Potts named Tech's starting QB
Let the debate begin (or should I say continue)!
over 1 year ago
RaiderGrad
7 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Sticks fans...
commence with more bashing…..
I do think I kinda have been calling this along…just saying.
by TheScarletandTheBlack on Aug 22, 2010 4:19 PM CDT reply actions
I tgought
We were all “Texas Tech Red Raider Fans”.
So the decision of naming Potts the starter shouldn’t really matter….right?
by ttutyler on Aug 22, 2010 4:35 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Depends on the halftime score of the SMU game
And the actions of the coaches if it’s not turning out as planned.
Naming Potts shouldn't matter?
Sure, if you don’t have opinions of your own….
"Life is short, tell me how you really feel"- me
by oldschoolraider on Aug 22, 2010 5:23 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Good news....
…of course I would have said the same thing if Sheffield had been named starter. As Tuberville said in the past – “I would hate to play us” particularly when you have another first string qb riding the bench. Tough decision but good problem.
"It's time to get down to serious business." Tommy Tuberville
True..
I still agree with Seth. Were gonna see both these QB’s this year.
by ttutyler on Aug 22, 2010 5:21 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Yes
This is the right pick. With what Coach Tuberville likes to do on offense this is the right guy.

















