Texas Tech Opponent Prospectus :: Texas A&M Aggies

2010 Texas Tech Opponent Prospectus
Game 1: SMU Mustangs (9.5.10) :: Game 2: @ New Mexico Lobos (9.11.10) :: Game 3: Texas Longhorns (9.18.10) :: Game 4: @ Iowa St. Cyclones (10.2.10) :: Game 5: Baylor Bears (10.09.10) :: Game 6: Oklahoma St. Cowboys :: Game 7: @ Colorado Buffaloes (10.23.10) :: Game 8: @ Texas A&M Aggies (10.30.10) :: Game 9: Missouri Tigers (11.06.10) :: Game 10: @ Oklahoma Sooners (11.13.10) :: Game 11: Weber St. Wildcats (11.20.10) :: Game 12: Houston Cougars (11.27.10)
General Information
| Opponent | Texas A&M |
| Nickname | Aggies |
| Location | College Station, TX |
| Enrollment | 48,702 |
| Conference | Big 12 |
| Head Coach | Mike Sherman |
| 2009 Record | 6-7, 3-5 |
| Starters Returning | 8 Offense : 9 Defense |
| Blogs | I Am The 12th Man : Spence Park Soap Box |
| Links | Post-Spring Depth Chart |
Join me after the jump for a closer look at the Aggies.
Statistics
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Statistic | Texas A&M | Texas Tech |
| Pass Offense | 281.62 (16) | 386.77 (2) |
| Rush Offense | 184.15 (30) | 84.00 (115) |
| Total Offense | 465.77 (5) | 470.77 (4) |
| Scoring Offense | 32.85 (19) | 37.00 (7) |
| Pass Efficiency | 136.02 (38) | 143.79 (19) |
| Sacks Allowed | 2.23 (74) | 2.38 (87) |
| Pass Defense | 254.69 (106) | 225.62 (73) |
| Rush Defense | 171.62 (90) | 126.77 (38) |
| Total Defense | 426.31 (105) | 352.38 (49) |
| Scoring Defense | 33.54 (105) | 22.46 (41) |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 134.45 (81) | 117.38 (35) |
| Sacks | 2.69 (18) | 3.09 (4) |
| Tackles For Loss | 6.23 (41) | 6.46 (34) |
| Turnover Margin | -0.15 (106) | -0.46 (94) |
Top Returners
| Category | Player |
| Rushing | Christine Michael :: 166 Rushes : 878 Yards : 10 TD |
| Passing | Jerrod Johnson :: 296/497 : 3,579 Yards : 30 INT : 8 TD |
| Receiving | Uzoma Nwachukwu :: 40 Receptions : 708 Yards : 6 TD |
| Tackles | Trent Hunter :: 56 Solo : 38 Assists : 94 Total |
| Sacks | Von Miller :: 16 Solo : 2 Assists : 115 Yards : 17 Total |
| Interceptions | Terrence Frederick : Kyle Mangan (2 each) :: 4 INT : 46 Yards : 0 TD |
Key Losses and Returning Impact Players
Disclaimer: I'm not an expert on the opponent, but I try my best. If I have something wrong, please let me know and I'll correct or revise as necessary.
Key Losses:
C Kevin Matthews, T Michael Shumard, T Lee Grimes, WR Howard Morrow, TE Jamie McCoy and S Jordan Pugh
Impact Offensive Player :: QB Jerrod Johnson:
With TAMU returning almost all of their skill position players in receivers Nwachukwu, Tannehill and Fuller and runners in Michael and Gray, it's going to make Johnson's life that much easier. The only question for Johnson will be improving on his 59.6% completion percentage and I tend to think that improving this will be dependent on improved offensive line play.
Impact Defensive Player :: LB Von Miller:
Miller is pretty darned good, and I think he's slotted to play the Joker position for the Aggies. If it's similar to what Texas Tech has had in the Joker, it's that Miller will primarily be a pass-rusher and he'll have the opportunity to line-up in different spots along the line. Miller's 17 sacks last year led the NCAA and just about everyone is projecting Miller to be one of the more highly rated NFL prospects.
Coach Speak:
Head Coach Mike Sherman talks about the spring game:
"We’ve had a few players out and some others who were limited today, but I was pleased with the competition on the field," Head Coach Mike Sherman said. "I like the competitive spirit of our team. Each and every play has an opportunity to be rewarded for positive results, but also to face the consequences of a negative play taking points off of the board. We have utilized this system throughout our spring drills."
Spring Chatter:
- New Defensive Coaches: Head coach Mike Sherman hired four new defensive coaches during the offseason:
Sherman had to revamp his staff despite a significant two-win improvement last season. A porous defense and misfiring special teams led to lopsided losses and seven setbacks on TV. That didn't give the season a feel of success then, nor now.
Sherman brought in four defensive coaches. He had to. Improving nine spots in total defense to 105th in the country really wasn't improvement. As for special teams, the Aggies were 91st in kickoff return defense, 98th in punt returns and 104th in net punting. That's unacceptable.
- Making Practices Count: Sherman utilizes a scoring system for each play to grade each practice during the spring:
Sherman uses a point system in each practice to promote even more competition between the offense and defense, with the loser having to run.
It's hard to keep the units balanced, though, with several key players being held out of spring drills with injuries. A&M had 10 healthy offensive linemen Sunday, which forced them to use a defensive lineman at guard.
"It's kind of a hodgepodge [at certain spots]," Sherman said. "[But] to equate success of what happens, I want each play to count. We grade each play by a scoring system."
- DeRuyter's Defense Makes Progress: New defensive coordinator Tim DeRuyter talks about the defense after the spring game:
"Probably a little bit better (than anticipated), to be honest with you," DeRuyter, Texas A&M's new defensive coordinator, said Saturday afternoon.
The Aggies had just wrapped up their annual Maroon & White game, and DeRuyter said afterward he's happy with the way his 3-4 defense has come along, with two spring practices remaining next week.
"We've tried to force feed our guys," DeRuyter said. "I wasn't sure how much they could handle."
- Most Improved: BCS-Eagle's Robert Cessna talks about a handful of players, including his most improved:
Cyrus Gray — he’s accepted the competition from Christine Michael.
Lucas Patterson — he was a force in the middle.
Terrence McCoy — he had a few practices where he matched last season’s seven catches.
Hutson Prioleau — he could fill voids at fullback as an H-back along with developing as a tight end.
Lionel Smith — he finally was able to use his speed to make plays. - Barrera Switches Sides: Offensive lineman Stephen Barrera switches sides to defensive end:
"It's not a knock against him as an offensive player, but he's a pretty good athlete," Sherman said after practice. "He's strong. I want to make sure we're making the right decision with him, and keeping him at the right spot."
Barrera (6-5, 302), who earned three early starts last year at left tackle as a true freshman, played on the defensive line at Clear Lake High.
"He might go back, or he might stay where he is, depending on how well he does on defense," Sherman said. "I'm trying to get him in a position where he can play. We're trying to get him on the field."
- Tannehill Talks Receiver Depth: WR Ryan Tannehill did a Q&A with FoxSports and addresses the receiver depth:
"It’s good to know that you have a lot of guys out there. They have to cover all of us. It’s not just one guy they have to focus on, double one guy. When you have weapons all over the field, they have to cover us throughout the whole field. Just about all the time there is going to be at least one guy open. I think it’s great to have some variability in your offense."
vs. Texas Tech:
I'd be lying if I told you that I wasn't completely intrigued with the Aggies. In fact, I think that they're a lot like Texas Tech has/is in the sense that they've got some fantastic skill position players and a high-flying offense, but a defense that is really holding the team back.
We'll take a look at the defense first, but take a look at the defense from last year. The stats look awful, and the defense gave up 47 points to Arkansas, 62 to Kansas St., 35 to an offensively challenged Colorado team, 65 to Oklahoma, 49 to Texas and 44 to Georgia. And although points allowed isn't indicative of the performance of a defense, it's a place to start in the sense that the Aggies were 105th in the nation in points allowed.
But it's a new season and the Aggies hired Air Force's defensive coordinator, Tim DeRuyter, and every Aggie that I've talked to have said that they think that DeRuyter is going to be great, but he may not be around very long as they see him being a head-coach candidate when the current Air Force coach takes a better job. I know that it's hard to compare stats across conferences, DeRuyter's Air Force defense was the 11th best defense (this is total defense) in the country last year. Of course, the caveat of this thought is that the coordinator can only make so much of an impact. Perfect example, James Willis was the co-defensive coordinator for an Alabama team that was 2nd in the nation in total defense. That certainly doesn't mean that you can expect the same type of success at Texas Tech and I think it's unrealistic to expect similar results if you're TAMU. You can hope for and expect improvement, but going from 105th to the top third in the country is going to be tough.
The defense obviously starts with OLB Von Miller, who led the BCS in sacks last year with 17. As an aside, and this doesn't make any sense to me, but Miller only had 39 tackles for the year. Really? He had 17 sacks but only 39 tackles? How does that happen? The rest of the defensive line is relatively young. DT Lucas Patterson should man one of the DT spots and he's been fairly productive, but on the Aggie two-deep, three of their top 6 linemen are sophomores. The linebacker group is a good mix of experience and youth and if you take a look at their depth chart, their mix of linebackers is similar to Texas Tech's in that their inside linebackers are in the 6-0/225 range, a 6-2/240 outside linebacker and the other outside linebacker is in the 6-1/210 range (more safety than linebacker, i.e. Julius Howard or Daniel Cobb).
Three of the four in the secondary return and this unit was very young last year and are still relatively young. Again, taking a look at TAMU's depth chart, of their top eight in the secondary, four of them are sophomores. As the stats played out, the defensive effort wasn't exceptional and the Aggies did lose Jordan Pugh, who was a big part of the secondary for a couple of years.
As mentioned above, the offensive skill positions are tremendous for the Aggies. Starting with the running backs, Christine Michael (844 yards and 10 TD's) and Cyrus Gray (757 yards and 5 TD's) were both really good on the ground and then signed three 4-star running backs last year in Ben Malena, Mister Jones and D.J. Jones.
The receiving corps is almost entirely intact, except for the loss of TE Jamie McCoy and WR Morrow, but does return some real play-makers in Uzoma Nwachukwu, Ryan Tannehill (I wish we had signed this guy) and Jeff Fuller. All three of those players caught over 40 passes and Nwachukwu had over 17 yards a catch last year. But the offense really starts with Jerrod Johnson. I've claimed that I think that Johnson and Missouri's Blaine Gabbert are probably the best quarterbacks in the Big 12 and I still think that's true. Skin Patrol pointed to the fact that Johnson's biggest fault is his completion percentage and he's right, that is the one spot that Johnson needs to improve. After thinking about it, TAMU's offense does like to throw the ball deep more than some of the spread teams in the Big 12 and that completion percentage isn't a huge worry.
However, what is a big worry is the offensive line. There are three returning starters coming back (I think) at center (Matt Allen), right guard (Patrick Lewis) and left guard (Evan Eike), but it's the tackles that are the biggest question marks for the Aggies. I will say that Sherman, a former offensive line coach, does know offensive line play and I do think that a lot of the issues that the Aggies have had over the years was due to the poor talent evaluation and/or recruiting by Fran, but there's a possibility that Sherman could start two true freshmen, Luke Joeckel and Jake Matthews (both were 4-star recruits). Joeckel was in College Station during the spring and Sherman had nothing but praise for his true freshman. I have no doubt that both are talented, but last year, the Aggies were 74th in the nation in sacks allowed, were pretty darned good running the ball and despite the talents of both players, there are going to be situations where both players won't be as consistent as a veteran might be just like Texas Tech (Terry McDaniel and LaAdrian Waddle). It's tough to expect young players to perform at critical positions at a high level on a consistent basis for the entire year.
So my thoughts on this game is that it's going to be tough. I know, you'd love for me to tell you that it's going to be a cake-walk, but if I'm being honest, I think that TAMU and Texas Tech are similar teams. I don't think the Texas Tech defense is going to be as bad as they were last year against TAMU (not adjusting for an entire game can be frustrating), but I do think that the TAMU can be that explosive. The offense never clicked against the Aggies last year, and whether you chalk it up to starting a right tackle that was a true freshman, a quarterback that couldn't get it going and was eventually replaced by a redshirt freshman, etc. It will be interesting to see where the TAMU defense is by this time and if they've made significant improvements over last year then I think this is a pretty darned close game.
I still believe that the problems that plagued Texas Tech last year are correctable problems and I don't think that the Aggies are 20 points better than Texas Tech. My worry level for this game is about a 3 and the offensive line should have time to gel once the Red Raiders travel to College Station. I'll certainly be watching to see how the Aggies perform against Missouri and in particular, how the Aggie tackles handle MU's Aldon Smith, one of the premier pass-rushing ends in the Big 12. That may give Texas Tech fans some insight on how TAMU good the Aggies can be.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Solid analysis Seth
First, I’m with you in voting a 3 for this game. I’m not particularly confident, but not overly nervous about losing this game either.
Outside of the OU game, I could see this being our most difficult contest of the year. This appears to be the most competitive Aggie team we will have faced in a long time. They won last year, but I think we simply did not play to our potential in that game. Sour grapes, I know, but that is how I feel about it.
I still see issues with depth on thier defensive side. Plus I would give an edge to Tech offensively. If I’m Sherman, my concern would be around developing a solid #2 at QB. Johnson is talented and seems durable, but you’re one unfortunate injury away from struggling offensively and that would concern me.
Very talented at RB and don’t sleep on Fuller. He is a great talent at receiver and compliments Tannehill.
Side note: I hate seeing Tannehill play for the Ag’s after his dad played at Tech. Sure wish we could have signed him as well. He’s an all-around talented player.
I still say we win this game. But it may be more like some of the close one’s we had in C.S…
IMWTx
"We thought we were too good to play Texas Effin' A&M" -Leach et al
Favorite Quote: Despite a significant two game improvement over 2008
They improved all the way to 6-7. And these clowns are the consensus pick to finish ahead of Tech this year? Doesn’t anybody who writes about college football in the pre-season actually follow college football? It seems to me they rank teams based on stadium size alone.
"I can't believe I finally decide to let a girl into my life and she tries to eat me" - Zombieland
Not too worried
I have never been sold on Johnson. I doubt he even gets a mention for the heisman by seasons end. Offensively they do have a few weapons such as in the RB department. The receivers they have are good but not up to Tech WR good. Fuller is probably their best player from how I see it. Okay, now the defense. A&M has one player that’s all the buzz and that’s Von Miller. This kid is the real deal but he can’t play every position on the defense. The linebackers are very average at what was once considered linebacker U. The secondary will find themselves chasing Tech WR’s to the end zone all day long. Our defense will be just enough to stop the powerful aggie running game. Bird moving to the middle and Duncan on the end is the difference maker. I doubt coach Willis lets this defense get beat like we did last season. I personally think Tech slept on these guys last year and I know that won’t be happening again anytime soon. My prediction is Tech wins big in this one by 21 points. Call me crazy but I don’t think the aggies will be all that good this season.
"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach
I do think the Aggies will be a better team than what they put out there last year. They played a TON of young kids in ’09 and did so-so. One has to assume that the experience will help them out (the same way we do with our players and team).
I can see them winning 8-9 games this year. But by the same token, they could easily lose six if they don’t show growth or have any one of JJ, Von Miller or Tannehill miss any time.
They will have their hands full against Arkansas and Mizzou back to back, and then Tech and OU back to back; then Nebraska and Texas back to back. The big factor that tilts their way is that four of the six are at Kyle Field, and one is neutral site. Texas is the only true road game of the six big boys. (Aside…what a great home schedule they get this year for their fans! Four marquee games)
I am fairly nervous about this one since it’s in College Station, and JJ scares the piss out of me. Whether he plays for the Ag’s or Florida or Furman or Hofstra, that kid is a freaking stud.
They brought in a new defensive coordinator who is supposed to be one of the best. Will they latch on to his schemes right away? Hard to tell…just like we don’t know how our boys will latch on to Willis’. So that’s kind of a wash to me.
I do think our WRs are just a slight tick better than theirs and I feel our overall stable of RBs is better than theirs as a unit. But…they have weapons. To pretend they don’t is silly (not saying anyone is, but…).
This game may end up being the best game out of all the conference games this season in the Big XII. We have the upper hand the last 15 years, but some of those have been stellar games. I expect this one to be tight, full of very big plays and one that goes right down to the wire. I stand by my thought that they get a last second field goal to take it by two. If it was in Lubbock, I’d feel we are 3 points better.
The hype is getting to ya man
Yeah we expect our players to step up and all, but we didnt have a 6 win season last year. They won 6 stinkin games all year and now all of a sudden they’re a force? When is the last time we didnt finish out with at least 9 wins? How come we dont get to be considered a force? I prefer being the underdog but i’m getting tired of all this aggie hoopla.
I’m thinking they could be a bit better (2 games or so) than last year. They only won 6 because they played something like 14 frosh and soph’s fairly regularly last season. Or some other number that is out of the ordinary.
I don’t think they’ll be a force by any stretch. And I don’t think we’ll suck. I just think we lose this particular game, as of now.
I agree they'll be better
But I dont have us pegged to lose to them. I expect us to go into Kyle Field playing on fire to avenge last year’s let down. I think we’ll still have the better team, and I definitely dont see us laying down two years in a row.
Which 8 or 9 games are you counting as their W?
Aggy schedule & my predictions:
SFA: Win
LA Tech: Win→ but this is not given, LA Tech is better than it looks on paper
FIU: Win
at OSU (aka TTU-Stillwater): Loss, they couldn’t beat them at home last year
Arkansas : Loss
Missouri: Win
at Kansas: Win
Texas Tech: Potential Loss—>Though trap game for Tech, Sherman again enters this game with his job on the line
OU: Loss
at Baylor: Win—> Thought not a given
Nebraska: Win—> I don’t see how NU wins a whole lot without any offense this year either
at Texas: Loss
So, 7 wins at best, give or take.
SFA: W
LAT: L
FIU: W (They will loose one of the 1st three)
OSU: L (Dana will smoke them for dinner)
AR: L
MZ: W
KS: W
TTU: L
OU: L
BU: L
NB: L
TX: L
4-8 / 5-7 at best, 2010 will be the sequel to the over hyped 2009 OSU flop
why would we lose to
La Tech? Why should I be scared of them? SFA and their QB who passed for 4000 yds should make the first game interesting (and not allow us to post great defensive numbers) but I did not view La Tech as a threat. What am I missing?
I didn’t say which…and I didn’t say they would. I said I could see it happening and I won’t be shocked if they do. I also said I could see them easily losing six.
They can beat Mizzou, they can beat Arky, they can beat OSU (who I think will gawd awful this year) and they can beat us. If Nebraska’s offense doesn’t improve by a lot over last year then that game is winnable, too.
Agree to disagree
You know I think they can beat any of these teams on a give day, but I just don’t think that this ATM team has it to beat them all consistently this season. They will beat a few of the above teams that you have mentioned and they will lose a few, but in the end I think they will have an indifferent year. But yes they have the potential to win it all no question, but so do we and so does NU and UT and OU.
Wait ...
Where is the always insightful beergut post? I would expect one by now.
Nope fell in that "mudhole" stomped in the middle of Kyle field
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Jul 23, 2010 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes
and notice in the general information table how Seth C ‘inadvertently’ leaves the ‘Blogs’ field blank.
Which of course leads us to the seventh DTN Commandment:
“Thou shalt not piss off Seth C.”
"This time it's different."
by LondonRaider on Jul 24, 2010 3:44 AM CDT up reply actions
I needed a break and
when I got 5 emails from TT fans saying they’re tired of coming to DTN to read his comments, then I felt I needed to take action.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
boooooo
I happened to like him here (at times). Especially when people would troll him and coax him into making an even bigger ass out of himself than he already was.
by TheScarletandTheBlack on Jul 26, 2010 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions
We should know
by the time this game rolls around we will have a much clearer picture of who is who and whats what, the ags have all the potential in the world but my main question is do they have the overall confidence? The game last year should be motivation enough for our guys, and other than that game the ags really havent won anything siginificant since they knocked off OK at home five or six years ago.
True but...
In a rivalry game, you can throw all that out the window. For example last year….
Tannehill
I am from Big Spring as well, his father was one of my coaches in HS (a real die hard Red Raider, too) Before a game we played at the Jones some guys spotted his name on a POTW placque and he got choked up. I think the kid went to AM to study biology or some similar subject that as far as Texas state schools Atm leads the pack by far.
o-line
that o-line is a lil skecthy. As we can atest to last season, o-line play is pretty important. Offense will be good, but the D needs to step it u. I expect some improvement on their D, but not a whole lot. I say they get to .500 and a bowl birth.
What do you call a Serbian with an insatiable desire for sweets with only one nad (in his throat)?
CHOCOHOLICINADINHISNECKDARKOINSKIVICHSKI
Tuberville
Needs to win this game to get his regime off to a great start. I’m hopeful that Tech will beat Texas early, but think A&M is the easier of the in-state rivals to beat. I don’t care where the game is played. The coaching and players at Texas is superior to A&M, and Tech has a good shot at beating both this year.
We played 18 true freshmen last year
I expect us to improve in every aspect simply b/c those guys are another year more mature. we lost a lot of games last year because of pitiful special teams and inconsistent defense. I expect both to improve with another year of maturity (still very worried about special teams though). Johnson spent half our games running for his life. That is why his completion percentage is a tick under 60 percent. Sherman has said he expects JJ to approach 70 percent completion this year.
When healthy, Fuller is the best WR in the conference. Some of you may not think A&M’s WRs are “Tech good” but Fuller will be drafted higher than anyone y’all have. Ryan Swope will catch around 50 passes this year if he stays healthy. Nate Askew ran a 10.51 100 at the Texas Relays and he is 6’4 228. He will make a nice contribution as a true freshman. Those of you who think our OL is sketchy do not understand how bad we were two years ago and entering last year. We may end up starting two freshmen at OT (I think we will keep Brian Thomas at RT) but our OL will still be an improvement over last year. Christine Michael is up to 217 of muscle and I expect him to be more consistent than last year.
On defense, we are going to see the benefit from playing so many freshmen last year. Our secondary should be vastly improved with Dustin Harris (shut down AJ Green in bowl game), Steven Terrell, and Steven Campbell returning as sophomores. Trent Hunter and Frederick will be juniors. Coryell Judie (juco all american) will be our nickel CB. Sean Porter is starting at OLB opposite Miller and he will get 8-10 sacks this year. Unless he gets injured or flunks out, he will be an NFL player. FYI, Von Miller had 48 tackles last year. We will need some freshmen to come in and help out on the DL but I think Nealy is going to be a hell of a DE for us. Jonathan Mathis should start at one DE opposite Tony Jerod-Eddie. Eddie Brown started at DT for us as a sophomore last year and will either back up or start at NG. Our defense should improve 20 spots just based on the experience factor.
I guess you could say I am somewhat concerned by Tech. We ran right through y’all last year and I think we will be a better running team this year. I am not convinced your offense will be anywhere near as explosive as it was under Leach. I still remember what Tubberville’s last spread offense looked like at Auburn for the 3 games it lasted. I expect to beat y’all at Kyle this year b/c I do not think your offense will be as good, I expect our defense to be better, and it is a home game. The NU and OU games worry me much more.
BTW, if Tubberville decides to go with Potts, I expect y’all to lose at least 5 games. It is obvious to me that Sheffield is the winner between the two.
I think Fuller is pretty good as well, but I see a more balanced passing game from the Aggies, maybe I’m wrong. I thought that all 3 receivers would have productive years. I wasn’t basing my thoughts on Fuller or any receivers on NFL potential. Never entered my mind.
I don’t know what I was thinking about Miller’s tackle totals (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2009/Internet/ranking_summary/2009000000697tackles.html). Sorry about that (although this says that Miller had 47 tackles).
I would agree that the Aggie defense should be better, it’s just hard to quantify how much better as I’m having the same issues with projecting TT.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Nice post here. Lots of good info. Fuller is the top WR but it always seemed to me like Tannahill (spelling) would step up at the right times. Improvements in defense are hard to judge. Who knows. I can’t disagree with your position about the whole team being better b/c of so many young guys last year. Thats what has me worried about A&M.
As you are fond of saying Mike ... no facts here just opinions.. and you are welcome to them.
“When healthy, Fuller is the best WR in the conference. Some of you may not think A&M’s WRs are "Tech good" but Fuller will be drafted higher than anyone y’all have.”
Nice ..
Thanks for the NFL scout opinion its just stunning – btw “vastly” is so factual.
“Our defense should improve 20 spots just based on the experience factor.”
I’d expect aTm to lose oh say 6 x games that’s including the Aggies Bowl loss. So who is you next head coach there tiger?
Baylor fans are radically optimistic too is that a little over the top Mike?
Yep old Sheffiled is the guy with the leadership advantage. Thanks for being a sport. I think J. Johnson is hell of an athelete but in “fact” my study of the Aggie offense says he wont break a 61 % completion rate . TheTubs slow offense will still crank 4500 yards thru the air. But we shall see.
Courtesy is contagious.
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Jul 26, 2010 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions
If Fuller had stayed healthy
throughout the year, I think he would have gone for 70 receptions and around 1000 yds. JJ always looks for Tannehill on 3rd down. There is a little inside scoop for your coaches.
IMO the Tech defense will depend a lot on how Duncan handles the transition to OLB, and if Whitlock is as effective as I think he will be at NG. I thought that guy was going to be a stud when he was a freshman. He has had his moments but is not what I thought he would be.
He's been double teamed his entire NCAA life.
That has to say something about the caliber of player he is.
" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...
Occuping a double team is a pretty good job for a NG/DT. That means one LB goes free. Dont mess with the Whitlock!
by Gus Mitchem on Jul 26, 2010 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions
My thoughts...
exactly.
Especially with the supposed more aggressive D that Tech will be running this year.
by TheScarletandTheBlack on Jul 27, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions
All decent DL get double teamed
The really good ones still make impact plays. Not a lot of impact plays from Whitlock. Most games i did not notice he was there. Like I said, I think the move to NG will be good for him. We will see.
Thanks Mike you are a bloody good coach..
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Jul 26, 2010 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions
He "only made" this play....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhOIqxLeriI
That play pretty much setup the rest of the night.
by TheScarletandTheBlack on Jul 27, 2010 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Excellent TS&TB .. just excellent. Plus1000
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Jul 27, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions

by 


















