders, dissention in the locker room, and Mike Leach scrambling like hell to hold it together. In 2006 Harrell was only a sophomore, Crabtree was dazzling only during Thursday scrimmages and the team was almost taken down by a bunch of “prima donna” wide receivers. In 2007 and 2008 we saw what was possible when leadership in the locker room (Harrell, Crabtree, Reed, Morris, Williams, etc) combined with a head coach known for being extremely demanding on his players and coaches. I’ll never buy into the notion that Leach lost this team. Perhaps several (including Brandon Carter, Swindell, etc) lost Mike Leach, but he held them together and delivered an 8-4 record. And, with real leadership again stepping up in 2010 (Karam? Graves?) Mike Leach’s team was destined to build on previous success. His body of work over the past 10 years shows that. He pisses players off and they don’t always see eye to eye- but the players that he didn’t lose (and that bought into the system) always got results. In the classroom and on the field. Those that didn’t probably don’t have a lot of nice things to say about Coach Leach and are happy to see him go. I’d prefer Graham Harrell, Rylan Reed and Eric Morris on my team. With Mike Leach as my coach.
by San Antonio Red Raider on Jan 4, 2010 5:52 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
That's a good point.
Even if he “lost” the team this year, do you fire him over it—the winningest coach in team history? Don’t you give him a few years to see if he can get it back together? Performance lagged this year, but the recruiting class was looking good.
Remember how emotional the Captain was after that Insight Bowl...
Thanks for bringing that memory back… what a crazy year, with maybe the most exciting, emotional ending we ever experienced.
by raider realist on Jan 4, 2010 6:04 PM CST up reply actions
I like your points
And I would prefer the team you listed as well. When 5 or 6 CURRENT players refute what these others have said, I will go back to being conflicted and confused. Till then, we have a whole season of strange problems that put together with these reports, point to one thing. Mike Leach let his trials with school, however unfair, to affect his team. As a coach, you can’t do that, appearantly not even for one season.
by TTUMAR on Jan 4, 2010 6:31 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Perfectly stated
I agree that Leach may have “lost” the team. But give the guy a chance to get it back together. This season was a hangover for the coach and the team.
You sleep off a bad day then get up the next and do it over again.
Only this time…our Captain had his throat slit while he was managing the hangover.
We’ll never know what next year could have been with Leach at the helm.
So we go on into the unknown. While I’m one to typically embrace change…this one I fear will have us hoping for 6-6 seasons for a long time to come.
Pirate for life...
by Damien Franco on Jan 4, 2010 10:54 PM CST up reply actions
I seem to recall the Jarred Hicks saga!
I also recall Leach not being concerned with it all. He’s there to coach and hold the team together.
Great post!
" Answers -- Become Resources."
Without Questions; There are limited Resources...
I discount the players reactions
I don’t recall any of them saying anything negative about Leach. I believe they were reacting to, and displaying their disappointment at the situation (except perhaps Carter). I am sure (speculation) they were told that Leach could have avoided all this, but he was just being stubborn, and it was Leach’s stubbornness that resulted in the dsimissal. I am sure they have all witnessed his bull-headedness, and at the time, blamed Leach.
Their reaction was a shrug of the shoulders and “What are ya gonna do, he’s gone, and he ain’t comin’ back”.
These are still kids, and support for Leach would have been viewed as disrespect for Ruffin, who is also well thought of.
Seniors
What about Mike’s seniors? These seniors had nothing to loose by supporting their enbattled coach. None chose to do so, an a number of them chose to make negative remarks. I understand the younger players not wanting to rock the boat. But the seniors have been with Leach for years, and yet they were at best silent, at worst relieved and glad he was gone according to their public statements. Once again, this notion Coach had the support of his team, and James & Co. Messed it all up just isn’t holding water anymore.
by TTUMAR on Jan 4, 2010 7:16 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Potts/Sticks
Potts and Sticks did not come out and say anything negative about the coach. They seemed the most loyal, thanked him for giving them a chance to play in D1 football and said they’ve heard different stories and declined to say which side they were on. That says a lot to me. Also, re: Potts, I think he was awesome especially against Texas, until he was hit by Sergio Kindle. If he hadn’t taken that hit late in the game, who knows. We will never know if Sticks could have pulled off a win against Tx. My guess is NO. I think the fans and players gave Potts a bad rap and relied on him for the win and blamed him for the losses. Sticks did not get as much playing time as Potts, but he had INT’s as well, so I just never saw the reason Potts got such a bad rap. Perhaps if the players weren’t so upset about Potts playing, they could have given the game everything they’ve got and helped Pott’s pull off some wins. I also firmly believe that if Sticks had started, he would have been injured and Potts would have had to come in. The QB injuries are a result of the O-Line not protecting the QB. Both of them were injured….sticks had the foot injury. I agree with the players having big heads and thinking they could repeat last season but make it to the NC and they shouldn’t have been worrying about that, but playing each game as it came.
by TechRaiders on Jan 12, 2010 11:55 PM CST up reply actions
Good job TTUMAR...
I see one point differently however, instead of thinking in the terms of Coach Leach losing this team, I feel the team lost Coach Leach and his “love” for this team and the respect from some of the players. My dad always taught me, you command respect you can’t demand it, and unfortunately I feel he demanded it from a few on this team who don’t respect themselves much less anyone else. Pride is a powerful thing and has brought down many a man!
Nice post
Certain elements of the team had definitely turned against Leach. Maybe Leach’s decision to put Baby James someplace dark was a direct result of the dissension within the team and Leach’s crackdown on foolish , childish, and stupid behavior (see Brandon Carter). When you feel like you’re losing control, you crack down and make an example of someone (see Brandon Carter, again).
This all amounts to mutiny, if you want to put it in pirate terms. But the inmates don’t run the mad house. What the players feel might impact their game performance, but this year wasn’t worse than most expected. Very few expected a repeat of last year given a first year QB and the loss of several key offensive weapons.
Even the players losing faith or trust in Leach is just a distraction, something that wouldn’t even matter if the administration wasn’t hellbent on getting Leach out of town and saving a few bucks in the process. That fact and that alone is the reason why Leach is not the head coach at TTU today.
Yo ho, yo ho, a pirate's life for me...
I agree completely with merrik
I’m afraid we are beginning to dig for answers because this is all so stupid. My question is- when did this all begin to turn around? Remember when Leach was thought of as an absent minded professor who never showed any emotion and wasn’t tough enough on his players? Now he has turned into this evil dictator who didn’t allow twitter accounts and made fun of girlfriends? Does Ruff’s ascent have anything to do with this? He has been on the staff with Leach since the beginning serving in various capacities, but always as the uncle that would give everyone a big ol bear hug. Since his elevation to DC I wonder if the players began to compare/contrast his approach with Leach’s. I would prefer someone to give me a big ol hug to someone challenging me and making me work my tail off everyday of the week. The question is- how will that play out over time when he is named coach? The players, media, and administration will love him and we fans will be thrilled with an occasional 7-5 season. Spike Dykes 2.0 coming our way by next Monday!
by San Antonio Red Raider on Jan 4, 2010 8:23 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
I read somewhere
That Leach denies banning twitter and the media ran with that…media is not always accurate. But I agree with you nonetheless.
by TechRaiders on Jan 12, 2010 11:59 PM CST up reply actions
Good Insight!
However, I believe some of this years problems were due to this being a rebuilding year. We lost arguably the best QB in Tech history and no doubt the best Receiver in Tech history along with many other good players from the O line and defensive side of the ball. I believe many of our problems were due to inexperience.
I am really worried that our University may become known as cheapskate U when it comes to paying a coach. Most of the time in the real world you get what you pay for. As a farmer if I cut my inputs for example fertilizer, seed, irrigation etc. why should I expect a bumper crop. If we have a coach that has good success we are going to have to pay him and pay him handsomely.I don’t think our adm. and some of our older boosters understand this. If we want to maintain our reputation and step up to the big time we are going to have to pay big time salaries if we keep expecting success.
American farmers feed & clothe the world!
Especially
If they are bringing in Revenue, better recruits, and national attention and notoriety to the U.
by TechRaiders on Jan 13, 2010 12:02 AM CST up reply actions
I’m pretty sure if anyone asks how I feel about the situation I’ll just paste the link to this on here. You hit the nail on the head of almost everything I think. I imagine most Tech fans would have a hard time disagreeing with you and the AJ should publish stuff like this if they have the guts.
And I second your thoughts about Ruff. He could be our Mack Brown type guy. And he is a lovable character. Lets Ruff it.
Hance / James connection
It seems I heard, maybe in the Leach ESPN interview, that James was always calling Hance regarding, among other things, a business deal. I didn’t know what that meant, and wasn’t sure i had heard it correctly.
Maybe some one has mentioned it here, but i was reading elsewhere (comments to an article), and someone had mentioned that Hance and James were involved in a wind farm deal together. Has anyone else heard of this, or can verify it. if its true, it just adds to the sleaze of this whole deal.
I think papa James tried to deny that in his statement,
Trail however seems to have gone cold, I’ve been trying to find anything breaking,
by raider realist on Jan 4, 2010 10:26 PM CST up reply actions
That would be a classic way for a Little League Dad to get his foot in the door.
“Kent? This is Craig. I called to talk about the prospects for our wind farm deal. While I’ve got you on the phone, let’s talk about my my son. It sure would be great during that Tech broadcast that I’m announcing if he could get a few balls thrown his way…”
The fact
that CJ was calling any of our games sickens me. What a conflict of interest. I wrote a letter to BSPN asking them to not have any commentators on any games where they have a family member playing on the field. BSPN’s coverage of the Alamo Bowl sickened me as well.
by TechRaiders on Jan 13, 2010 12:04 AM CST up reply actions
hmm…I don’t believe Leach lost this team. I think this team simply had more immature players who were wusses and didn’t want to work as hard as Leach wanted them too. Like many other people, I liked last years squad a whole lot better than this year’s squad. It simply seemed like they were more tough “men” on the field than there were this year.
Graham Harrell. Rylan Reed. Michael Crabtree. Eric Morris. Louis Vasquez
Those guys worked their tails off and all have rightfully succeeded past their college careers at Texas Tech. Those are the type of players I want on my team. Not “emotional” players who are going to whine or complain about a coach constantly getting onto them for not practicing hard enough.
This was a great article and raises alot of good points nevertheless though.
Very well written
Ruffin
one of the Strengths of McNeill is recruiting though. He’s like the Dad every football player wants to have. All the players love him, and that’s not a bad element to have on a team. I personally want to keep Ruffin McNeill whether it be HC or DC i don’t care really…but Ruffin needs to stay for that reason. However, I don’t necessarily like the idea of Ruffin being Head Coach.
I simply can’t see Ruffin being the guy who is going to enstill discipline on our football team. Ruffin can’t let those players do whatever they want. He can’t constantly give them hugs n kisses every where they walk because that’s not going to win you tough football games. We need a head coach who is going to be as tough as Mack Brown, as tough as Bob Stoops and his brother down in Arizona. We need a Bo Pelini type of coach. Not a Ruffin McNeil as Head Coach.
Ruffin is still a great part of this team, and I do hope he stays on the team for a long time but when I look at the scope of things Ruffin may have a great future ahead of him if he continues his good work as DC but I simply do not think it is “his time” to be Texas Tech’s next head football coach. He needs to toughen up his personality and be less “emotional” if he wants that job.
I want to see the Bennie Wylie side of toughness out of Ruffin McNeil before I want him as my head coach.
Excellent Post TTUMAR
Thanks for connecting the dots for me. I agree and I’m also ready to move. I’m also ready to work with all you other fans to make sure we get new administration leadership. I’ve signed the petitions, written letters; what else?
Also, I hope the University of New Mexico hires Leach. UNM President, David Schmidly, helped hire Leach back in 1999 when he was TTU VP.
What at strange season....
Who would have thought that the Pirate’s last season would be so controversial…however, I shouldn’t be surprised as it is Mike Leach who we are talking about. This season has just been weird overall. Everything mentioned in the article above classifies the season perfectly. It was like we were in the bizarro universe. The calls were gimicky, the players were at odds, none of the quarterbacks wanted to play, the defense was shotty, Brandon Carter stopped painting his face…all these things made this most recent season the weirdest I have seen in my backing of Texas Tech.
I have arguments for all the coaches who are applying, but I think our question should be “Do we want to win now or later?” I still don’t know what to say. We really need the guy who will win now AND later. Who is that guy? Will he be the one calling the plays? Will he be the guy who just stands on the side lines with a headset that isn’t plugged in and let the assistants make the call? Will he be the poster boy who goes out as the official butt-kisser trying to make up for lost finances? I don’t have answers, nor really an opinion. I’m just wondering out loud. Any thoughts?
At the end of the day, TT is always going to mess it up
Having grown up in Lubbock, the South Plains and TTU will always be a special place for me. At the end of the day, though, no matter how big Tech or Lubbock grows small-town tactics and politics will rule. History has proven this time and again.
Take a look at past successful coaches.
Jim Carlen – Carlen wanted more power over the operation requesting to be the AD as well as head coach. He didn’t feel he would ever accomplish what he wanted at Tech without it (even after going 11-1), and they weren’t going to give him that much power so he jumped ship to South Carolina.
Steve Sloan – Nobody at Tech really believed he would ever stay around long. The buzz about him was he was next in line to replace Bear Bryant at Alabama where he also played. Tech signed him to a few successive one year deals but Tech didn’t want to make a commitment to him because everyone at Tech thought Tech was just a stepping stone. He eventually signed a deal with Ole Miss after 3 years. disloyal
Sloan was replaced by Rex Dockery, the President’s choice for football coach. The AD, JT King, lobbied hard for Tom Wilson (who would go on to coach at ATM), but the President wanted to show his authority. The decision ended up costing the President his job. This is where Texas Tech football entered what I like to refer to as: the “dark years” until T. Jones and Spike Dykes appeared on the scene in 1985-86.
Power, perception, stroking egos, loyalty, keeping in line…these are what are important to Tech administrators. You can say that the faces, attitude, and ways have changed, but have they really?
Mike Leach – the coach who did more to put Texas Tech on the national landscape than any coach before him. A coach who inspired legions of fans, players, and donors to unite behind his system. A coach who captivated audiences with his alternative viewpoints and intriguing interviews. After taking steps in his own interest (interviewing at other universities whether they were real or perceived interviews) he developed a target on his back as a miscreant and an disloyal ingrate.
The old guard in Dallas and the administrators didn’t like this uppity attitude. Who was he to demand more money than a coach from the B12 North who achieved the same record amidst far less competition! Who was he to go interview at competing schools! Who was he to lock up a player in a dungeon and give him 500 lashes, press him with weights, stretch him on racks, disembowel, and quarter him!
Tech has a unique ability to run off coaches who win 10 or more games in a season. The sooner we all realize that the past few years were an aberration more than the norm, the better off we’ll all be.
We will continue to support Red Raider athletics (although for me that can start again once Myers is gone), and maybe we’ll get another 10 win season some time. I will relish it and enjoy it for what it is. I’ll always know, however, that the big boys who run things in Lubbock will end up f%&^ing it up.
by rpowel2 on Jan 5, 2010 11:45 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
Well said Sir
Very disappointed that a bosses inabilty to connect with his employee soured this relationship.
Go Raiders – just dont ask for my money.
"do routine things routinely"
I agree....
A made a post earlier today discussing the public opinion of the actions of our “good-ole-boy club” of administrators and am asking for an organized call to action!!!(post:A outsiders perspective…)
Very well said
For those of us who have follwed the Raiders our entire lives, this is all painfully familiar. The leadership can’t handle success. With success, comes a loss of control. They would rather have control. This may be our “last straw” The question becomes, HOW do WE make a change?
The Damage to Adam James' Life
I have said this before in other places, but….
I have five kids (Three boys) ages 25-5. Yes, one wife. You don’t know how many times I have heard "Coach so-and-so or Teacher so-and-so doesn’t like me." The first thing I tell them is "LIFE AIN’T FAIR!" What do you need to do to get Coach so-and-so or Teacher so-and-so to like you?
Craig James has done his son a HUGE disservice. Some day soon little James will be in the work force where Papa James will not be able to bail him out. When that happens, you have to figure out what you need to do to work through the situation and come out on top. Son James is a MAN and needed to figure that situation out for himself. Sometimes life takes a little bit of sucking up and a$$ kissing. This young man needs to own up to his role in the events and not go through life thinking every bad situation is always someone else’s fault.
I am not dismissing Leach of his mistakes, but Craig James did his son potentially YEARS of damage with his actions.
My $.02.
I think you're right
It’s sad to think that a kid who may well have actually had a chance to be decent guy had to have a douchebag for a dad who just screwed him up. What’s Adam’s career path look like now? Guest shots on Real Housewives of somewhere? A Kim Kardashian Show spin-off?
Not likely
obscurity for a few years while his Dad sets him up in some cushy job using his political ties.
Then he’ll probably continue to groom Sweet Baby James to be just like “Good Old Dad”.
Pirate for life...
by Damien Franco on Jan 8, 2010 4:46 PM CST up reply actions
CJ
will get AJ every job he ever has, probably even meddle in his marriage…He’s just unbelievable. AJ will probably never have to actually work a day in his life, and therefore will do his kids a disservice. Unless of course AJ’s fortune will pay for their lives as well. Rich Dad Poor Dad, ever heard of that book?
by TechRaiders on Jan 13, 2010 12:08 AM CST up reply actions
I meant
unless of course CJ’s fortune will pay for future generations.
by TechRaiders on Jan 13, 2010 12:09 AM CST up reply actions
I totally agree...but
Great article! You made a lot of good points. I remember thinking during the season, mostly after the losses, and the player suspensions, and twittergate, how it seemed like he was losing the team. But hold on a second…I remember being 18, 19, 20…as a matter of fact it was a mere few years ago. I remember many times, my least favorite professors, my least favorite bosses (well, some were just total dicks), and even my parents, really, really pissed me off. They disciplined me, gave me homework, bad grades, less/bad shifts, and I remember thinking how I deserved better, how I’m better than that and they should see that. I remember thinking how they didn’t know what the hell they were doing/thinking/talking about. I was defiant. I was at times abrasive. I was, for about two solid years, lazy. I’ve been there, boy have I been there.
But years later, classes passed, graduated, gainfully employed, with a girlfriend who I’m sure would’ve never so much as looked at me long ago, I look back, with a little more experience, wisdom, & knowledge. I look fondly, with much respect towards those who, at the time, were really hard on me. I appreciate my parents for always being on my ass to go to class, and to those professors who were the hardest, I learned the most in, I remember the most from those classes, and I really did enjoy them (looking back, I didn’t enjoy them while I was in). This is probably where the distinction between good reps from past players, and bad reps from current players, comes from.
The point is, when you’ve got 100+ (?) kids between 18-21, someone has got to be the boss. They can’t be the boss, the coach has to be the boss. I’m sure Mike was hard on them. Maybe he was too hard. Maybe conflict between Leach and Admin was spilling over into the team, but I can’t really side with the players on this one. Regardless of who was really wrong, their actions definitely did not make the situation any better. Sometimes we put college football players up on this pedestal. We not only expect them to be talented, but to be mature. We want them all to be Tebow—an adult among mere children. They’re not. They’re kids. Trust me. I was one [a child, not a player, well, not in college anyway].
by mkbryant on Jan 9, 2010 12:21 AM CST reply actions 1 recs

by 



















