Double-T Nation Daily Diatribe | 2011-03-15
ODDS AND ENDS
|
| WHY I DON'T COVER MORE STUFF |
Sometimes DTN gets comments about why certain sports don't get covered on DTN or questions why I don't get around to covering other sports and the answer is time. I just don't have enough time. I've mentioned this a couple of times, but the easiest way to remedy this situation is for you to step up and become a regular contributor. Email me and let me know when you intend on posting a FanPost previewing a game or sport and I'll make sure it receives front page recognition (a lot of times if I'm at work, I can't push something to the front page) in a timely manner. But I need help. I can't do it all.
| DTN'S 2011 BRACKET CHALLENGE |
Bracket Challenge!!!! I'm awful at picking games, but it's a rite of passage. Not to mention, the DTN community has officially picked San Diego St. as the official team to follow, by a margin of 45%. So, DTN's official contest will be at CBS Sports and you can REGISTER HERE. The group name is DTN 2011 March Madness and if there's a prompt for a password, it's "redraiders". Register and kick my rear.
| POSSIBLE NEW BIG 12 TELEVISION CONTRACT |
Yesterday, the Sports Business Daily (DTN FanShot) broke that the Big 12 is on the verge of a new second tier television contract. College Football Talk's John Taylor had a breakdown of the proposed agreement as does ESPN's David Ubben. I haven't had the time to read up and truly understand how this is either beneficial or not beneficial to Texas Tech so I'm going to withhold comment until I can be a little more educated. And if you're already educated on this subject, I'd love to see a FanPost on the matter.
TEXAS TECH BASKETBALL
|
| COACHING SEARCH UPDATE |
There seems to be a bit of a fight between RRS and the LAJ. This seems to have started earlier yesterday morning when RRS.com's Chris Level tweeted the following:
Barring a late change I expect #TexasTech to announce Billy Gillispie as it's next head coach on Wed. which is end of 10 day waiting period.
This then prompted LAJ's Courtney Linehan to tweet the following:
Sources tell me Texas Tech has NOT made an offer regarding the men's basketball coaching job.
TW&HS's Ryan Hyatt also tweeted and clarified that this hire process is largely contingent on new athletic director Kirby Hocott's first day, which should be March 21st:
Looks like Kirby Hocutt's first full day as AD at Texas Tech is 3/21/11. If that's the case I don't see a formal introduction of new men's basketball coach til At least next Monday, maybe next Tuesday. No worries though.
Then, Linehan chimed in with the following:
Whoever said Tech will announce its new bball coach on Wednesday is wrong. No offer will be made before March 21.
See, this is funny to me because it's pretty obvious as to who is saying that the hire will happen on the 18th rather than the 21st, but Linehan isn't specifically calling out Level and RRS.com and I don't know why. Maybe that's the part I miss as a blogger, which is that I've got no problem calling someone out, but it's more professional to do it this way. Either way, it creates more work for me as I have to put together their dueling tweets. Anyway, this then prompted RRS.com's Level and Aaron Dickens to release a free timeline as to events, with the following qualification:
Monday, March 14 - Level reported that all key parties involved were "on board" with Gillispie becoming Tech's next head basketball coach and that an announcement could come as soon as Wednesday if the state-mandated 10-day waiting period is waived and if Bailey officially makes the hire instead of Hocutt, who will not be a full-time Tech employee until Monday, March 21.
And then LAJ's Linehan writes last night and obtains a quote from President Guy Bailey that it's going to be Hocutt's hire and it's going to be no earlier than the 21st:
"This is Kirby Hocutt’s hire," Bailey said in an email Monday, "and Kirby doesn’t become a TTU employee until March 21 and could not make an offer before then."
Linehan also writes that with Oklahoma's Jeff Capel losing his job, this could create some competition for Billy Gillispie and although there is some concern that Gillispie could choose Oklahoma over Texas Tech, I think this is a decision that's entirely in Gillispie's court and no timeline would either interfere or prohibit his hire at Texas Tech. The dates and timelines are entirely superficial, and although I think that as of the time that Linehan wrote her article, Gillispie didn't have an offer, but I'd bet that as soon as he hit send on his email, Gillispie had an offer from Texas Tech.
One other note, according to the Tulsa World's Dave Sittler, the top candidates for the Sooner's job are Gillispie and Marquette's Buzz Williams, which makes me think that both OU and TTU will each get one of these two coaches and I think they would both be fantastic hires for either university, so I don't think there's going to be a "loser" in this situation. And if you think that Buzz isn't as good a coach, then go take a look at their stats (thank you StatSheet): Buzz Williams and Billy Gillispie. They both have their pluses and minuses.
And a final note, Gillispie was on with Galloway & Co., 103.3 ESPN in Dallas and when specifically asked about the Texas Tech job, he completely sidesteps the question (about the 6:30 mark).
LADY RAIDER BASKETBALL
|
| LADY RAIDERS A #8 SEED TO FACE #9 ST. JOHN'S |
The official site has the goods, as does LAJ's David Just, who writes that the Lady Raiders are headed to California:
Eighth-seeded Texas Tech will face ninth-seeded St. John’s in the opening round of the NCAA tournament at 3 p.m. CDT Saturday at Maples Pavilion in Stanford, Calif.
"I’m going home, so I’m happy," Morris said. "The seeding was important and everything, but I’m sure we can beat anybody that we play."
The winner of the first-round game between Tech and St. John’s will face the winner of top-seeded Stanford and No. 16 UC Davis on Monday.
Morris and Wickett, transfers from California and Pepperdine, respectively, said they’ll both have family on hand this weekend.
The official site has video as the pick was announced and KAMC has a story on a tiny screen. Congrats to the Lady Raiders, this should be fun!
TEXAS TECH BASEBALL
|
| RED RAIDERS TO WRAP UP TEXAS TECH INVITATIONAL |
Very quick mentions for the baseball and softball teams. The men finish up the Texas Tech Invitational with a game against Texas A&M - Corpus Christi @ 1:00 p.m. today at Dan Law Field. This is the last game before conference play starts.
LADY RAIDER SOFTBALL
|
| LADY RAIDERS FINISHES MASKED RAIDER INVITATIONAL |
The Lady Raiders are an amazing 29-1 this year, beating Alcorn St. and Evansville yesterday (both shutouts) to wrap up the Masked Rider Invitational.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great job, Lady Raider softball and basketball teams.
- seed is terrific! I was happy they made the tourney, but #8 is great! The tradition of winning is becoming more solid over time. Can’t wait to see if Kristy can pull in another monster recruiting class.
Softball team must have at least three good starters to play this many games this often and still get shutouts. Can’t do that without great depth on the mound. Keep going, Ladies.
There are not many scholies available this season...
Maybe only one.
Living large in Texas...Texas forever.
On the proposed Big 12 TV deal
from Clone Chonicles:
http://www.clonechronicles.com/2011/3/14/2051280/television-and-the-big-12
I thought this was well explained as to the 1st tier, 2nd tier and 3rd tier rights.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
If proof is needed...
If ANYONE needed ANY proof that Dan Beebe is a TERRIBLE conference commissioner and NEEDS to go, IMMEDIATELY, here it is (from CFT’s John Taylor):
All told, the Big 12 will have in the neighborhood of $155 million to split amongst 10 schools, not 12 as in the past. That number still lags slightly behind the ACC, and far behind financial behemoths the Big Ten and SEC.
If that’s true and our deal is still behind the ACC (let alone the Big10 and SEC) then that is ridiculous. For the rest of it’s life (all 3-5 years of it) the Big12-2 will be playing “catch-up” to the real conferences. We were behind the Big10 and SEC ALREADY, and when they re-negotiate, do you think they’re going to have some giant DROP? Heck, Beebe is SUCH a waste of space, I’d lay odds 50/50 we’d have a better deal in a non-BCS conference by now had we jumped. (slight exagerration, but I think the big 12-2 is dying and being in it is bad for ALL involved (except Texas, which is why THEY are still here, for NOW))
Well
I think the point of the article is that our 1st tier rights package should be worth more and make up some of the difference. When you have UT/OU, Tech/A&M/Texas, OU/A&M, OSU/OU, Texas/A&M every year, which are all going to be important games to a lot of televisions, first tier rights should go up. I think the fact that we should make around 5M a year more (by this guys estimation) is huge. Sure it is still $5M behind the SEC, but that is without the 1st tier rights negotiations. Remember that number could increase a lot more b/c this bidding didn’t include UT and OU.
To me it seems like we got a decent deal. Sure it could always be better but I won’t mind when our athletic department has another $5M per year.
adding numbers from CloneChron link
AVERAGE take for each school under the current deal=$12mil per school, that assumes EVEN distribution of funds (which the Big12-2 does NOT have). But for sake of argument, let’s assume Tech (which is the only school we care about for this example) falls in the median and gets “average” payout. The new deal runs for some period possibly out to 2022. However, the CURRENT ABC/ESPN deal (1st tier) runs through 2015-16. That means for the next FOUR years UT is pulling in MORE MONEY from their own network than we’ll be receiving from the conference’s two TV deals (1st & 2nd tier rights combined). And sorry, I dunno about you, but I don’t think this conference survives past the due date of the ABC/ESPN deal.
So, I re-iterate, for a period (that IMO is likely the remaining life of the conference) we are going to be pulling in LESS TV money than your average ACC team, let alone Big10 & SEC. Which again, reinforces my CORE contention, that Dan Beebe is a tool.
I agree that this doesn't look good, I doubt this straw breaks the camels back, though.
I still don’t think that the conference goes anywhere. It all hinges on whether the SEC still wants A&M (if it ever did), and if they did whether or not the politicians would let A&M go. Not sure I believe in either being likely going forward. That window has closed. Short of those – the conference isn’t going anywhere. UT, OU will be in the drivers seat and making plenty and will not join any other conference and be forced to share their network revenues. No good options for the rest to run to. This still represents the most $$ the other teams can hope for.
What we are doing now, is waiting until 2015 just to see how much value the conference actually retained. Better hope that we get 2 teams in the BCS every year between now and then, because we are stuck with it.
The Big XII is behind because we haven't negotiated as recently as the other conferences (for our first tier rights).
The SEC is not going to renegotiate any time soon because they just signed a huge deal that goes through 2024. The Big Ten is harder to determine because their second tier rights go to the Big Ten Network, if I’m not mistaken.
by Texas Wahoo on Mar 15, 2011 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions
We need to
Move prior to the 21st….ga tech is now looking also. I have heard we already offered buzz, but still hold out hope for bcg.
I look forward to getting into hoops again, as this year I haven’t.
"Trust your gut....mine always finds good Mexican food"
-Me
by oldschoolraider on Mar 15, 2011 9:07 AM CDT reply actions
I trust Level's sources more
Courtney likes to stir the pot a bit, but I would trust Chris level & Co. on this one. In the event that we even lose BCG, there are plenty of good coaches out there we will find one, its not hard to do better than what we have done in the past 3 years.
Professionalism points added for not calling people out by name on Twitter
Professionalism points deducted for using Twitter
More professionalism points deducted for thinking that the proper alternative to calling people out by name is to phrase your reporting in the form of passive-agressive baiting
That was my first thought...well after it is kind of funny
Lineham continues to present herself and the LAJ in a poor light.
Living large in Texas...Texas forever.
I think Arkansas is a bigger threat
For BCG than OU is. He might also consider NC State. Why would Buzz leave Marquette for Tech?
by miketag on Mar 15, 2011 3:31 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Why would
The Miami ad leave for tech? Man these are tough questions for an aggie.
"Trust your gut....mine always finds good Mexican food"
-Me
by oldschoolraider on Mar 15, 2011 7:14 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
What is the sum of two plus two?
Another tough question for an Aggie.
Shiver in my bones just thinking about the weather.

by 















