Tale of the Tape: Part 1

"Well, hello ladies. . ."
This post, the first in a three part series, will attempt to get to address the question, "Who is the better coach?"
Tuberville or Leach?
In the course of this discussion, these posts will also attempt to validate and disprove some of the perceptions about Leach and Tuberville's past accomplishments.
Based on a simple reading of Overall Winning Percentage, a common sentiment is that while Leach might have a higher winning percentage (66.1%) than Tuberville (64.7%) overall, Tuberville’s teams played and beat more challenging opponents than did Leach’s Texas Tech teams by virtue of playing in the SEC and playing more substantive non-conference competition.
Leach supporters counter that Leach did more with less. Tubervillites point to Auburn’s undefeated 2004 season as the ultimate trump card.
Table 1. Overall Winning Percentage
| Coach | Winning Percentage |
|
Leach |
66.1% |
|
Tuberville - Auburn |
68.0% |
|
Tuberville - Mississippi |
55.4% |
|
Tuberville - Aggregate |
64.7% |
So which side has the better argument?
I make no promises to answer that question (sorry), but I do hope to provide you with enough ammunition to make you dangerous.
Let’s get the ball rolling with our favorite topic - Non-Conference Patsies.
Wins versus Non-conference Patsies
Non-conference patsies can sometimes be hard to define, but to paraphrase former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, you know one when you see one.
It has been claimed by some that Mike Leach's record benefited from an overly soft schedule. Whether that is the case will not be addressed here, however, as the list below reveals, both Tuberville’s and Leach’s records were amply padded by road kill in the form of patsies over their respective tenures.
Table 2. The Patsies – A Walk Down Memory Lane
| Leach | Tuberville- Auburn |
|
Tuberville - Mississippi | ||||
|
2000 |
UL Lafayette Utah State New Mexico North Texas |
|
1999 |
Appalachian State Central Florida Idaho |
|
1995 |
Indiana State Tulane Memphis |
|
2001 |
New Mexico SF Austin NorthTexas |
|
2000 |
Northern Illinois Louisiana Tech Wyoming |
|
1996 |
Idaho State VMI Arkansas State |
|
2002 |
SMU |
2001 |
Louisiana Tech Ball State |
1997 |
Central Florida SMU |
||
|
2003 |
SMU |
|
2002 |
Western Kentucky Louisiana Monroe Syracuse |
|
1998 |
Memphis SMU Arkansas State |
|
2004 |
SMU |
|
2003 |
Western Kentucky Louisiana Monroe |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
Indiana State Sam Houston Florida International |
|
2004 |
Citadel Louisiana Tech Louisiana Monroe |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
SE Louisiana SMU UTEP |
|
2005 |
Ball State Western Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
Rice SMU UTEP NW State |
|
2006 |
Buffalo Tulane Arkansas State |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
East Washington SMU UMass |
|
2007 |
Tennessee Tech New Mexico State |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
North Dakota State Rice New Mexico |
|
2008 |
Tennessee-Martin Louisiana Monroe |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
26-0 |
|
|
25-0 |
|
|
11-0 |
Notes: Texas Tech played New Mexico 6 times during Leach's tenure, but the Lobos only appear 3 times on this list. The New Mexico teams of 2002, 2003, 2004 all received bowl bids, hence none of the New Mexico teams from those years appear on this list. The 2001 New Mexico team was 6-5 in 2000, but did not receive a bowl bid, hence that team remains on this list. In Tuberville’s case, I did not include 5-7 Kansas State (2007); 7-6 bowl bound Southern Mississippi State (2008); 9-4 bowl bound South Florida (a 2007 Auburn loss); 6-6 non-bowl bound Washington State; or 7-6 bowl bound Georgia Tech (2003), but chose to include 4-8 Syracuse (2002). Feel free to add our subtract these opponents as you will.
As we can see, both Leach and Tuberville, while at Auburn, scheduled an almost equal number of patsies over their respective tenures. Leach played 26 patsies at Texas Tech. Tuberville played 25 patsies while at Auburn. If we were to deduct games versus patsies from the both coaches' overall records, we would adjust their record as follows:
Table 3. Overall Record – Adjusted for Patsies
| Leach |
Tuberville Auburn |
Tuberville Mississippi |
Tuberville Aggregate |
||
|
Actual Total Wins |
84 |
85 |
25 |
110 |
|
|
Actual Total Losses |
43 |
40 |
20 |
60 |
|
|
Actual Total Winning Percentage |
66.1% |
68.0% |
55.6% |
64.7% |
|
|
Patsie Adjusted Wins |
58 |
60 |
14 |
74 |
|
|
Patsie Adjusted Losses |
43 |
40 |
20 |
60 |
|
|
Patsie Adjusted Winning Percentage |
57.4% |
60.0% |
41.2% |
55.2% |
|
| Patsie Adjustment Factor |
-8.7% |
-8.0% |
-14.4% |
-9.5% |
When you account for the Patsie Factor, Leach’s overall winning percentage declines by 8.7% while Tuberville’s Auburn winning percentage declines by 8.0%, and Tuberville’s aggregate winning percentage drops by 9.5%.
For the sake of not splitting hairs, I think it is probably fair to say that both Tuberville and Leach got a similarly nice bump in their overall records by deigning to play their fair share of patsies over the years.
Schedule versus Ranked Opponents
Putting the patsies to one side, what about Auburn’s purported superior schedule and specifically its more challenging non-conference schedule you ask? Didn’t Auburn, by virtue of playing in the SEC and its more masculine non-conference schedule, have a higher degree of difficulty than Texas Tech over the years?
We break down the schedule into three components
-
Number of games versus ranked non conference opponents
-
Number of games versus ranked bowl opponents
-
Number of games versus ranked in-conference opponents
Table 4. Breakdown of Ranked Opponents
|
Ranked Non Conference Opponents |
Ranked Conference Opponents |
Ranked Bowl Opponents |
Total Ranked Opponents |
Average Number of Ranked Opponents per Year |
||
|
Leach |
3 |
26 |
3 |
32 |
3.2 |
|
|
Tuberville-Auburn |
3 |
33 |
5 |
41 |
4.1 |
|
|
Tuberville-Ole Miss |
0 |
13 |
0 |
13 |
3.3 |
|
|
Tuberville-Aggregate |
3 |
46 |
5 |
54 |
3.9 |
In 10 years Leach’s teams played ranked opponents on 32 occasions – of which 3 of those opponents were non-conference opponents while another 3 were ranked opponents in bowl games. On average Texas Tech played 3.2 ranked teams per year including bowls.
In 14 years, while at Auburn and Ole Miss, Tuberville’s teams played ranked opponents on 54 occasions – of which, like Texas Tech, three of those opponents were non conference opponents while another 5 were ranked opponents in bowl games. On average, Auburn played 4.1 ranked opponents per year during Tuberville’s tenure. While at Mississippi, Tuberville played 3.5 ranked teams per season. In Tuberville’s aggregate tenure he played 3.9 ranked opponents per year.
When we examine Texas Tech’s schedule and Auburn’s schedule, we see that Auburn’s marginal advantage in the number of ranked opponents is a function of playing in the SEC and not an overly taxing non-conference schedule.
Non Conference Schedule - Ranked Opponents
During Leach’s tenure at Texas Tech and Tuberville’s tenure at Auburn, there was relatively little difference between the two schools’ non-conference schedules. Each school actually played the same number of ranked non-conference teams during Tuberville’s and Leach’s respective tenure.
Table 5. Ranked Non Conference Opponents
|
Leach |
Tuberville-Auburn |
Tuberville-Mississippi |
|
2002: Ohio State (1), L 2002: NC State (12), L 2003: Mississippi (13), W |
2001: Syracuse (16), W 2002: USC (4), L 2003: USC (1), L |
No ranked Opponents |
|
Record 1-2 Average Opponent Rank: 8.7 |
Record: 1-2 Average Opponent Rank: 7.0 |
Leach and Tuberville achieved the same record against ranked non-conference opponents. Tuberville’s degree of difficulty was slightly higher than Leach’s.
Note: All references to ranked opponents are based on end of season AP polls only.
Bowl Schedule versus Ranked Opponents
Over a 10 year period, Auburn played against 5 ranked bowl opponents while Texas Tech played against 3 ranked bowl opponents:
Table 6. Ranked Bowl Opponents
| Leach | Tuberville - Auburn | Tuberville - Mississipi |
|
2004: California (9), W 2008: Alabama (8), L 2009: Mississippi (14), L |
2000: Michigan (11), L 2002: Penn State (16), W 2003: Virginia Tech (10), W 2005: Wisconsin (15), L 2006: Clemson (21), W |
No Ranked Opponents |
|
Record 1-2 Average Opponent Rank: 10.3 |
Record: 3-2 Average Opponent Rank: 14.6 |
As we see from the discussion above, Tuberville played two more ranked bowl opponent than did Leach. Tuberville had a better record, but Leach’s degree of difficulty, based on end of season AP Polls, was higher.
Ranked In-Conference Opponents
Finally, let's take a look at the ranked in-conference opponents faced by both coaches during their respective tenures.
Table 7. Ranked Conference Opponents
| Leach | Tuberville- Auburn |
|
Tuberville - Mississippi | ||||
|
2000 |
Oklahoma-1 Nebraska-8 Texas-12 |
1999 |
Tennessee-9 Florida-12 Mississippi St-13 Georgia-16 Arkansas-17 Mississippi-22 |
1995 |
Florida-2 Alabama-21 Auburn-22 |
||
|
2001 |
Texas -5 Nebraska-6 Oklahoma-8 |
|
2000 |
Florida-10 Florida-10 Georgia-20 LSU-22 Mississipi State-24 |
|
1996 |
Tennessee-9 Alabama-11 LSU-12 Auburn-24 |
|
2002 |
Oklahoma-5 Texas-6 Colorado-20 |
|
2001 |
Florida-3 LSU-7 Georgia-20 |
|
1997 |
Tennessee-7 Georgia-10 Auburn-11 LSU-13
|
|
2003 |
Oklahoma - 3 Texas -12 |
|
2002 |
Georgia-3 Alabama-11 |
|
1998 |
Georgia-14 Arkansas-16 |
|
2004 |
Oklahoma-3 Texas-5 |
|
2003 |
LSU-2 Mississippi-13 Tennesee-15 |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
Texas-1 Oklahoma-22 Nebraska-24 |
|
2004 |
Georgia-7 Tennessee-13 LSU-16 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
Oklahoma-11 Texas-13 |
|
2005 |
LSU-6 Alabama-8 Georgia-10 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
Missouri-4 Oklahoma-8 Texas-10 |
|
2006 |
Florida-1 LSU-3 Arkansas-15 Georgia-23 |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
Texas-4 Oklahoma-5 Oklahoma State-16 |
|
2007 |
LSU-1 Georgia-2 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
Texas - 2 Nebraska -14 |
|
2008 |
Georgia-13 |
|
|
|
|
Record |
7-19 |
|
|
13-18 |
|
|
1-12 |
|
Winning % |
36.8% |
|
|
41.9% |
|
|
7.7% |
|
Degree of Difficulty |
8.8 |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
13.2 |
Leach generated a 7-19 record against ranked conference opponents over 10 years, a winning percentage of 36.8%. The majority of those wins were generated over the past five years when Leach went 6-7 against ranked opponents.
While at Auburn, Tuberville generated a 13-18 record against ranked conference opponents over 10 years, achieving a winning percentage of 41.9%. The majority of those wins occurred during the six year period spanning 2002 to 2006 during which time Tuberville’s teams went 11-5 against ranked opponents.
While at Mississippi, Tuberville generated a 1-12 record against ranked opponents over 4 years, achieving a winning percentage of 7.7%. Mississippi’s lone victory came against #13 ranked LSU in 1997.
In aggregate, Tuberville generated a 14-30 record, good for a 31.8% winning percentage against in-conference opponents, slightly less than Leach’s 36.8% winning percentage.
Although Tuberville’s teams played more ranked in-conference opponents (3.3 ranked in-conference teams per year) than did Leach’s teams (2.6 ranked in-conference teams per year) , Leach’s degree of difficulty, based on the average ranking of his opponent (8.8) was higher than Auburn’s Tuberville-led teams (11.2) and Tuberville's Mississippi teams (13.2).
Conclusion
This discussion illustrates that the scheduling differences between Auburn and Texas Tech during Leach's and Tuberville's respective tenures are not as disparate as some might presume.
Although Tuberville's Auburn teams played a total of 7 more ranked opponents in the regular season than did Texas Tech under Leach, that difference came from playing in-conference ranked opponents. However, Leach's teams, based on taking the average rankings of its ranked in-conference opponents, actually faced a higher degree of difficulty than did Tuberville's Auburn teams versus ranked in-conference opponents.
Some Texas Tech fans hope that with Tuberville on board, Texas Tech should strive to improve its non-conference schedule to be more in line with a program like Auburn. However, this sentiment is somewhat misplaced.
As we see from this discussion, there was little difference between the football programs' non-conference schedules. Both programs also benefited roughly equally from playing out-matched non-conference opponents.
It appears that having learned the lesson that scheduling quality non-conference competition does not actually benefit a team's final record, ranking or bowl placement, neither Leach’s teams nor Tuberville’s teams have actually played a ranked-non-conference opponent since 2003.
-----------------
Next Post: Tale of Tape Part 2: Comparing Performance
2 recs |
48 comments
|
Comments
Great read London.
I noticed a couple of days ago that you had been conspicously quiet recently and knew you were up to something. Love your analysis. Keep ’em coming.
"There's going to be ups and downs but you have to enjoy the battle." Mike Leach
Good stuff london
Both of these guys have been very successful at their schools. Tubs success can be seen with tangible stuff like divisional,conference, and BCS titles. Leach’s accomplishments can be pointed towards more “firsts” for a university. Leach has won more bowl games in his tenure here than he have as a program altogether. Thats a first. He has the most wins in school history. Another first. Someone correct me but we never beat a number 1 ranked team at the jones until Leach’s tenure? If so, then thats a first. Both of these men have been successful wherever they coached at, regardless of conference,opponents, etc. Leach was great, and i thank him for the memories. I exicted about Tubs and the new memories he will create here.
Wreck’Em
We gon rock it to the wheels fall off
Another great report
Under the circumstances, in the removal of Leach, we are very lucky to get a HC of this caliber. There is no doubt in my mind that with caller ID, some of the phone calls by Myers, oh I mean Hance, were unanswered in the coach quest.
"I find I'm so excited. I can barely sit still or hold a thought in my head. I think it's the excitment only a free man can feel, a free man at the start of a long journey whose conclusion is uncertain. I hope I can make it across the border. I hope to see my friend and shake his hand. I hope the Pacific is as blue as it has been in my dreams. I hope." Red-Shawshank Redemption
great research...
but to me here is the rub…..Leach is gone..I loved him, I wish he was still our coach….he had so many firsts@TTech….I have his autogragh and will always cherish it….he left the team with great talent….he really didn’t get out and promote TTech football on a regular basis…..did a great job of promoting himself & TTech on a national level….loved his offense but if you look back at the last 3 or 4 years he had begun to change somethings, i.e. trying to run more…..will never forget “the catch” on Halloween against the #1 teasips!!!!!!!!….then watching in person with my 2 sons the slaughter of osu(copycats)…..Leach is gone….thanks to the stooges…..so I must turn to the South Plains Drifter to continue what the Pirate began….I have no choice….by birth, being an alumnus, habit(50 yrs.) and compulsion I’m a RED RAIDER!!!!!!!! Wreck’Em Tech
Must be a cold miserable winter in London, Raider
They have bars which serve wonderful bitters, they come in pints !!! Only a few bob… ;-)
Actually, this is a greatly detailed and well considered review of schedules…I am looking forward to see how you look at performace.
I am wondering, now, if you are going to compare recruiting, if so, I am excited to see the way you establish your basis.
Sometimes a river boat can out run a pirate ship.
The good thing about pubs here is that most of them have wireless :)
Performance and recruiting are on the way…
"This time it's different."
by LondonRaider on Mar 12, 2010 5:59 AM CST up reply actions
London needs to be a sports analyst
Great write up and my mind was racing trying to sift the information and make a reasonable comment. I guess if your playing in the SEC or Big 12 it’s probably wise to schedule a few cup cake games being how the conferences are so loaded with talent. I look at Tech’s future as a piramid of success that started with the hiring of Leach. No offense to Spike but I was a student back then and we were doing good just getting to a bowl. I feel like even though we lost Leach we are still on the cusp of breaking through and winning a Big 12 championship. I would also go as far as saying it’s going to take a solid defense to do it and Tuberville will do a better job with that side of the ball. Leach made our offense what it is today and I think it stays close to what he has built and now we have to do the same with the defense. In the end I think we Red Raiders dodged a huge bullet by getting Tuberville as a head coach. We all wanted Leach to stay but we certainly didn’t pull an A&M with this hire.
"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach
Absolutely awesome read.....
LR although we don’t always agree, you are a huge asset to DTN and I hope to meet in person one day. Based on lack of evidence in the Big 12 thus far, I have never felt that we have achieved an overall upgrade at HC with the hiring of Tubs. I felt we lost an elite caliber coach in Leach, and was hopeful that we got lucky to recruit another elite caliber coach in Tubs. Based on your report, the near identical past record indicates that hope is well founded. The ultimate answer cannot come by looking at the past however, but will come when play begins again on the field.
In the end this report seems to validate all sides of the debate, if there is a debate. Leach supporters are correct in their feeling that Leach was elite and just as much a winner as Tubs. And those hopeful that we won’t see a drop off with Tubs are validated that his past record inidcates he holds the same caliber pedigree as a winner as Leach had. This all good news for Raider football, and hopefully is another tipping point towards building excitement for the upcoming season.
"We have a running game at Tech......sometimes we throw short passes." -Mike Leach
Great post LR
I see all these tidbits, records and trends swimming around but can’t seem to reel them in and throw them in the cooler. You have a knack for capturing all of these details and stringing them together.
Looking forward to posts 2 and 3. It’s a great way to pass the time.
"I swear, I'm gonna stab you with a fork."
-Gerald Myers or Kent Hance
by San Antonio Red Raider on Mar 10, 2010 10:29 AM CST reply actions
Does it really matter?
I guess it would be different if their was a decision between hiring one over the other but Tubs has the job so who cares what coach is better?
Yes it matters when we have people that treat Tubs as the second coming.
Hint: He isn’t.
by Damien Franco on Mar 10, 2010 7:01 PM CST up reply actions
London nice piece of work
Leach had certain style but he got to out recruited. I dont think there is any denying that. Tubs will have a short window to show success in order to maintain a level of programatic momentum.
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Mar 10, 2010 7:07 PM CST up reply actions
ahem,
That’s Coach John Fitzgerald Katfish Jesus to you.
"There's going to be ups and downs but you have to enjoy the battle." Mike Leach
This will be really easy to answer in about 5 years
Because Tuberville will be coaching the same level of talent Leach had to work with at Tech (barring some massive increase in recruiting success. Tech’s signing class was ranked 6th in the Big 12 South this year, so there’s a lot of work to do upgrading that aspect of Tech football).
John Hancock
Great post
I think it’s important to note that Tuberville was at Ole Miss when they had scholarship limits, and that likely had a negative effect on his record there. I think a more appropriate comparison would be Tubs at Auburn vs Leach at Tech, and throw out the Ole Miss records.
After all is said and done, more is said than done.
Thanks for the stats...
Appreciate the in depth analysis London concerning the Tuberville & Leach coaching stats. Can’t wait for parts 2 & 3. From what I can surmise, it’s a wash between the two, although I think the SEC continues to garner more respect than the Big 12, mainly because of the medias’ love affair with that conference.
Nonetheless, as a Leach fan and supporter, I’ve always said that Tuberville couldn’t have been a better choice for us. I honestly think that with our improved defense, that alone will be good for another 2-3 wins a year, which if you think about it, could realistically cause us to go undefeated (based on past years records) and eventually win the Big 12 Championship….as of course Tuberville has preached at his latest few luncheons…
I think we have seen that Tech football has been improving in every facet yearly under Leach. Every reporter in the nation salivates when Mike Leach opens his mouth. Nationally I don’t think too many people give a crap about what Mack Brown or Mike Sherman has to say. I would dare to say the same about Tubby. I think this is as or more valuable than alumni butt kissing. Leach gave the school and athletic program an indentity. I really appreciated that. Before we were just a program that would sometimes win and sometimes lose and you never knew when either was going to happen. WIth Leach Tech was always in the game even if we were 31 points down. This is invaluable. I don’t think the overall winning percentage is a tell all of what the coach brings to the table. We were pirates! We were outlaws! We were a team that did things our way, everyone else be damned, and we won! Leach, single handedly, changed the game of college football. He was still in his first head coaching job. How many other head coaches in their first job did what he did?
I still like being an outlaw or pirate.........
…………just sayin oldschoolraider………..just sayin
"There's going to be ups and downs but you have to enjoy the battle." Mike Leach
I'ver proudly been a pirate (of sorts0 for 55 years.......
was a pirate before pirates were cool.
"There's going to be ups and downs but you have to enjoy the battle." Mike Leach
Maybe Leach's legacy.....
is giving us our own real identity. Just support the South Plains Drifter to encourage him to win, win, win and we as a fan base continue to explore a national identity. Our students have done a great job of “dressing up” so we as a fan base can continue pirates, outlaws, matadors, or gamblers. Whatever it is our identity is on us!!!!!Wreck’Em Tech
Looking at the Tuberville picture at the top
What is it about guys from the deep south not having any lips? Did they breed lips out of the race back in the 19th century?
John Hancock
HA!
I almost spit my coffe out on my keyboard.
It’s okay…I got the monitor instead.
Carry on.
by Damien Franco on Mar 10, 2010 7:04 PM CST up reply actions
Outstanding work London.
If we ever actually make it to England I’m looking you up and buying you lot’s of beer.
if you came back over here it would be cheaper on all of us.....
just a thought
"There's going to be ups and downs but you have to enjoy the battle." Mike Leach
Cheaper? No kidding. ..
I don’t make it out to Midland much, but do plan to be in the Hub at some point this year. Will let you know when I do…
"This time it's different."
by LondonRaider on Mar 12, 2010 5:57 AM CST up reply actions
Please do.
Seriously…I’d love to buy you a beer (or six) for all your hard work and dedication.
by Damien Franco on Mar 12, 2010 5:52 PM CST up reply actions
Excellent info, LR
I think what you might have to consider is that the Auburn job was Tuberville’s second, while Texas Tech was Leach’s first, in Div I football. While Leach had some outrageous ideas concerning the offense when he arrived at Tech, he had never had to consider what the defense needed to be like to maximize what the offense brought to the table. This is something I think he had to, and did, learn after a few years of mild success. His decision to release Setencic (sp?) and move Ruffin up started the uptic for Tech. Since Ruff was also learning on the run, sort of, the defense took a year or so to begin jelling. I still have no doubt that Leach had Texas Tech football at a point where he was going to have the team vying for a national championship on a continual basis. He was getting better and better recruits on offense AND defense. If the GOBs would have made an attempt to like Leach and show approval of his football coaching abilities, I feel Tech would have shined for years. However, their negativity began affecting Leach and the rest of the team, maybe the staff, suffered, causing the whole football team to be less than they should have been. Now, I just hope Tuberville can re-invigorate the team, while also rebuilding trust in the fan base. Should he do so, there is no limit, IMO, how high Tech can go. Well, there is a limit, so to speak——the National Championship! So, while the Captain sips margaritas on the sandy beaches of Key West, Florida, the Red Raiders will be establishing themselves as an elite football power nationwide, right there in the sandy atmosphere of Lubbock, Texas…..unless the GOBs become unhappy, again.
TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ΒΆ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.
You are onto something Pilkman..
somehow the BOR/Admin. got scared of success. Just cant get it that they dont have the managerial skills to deal with a prickly employee. Tubs is the quintessntial spokesman. They lovet this aspect of his package. If Tubs wins the Big12 watch the doorway. ie dont stand there you could get run over.
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Mar 11, 2010 8:45 AM CST up reply actions
spelling .. quintessential .. sheesh
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Mar 11, 2010 8:46 AM CST up reply actions
I agree. I think Hance & Myers could see the future.
And they knew this would be their last chance to get rid of Leach and bring in someone more like themselves. All signs pointed to a great 2010, a defense that was improving every year and recruiting classes that turned heads. We’ve talked a lot about the last 10 years but it was only the tip of the iceberg. Leach was on the verge of something really big.
Give them credit because they (Hance, Myers, et al) knew that as well as anybody. They knew they had one shot and they took it. They traded a few months of misery for a more comfortable atmosphere in the long run and not having to begrudgingly give Leach credit. We already see that sentiment on DTN- “He was ok but he never won a championship.” I bet you a dollar he was about to win several, and those guys couldn’t stand the thought of that.
"I swear, I'm gonna stab you with a fork."
-Gerald Myers or Kent Hance
by San Antonio Red Raider on Mar 11, 2010 9:14 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
++++++++
We were right there, I agree. Don’t you love that the guys who scuttled the ship just before the big payoff have the balls to use the “never won a championship” line.
by raider realist on Mar 11, 2010 11:59 PM CST up reply actions
Great work
Slightly off topic london, but were you at a pub in London for the Virginia vs tech bowl game a couple of years ago? If so, I met you. My wife and I were in England for Christmas and we found you guys through the alumni assoc. and watched the game with you. If so, let me know.
I was austinrr. . .
. . . and I remember our conversation well (btw I was the tall guy). I hope you are doing well…
"This time it's different."
by LondonRaider on Mar 12, 2010 5:56 AM CST up reply actions
Wow, such a complete waste of Time!!!!!!
You guys need to get a job, this is more BS that I would even think about reading……..Who has been the best coach? We all think we have had the best coach….right? Now we just have to hope that TT can take us to the next level. Please no more pirate BS. I’m sure TT will have more to say than how to swing your sword…….think about it guys…..Oh, this is how you swing your sword, x..slsllklsdljdj,,ljMf, that MF won’t be able to beat you if you just swing your sword this way.
by fortworthraider on Mar 16, 2010 6:44 PM CDT reply actions

by 
















