Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

Keys to the Game | SMU Mustangs vs. Texas Tech Red Raiders

KEY 1: PRESSURE PADRON

Watch this highlight video from SMU's game against Nevada in the Hawaii Bowl and the one thing that I take away from watching Padron and the SMU offense is that in the highlights, he's got a relatively clean pocket and Padron is going vertical for the big plays. Getting pressure on Padron and collapsing the pocket should be a huge part of any success that Texas Tech has defensively. I've mentioned this before, but SMU is not a dink-and-dump offense.  Now that we know that the defense is going to try to get as many pass-rushers on the field as possible, Brian Duncan and Scott Smith on the ends with Sam Fehoko getting a look at the Buck linebacker position.  Don't get me wrong, it would be great to get a little bit of pressure up the middle and I might be drinking the kool-aid, but I do think that Colby Whitlock, Myles Wade, Lawrence Rumph and Donald Langley are going to be better than expected and I'm not expecting a huge drop-off in talent once the starters leave the game or from last year.  It's not a secret and quite frankly, it's somewhat lazy to say that it starts up front, but with SMU, I think it's going to be imperative to try to knock SMU off rhythm because once they get started, it's hard to stop.

KEY 2: BREAKING DOWN THE RUN-N-SHOOT

First, you really need to watch this video where Jones breaks down the Run N Shoot:

 

More good good after the jump.

Star-divide

Here's a quick summary for those of you too lazy to watch (or unable to do at work):  two formations, very little motion, and the quarterback reads the coverage on the snap of the football. Defensive coverages do not affect what they do on offense. The flat receiver is essentially the tell for the quarterback and the flat receiver adjusts his route based on defensive coverage.

The interesting thing that Jones says at the end is that he would prefer that defenses come after his offense because he thinks that leaves holes available for his quarterback open receivers and when a tackle is missed, it's a touchdown. I'm pretty sure that we can expect Tuberville to go after SMU and I think that a couple of huge keys for the Texas Tech defense is going to be not missing assignments defensively and not missing tackles.  One other thought is that you might not necessarily see Tuberville simply bring a blitz each and every down, but what you might see is a different defender each and every pressuring Padron, whether it be a linebacker, safety, corner, etc.  I keep thinking that you'll see three rush the quarterback and you won't necessarily know where the fourth pass-rusher will be originating.

KEY 3: OFFENSIVE LINE DOMINANCE

SMU Week
MONDAY Five Questions
TUESDAY What We Think We Know
WEDNESDAY Keys to the Game
THURSDAY Reasons for Concern and Optimism
FRIDAY Prediction Time

I'm not so much worried about the skill positions (insert quarterback comment here), but it's the offensive line. OL coach Moore set his offensive line a couple of weeks ago and I get the impression that he's pretty happy with his starting five, but he's worried about depth. Right now, I'm still not sure about who starts at left tackle, which can be a problem considering the inconsistency last year. These are the guys in the mix: RT: Chris Olson; RG: Deveric Gallington; C: Justin Keown; LG: Lonnie Edwards; and LT: LaAdrian Waddle .  Both Mickey Okafor / Terry McDaniel should round out the top seven.

Tuberville has mentioned, as well has some of the members of the offensive line that the 31 sacks that the team gave up last year was unacceptable. Considering the number of pass attempts that Texas Tech has last year, the number of sacks given up might not be an acceptable figure, however, when you consider sacks per pass attempt, Texas Tech was still 8th in the conference (1 sack for every 21.58 pass attempts), which is not acceptable. Still the volume of sacks isn't good, especially when you consider that in prior years, the most sacks that the offensive line gave up was 18 (2006 - 18; 2007 - 18; and 2008 - 13).

I'd love to see the offensive line and offensive coordinator try to take advantage of an SMU defense that was atrocious against the run last year, giving up 166 yards a game. Not only did they give up 166 yards a game, but the Ponies were prone to giving up huge chunks on the ground. Of their 13 games last year, SMU gave up over 200 yards on 5 different games and over 150 yards on 7 different occasions. If the Texas Tech offensive line can dominate the line of scrimmage early and often, the passing game should open with relative ease.

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Let’s just hope our young and thin secondary can keep up with the ol’ run and shoot. That probably my biggest concern of this game.

by pcrawttu on Sep 1, 2010 9:25 AM CDT reply actions  

3 seconds

As long as each member of the secondary sticks to their men like white on rice for 3 seconds, that’s all I ask.

by NM99 on Sep 1, 2010 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I feel a run game coming on!

I think we will run and I look for us to break some long ones. That will be cool to see. Also, I think we will pass for at least 350 yards.

Can’t wait to see a blitz or two during a game!

by logan5555 on Sep 1, 2010 9:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Well,

with a three headed RB monster (Batch, Crawford, and Stephens) constantly attacking them, I expect to see Ponies gasping for breath by the late 3rd qtr

The Lyle Leong Bandwagon will Continue to Roll!!!
Arriba sus Pistolas, Muchachos!

by Tortilla Pirate on Sep 1, 2010 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I see Tech playing loosly in the secondary but finding a way to shut it down by the 3rd qtr. I see us blitzing all day long and coming away with some QB sacks. I doubt SMU’s offensive line can fend off our pressing at the line. Offensively, I’m going to go all out and say we score on all posessions. Running game and passing game will move the ball at will against this SMU defense. Our special teams will place the ball close to mid field all day long. I give credit to SMU but I expect this game to be a great segway into the Tuberville era.

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Sep 1, 2010 10:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Scoring on all possessions?

That sounds like a wager to be had at Two Brothers…..I would have to take you up on that one.

'Thats how baseball go"-Ron Washington

by oldschoolraider on Sep 1, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Keys

 #1 I think we will find a solution towards pressuring Padron. The Jeep will find something that works. If Whitlock, Wade, Rumph, & Langley can (and I think they will) hold down the center of the line, BDuncan, SSmith & Co will find the path to the QB.

 #2 The defense WILL experience growing pains. I think a few defensive gaffes will cost us but we will make up for it in big plays (fumbles, int’s, etc…) Also, it may help and I think we may just do this (GASP!) dominate time of possesion. The best defense is a good offense.

 #3 Dovetails nicely with my wrapup comments on #2…If the o-line can control the line of scrimmage not only will the passing game open up nicely but we will keep the ball away from the ponies denying them the opportunities to score. It CAN be done with our Air Raid offense….see Nov 1 2008 ;)

The Lyle Leong Bandwagon will Continue to Roll!!!
Arriba sus Pistolas, Muchachos!

by Tortilla Pirate on Sep 1, 2010 10:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Prior to no later than the 10th snap of this game, when was the last time a Tech defense ran an all out blitz?

by Tech92 on Sep 1, 2010 11:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Four score and seven years ago?

by CRV on Sep 1, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Under Ruff and Lyle...

…we only all out blitzed if we were behind by at least 4 touchdowns. And never on 3rd and long.

by logan5555 on Sep 1, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

3rd and long

is what I’m looking forward to most with this new D.

by TheScarletandTheBlack on Sep 1, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Doubt TTU has....

all out blitzed in @ least 10 years…..I’m also glad that our Defense actually practices tackling……I Ruff did some but not like THE JEEP…..Good tackling will also keep the Defense out of some big plays(see any running QB TTU has played in the last 10 yrs.)…..Can’t wait to Ride the Ponies! Wreck’ Em Tech

by techgolf44 on Sep 1, 2010 1:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Off topic.....but the below tweet is from jay drew @ salt lake trib

Look for #BYU fb to schedule Clemson, Texas Tech in the not-so-distant future. Source tells me discussions ongoing with Tigers, Red Raiders
web • 8/31/10 11:31 PM

'Thats how baseball go"-Ron Washington

by oldschoolraider on Sep 1, 2010 3:58 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

That must mean Tech is going independent too

But seriously, I do think UT scheduling BYU and Notre Dame in upcoming seasons is no coincidence. The Horns will go independent as soon as the Aggies bail for the SEC in 2013. Then they’ll blame it all on the Aggies. Which is why our new AD must come out of the Pac 12 office. We need an in for when the Big 12-2 implodes.

by mbrown603 on Sep 1, 2010 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still think SMU finds a way to win this game. Maybe Tuberville will prove me wrong, but I do not like the idea of a new defense going up against that run-n-shoot offense

by miketag on Sep 1, 2010 7:51 PM CDT reply actions  

About as good as a chance SFA has in beating you guys Mike. Seriously?

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Sep 1, 2010 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

SMU has much more talent than SFA

and I think SFA will score 20 against us. SMU would be a threat to score around 30 against us IMO.

by miketag on Sep 1, 2010 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

ahhhh yes...

let the aggie trolling begin.

"A job well done is better than a job well said."

by I bleed Red and Black on Sep 2, 2010 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't A&M switch to the 3-4 for also?

Why is that hard of a concept to grasp regarding the switch from 4-3 to a 3-4?

" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...

by KWashburn on Sep 4, 2010 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

This...

it correct.

But, you forget, they’re A&M. So, even though it’s going to fail for Tech, it’s pure win for them……

by TheScarletandTheBlack on Sep 7, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

The 3-4? Hybrid? 5-2? all quoted in this blog

I believe the defense will be all of the above. I believe pressure in addition to the DL will come from at least one to two lb in the backfield. My concern has always been complexity versus agressiveness. We shall see.

This is the biggest reason why I’ve hesitated trying to do any sort of 3-4 tutorial this offseason because I don’t think that the 3-4 defense that I traditionally think will be the 3-4 defense that we’ll see. I keep getting the impression what we’re going to see is a complete hybrid situation where players flow between spots seamlessly and although there are starting players, there really won’t be starting positions.

"It's time to get down to serious business." Tommy Tuberville

by jdhud on Sep 1, 2010 8:13 PM CDT reply actions  

I’d love to see the offensive line and offensive coordinator try to take advantage of an SMU defense that was atrocious against the run last year, giving up 166 yards a game. Not only did they give up 166 yards a game, but the Ponies were prone to giving up huge chunks on the ground. Of their 13 games last year, SMU gave up over 200 yards on 5 different games and over 150 yards on 7 different occasions. If the Texas Tech offensive line can dominate the line of scrimmage early and often, the passing game should open with relative ease.

This could be a prophetic comment. The OL is thin, Okafor is not going to play due to the concussion as it currently looks so the offense may be forced to run to protect the qb…that would make for an interesting week of commentary.

women should put pictures of missing husbands on beer cans

by TallMike on Sep 1, 2010 9:37 PM CDT reply actions  

This is going to be a close game

Until the middle of the 3rd period. That is when Tech’s superior talent level will become evident and SMU begins to make more mistakes, miss tackles, etc. With that, Tubs will not necessarily go for the throat, but will have the Raiders go on long, run-filled drives to “protect” a lead. While I think Tech could probably win this by 35 or 40 points, I think Tubs will keep the differential under 30, but still come out of it with a solid win.

TTpilk Psalm 117:
1 ¶ O praise the LORD, all ye nations: praise him, all ye people.
2 For his merciful kindness is great toward us: and the truth of the LORD endureth for ever. Praise ye the LORD.

by TTpilk645 on Sep 1, 2010 10:10 PM CDT reply actions  

If he is interested in making a good first impression on all Texas Tech fans

He will beat the spread too.

Back in the Jerry Moore Years when the cheerleaders would do the Go! Fight! Win! cheer we all screamed Go! Fight! Beat The Spread! Winning wasn’t really an option in those years.

by mbrown603 on Sep 2, 2010 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU