Defensive Matchups | Northwestern Wildcats Offense vs. Texas Tech Red Raiders Defense

TEXAS TECH DEFENSE VS.
NORTHWESTERN OFFENSE | Thank goodness that Northwestern isn't a top 25 pass offense, otherwise I think Texas Tech might be in some trouble. If you cannot tell that this is sarcasm, then you don't know me well. The pass defense started out on the wrong foot and it's never gotten back on track. I intend on getting to this later in the offseason, but I've praised the book from Pat Kirwan on the NFL and one of the chapters deals with defensive backs. The thought is that cornerbacks that play man coverage and cornerbacks that play zone coverage are two completely different type of players. What they are asked to do are completely different. Sure, they play the same position, but their responsibilities are completely different. Perhaps the biggest thing is that when a cornerback is playing man coverage, his rear-end is facing the quarterback and is trying to force the receiver to the outside along the sideline, while a cornerback playing zone coverage has his rear-end facing the sideline and is trying to force the receiver towards the middle of the field. I'm going back in my mental memory of the games and it seems like that most, if not all of the long passes were completed along the sideline, which is exactly what Willis wants. Well, he doesn't necessarily want the completions to be made, but the cornerbacks are forcing the opposing receivers into the correct coverage.
I'm sure that no one is going to think that this is a positive except for me as I try to find some good out of what has been an awful season for the defense. My positive is that the defensive backs, although they're struggling to look back at the ball, another concept that cornerbacks that play zone coverage generally do not have to master, and force incompletions, are playing the correct defense. With James Willis no longer a part of the program, I think we'll see if this trend with the next defensive coordinator continues in that will the coordinator be willing to play more zone coverage considering the personnel? More immediately, you have to wonder what the game-plan will be on New Year's Day and this will give something to watch on defense.
The Northwestern offense is largely a running team as 59% of their plays are running plays, although only 38% of their yards is a result of that rushing offense. Conversely, only 41% of the plays called are pass plays, but gains 62% of the passing yards. And those numbers have changed as a result of the Persa injury (more on that below). Northwestern is still running the ball 58% of the time, although the offense is gaining 57% of their yards on the ground, most likely in that the backup quarterback for Northwestern just isn't the passer that the starter was.
| Category | Northwestern | Texas Tech | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass Offense vs. Pass Defense | 242.58 (40, 3) | 306.08 (120, 12) | |
| Rush Offense vs. Rush Defense | 149.83 (68, 7) | 157.00 (68, 8) | PUSH |
| Total Offense vs. Total Defense | 392.42 (49, 5) | 463.08 (116, 12) | |
| Scoring Offense vs. Scoring Defense | 25.42 (74, 8) | 30.33 (85, 10) |
More after the jump.
The Northwestern offense was largely driven by QB Dan Persa, who was injured late in the season and will not play this game. Persa was responsible for 310 yards a game, including over 50 yards a game. Now the Wildcat offense will rely on redshirt freshman Evan Watkins, who isn't the player that Persa is. Over the course of 6 games, Watkins is completing only 53% of his passes, 6.2 yards/attempt, 1 touchdown and 4 interceptions. The bulk of Watkins' playing time was against two of the biggest losses for Northwestern, a 27-48 loss to Illinois and a 23-70 loss to Wisconsin. And with Watkins at the helm, Northwestern had their lowest total offense output of the year with 318 and 284 yards of total offense for those games.
The running back position is spearheaded by Mike Trumpy (116 Att; 530 Yds; 4 TD) with Adonis Smith (30 Att; 135 Yds; 0 TD), Stephen Simmons (32 Att; 123 Yds; 0 TD) helping out. As you might expect, Persa was actually the team's second leading rusher and led all rushers with 9 touchdowns.
Without Persa, Watkins and the receivers are struggling to find many yards to make a difference with Watkins in the lineup. By a longshot, Jeremy Ebert is the team's best receiver (59 Rec; 919 Yds; 15.58 Avg; 8 TD) and it's not even close. Demetrius Fields (38 Rec; 437 Yds; 11.50 Avg; 0 TD) is second in yards on the team. I always get a bit concerned with tight ends that can catch and Drake Dunsmore is that guy (39 Rec; 378 Yds; 9.69 Avg; 5 TD). Interestingly, there's only two players for Northwestern that get the ball into the endzone, and that's Ebert and Dunsmore.
The offensive line starts with left tackle Al Netter, left guard Brian Mulroe, center Ben Burkett, right guard Keegan Grant, and right tackle Patrick Ward. Grant is the only senior of the bunch, although the line did give up a whopping 3.25 sacks per game, which is good for 115th in the nation.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Love the technique talk
Never was blessed with the speed or athleticism to play db, but this years play made me study techniques and philosophy. It was obvious that we were keeping all receivers in front of us and breaking on nothing. The talent level was obviously not great, but my biggest disappointment was that young defensive players like tre porter didn’t get better as the season went on. He peaked in September?
"It's fun to do bad things"- Latarian
by oldschoolraider on Dec 28, 2010 11:48 AM CST reply actions
Our coaches are amazing amazing people and the fact that we did not improve during the year is proof positive that we just don’t have any talent on the field.
"A pretty girl will leave you. An ugly girl will leave you too but then again who really cares?"
by FriscoRaider on Dec 28, 2010 2:56 PM CST up reply actions
Ridiculous!
That’s a ridiculous statement! Most of Tech 2010 was around for Tech 2009, and whiole you saw what they did on the field in 2009 (not so great), you think we have “amazing, amazing” people as coaches, and the result of Tech 2010 proves we had “no talent”?
I’m stunned. I’m hoping I just missed the sarcasm and humor in your joke; otherwise, this is just a plain stupid statement.
Take the "P" out of "Pirate" and I'm "Irate"!!!
You really need to get that book. I think what the staff was thinking with Porter was where he fits best. He’s not fast enough to play man coverage and he’s probably not physical enough (right now) to play safety, but I think they think that he’s going to eventually take over for Mitchem next year and be a more fluid and fast version of Mitchem or the guy that can more than handle his own on the slot receiver. I think they had him misplaced as a cornerback earlier in the year.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
From what I saw
we have absolutely nobody that can play cb in this scheme….and should have gone zone 100% of the time.
"It's fun to do bad things"- Latarian
by oldschoolraider on Dec 29, 2010 8:31 AM CST up reply actions
Dont forget that our defense
Just dropped some dead weight! We dropped an entire Jeep so that is another plus for our D!
"Yeah one time I was 11 and 2...well that doesn't make a S*%T anymore.......As soon as we have a little bit of success we think were too Fn good.." - ML
by Filemon G on Dec 28, 2010 1:55 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Seth like you I am nervous about a tight end who can catch.
If I recall the two scores that the Ole Miss Tight End put on us at the 09 “Cotton Bowl” following the 2008 season. He broke our backs. Then Harrell can’t run and leaves 6 on the field at thehalf. So yeah I am nervous about Mr. Dunsmore @ 9 yards per catch and 5 TD’s he’s bound to find the endzone on our guys at least once.
"do routine things routinely"
Yep, I think both Texas and ISU Tight Ends scored on us in key situations.
I still have that image where Bird could not recover and Texas tight end scored on goal line. ISU tight end killed us as well. Watch out for the Big Tight End who can catch.
Now that the Jeep is gone, maybe we can have someone cover the tight end. Since we did not have a tight end, Jeep did not know they existed.
"I'm too close to the fire to say. Come on down to Key West and hang out for a while. Can you imagine the resistance that the caveman who invented the wheel got or the guy who invented fire? - Mike Leach.
Yep, both of you are right. I think the staff made some changes later in the year and if we see anyone covering a tight end, it will be Dewhurst or C. Davis. At least that’s my hope. I think they see the same thing we see, which is either Bird or Duncan trying to cover any tight end slanting over the middle is a problem as neither have the speed to keep up with a tight end.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
I think
we go back to a 4-3, maybe even 4-4, for the majority of the game, with zone being run a lot. If Tech shuts down the run with a frosh at QB for NW, the chances for a big win escalates. I am not at all impressed by the team from Illinois. Except for the upset of Iowa, their wins were all against bad teams, barely beating by one point a very bad Minnesota team. They would have been fortunate to pull out 1 win in the Big-12, if that. I stick with my prediction, a 42-24 win for our Red Raiders. I think that is very conservative, with Tech maybe winning by many more than 18.
TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.
Pilk I'd say you are right about shutting down the Northwestern run game
however. What spooks me is a lackluster first period like versus ISU or Colorado or heck aTm… Tech doesn’t need to keep these guys hanging around. Get on the gas & dont let up, no ball control delusions just rip up yards.. yarrgh!
The things is if the Raiders can get 2 or 3 scores up on them and force them to pass, well then yes your prediction is conservative. Look at that number of sacks surrendered number – 3 plus per game thats something to replicate.
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Dec 28, 2010 6:49 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks, centexraider.
Tech has come out flat a few times, but they seem to really want to send the seniors off with a bang. So, I have a feeling the Raiders will be running on all cylinders as the NASCAR offense produces several strong, time consuming drives early to set the tempo and put a lot of pressure on the young QB to perform while behind. In that scenario, I feel Tech wins …. BIG! I don’t know why, but for some reason I just have a really good feeling about this bowl game. Maybe ‘cause "An offense running NASCAR don’t need no jeeps!" (sarc)….
TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.
Too funny don't need no jeeps..
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Dec 29, 2010 9:04 AM CST up reply actions
BTW Seth beergut even managed a post on how "good" our team defense was..
"do routine things routinely"
if you mean awesome like a
dumspter fire full of bargain bin DVD’s, then yes, I agree too.
" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...

by 



















