Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jon Jones Arrested on Suspicion of DUI

Five Questions | One Scrimmage In The Books

Five_questions_-_tiltshift__resize__medium


1.  The first scrimmage is in the books and QB Steven Sheffield proclaimed that QB Taylor Potts was the winner in the quarterback race.  How do you feel about Sheffield being so honest (assuming that he is being honest, why would he lie?) about the quarterback race? 

I'm going to shoe-horn this in, since this is the only link I found this morning was DMN's Chuck Carlton on OC Neal Brown, who knows that the honeymoon is about to be over:

Tommy Tuberville has the responsibility of replacing Mike Leach, the head coach who straddled the line between certified genius and just certifiable.

Brown has potentially the harder task. Leach, the offensive coordinator and play-caller, was one of college football's best for a decade. Three Tech quarterbacks led the nation in total offense during the Leach era. The Red Raiders produced yards and points sometimes at will.

"There's going to be darker days. There will be ups and downs," Brown said. "There's not going to be 12 games of 500 yards passing and 50 points.

"I told my wife the other day this honeymoon is getting ready to be over. You've got to play someday."

2.  The SMU game is only 20 days away, what concerns you right now and what gives you comfort?

3.  You'll have to go to the jump, but thanks to TTpilk645 who put together the spreadsheet and emailed it to me, we not only have a list of the weight loss, which has been one of the big stories thus far this early fall practice, but there's been quite a bit of weight gain from more than a handful of players.  Two questions here, what is the most impressive weight gain and what do you think will be the most important weight gain?

4.  Same type of question as #3, what is the most impressive weight loss and most important weight loss?

5.  OT:  There's only two shows that I'm currently taping on my DVR because I don't ever want to miss them in between my wife taping every reality show known to man, Mad Men and No Reservations.  As an aside, perhaps the best television I've seen all summer was the No Reservations episode on Liberia and it made me consider how ignorant I am about a lot of things in this world.  Back to the question:  What television show do you watch during the summer months to bide your time until the season starts?

Star-divide

 

Weight Gain

PLAYER BEFORE AFTER NET
Terrance Bullitt 182 191 +9
Steven Sheffield 190 197 +7
Cornelius Douglas 193 200 +7
Austin Zouzalik 181 191 +10
Will Ford 186 190 +4
Tramain Swindall 180 184 +4
D.J. Johnson 170 190 +20
Taylor Potts 218 222 +4
Julius Howard 208 220 +12
Detron Lewis 205 208 +3
Lyle Leong 165 175 +10
Bront Bird 240 248 +8
Josh Talbott 199 201 +2
Dion Chidozie 194 208 +14
Corey Lee 160 167 +7
Eric Stephens 182 192 +10
Baron Batch 205 210 +5
Brett Dewhurst 193 197 +4
Aaron Crawford 204 205 +1
Arlan Waller 184 190 +6
Gerardo Acevedo 197 212 +15
Andre McCorkle 204 210 +6
Sam Fehoko 220 233 +13
Daniel Cobb 211 215 +4
Ryan Erxleben 190 192 +2
Tyrone Sonier 225 233 +8
Ryan Haliburton 245 251 +6
Jonathan Brydon 220 236 +16
Brian Duncan 240 248 +8
Jonathan Guerra 281 297 +16
Chris Olson 296 300 +4
Kyle Clark 277 295 +18
Beau Carpenter 275 293 +18
Blake Emert 287 297 +10
Lonnie Edwards 290 322 +32
Garrick McCray 184 200 +16
Adam James 216 233 +17
Blake Kelley 184 188 +4
Bradley Hicks 164 169 +5
Matthew Williams 164 170 +6
Alexander Torres 196 199 +3
Aaron Fisher 182 186 +4
Travis Malone 224 232 +8
David Neill 280 284 +4
Kerry Hyder 255 265 +10
Colby Whitlock 287 294 +7
Pearlie Graves 278 286 +8
Michael Aguilar 226 238 +12
Chris Perry 300 309 +9

 

Weight Loss

PLAYER BEFORE AFTER NET
Seth Doege 205 200 -5
Jonathan LaCour 220 216 -4
Harrison Jeffers 204 201 -3
Cody Davis 200 194 -6
Jared Flannel 167 166 -1
Sawyer Vest 178 172 -6
Myles Wade 340 300 -40
Donnie Carona 218 217 -1
Joel Gray 306 302 -4
LaAdrian Waddle 350 322 -28
Deveric Gallington 350 314 -36
Terry McDaniel 335 315 -20
Justin Keown 302 300 -2
Mickey Okafor 319 305 -14
Britton Barbee 296 287 -9
Donald Langley 295 257 -38

Comment 98 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My answers

1. I think Sheffield was being honest but Potts was the better QB at scrimmage even last year. However, Potts could not consistently carry forward his scrimmage success to the field last year. Potts did win that QB competition at Manning camp this summer and may be an improved QB than he was last year but I just haven’t seen enough to make that decision yet, the coaches probably have.

2. About the SMU game, I am happy about the depth and options that we have at almost every position but the O-Line. The O-line is injury ridden and is still a cause of concern for me.

3 &4.Sheffield, Fehoko and Adam James stand out. But I haven’t heard much about James and don’t know if he will infact serve as the tight end at all this season.

by jef on Aug 16, 2010 6:49 AM CDT reply actions  

1) I think we all know that sticks doesnt practice well, and performs his best under pressure.

2) Im concerned that potts will be named starter bc he practices better, and we will have the same ordeal as last year for the fans to be calling for sticks.

3) impressive weight gain: anybody but nancy……..most important weight gain: anybody but nancy

4) impressive weight loss: Donald Langley……most important weight loss: LaAdrian Waddle

5) college football live

by chad0454 on Aug 16, 2010 7:23 AM CDT reply actions  

1. Don’t really care at this point. This dead horse has been beat into the mud. Whoever trots out onto that field trots onto the field, I will still be cheering my head off from the comfort of my living room.
2. Concern and comfort don’t really describe it. I’m just anxious to see all of the pre-season interviews and info be validated and see my favorite team play some actual televised football!
3/4. I understand that height/weight are very important, but I never have been able to give them much credibility when I see those ‘in the know’ claim that a play is worthless at a position compared to another player(based solely on their height/weight) when there is 1 inch and 8 lbs difference between them. Either a kid can play or he can’t(see Welker, Amendola, Jamar Wall I think was a little undersized according to the experts, etc etc) . I’m glad our O line lost a little weight if they kept their arm strength and improved their speed I suppose.
5. It is a little cheesy, but I love Psych. The show is clean enough for the whole family and Sean and Gus’ dialogue crack me up.

by jdeeTTU on Aug 16, 2010 7:44 AM CDT reply actions  

1. Discussed this QB competition at length with my brother yesterday. Here the conclusion. Potts practices well. Plays well. When he gets overwhelmed (read rattled) he is really rattled. Sticks makes everyone else perform better, exudes a sense of success personifies the daring do component of the team. I can’t tell why the practice thing is affecting him but my suspicion is testitis i.e. being graded, on checklist or some such mental thing. Over think. It’s just wishful thinking on my part but if I could game plan I’d start Potts then launch Sheffield in at the end ofthe2nd period and again in the 4th . I know no one would consciously do that..
2. I am most concerned about serviceable O linemen yet position Coach Matt Moore is arguably the most stable guy on the team. It’s going to okay, and we won’t notice the change because the run game will mask blocking , footwork and mental errors. So the real concern then shift to defensive down linemen. I hated it when B. Barbee went down. I had him pegged as a breakout guy. Graves, Perry, & Hyder need very solid play- on 18 Sep.
3./ 4. Most important weigh t gainers are Bird, Sonier and Fehoko .Weight loss guys actually I’m little concerned here 30 lbs is a lot. I suppose it’s better from a stamina perspective. But I favor a heavy o line then again if the scoring goes off the charts in the 4th period then I’m sold.
5. Cruising channels, rewatching recorded games.. did I mention watching replays..

"do routine things routinely"

by centexraider on Aug 16, 2010 7:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Questions

I’m gonna tie 1 and 2 together. My biggest concern is the QB battle and the potential fall out if Potts wins the job. All kidding aside, this could get ugly and I would bet a donut that Katfish and Brown have spent time discussing the possibility. Sticks has set this scenario up where in the past he didn’t get a chance, didn’t get proper coaching, etc, etc. I think some of that resentment spread throughout the locker room (this isn’t a knock but you gotta admit the kid talks ALOT). Now if Potts wins the job but doesn’t play exceptionally well, will Sticks be a team player or will he start planting seeds of doubt?

It seems that Seth touched on this yesterday with his Katfish transcript:

On Taylor Potts and Steven Sheffield it’s about making the right decision because one will be running with the second team, both made good decisions and bad decisions.

Regardless, I’m supporting whoever starts. If two offensive minds (Brown & Leach) and the mighty Katfish (Katfish) think Potts beat Sticks, then I’m gonna have to trust them.

4. Weight Loss- Looks like Myles Wade lost a 3rd grader. 40 lbs is quite a bit.

5. Just waiting for the new season of East Bound and Down to get going.

"No bullfights. No gambling. No donkeys. No vanilla extracts. No piñatas. None of that stuff. Straight football. No switchblades."
- Mike Leach

by San Antonio Red Raider on Aug 16, 2010 7:51 AM CDT reply actions  

1. Don’t really care for the “Potts played better than me” statements. I would rather Sheffield just state that he had an off day and let that be it. Seems like he’s getting too emotional too early. This competition is ongoing and we all know Potts performs great in practice but lack game time delivery. For now I just consider this battle somewhat even but I would probably agree with some that Pott’s may have learned a thing ot two about his previous play and continues to work on weaknesses. Both these guys will play in 2010.
2. Not really concerned at all about SMU. Our defense and offense will be making huge plays all day long.
3./4. Detron looks like he’s bulked up a bit along with Batch. Also, Sheffield was looking like mister pretzel last season so I’m glad he’s up on his weight. I think a great deal of this is the weight room training. Obviously muscle weighs more than fat and we may be seeing an uptick from the weight training. I like some of the O-line losing a couple of pounds to be more agile but they have to be careful not to lose to much. We need the beef on the line.
5. I’m a DVR junky for College football Live. The show spends way too much time talking about USC but now that Erin Andrews is hosting I can deal with it. Also, I’m a huge Friday Night Lights fan but is over for now.

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Aug 16, 2010 8:23 AM CDT reply actions  

My contribution:

Weightloss: As impressive as the weightloss is, it pales in comparison to the amounty of actual body fat these kids have lost. When you consider that they are engaged in intense resistance training or in other words, building muscle while losing fat, 40 lbs lost is a huge accomplishment. A football player lifting every day but also losing 40lbs probably lost any where from 50 – 60 lbs of fat and added 10-20lbs of muscle to net out at 40 lbs lost. The actual body fat loss is the key, and these guys will see huge performance improvement with that kind of fitness level increase.

QB Battle: My thoughts on this are pertually evolving as information changes, but this did occur to me. Perhaps we saw one QB with all the tangibles underperforming, and a QB with less ability but more heart overperforming. Now, perhaps, the QB with all the gifts has started to reach his potential on the field, and the over performing QB has settled in closer to where two different coaching staffs always thought he should be…..second string. Im just grasping at straws here, but you have to admit atleast its a different take besids the now cliche “Potts is only good in practice”.

"Dress good, yu'll play good. Play good, yu'll get paid good." -Deion Sanders

by TTUMAR on Aug 16, 2010 9:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Great observation.

I had never really thought about it that way but it would seem to explain a lot about how last season played out. Add in the possible scenario of Leach not managing the mental preparation of the Potts properly and I think it might explain how last season played out

"Well I’m glad you picked us last, we put that on the bulletin board and maybe we can circle around that" - Neal Brown, Offensive Coordinator

by ttu_porters on Aug 16, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great comments, astute, regarding the weight numbers.

women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans

by TallMike on Aug 16, 2010 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

5 Answers

1. I am uncomfortable with his “honesty.” He has made several comments to reporters that would have been best unsaid. On the other hand, I was very impressed with Taylor Pots in the post-scrimage interview posted on the official website. Taylor was very mature and very team-oriented in his comments. Everyone seems to be entranced by the idea that Sticks has “it.” I’m not so sure. Last year there seemed to be something wrong within the chemistry of the team. I have no idea what it was or who was at fault, but it seems to have been corrected this year. Sticks’ excessively negative beatdown of himself is not helpful. (By the way: I was at the Alamo Bowl and felt the excitement when Sticks entered the game. I saw the energy he brought to the game and the effect it had on the team. I am not anti-Sticks. I just think he sometimes needs to think before he talks.)
2. The unity and enthusiasm of the team and every player’s willingness to do anything to contribute get me totally pumped. I can’t wait for the SMU game. SMU is a good team, but I am absolutely confident that they will have to wait until game two to begin their winning streak.
3. The Baron put on 5 pounds. Yea, that’s not much, but it looks like every ounce of that added 5 pounds is leg muscle. The man is beginning to look like Emmit Smith in his prime. I think there will be some linebackers and defensive backs that will regret making contact with the Baron this season.
4. In the post-scrimage interview, Brian Duncan made a comment about how quick the O-line had become. It’s hard to get around a quick O-lineman. I think this will pay big dividends. Regardless of who our quarterback is, we MUST protect him, and the Baron will never get the chance to punish the defensive backs unless he can get past the line.
5. Off season TV? What’s that? If I want entertainment, I check the articles and comments on DTN.

by Colonel 71 on Aug 16, 2010 9:04 AM CDT reply actions  

TV

Deadliest Catch is the best “reality” show on TV though I dont like to use that term because most “reality” shows are anything but real. This might be the last actual reality show that remains. This last season pushed things to another level, althogh it has always been a great show.

Have to admit Im a sucker for American Pickers, Im analytical and tidey and its amazing that folks can get pleasure from hoarding so much junk. Cheesy but it knows what it is so comes off well done.

Infomania on Current, if you have directv you have this channel its 358, this show is great it illustrates how assian the media is and shines a light on all the bs that news and pop culture get obesed with. Similar to how the daily show was ten or twelve years ago before it turned into Jon Stewart being so proud of how funny he isnt.

by Gus Mitchem on Aug 16, 2010 9:05 AM CDT reply actions  

"Reality" TV...

I actually have a friend who was a “writer” on both Batchelor and Batchelorette. Why would a “reality” show need a writer?

by Techsan71 on Aug 16, 2010 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

killing some time on a Monday

1) Interesting, that Sheffield did so poorly in the scrimage. I always thought he performed better in “game” situations.

2) 20 days to solve QB, coach up the freshmen DBs and implement a very aggressive defense…no worries.

3) Sheffield looks like he has gained more than 7 lbs. I saw him Saturday at autograph day and he is much bigger. I would have guessed +15 lbs based on this time last year.

4) Langley and Wade. This is going to make both a lot quicker and should help improve their endurance late in games.

5) College fooball Live and NFL Network

"Well I’m glad you picked us last, we put that on the bulletin board and maybe we can circle around that" - Neal Brown, Offensive Coordinator

by ttu_porters on Aug 16, 2010 9:10 AM CDT reply actions  

Weight changes

Those changes that were made on the official list show the differences between Spring and Fall workouts, not from last season, so some differences may just be corrections, or they may not really show ALL of the ups and downs or the TOTALS of the ups and downs. It was an exercise that just seemed to show the team is making changes that I think are significant in performing as well overall as the new regime wants them to.

TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.

by TTpilk645 on Aug 16, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for this note

I was wondering the base data’s origin. I think you did it as well as could be given the opportunity to find data.

women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans

by TallMike on Aug 16, 2010 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Being sad that this is my last week of summer...

1. Not a surprise. Potts was great in practice last year, but when he had 300 pound linemen in his face he froze up. I’ll root for whoever starts come the SMU game and beyond.

2. Concerns: QB, Freshman DBs, O Line, New Offense
Comforts: RBs, WRs, Defense

3. Impressive: DJ Johnson
Important: Lonnie Edwards

4. Impressive: Myles Wade
Important: Donald Langley

5. Premier League Football (GO SPURS!)

by techfan5730 on Aug 16, 2010 10:01 AM CDT reply actions  

just one comment...

Re: Potts & Sheffield

It’s POSSIBLE that Sheffield “had an off day” but also saw Potts performing very well and figures that he can’t afford the slip ups now. I say that because of the two, from what I saw last year it seemed that Potts’ problems a) wasn’t as mobile when the line broke down, b) technical issues that coaching could/SHOULD fix. OTOH, Sheffield’s problems were physical a) injury-prone, b) not as good with the “measurables” as Potts.

I was really struck by Sheffield’s comments earlier in the off-season that this new staff was paying MUCH closer attention to the minutia and details and coaching up the players (in his opinion). It was always MY opinion that (if true) that would be a MUCH bigger boon for Potts than for Sheffield. Also, since Sheffield is better than Potts as far as scrambling, I’d say it’s likely that Potts has more to gain from Tuberville raising the profile of the running back corps.

(just my two cents)

by HeeroTX on Aug 16, 2010 10:03 AM CDT reply actions  

1. I don’t like Sticks lack of confidence in his comments. I’ve always been concerned with Potts dear in the headlights play, but I have to concede that Leach, Tuberville and Brown can pick a starter better than I can. If they all think Potts is the guy then he’s got my support. I’m sure Taylor will sleep better at night knowing that.
1(a). Brown’s quote made my stomach hurt. The reality that Leach is gone – and with that the high flying risk taking offense that we know and love is gone too. Brown’s acknowledgement of “darker days” and the lack of the number of games lighting up the scoreboard is a reality I was trying not to face.
2. Very concerned to see what this team will look like – have they gelled as a team after so much disruption/change? How is the defense handling the new defensive formation? SMU is coming off a decent season. This game is not a given.
3.What is up with Adam James – is he finally working? Don’t really care, still don’t want to see him play.
5. Dexter, Law & Order reruns – I’m pretty sure I could solve crime in my free time.

by Austin, Tx on Aug 16, 2010 10:22 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, Dexter

I watched this also, scared the crap out of me…the very thought of it…the horror of it…it was very well written, presented, and acted.

women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans

by TallMike on Aug 16, 2010 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have been pro sticks since last fall after the k state game

That being said, I really dislike his comments after this scrimmage…

Not only are the comments extremely self centered, they are way too negative… it shows the lack of confidence that I have feared that he has. It seems the job has been Potts to lose, and that Sticks has felt he must be perfect to be QB1.

I think Sticks solidified his second team status with these comments, if I am Tubs, I look at these comments and think, wow, this guy was paying attention to every play he messed up on throughout the entire “game” and also was focusing on how the other team was doing and continuing to get down on himself. You hear all the time about forgetting about the previous play, and these comments suggest that sheffield was way too focused on his performance as it was happening rather than focusing on the next play… IMO not a good place to be if you are starting QB

by johnlaf13 on Aug 16, 2010 10:48 AM CDT reply actions  

1. I don’t know if I am being asked to opine on Sheffield’s choice of words or his character…at the end of the day, I try to get more big picture on these types of issues. I have also tried to be pretty consistent with my thoughts and words for qb this season, there are two good ones, either can play, one has to be named, the result we will see, what did not happen with the other at the helm, we will never know….I am going to enjoy TTU football.

2. SMU is another first game of the season. There are the usual concerns, I haven’t seen this year’s TTU team play yet, so I don’t know what they will show. Add to that uncertainty, the new staff and schemes and multiple changes…there is less comfort from the familiar. Then there is the clear improvement of the SMU program under a fine head coach. I am most concerned about TTU’s defense, it is young in terms of a lot of new guys in new positions running a new scheme. I am least concerned that TTU will win the game, the running part looks to be stronger…and I believe any of our qb’s—any of them—can get the ball to the recievers vs this opponent.

3. I would like to take another cut on the weight data as a validation but what I came away thinking after looking gives me the thought that there are a lot of guys who looked light…who no longer look so, there are a lot of skilled guys who move closer to 205-210 (does the data lead to exploring the thought that there are ideal weights by position class?). Example, Leong came out of HS at about 165, then in the past few months he gained 10. I am honestly impressed that James is now 235ish…he worked as hard as anyone to do that—unless it is cheetos ;-)…I am also impressed that people who look like squad players are included in the whole of the effort.

4. The weight loss may have the same focus, get guys to a better playing weight…it kind of looks like the linemen on both sides of the ball are aiming at about 300. Those guys who lost significant weight from 340/350 are impressive to me….a few of them around 8-10% in a few months….there has been a lot of dedicated work around conditioning.

5. Regarding Liberia, there is some of that here in the U.S.A. that is equally ignored. And, I found my eyes open big time with I lived outside of the U.S.A. in a foreign language invironment that made me a sure fire minority, I recommend that experience to anyone if done with a learning eye. What television show do you watch during the summer months to bide your time until the season starts? At the end of Spring, I disconnected the TV, no antenna. Enjoyed the peace and quiet for a while, spent way too much time reading DTN, and finally bought into NetFlix where for a pittance I have enjoyed great entertainment that I had missed over the years, lots of very well written sci-fi: Firefly, Torchwood, and some Dr Who….as well as good movies and histories…Ken Burns does a good job presenting his takes on our history.

women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans

by TallMike on Aug 16, 2010 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

1. Whoever starts, starts. We win with either of them. Both have experience as the starter and I’m confident in the staff’s decision.

2. We roll SMU.

3 & 4. Looks like the guys who needed to lose, did…and those who needed to gain did. Let’s see how that translates to the field.

5. No Reservations is one of my favs as well. Watching Hung on HBO. And, Chopped on Food Network pulls me in like a magnet…can’t explain it.

by Techsan71 on Aug 16, 2010 11:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Sounds to me like Sticks is too worried about being named starter and not worried enough about just executing the plays called.

by Tech92 on Aug 16, 2010 11:35 AM CDT reply actions  

agree

"Winning isn't everything"... Bob Knight

by raider realist on Aug 16, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree too

While I do like Sticks, I always thought some of the things he said regarding deserving to be the starter were dumb. He now needs to truly beat out Potts and show in practice that he deserves to be the starter.

by Boarder on Aug 16, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Alamo Bowl on ESPN

The Alamo Bowl will be airing on ESPNU (1605 on Uverse) at 3 am tomorrow morning.. Set your dvrs!!!
Sorry for not posting a fan shot but I’m not in the office at the moment.

"I like to think of myself as a one man wolfpack."

by Remington870 on Aug 16, 2010 12:24 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Sticks vs Potts

I think we are all over analyzing this information. I think we all should be happy with whoever our starting QB is because both of these kids are talented!

"A job well done is better than a job well said."

by I bleed Red and Black on Aug 16, 2010 12:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Too much hype...

No reason for Sticks to add drama by making those comments, just go to work…Potts’ only problem has always been mental, we’ve all seen him make the throws at times, just get off that back foot! Sticks seems to be getting caught up in the whole QB battle hype. We got bigger fish to fry….

I really like the Honeymoon statement. The Leach era was fun, but to get to the next level we’ve got to get better on the other sides of the ball. I don’t think he means the offense will take a dive, just that our gameplan will hinge on more than just scoring 50 points each game. I supported this gameplan during Leach’s tenure because we needed the national recognition. We’ve got that now, so lets get ready to do the little things that make a real “Marrige” work.

Cicero 1/2 of Patton Productions
www.myspace.com/pattonproductions

by Cicero4PatPro on Aug 16, 2010 1:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I think we lie about Nancy's weight

He looks much smaller than Torres or Detron…..

by RdrPwr on Aug 16, 2010 1:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Mindset is important and a MUST....

1 – Sheffield needs to get his head around things if he is going to have a chance at being picked as the QB. It is his to lose. He needs to not focus on his mistakes. Be the team leader he was last season and he will earn the top spot.
2 – I feel we will win the game against SMU. I have a feeling CTT and Brown will not show all of their cards until the third game (Beat UT !!!)
3 – Important: Sheffield with a slight weight gain hopefully will stay healthy this season. Hopefully he added more muscle and a little bit of padding to reduce injury. Impressive: Lonnie Edwards took on a lot of weight in such a short time. Hopefully his body can work with the new weight.
4 – Important: Waddle, Gallington, McDaniel combined weight loss 84lbs for the OL. Let’s see if it was cashed in for strength and agility. Impressive: Myles Wade lost 40lbs. Let’s hope he gained more speed and agility
5 – Top Chef Masters and Top Chef – I love to cook. The geek and Sci-Fier in me watches DVR tapings of Star Trek: Enterprise (with Scott Bakula, of Quantum Leap fame, playing Captain Jonathan Archer)
Saw the movie "Restrepo" this weekend. This one opens your eyes to how good we have it everyday, while our boys are over fighting in these Hell holes.

by RndRckTTU on Aug 16, 2010 2:31 PM CDT reply actions  

Mindset is important and a MUST....

1 – Sheffield needs to get his head around things if he is going to have a chance at being picked as the QB. It is his to lose. He needs to not focus on his mistakes. Be the team leader he was last season and he will earn the top spot.
2 – I feel we will win the game against SMU. I have a feeling CTT and Brown will not show all of their cards until the third game (Beat UT !!!)
3 – Important: Sheffield with a slight weight gain hopefully will stay healthy this season. Hopefully he added more muscle and a little bit of padding to reduce injury. Impressive: Lonnie Edwards took on a lot of weight in such a short time. Hopefully his body can work with the new weight.
4 – Important: Waddle, Gallington, McDaniel combined weight loss 84lbs for the OL. Let’s see if it was cashed in for strength and agility. Impressive: Myles Wade lost 40lbs. Let’s hope he gained more speed and agility
5 – Top Chef Masters and Top Chef – I love to cook. The geek and Sci-Fier in me watches DVR tapings of Star Trek: Enterprise (with Scott Bakula, of Quantum Leap fame, playing Captain Jonathan Archer)
Saw the movie "Restrepo" this weekend. This one opens your eyes to how good we have it everyday, while our boys are over fighting in these Hell holes.

by RndRckTTU on Aug 16, 2010 2:31 PM CDT reply actions  

1) Not a good sign for Sticks to refer to Potts to describe his own play. I agree with others that it shows Sticks is overly concerned on whether he will get the nod or not. I think Potts will start and I think we will be fine.
2) Ready for SMU . . . bring on the ponies. . . TT knows how important his first game is so he’llhave them ready to go.
3) Not sure any of the weight gains are great althought glad to see Sticks add a few poiunds.
4) Good to see some of the big boys lose some weight. hope they turned fat into muscle and added some speed.
5) The Western channel on Dishnetwork and BBQ Pittmasters. other than that I spend time dringking beer outside talking to my horses.

West Texas sunsets are the best !!!!!!
Go RED RAIDERS!!!!!!!!!!!
Long live the Pirate Spirit!!!

by IndianaRedRaider on Aug 16, 2010 3:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Tech dropped from #14 to #20 in the recruiting rankings on ESPN

They don’t explain why. It must be that we got all our hot commits early & the schools they moved in front of Tech have been adding blue chips between the 1st list in June & the one that came out today.

http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/classrankings?&action=upsell&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fncf%2frecruiting%2fclassrankings

by mbrown603 on Aug 16, 2010 4:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Re: 5 Questions.....

1. I don’t care who throws the football at this point. It could be Janitor from the School Of Engineering. Somebody just throw the damn thing and play football. But seriously, I think we all might be reading a little to far into this. Tubs is giving these guys a chance to speak and they are doing so. Remember last year when we had our Deep Snapper Austin Burns talking to the media? He was as lost as we where.

2. The only thing that concerns me about this game is that it’s on a Sunday. It just seems so weird that we’re having the game on Sunday against a Methodist School.

3. Mine. I think I gained about 20 lbs. during the offseason. I need to lose the majority of it in the first 3 weeks of football. This is due to not having adequate football to watch and a TV to scream at.

4. No idea. I guess it would have to be Donald Langely. That is pretty solid.

5. Nitro Circus, Cities of the Underworld, Fantasy Factory, Modern Warfare, The History Channel, Discovery

" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...

by KWashburn on Aug 16, 2010 5:25 PM CDT reply actions  

5 Qs

1. I am not too concerned as both QBs are good enough to win at least eight games, but the rest of the team needs to play great to get more wins. After all, the QB can’t do it all.
2. My concern is whether the players in all areas of play can digest and put into practice the changes being implemented by the staff. I am comfortable enough, though, where they are physically and mentally to be able to easily handle anything thrown (literally) at them by SMU.
3. The most impressive weight gains for me is DJ Johnson, Austin Zouzalik, Sam Fehoko, Beau Carpenter and a few others who are backups. The most important may be Lonnie Edwards, if it is muscle and not water.
4. The most impressive weight losses would have to be
Myles Wade, Deveric Gallington, LaAdrian Waddle and Donald Langley. The most important will be Terry McDaniel, if he can get his head on straight and play up to his potential.
5. I like the CSI and NCIS shows. Baseball and basketball lost me a long time ago.

TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.

by TTpilk645 on Aug 16, 2010 6:43 PM CDT reply actions  

5

1. I don’t know why Sticks would eliminate himself like that because one a bad day. Nobody else did. It’s sort of strange but he either knows Potts is playing better than can play right now and it’s got him discouraged/rattled, or he just can’t deal with the stress of this competition and having a less than great day. Either way isn’t good. I’d like to see Sticks win the job all things being more or less equal just because I think he’d be more interesting to watch.

2. I’m concerned right now with CNB talking about “dark days”, honeymoons being over, and “you’ve got to play someday”. Sounds like he really doesn’t like our offense’s chances this year. Hopefully he takes some valium or something.

3 / 4. Yeah.. weight charts. I think the most impressive weight losses are the people who lost the most!

5. Watched all of The Dresden Files, House, The Legend of the Seeker, Firefly, and Bones on Netflix this summer. Also watched Pawn Stars some, that’s a pretty interesting show.

by merrik on Aug 16, 2010 7:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Practice Does not always make for Perfection

I get the impression that Sticks is just not a very good practice player and staying within the system. It might well be that Potts has all the physical tools and size, but when it comes to game time, he gets All Happy Feet on us. I think Sticks is one of thos guys who has the IT and WOW factor. You can’t coach the IT factor. Question is, how long does OC Brown stick with Potts, with the IT Factor sitting on the bench. I hope in this case that we do not stick, no pun intended, with Potts too long. Thier is a reason we called him the Pirate, he has that hook, and knows when to use it. I will be rooting for whichever QB wins the starting job, but I hope OC Brown does not let us go 0-3 to prove a point. Go Red Raiders.

by Btech on Aug 16, 2010 7:21 PM CDT reply actions  

AMC does a really good job with their original shows. Mad Men and Breaking Bad are two amazing tv series.

by willthetechfan on Aug 16, 2010 8:39 PM CDT reply actions  

#1

I will support Sticks. Potts will have to earn my support if he’s the starter Day 1. If Stick’s #s were pro-rated for an entire year, he would be in elite (read alone) territory. Anyone who says they’ll support whoever they put in did not watch last season.

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 7:58 AM CDT reply actions  

I go with winners

There’s a difference to being a great practice player, and a great game player. In all my years that I played competitive sports, I would see it time and again.

As you know, Sheffield relishes the underdog role. He was the 180-lb beanpole who came in under the radar. The QB that was never going to see the field. The system backup to a hugely touted prospect (Potts). He had no pressure, and he played like it. Now that he has a little pressure, it’s affecting him a bit.

Once he settles down and figures out that all he needs to do is be loose, he’ll be fine.

Funny that you say it, but I believe “his own admission” is his way of taking the pressure off of himself. He knows he can do it coming in as the “savior” so he’s setting himself up to be just that…

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know

seems like a really convoluted way to earn a starting job. I agree, I’d love for him to be top notch, but if he doesn’t go out an earn it on the practice field and during the scrimmages, then Sheffield has no one to blame except for himself. I think that Sheffield is the better quarterback, but if he doesn’t step up his play, then Leach, Tuberville and Brown all are forced to reach the same conclusion and go with Potts.

Ultimately, I want my team to win first and foremost, and Sheffield gives us the better chance to do so, at least in my opinion, but Sheffield has to pull his weight in this quarterback battle.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

If that's the conclusion they come to

I’ll just go ahead and change my Avatar from “Tech 80” to “14.”

As far as I’m concerned, Sticks doesn’t have to earn anything. His resume was what he did on the field last year. I’ll admit I’m a little hard-headed on this one, but I can’t change what I believe.

It’s like the NFL coach saying, “I had no choice but to punt.” Go with your gut.

“Stick” with what works!

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

If Leach were here, I would agree with you.

But the coaching staff has to start with a blank slate. I’m sure they’ve watched film from last year, but what if Sticks is a complete goof-off and doesn’t put the work into being a starting quarterback. If it’s me, I want him earning the position, nothing is given in this world, at least not for me, and I don’t see why it should be any different for a player on a major college football team.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think this is maybe not a fair comparison. Favre has been doing it for two decades, Sheffield did it for a handful of games.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

you said "nothing is given in this world, not for me"

I believe there is a 3 win difference between the two. Too many people on this blog state, “I’ll suppport whoever they put in.” This only adds to the detractors who say Tech is a system QB warehouse. I believe it only takes a few key individuals to make the difference and spark a team to excel, and I believe Steven Sheffield is one of those guys. We will have success with him at the QB position.

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with your outlook on it Seth..

but tell me this. Why wont we have them on a short leash, or even a two QB system? I normally hate to switch, but if you have two senior QB’s and one and proven himself in games and the other has proven himself in pracctice….why would you not just put one in and switch if they’re having a bad day? Not like you have futures and learning to worry about with two seniors.

by RdrPwr on Aug 17, 2010 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be okay with that, but the staff

seems to want to put one guy in charge. Leach wanted to do the same thing last year and he was hesitant, to a fault, to put in Sheffield.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

More Sheffield fans than Potts supporters too

Would be a way for this coaching staff to pull more fans back to them imo. All I can say is this, If Potts earns the job this fall I’ll be disappointed but extremely supportive. That is until he throws 3 picks in the first half, then I cant say that I wont join in the “No more Potts” chants that will surely start up again. No reason to ride out a bad performance with a proven player standing on the sideline.

by RdrPwr on Aug 17, 2010 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

wtf?

In his first year at Tennessee, Vince Young started some games and was considered a “pro bowl” QB, in his second year he went insane, played terribly and was benched for Kerry Collins who had an incredible end of season. The next season Collins began as the starter, sucked it up for 6 games going 0-6 leading to his replacement by the aforementioned Vince Young who had a decent back half of the season (helped by an out of his mind Chris Johnson).

The point here is, at this point would you say either of those two “doesn’t have to earn” anything at this point? Both had good stretches and both were terrible in other stretches. Sheffield has had good games, but he has also been incredibly average at times. He also got the benefit of not playing in our toughest game (UT on the road) and has legitimate questions about whether or not he can survive a full season.

I will support the starter on opening day WHOEVER IT IS. In my opinion, NEITHER player has “earned” anything yet. Neither of these guys right now is Harrel post-2008, and even in that season Harrel made mistakes. Honestly, at this point I’d PERSONALLY probably rather start training up one of the “kids” and go for a full 4 seasons from one of them, but that’s just me. For now, I look at our QBs with a clean slate because a different scheme and different coaching CAN make all the difference.

by HeeroTX on Aug 17, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

neither one of these QBs are anything close to the athlete VY was

he used his athleticism to create opportunities in college. Neither one of these QBs do that. Sheffield can make the reads and make the throws. Nothing about Stick’s performance was average last year (except the couple of pick 6’s but like you say any QB will make mistakes). Sure he has durability issues, but doesn’t he deserve the chance to see if he can make it?

I’ll always support the team. I just think one QB gives us a better chance to win than the other. That was true of VY even when he was on the bench (as I believe was proved later on). KK couldn’t win the playoff game – VY has the talent to win it even if he did deal with a few headcase issues early on in his NFL career.

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Granted, Vince Young was a phenomenal athelete, and he made MANY plays with his feet that neither of these two can. That said, Young is NOT a premiere QB in the NFL and sometimes a change of pace can make all the difference to performance, that doesn’t mean a quarterback WILL provide sustained quality.

I hate that people have this antipathy against Potts MAINLY because it makes me “trash” Sheffield to prove a point. (which I don’t wanna do, I merely want us to play whoever the coaches choose and I want the fans to support THAT person (unless it’s the James kid))

Potts played well in the UT game, our toughest of the season, EASY. He played “ok” but not great in the UH game (probably should not have played that one due to the beating of the UT game). I grant, Potts sucked badly in the UNM game, no excuse for that. I don’t blame Potts for the aTm game, I think that was a terrible performance by our entire team.
(OTOH)
Sheffield played well against Nebraska, likely our second toughest game. He played great against KState (who the hell cares?!?) and debateably cost us the OSU game. (game was decided by 7 points, Sheffield had 1 interception more than Potts despite throwing 23 passes to Potts’ 35, and it was one of Sheffield’s that was returned for a touchdown)

But regardless, who has Sheffield played that has “proven” him a winner? I’m not saying he’s terrible or I don’t want to see him play, but he’s played against Nebraska (good job), Ok. State (not so good), and then a bunch of teams we were SUPPOSED TO BEAT. Now, you can argue Potts wasn’t going to beat one of those (UNM) and he lost games we SHOULD have won (UH, aTm), but I don’t see how wins against UNM & KSU should “annoint” Sheffield as the best QB we have.

Here’s the bottom line, if Potts is THAT much better in practice then one of two things is true. Either (a) Sheffield is TERRIBLE in practice, in which case I’m not wildly excited about naming someone so WILDLY inconsistent as our #1 QB. Or (b) Potts has a higher “upside” than Sheffield that he has yet to realize for whatever reason. I don’t think Potts is someone who totally folds under the “game” lights (see: UT game, OU game), but I DO think Sheffield was a better choice behind what was (last year) an AWFUL Offensive line (because he was/is more mobile). I think if our line is good, then Potts CAN be better than Sheffield, if our line sucks then Potts is gonna get hit and not be able to get as much use out of his arm. But at the end of the day, whether the coaches think Sheffield is a better leader or Potts is a better talent, or Sheffield’s scrambling keeps plays alive or Potts throwing stretches the field, or WHATEVER OTHER CRITERIA THEY USE, I’m gonna be amped and behind whoever we start until they prove otherwise.

I’d rather support the Raider QB (whoever it is) until they give me a reason not to, than go in thinking “you suck dude, prove me wrong!”

by HeeroTX on Aug 17, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

my attitude is not your last line

nowhere have I bashed him – read through my comments – just that he will have to earn my support to be the starter while SS already has it from me. I will go just as wild for a TD regardless of who is throwing it. One QB just gives us a better chance to win – SS

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

"I will go just as wild for a TD regardless of who is throwing it"

That’s good to hear!

Cuz if I hear any “boos” when Potts takes the field as a starter, I’m gonna come at you like a spidermonkey…

"Winning isn't everything"... Bob Knight

by raider realist on Aug 17, 2010 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

spidermonkey?

I think you should try out IAT12M for some good reading. Deal with donkeys, collies, spidermonkeys, and such

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 10:45 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

The BCS polls & the AP don't give brownie points for practice perfection

Games on Saturday against opposing defenses coming at full speed to knock out the Texas Tech QB are the only places where a college football team is judged. Based on a full year of real game observation, Taylor Potts doesn’t hold a candle to the in-game performance of Steven Sheffield. If Potts starts the season, I predict he will be benched and replaced by Sheffield sometime during the 1st three games.

by mbrown603 on Aug 17, 2010 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

That very well may be true,

but that still doesn’t mean that if they’re both starting from ground zero and Sheffield shows up to practice and completely goof-off the entire time then who is to blame for Potts being named the starter? Tuberville/Brown or Sheffield? I think my biggest points are that Sheffield needs to step it up and if he doesn’t then we shouldn’t “blame” anyone but Sheffield. Sheffield has to take some ownership in the position here and perform better in practices.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I just don't want this life lesson for Sheffield & the new coaching staff to cost us wins early in the year

Believe me, if I had seen improvement by Potts as last season wore on I would be fine giving him a clean slate this year. But the fact is most Tech QB’s in the Air Raid era only get 1 season to show their stuff. Potts was as ineffective against Baylor to end the season as he had been against New Mexico at the start of the season. I will have a hard time feeling optimistic if the new staff decides to repeat the experiment.

by mbrown603 on Aug 17, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess what I'm getting at is what is the

line of delineation? If Sheffield horribly under-performs during the spring, takes a dump on the double-T and shows up to the SMU game drunk, do you still want him to start? I think we’re saying the same things here, which is that Sheffield has proven in his limited time that he had the better year, but is there a point for the three of you as to say, “yeah, he shouldn’t be starting”. And yes, this is an extreme example, but I’m just trying to figure out where you guys (or gals) think it’s wise not to start Sheffield.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Under no circumstance should Sheffield not start

the position is his to lose, and he should only be benched should his game performance not put Tech in a position to win. I don’t care if he pulls a Mickey Mantle the night before the game if he plays well.

If the new Tech coaching staff can’t recognize the difference between a gamer and a “serviceable QB” we’re in for a loooong season.

I’ve posted Sticks numbers on here before in his defense; do I need to go dig them up again? How about just one stat we like to look at on DTN:

9 yards per attempt!

The rest of them are absolutely phenomenal, and that’s just the stat sheet – nevermind the emotional lift he gives the team!

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I personally feel that Sticks should start...

But I agree that if Potts outperforms him in practice with new coaches and a new scheme, it makes sense that Potts would start. My real concern is that the coaching staff will stick with who they pick, regardless of performance. If either quarterback comes in and lays an egg, pull him and throw you’re other talented guy in. Answer seems simple in that sense. And btw… speaking of Sticks being drunk. I was at the pom squad party he was at the night before UNM last year where he came in and amazed folks, guy could barely stand he was so drunk the night before.

by RdrPwr on Aug 17, 2010 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

see, I was just hypothesizing about the Mickey Mantle stuff

but I don’t care!

new scheme? is this the Neal Brown “things are going to be dark” channel?

TTU86 – This is like the new coaching staff coming in and starting Steve Walsh because they felt obligated since he was having better practices, had more tenure, and could manage the game better than Aikman.

Whoever said they should put in a new guy and let him play for 4 years must be joking. You don’t sit a passer with a QB rating of 177 no matter how brief his stint.

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

What I said was more of a compliment to him

Played extremely well and had to have been hungover!

by RdrPwr on Aug 17, 2010 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I had Cowboys season tickets during the Walsh/Aikman QB Competition. It wasn’t much of a competition and it didn’t last long. I always attributed the Walsh draft to JJ’s loyalty to his UM player. Nothing else made sense.

Having said that, I don’t see the comparison with the current Tech situation. Walsh was purely a West Coast Offense QB whereas Aikman failed only at the wishbone. Sheffield more closely resembled Romo. He always tries to make something out of nothing. Sometimes the right call is to put the ball 6 rows up in the stands. Potts has the tools to manage the game and make all the throws. The question is whether he is too slow getting rid of the ball. That and throwing off his back foot.

by TTU86 on Aug 17, 2010 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

wasn't much of a competition

Hope you have season tickets for Tech this year because history has a funny way of repeating itself.

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 10:48 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think Sheffield weras a halo

I just don’t see the upside in Potts. Last year was very frustrating to watch.

Let me review 2009 to see if my impression of the season is wrong. We open with easy wins over N Dakota & Rice. We play a defensive battle against Texas week 3 with the difference in the game a line drive punt to Shipley for a Longhorn TD. So far so good for Potts. But Potts took several vicious hits in that game & I don’t think he was ever comfortable under center after that game.Week 4 we play Houston. The Leach haters blame that loss on the coach because of the failed 4th down attempt from the 1 yard line. I watched the play live & I’ve seen several replays of it & Potts changed that play to a QB sneak just before the snap. So that is 1 loss I lay on his shoulders. Week 5 New Mexico comes to Lubbock & the home team takes the opening kickoff & drives the length of the field in under a minute to put up the 1st 7. Then… nothing the rest of the half. Against a New Mexico team that would post a 1-11 record before the seaon was over. Potts is pulled with a minute or so left in the half due to injury & the offense wakes up & reels off 41 points with Sheffield under center. Weeks 5 and 6 Sheffield starts in offensively productive wins over Kansas State 66-14 and at Nebraska 31-10 (yes, that Nebraska who came within a Big 12 referee of winning the Big 12 title). Tech returns home to play the hapless Aggies of Texas A&M. This loss sits squarely on the shoulders of the defense, but it has to be said that this was Potts 1st game back from injury. Tech loses 52-30. If Kansas State can score 60 points on the Aggie defense the week prior, shouldn’t Potts have been able to put a few more TD’s on the board? Seth Doege is named the starter for the Kansas game the following week. He is replaced at halftime by Potts. ESPN: “One-time starter Taylor Potts replaced Doege in the second half and finished 11-for-19 for 94 yards”. Tech wins 42-21 keyed by 4 rushing TD’s by Baron Batch. The next week Tech travels to Stillwater where neither Doege or Potts is effective. So they throw Sheffield in but he is wearing a 2 ton boot on one foot & unsurprisingly has a hard time managing the offense. Tech loses. Oklahoma visits Jones Stadium the following week & Potts has his one complete game where he doesn’t get in the way of the Tech offense since getting plowed in the Texas Game week 3. Tech runs the ball all day & has an easy time crushing the reeling Sooners. We finsih the season in the Jerry Jones Deathstar where Potts plays the whole game & Tech needs a goal line stand by the defense to preserve a victory over Baylor. Finally we play a 6-6 Michigan State team in the Alamo Bowl who have been hit hard by player suspensions prior to the game. Potts starts & has Tech losing to the Spartans on the second half, when Sheffield comes in & leads the team back to a convincing victory.

That’s my take on Taylor Potts in 2009. What am I missing?

by mbrown603 on Aug 17, 2010 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

nice asterisk

nice of you to include the “healthy” bit. So tell me, how many games did a “healthy” Sheffield play in? I see 3 (4 if you count half of the bowl game), only one of which was against “serious” competition.

UNM – “healthy” Potts is debatable
KSU – Terrible team
NU – Good win for Sheffield, great game against a team that ALMOST beat UT in the BigXII title game, huge win over a team that… also lost to Iowa STATE 9-7 (the week after losing to Tech). o_O

by HeeroTX on Aug 17, 2010 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

UNM looked pretty good before Sticks played.

He played in 6 games. Even a somewhat slowed Sticks in the MSU game led us to victory. So he basically was healthy for 3 where nobody in the League could touch him, performed rather poorly in one (OSU) where he shouldn’t have seen the field, and competently enough to put us in a position to win in 2 where he was not 100%.

Dare I say…..the presidency….

by rpowel2 on Aug 17, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your not missing anything as I think we both think that Sheffield should start,

but is there any circumstance leading up to the SMU game that would make you think that he shouldn’t start. If he’s awful in every practice leading up to the spring, throwing interceptions every other play and publicly stats a number of times that Potts was better, is this enough for you to start Potts? What I’m trying to find out, and RdrPwr and powel have seem to be a little different (i.e. there is a limit for RdrPwr, but not one for powel).

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Again, this angst of mine has nothing to do with Sheffield

It’s fear off watching the offense sputter under Potts for another season. If Potts is named the starter & smokes SMU, New Mexico & finds a way to win at home against Texas, all my angst is gone. I do not want to spend another season frustrated about how little offensive production we are getting when I know a simple change will get it all going again in an instance.

by mbrown603 on Aug 17, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Isn't the the crux though?

I get that you don’t want to be frustrated. I think I said it yesterday regarding Terry McDaniel, which is that I want him to get his ass in gear if he wants to play b/c I know he has the talent to be a difference-maker. Same goes for Sheffield. That S.O.B. needs to get his ass in gear, impress the coaches in practice and we’re not having this conversation. It’s all up to Sheffield to perform, not anyone else. If he doesn’t do it in practice, then it’s Sheffield that’s to blame, not Potts, not Tubs, not Brown and not anyone else. But if he doesn’t show what he can do in practice then the coaches don’t have much of an option. Sheffield has to step it up.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am sorry - I avoided this topic the last two weeks

I could tell you were getting tired of the Potts bashing & it was looking like a dead horse of a subject. We had picked over the carcass in every possible way. But Brown & Tubs look like they may want to do a Dr Frankenstein and bring that old dead horse back to life. And I say “Neiggghhh” to that.

by mbrown603 on Aug 17, 2010 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's okay.

So to the three of you, would this be a fair poll question for tomorrow morning (or whenever I remember):

Should Sheffield be named the starting quarterback vs. SMU even if he performs horribly in every practice and scrimmage and publicly states that he’s been horrible during these fall practices, but based on last year’s results alone?

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Aug 17, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a tough decision, I agree

I can’t give an answer there, thats why they make the big bucks. I’m just gonna stick to my guns with the very short leash thing.

by RdrPwr on Aug 17, 2010 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Give the scenario Seth just painted,

It’s really NOT a tough decision at all.

"Winning isn't everything"... Bob Knight

by raider realist on Aug 17, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eh...

I would find it hard to not include last year’s performances in my evaluation

by RdrPwr on Aug 18, 2010 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I honestly think if SS practices himself out of a job, Karam or Doege should start

They both looked pretty comfortable running the offense in the spring game. I thought Karam looked very good. That would be my plan B if I was making the decision.

by mbrown603 on Aug 17, 2010 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I said it last year, and I’ll say it again this year:
2008 was a great season where we had (surprise) an AWESOME O-Line
2009 was a disappointing season where (surprise again) our O-Line struggled

The O-Line is the great “unsung” strength of any great team. Which is why great rushers and QBs in the NFL love their linemen. Honestly, my biggest disappointment last year was Brandon Carter. He was one of our “name” players and he didn’t lead the line. I think our performance this year will AGAIN depend on line play.

by HeeroTX on Aug 17, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Total agreement here.

"Winning isn't everything"... Bob Knight

by raider realist on Aug 17, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you win the line of scrimmage you don’t lose too many games.

by TTU86 on Aug 17, 2010 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree Here Too

My memory is fading, but I think the O Line only gave up 5 sacks in 08 and 30 something in 09. The running game might be necessary. I think Tubbs watched enough film to realize the O Line may not be ready to protect our QB’s. I think if our O Line is like 08 Potts is our Guy, but if the O Line is like 09, Sticks run for your life. Go Red Raiders.

by Btech on Aug 17, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

The BCS polls & the AP don't give brownie points for practice perfection

Let me see, a full year of game experience vs 2.25 games; UT and OU vs Nebraska and K-State; Pre-concussion and Post-concussion vs broken foot.

Bottomline, we don’t know as much as we think about either QB. We saw two years of Harrell. We saw good and bad. People like the spark that Sheffield brought. OK. In Potts’ defense, do we know how he can play when all the cob webs are clear? How much of the criticism we level at Potts is due to the effects of the concussion? What makes you think Sheffield can make it through a full season?

We each have our preferences. I like a QB who manages the game better than I like a gunslinger. I prefer Aikman to Romo. Tech’s offense only requires the QB to make consistent judgements and accurate throws. The RB’s and WR add the spark after the catch.

Hopefully, the coaches choose well. Either way, I believe the better balance on both the Offense and Defense take some of the pressure off the Tech QB. He doesn’t have to be perfect for Tech to win any more.

by TTU86 on Aug 17, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

We did outscore nebraska by far more than anyone else this season

including Texas, who beat us with Potts playing QB. Broken logic I know, but just throwing out a fact.

by RdrPwr on Aug 17, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

We outscored alot of teams. Thats what we do. We put 30 points on everyone. The difference in my eyes is that the defense played one of their best games against a struggling offense. They got on and off the field leaving the offense with many opportunities to score.

The UT game was a better measuring stick for Tech than Nebraska. UT is always a balanced team. Nebraska seldom is. Potts did fine against UT until the concussion. I doubt any QB is going to do very well after that kind of shot. Sheffield would have seen the same fog. The question is what kind of protection we get from the OL. If it is a jailbreak, put Sheffield in and let him run for his life.

by TTU86 on Aug 18, 2010 8:41 AM CDT reply actions  

See

I don’t feel that Potts was all that great in the UT game, just not bad. But I guess we don’t know that Sticks would’ve performed better or worse, which is why I’m no longer arguing over who should start really. I would like for it to be Sticks, but won’t be upset either way….until one sucks it up and we keep him in.

by RdrPwr on Aug 18, 2010 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely agree with you that Styx has better evasiveness in the pocket. But to get at the crux of your argument, are you saying that TP performed better against better competition and SS was the recipient of good defense? I find that a stretch. What’s the excuse for UNM?

by rpowel2 on Aug 18, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

My #1 issue with Potts is that I don’t know how long the concussion impacted his performance. I was happy enough with his results until the hit at UT. Then everything started to slow down.

The best QB needs to start. If Potts can’t outperform Sheffield, he shouldn’t expect to play. On the other hand, I am not ready to annoint Sheffield on the basis of two games where everything went right. He may be a folk hero but he needs to be judged on the complete body of work. I am no expert but I don’t expect 7 TD’s from either one of these guys on a weekly basis.

As Tech matures, the key will be more in eliminating mistakes than in making a miracle happen. I have nothing to support it, but I believe Potts provides the best long term answer to managing the offense and winning games. I have grown selfish having gotten used to 70%, 400+ yard passing days. I just can’t stomach a high number of Int’s or fumbles. Whoever ends up starting is going to have to cut down on our turnovers.

by TTU86 on Aug 19, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Texas-tech_small
Reasons to be excited about the 2012 football season
Small
Tommy Tuberville & Mike Leach Coaching Comparison
Small
Craig James has a son in Arkansas!
Texaslondon_small
Not our favorite topic, but its out there
68108_10150348560555521_631660520_15960719_5048910_n_small
UT trio faces misdemeanor charges
170px-mrstatue_small
So Far Away Yet Not Too Far
Small
Is the arrow going up or down?
Small
Texas Tech Football # 8 of 20 football programs on the decline.
Small
7 years ago today...
Small
This used to be us....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU