Potts named Tech's starting QB

Let the debate begin (or should I say continue)!

over 1 year ago RaiderGrad 7 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Sticks fans...

commence with more bashing…..

I do think I kinda have been calling this along…just saying.

by TheScarletandTheBlack on Aug 22, 2010 4:19 PM CDT reply actions

I tgought

We were all “Texas Tech Red Raider Fans”.
So the decision of naming Potts the starter shouldn’t really matter….right?

by ttutyler on Aug 22, 2010 4:35 PM CDT via mobile reply actions

Depends on the halftime score of the SMU game

And the actions of the coaches if it’s not turning out as planned.

by mbrown603 on Aug 22, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions

Naming Potts shouldn't matter?

Sure, if you don’t have opinions of your own….

"Life is short, tell me how you really feel"- me

by oldschoolraider on Aug 22, 2010 5:23 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions

…of course I would have said the same thing if Sheffield had been named starter. As Tuberville said in the past – “I would hate to play us” particularly when you have another first string qb riding the bench. Tough decision but good problem.

"It's time to get down to serious business." Tommy Tuberville

by jdhud on Aug 22, 2010 4:43 PM CDT reply actions

True..

I still agree with Seth. Were gonna see both these QB’s this year.

by ttutyler on Aug 22, 2010 5:21 PM CDT via mobile reply actions

Yes

This is the right pick. With what Coach Tuberville likes to do on offense this is the right guy.

by 36BellyG on Aug 22, 2010 6:21 PM CDT reply actions

Network Bar

Double-T Nation -

Home of the Double-T's.