Texas Tech Spring Game Review :: The Defense
Under Construction: The defensive line was pretty banged up and I thought that the players up front just couldn't muster much pressure on the quarterback. Of course, when you're talking about a 164 play scrimmage where there's a handful of players that get playing time and not just the starters, it's not going to look perfect. I mentioned this a couple of times to the group after the game, that I'm a bit concerned about Brian Duncan's ability to get consistent pressure on the quarterback. I tend to think of Duncan of being a bit undersized, but truthfully, he's the same size as Daniel Howard. The key is probably technique and time. He's virtually learning an entirely new position, a position which requires him to completely change how he approaches the game. Of the players that I think can effectively make that change, it's Duncan and Bront Bird. I get the feeling that whatever either of them are asked to do, they'll do for the betterment of the team.
But back to the defensive line, despite missing DT's Colby Whitlock, Myles Wade and Chris Perry I did think that some of the young players made an impact. DT Donald Langley stood out as being a strong player and pretty danged athletic for his size. DE Kerry Hyder, who I had to figure out who it was, and DE Aundrey Barr, also stood out a bit. There's definitely talent there. Now the question becomes, how much of an impact will the new defensive linemen make, in particular DE/DT Scott Smith and DE/DT Lawrence Rumph. With the incoming talent and the talent that I think is currently there, the defensive line will be fine and I think they'll be much deeper than they have been in previous years.
Making Improvements: What's being reported and what's being stated about the defense is true, that the defense was fairly vanilla. I always find myself focusing on one thing or another, and I caught myself focusing on the offense more than the defense. In any event, I did think that the defense is doing a better job of getting to the ball and running down the ball carrier, no matter who it is. I don't think this defense lacked effort under McNeill's watch. You can say a lot of things about McNeill, but him having players give full effort wasn't one of them.
What I can say is that I think the defense will be more unpredictable and the defense will have pressure coming from a bunch of different angles (although this wasn't on full display last week). And not just pressure on the quarterback, but pressure on the offense. The conundrum is that with the defense giving a bunch of different looks, this is a relative departure from McNeill's stance of keeping things simple. I don't think it's rocket science, but I'd also say that there's a fine line between overwhelming these guys, which is the impression I got from this spring, versus letting them play. From all of the reports, perhaps overwhelming them in the first two weeks was the best way to handle the situation as you've got to find the players that can handle the stress. You've got a limited amount of time to find out whether or not these guys can play and if they can't.
Tuberville has said a number of times this spring that there's still work to be done and he's anxious to get some of the new signees on campus and up to speed:
"We got a lot done this spring, but we’ve got a long ways to go," Tuberville said. "We’ve got to work on our depth, and we’ve also got to get some of these young guys that we signed in here in June and get them on the team and get them ready to go."
Tuberville has said this a number of times and I have no doubt that he's seen the relative speed on the field and he wants to be even faster. I referenced Eugene Neboh earlier last week and kept wondering why he was was getting so much burn, and when I researched Neboh, it became apparent that Neboh may be really raw in terms of play-making ability, but he must be fast. Same thing goes for Jarvis Phillips.
2010 Impact Player: If you would have asked me who the impact player was before the game, I would have said it may need to be DT Colby Whitlock. Whitlock didn't play and right now, I see the 2010 impact player being Bront Bird. I get the feeling that he's not going to come off the field very much and I still think that Willis and Tuberville will want to create pressure with Bird from a few different spots. I keep talking myself into the thought that had Brian Duncan stayed inside, I still would have picked Bird, but my thought is that Bird's a fairly unique player that should have an impact because he can play inside or put pressure on the passer. Perhaps better said, if Bird isn't having a truly impactful year in 2010, then I'm worried that it could be a really long season.
Future Watch: We've talked about this a bit prior to the start of the spring practices, but right now, my money is on whoever is fast, especially given Tuberville's constant reminder that he wants player that are fast. In the 2010 recruiting class, Tuberville signed three defensive backs that were clocked at a 4.4 40-yard dash, Brandon Smith, Phillip Warren and Tre'Vante Porter. In the 2009 recruiting class, only D.J. Jonson was clocked with a 4.4 40-yard dash time. Thinking this through, in the 2009 recruiting class, Leach signed what would end up being six defensive backs (with Daniel Cobb being moved to linebacker) and went to the well again to sign six more defensive backs in the 2010 class. Maybe I'm reading too much into all of this, but as talented as I thought the 2009 defensive back class was, Tuberville could have shored up the offensive line a bit or some other position of need, perhaps receiver, but instead opted for more speed in the defensive backfield. Picking right now, I'm going with Tre'Vante Porter, who may be the most polished and ready to play of the defensive backs. Think Will Ford, but faster.
Optimistic 2010 Prognosis: I'm pretty comfortable with the defense. Despite losing some players that contributed heavily, I think prior to this fairly impressive streak of recruiting players that are able to fill positions, there's not going to be that big of a drop-off in talent. The biggest concern heading into the spring was defensive line and despite the handful of injuries prior to the game, I left the game thinking that it's not as bad as you might think. And to think that the defensive line should be bolstered by guys like Lawrence Rumph and Scott Smith, I think the pass-rush aspect of the defense will be fine.
The linebacking corps was developed slowly over time and credit needs to be given to McNeill for pushing playing time for guys like Sam Fehoko, Tyrone Sonier and Julius Howard. When Bird and Duncan leave after 2010, the defense should be in relatively safe hands.
The secondary may be even better this year than last year, and although it's blasphemy to suggest that the incumbent safeties, Cody Davis and Franklin Mitchem, may not see as much time as they did last year. They were very steady last year and the don't get beat deep often, may be replaced by players such as Terrence Bullitt and Yashua Williams. They may not play as technically sound as Davis and Mitchem, but they may be a step faster.
If there's even a semblance of a pass rush in 2010 and Willis and Tuberville can create some opportunities for the defense whether it be because of scheme or talent, then I think this team doesn't fall far from where it was in 2009. If the pass rush and sacks can continue, then I'm more optimistic. The basic concept of last year, which was don't get beat deep, keep everything in front of you and generate a pass rush without blitzing, worked to an extent, but it was still mediocre. Texas Tech was still 6th in scoring defense, 7th in rushing defense, 5th in passing defense and 6th in total defense in the Big 12 in 2009. Optimistically, if the defense can improve to the top third in the conference and the offensive drop-off is slight, then that's where you hang your overly-optimistic-hat.
16 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff Seth.
After reading this morning that Tuberville implied that, given the talent we have on campus now, he feels the defense won’t still won’t be ideal come the fall, has caused me to temper my optimisim. I agree that rather than expecting a huge increase in defense prowess, we may be doing well to match 2009’s performance on defense. If Smith and Rumph can add impact immediately, if the scheme is absorbed by the fall, and if the pass rush can some how match last years, then again I agree, there may be a path to a better showing…..but those are alot of ifs.
"We have a running game at Tech......sometimes we throw short passes." -Mike Leach
I think we must guard against being too optimistic
Overly optimistic is right Seth. The thing is no matter what Tubs and Neal do offensively its guaranteed that a going for it on fourth down comparison is going to be made. A Run pass mix issue to be critiqued. Or some such other criticism. The trade offs in game management philosophies is that a run which pounds out 6 yards versus 3 yard pass which goes for 8 plus is going to cause some apoplexies among the fan base. The goodness is that a few timely runs may eliminate some chances for the opposition. Goes to keeping the ball in our teams hands longer. All I want to see is a superior red zone success rate from the new Coaching regime at Tech. Don’t rally care how they score TD’s. Don’t score FG’s in the red zone for all the obvious reasons. The pass game is going to be just a potent in 2010. Now this defensive bend on the field that’s where we can get overly optimistic. It’s just a given with the current 9 x down lineman rotation it’s going to be very difficult to halt OU, ut, OSU and even aTm. Hell Mizzou is good offensively. The Tech defensive team is just going to get a little better and that may not grade out to being in the top third of the league. The exciting bit is getting a new attacking attitude may deliver a few more turnovers, pass break ups etc. Though the Ruffin lead defense was pretty good at that in 09. We seemed to get in trouble- again for obvious reasons – when Tech guys put the ball on the ground i.e. Uh , Baylor and Kansas just to lay out the squeakers versus the near "miss" from the win column. The worst instance was giving up a defensive TD to OSU..
"do routine things routinely"
Nice rundown, Seth
2010 Impact player: I think it will be Sam Fehoko. I just have a feeling he is going to have one of those unbelievable years as he will basically be playing his old high school position where he was very dominating.
Future Watch: Phillips may be the one here to watch. He seems to have some great talent.
Prognosis: Always optimistic. Of course, that tends to open me up to a major let-down should Tech not match my expectations. I feel the “D” is going to be better than some may think. Even Tubs seems to be a bit negative, but I am not sure he really knows for sure how much heart this defense has and how much they want to prove themselves to him, fans and media. Expect more from them than you do now….just a gut feeling here, too. With that, the team should match, even better last year’s record, while not having that big blow-out loss we have become accustomed to seeing. This team WILL finish no worse than 3rd, maybe even win the South Division. After that, it will all be gravy.
TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.
right on! with the Fehoko fan club...
I really like Fehoko and have since he came on campus. I’m glad to finally see him get on the field. I also like Sonier. He is one of the best athletes we have on the field and that’s what we want, the best athletes on the field.
Willis has described Tre Porter as an NFL corner, so I’m going to be watching him too.
I actually met Kerry Hyder’s family at signing day last year. I liked him then and stil do. Watch out for him, he may surprise us.
Defense not being better is UNACCEPTABLE
No slack here….I am expecting a dip offensively,but if the defense doesn’t match 2009, this thing is a bust. Tuberville is a defensive coach, not offensive. I don’t care how you frame it (the speed isn’t here, the cupboard is bare, they arent’ his type of players)…..if you can’t make us a better defense this next year, I am not buying your story from here on out. So stop hedging your bets and coach your ass off.
"Life is short, tell me how you really feel"- me
by oldschoolraider on Apr 26, 2010 1:23 PM CDT reply actions
agree oldschool
No reason this defense should drop. I suspect a more aggressive and up tempo defense in the fall. We need Smith to make it campus at the DE position for all this to happen. We should be loaded with DB’s and LB’s all day long. The line is suspect but I expect the holes will be filled in August. I still believe 10-2 in 2010.
"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach
count me in on this comment
if John Fitzgerald Katfish is the Spurrier of defense, then regardless of what he has to work with, this should be a better defense than last year. then again, maybe his a Spurrier type and is only good at one school.
"There's going to be ups and downs but you have to enjoy the battle." Mike Leach
+1
With the supposed quality of defensive coaching we have now and attention the defense seems to be getting, slipping on defense from where we were with our previous paradigm of defense as second class citizens and an offensive-minded head coach is totally unacceptable.
If you don’t have the personnel to run the defense you want, why would you install that new defense anyway and just be really mediocre on defense for 2-5 years? Isn’t that the same mistake JFK made at Auburn with the spread?
I am torn by analysis of Tuberville's comments and
the words from a respected guy like Bird…who is excited, excited, excited.
Part of it for me is how little I know Tuberville, I don’t know if he has a lot of coach speak or if he is thinking about a small segment of the team while he talks about defense….the guys he wants in, IMHO, are obvious…Smith and Rumph…maybe Jackson and Porter…after those, I can only see a reach…we all like the Arkansas MLB, Carmical. It may be that his words express a constant sense of urgency to get to the next step, whatever it is. In this case it could be getting those guys on campus so they be seen and evaluated on our field.
I am remaining constant with my evaluation of the Spring Game, both sides of the ball played very limited aspects of their schemes…we haven’t seen the bulk of what they players are going to be executing…that may be what excites Bird, what he knows and we have not seen.
I am hopefull for a good season on defense as well as offense…I am very concerned about the LOS on both sides of the ball, way too much talent being relaced by guys, who may turn out to be very fine football players, but have not had much time to work together…new schemes or not.
women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans
Coach speak it is...
While I must admit that I was not in Auburn during CTT’s tenure, I did follow him intently in the statements that he made regarding recruiting, training, A-Day game and into the fall. CTT is truly a CEO in that he will make sometimes veiled comments which may seem very vanilla too some, worrisome to others, but send a VERY strong message to those at whom it was actually aimed. Can I decipher it…heck no. But I guarantee those to whom he was speaking know full well what is expected of them. It could be certain players or even coaches. It could be those reporting soon. But whomever it is I’d bet that something stronger has been said in private.
It could just be additional motivation for one or 2 players…hit the weight room a little harder, run a few more hills (crap! is that built yet?) , study the playbook, heck who knows?
My personal opinion is that it is total coach speak to keep everyone working hard in the offseason. They already know EVERY position is up for grabs. The strongest fastest player who learns the position WILL play. PERIOD. ie…“Nobody is quite where I want them…so who wants it the most” kinda thing. I think CTT wants self-starters in the Jerry Rice mold. Who put in the work on their own and come in ready to perform.
JMHO…but I choose to remain cautiously optimistic…(and deep down inside jumping for JOY!!!)
" I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy." ---Unknown
G.Kevin, you may be on to something
maybe not like a laser, but close….
women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans
The South Plains Drifter......
view of D is totally different than we have seen in many years if ever, so I think that the D will be better from our perspective eventhough the SPD and the “Jeep” aren’t always gushing. Again think about the Pirate and his feelings on our O the first 4 years he was @ TTech. Kingsbury did a great job in comparision to the O we had been used to. So I’m very optimistic that the SPD and Jeep can put an attacking D on the field. I think it will be fun to watch, just as the O is!!!! Wreck’Em Tech
You know, I have been thinking (I know, dangerous)
The one thing all coaches I have ever seen, heard, known or read about have one theme that is constant: “Play every minute of every game as hard as you can.” After all, you never know when something good will result, even accidentally. By playing hard every minute of every game you place yourself into the best positions to succeed, especially at the most opportune times. If you are out of place, then you cannot take advantage of those “gifts”. We know Zach Thomas was never the fastest person, but he never quit and as a result made some great plays because of that constant hustle. Add some speed and even better things could come of all that hard work. If these players can get that into their heads, they will do collectively what some teams only do individually, thus winning some battles that could swing a game into Tech’s side, aiding that chance, snatching victory away from defeat.
TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.
One of those "NOT THE SIZE OF THE DOG IN THE FIGHT" things right?
JUST THE SIZE OF THE FIGHT IN THE DOG!!!
Wreck "Em!!!
" I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy." ---Unknown

by 
















