Texas Tech Red Raiders vs. New Mexico Lobos | Play Charting
Keep in mind the general concept. The "P" or "S" stands for Pistol or Shotgun and the number is for running backs and tight ends. Thus, P21 means Pistol formation with 2 running backs and 1 tight end. The formation is how the receivers are lined up, which means if you have "1X1", this means that there is 1 receiver on each side or "3L" means that there are trips on the left side of the field.
One other note. I tracked the first 10 drives and missed some plays during the "technical difficulties" so the 9th drive lacks some of the plays. Also, after QB Jacob Karam threw his touchdown to TE Jace Amaro, I stopped tracking plays. I have no other reason other than I was tired of tracking plays. The 10th drive ended in RB Ronnie Daniels first career touchdown. Strangely, after I stopped, RB DeAndre Washington fumbled the ball, which was the only turnover for the game. Lesson learned.
And I'm sure there are mistakes. This takes quite a bit of time and I didn't go back and re-watch the game to verify everything including yardage gained on each and every play. If I have something wrong, let me know and I'll get it fixed.
Here's my break down by personnel and formation:
| Personnel | Formation | Run | Pass | Total | Run% | Pass% | Yards | Yards/Play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P12 | 1X1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 42.9% | 20 | 2.86 |
| P20 | 2L | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 23 | 23.00 |
| P20 | 2R | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 25 | 25.00 |
| P21 | 1X1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 20.0% | 47 | 9.40 |
| S00 | 3R | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | -6 | (6.00) |
| S10 | 3L | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 58.3% | 151 | 12.58 |
| S10 | 3R | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 61.5% | 64 | 4.92 |
| S10 | 2X2 | 6 | 17 | 23 | 26.1% | 73.9% | 170 | 7.39 |
| S20 | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | 4 | 1.33 |
Here are my quick-hit thoughts on what I saw:
- Texas Tech ran 14 plays out of the Pistol formation, 8 runs and 6 passes. Naturally, you would think that this would be more of a running set and thus far, OC Neal Brown is sticking to that.
- Texas Tech passed the ball on the first 9 plays resulting in 2 touchdowns. I'm sure that will make some of you incredibly happy.
- One other note, which is that of those 14 plays in the Pistol, the offense gained 115 yards, which was good for 8.2 yards per play. The pistol is not a short-yardage offense, at least not against New Mexico, but it can be an offense that is explosive.
- The most explosive alignment was Shotgun with 1 running back and trips left. An astounding 12.58 yards per play.
- The most common formation was Shotgun with 1 running back and 2 receivers on each side of the ball and it was also the formation where Texas Tech did the most passing, throwing 73.9% of the time.
- The touchdowns were scored in S10/3L (Doege to Moore for 56 yards); S10/3L (Doege to Moore for 7 yards); S20 (Doege to Eric Ward for 2 yards); P20 (Zouzalik to Moore for 25 yards); P12/1x1 (Stephens for 6 yards); S10/3R (Doege to Ward for 18 yards); and P12/1X1 (Doege to Amaro for 5 yards).
- Out of the Shotgun, Brown likes to run the ball when he has receivers trips left or right. On Saturday night, OC Brown was more likely to run, about 40%, in trips left or right compared to 26% when he has 2X2.
- If you look through the plays, you'll see the "~", which denotes when a player was in motion on that play. Texas Tech had a player in motion 6 different times on Saturday. During Leach's tenure, he didn't like to run players in motion, but in Potts' and Sheffield junior years, he did have them run more in motion as the idea is that it helps the quarterback know if the defense is in zone or man. I get the feeling that OC Brown likes to have players go in motion, not to help the quarterback, but to give the defense a few more things to consider. This isn't to say that Leach only put players in motion in order to help the quarterback, he would often run that one play with the receiver going in motion, maybe it was Britton, and the receiver would pass the quarterback just as the ball was snapped and the quarterback would hand the ball off to the in-motion receiver. Either way, I do like having players in motion to mix things up a bit and I think it creates some questions on the defense, but I don't think you'll ever see a lot of motion and pre-snap movement from OC Brown.
The first 10 drives are after the jump. You opinions and analysis wanted in the comments.
| DRIVE | DOWN | DISTANCE | PERSONNEL | FORMATION | QB | WR | RB | YARDS | NOTES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 18 | 14 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 10 | ? | ? | 7 | 18 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 8 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 24 | - | ||
| 1 | 3 | 8 | S10 | 3L | 7 | 14 | 56 | TD | |
| 2 | 1 | 10 | P21 | 1X1 | 7 | 8 | 20 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3L | 7 | 86 | 10 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 14 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 9 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 86 | 7 | ||
| 2 | 3 | 2 | S10 | 3L | TIMEOUT | ||||
| 2 | 3 | 2 | S10 | 3L | 7 | 14 | 7 | TD | |
| 3 | 1 | 10 | P21 | 1X1 | 24 | 7 | |||
| 3 | 2 | 3 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 14 | 8 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | S00 | 3R | PENALTY NM | ||||
| 3 | 1 | 5 | S00 | 3R | 7 | (6) | BAD SNAP | ||
| 3 | 2 | 11 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 8 | 14 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | S20 | 2L | 21 | 2 | |||
| 3 | 2 | 8 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 14 | 5 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 3 | S10 | 3L | 24 | 6 | |||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | ? | ? | 7 | 14 | 9 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 1 | S10 | 2X2 | 24 | 5 | |||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | PENALTY NM | ||||||
| 3 | 1 | 5 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 24 | 18 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3L | 7 | 18 | 8 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 2 | S10 | 2X2 | 24 | 1 | |||
| 3 | 3 | 1 | P21 | 1X1 | 20 | 4 | ~14 | ||
| 3 | 1 | G (2) | P12 | 1X1 | 7 | 14 | INC. | ||
| 3 | 2 | G (2) | P12 | 1X1 | PENALTY TTU | ||||
| 3 | 2 | G (7) | S20 | 24 | 3 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | G (4) | P12 | 1X1 | 24 | 2 | |||
| 3 | 4 | G (2) | S20 | 7 | 18 | 2 | TD | ||
| 4 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 4 | 11 | ~86 | |
| 4 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3R | PENALTY TTU | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 15 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 6 | 11 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 4 | P20 | 2L | 7 | 18 | 23 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 2 | 9 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 1 | P20 | 2R | 6 | 14 | 25 | TD ~6 | |
| 5 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 24 | 9 | ||
| 5 | 2 | 1 | S11 | 7 | 24 | 8 | |||
| 5 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3L | 21 | 5 | |||
| 5 | 2 | 5 | S10 | 2X2 | 21 | 3 | |||
| 5 | 3 | 2 | S20 | 24 | (1) | ~24 | |||
| 5 | 4 | 3 | S10 | 3L | 7 | 14 | INC. | ||
| 6 | 1 | 10 | P12 | 1X1 | 20 | 7 | ~8 | ||
| 6 | 2 | 3 | P12 | 1X1 | 20 | 3 | |||
| 6 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 20 | 2 | |||
| 6 | 2 | 8 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 18 | 7 | ||
| 6 | 3 | 1 | S10 | 3R | 24 | 1 | |||
| 6 | 1 | G (6) | P12 | 1X1 | 24 | 6 | TD | ||
| 7 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 24 | 21 | |||
| 7 | 2 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 14 | 8 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 2 | S10 | 3L | 24 | 27 | |||
| 7 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3L | 7 | 24 | 8 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 2 | P12 | 1X1 | 7 | 82 | INC. | ||
| 7 | 3 | 2 | P21 | 1X1 | PENALTY TTU | ||||
| 7 | 3 | 7 | FG - END HALF | ||||||
| 8 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 24 | 8 | ||
| 8 | 2 | 2 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 14 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3 | 1 | P21 | 1X1 | 24 | 7 | |||
| 8 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 2 | 13 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3R | 24 | (1) | ~24 | ||
| 8 | 2 | 11 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 21 | 3 | ||
| 8 | 3 | 8 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 18 | 11 | TD | |
| 9 | 1 | 10 | P21 | 1X1 | 24 | 9 | |||
| 9 | 2 | 1 | TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES | ||||||
| 9 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 11 | PENALTY NM | ||
| 9 | 1 | 5 | S10 | 3L | 21 | 7 | |||
| 9 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3R | 21 | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2 | 8 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 11 | INC. | ||
| 9 | 3 | 8 | S10 | 3R | 7 | 2 | 5 | ||
| 9 | 4 | 2 | P12 | 1X1 | 7 | 22 | 2 | TD | |
| 10 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 7 | 11 | 10 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 20 | 8 | |||
| 10 | 2 | 2 | S10 | 2X2 | 3 | 20 | 2 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 2X2 | 3 | 82 | INC. | ||
| 10 | 2 | 10 | S10 | 3L | 20 | 5 | |||
| 10 | 3 | 5 | S10 | 3L | 3 | 9 | 12 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 10 | S10 | 3R | 20 | 7 | |||
| 10 |
2 | 3 | S10 | 3R | 20 | 10 | TD |
17 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Some Doege charting Seth
Looking forward to the same for the D. Still trying to figure out what’s going with alignments, and how the new system affects what’s going on in the secondary.
Count me as one that loves 9 plays, 9 passes, 2 touchdowns. That’s totally Doege.
"What the hell did you do that for"... Tubs Mom
by raider realist on Sep 20, 2011 10:19 AM CDT reply actions
I won’t be doing this for the defense. It’s just too time consuming.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
hmm
I hope you haven’t help the comp with this excellent analysis
by Wrongway0001 on Sep 20, 2011 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions
The most explosive alignment was Shotgun with 1 running back and trips left. An astounding 12.58 yards per play.
I wanted to clarify this statement, which is that there were two plays in the Pistol that had 25 and 23 yards, but that was just one play. What I meant was that this was the most explosive alignment with a decent sample size.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Good job but...
i hope Nevada coaches are not reading this. lol
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that it is nearly impossible to discern if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
Should be fine. High school football coaches teach Government or Health classes, not Math
Seth’s charts will just make their heads’ hurt.
2011 Season - No excuses. Just win!
Thoughts
1. I really like how, for the most part, we stayed out of 3rd and long. Even for a good passing team, those are drive killers as often as not.
2. It’s good to see multiple short (5-7 play) TD drives. Hopefully we’re starting to see some of the explosiveness on offense that we’ve heard so much about.
3. All plays out of the shotgun. I’m sure Doege is more comfortable there, and they don’t want to put too much on him early in the year, but I hope we are planning to run some plays from under center. Giving opposing D-lines the same place to aim their pass rush every time probably isn’t the best idea for an entire season.
by Raiders on the Storm on Sep 20, 2011 11:08 AM CDT reply actions
Thank you Seth
Phenomenal breakdown. Can’t blame you at all for not charting the late game trash time. Those are probably more geared to getting backups an opportunity to get a feel for running some of the same basic plays we already saw from the first team in a live game situation. Out of curiosity, do you know if any of the other fan sites contribute this level of analysis? If not, then we have to thank our lucky stars that with everything you have going on in your life, that you are willing to spend the time and attention with this and even more for sharing your insights into our team. Thank you Seth. It’s the little things like that which make our fans much more than just the koolaid drinkers other schools’ fans are…
Agreed!
Around here football is bigger than the state of Texas!
by Distant Raider on Sep 20, 2011 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually, MGoBlog does an even more extensive breakdown, not just on the offensive side of the ball. This is an example:
http://mgoblog.com/content/picture-pages-how-press-michael-floyd-and-live
I’d love to do that, but I don’t have the time.
And thanks, the more you know . . .
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
You're right, Seth
that 17 play drive WAS a thing of beauty
Arriba sus Pistolas, Muchachos!
by Tortilla Pirate on Sep 20, 2011 12:48 PM CDT reply actions
Yes, looking back at it, it was pretty unbelievable. There was 1 bad snap, 1 TTU penalty and 1 incompletion.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Bob Sturm
would be proud….just like Kramerica, we should work on getting you an intern
This is appreciated much
"Trust your gut....mine always finds good Mexican food"
-Me
by oldschoolraider on Sep 20, 2011 1:53 PM CDT reply actions
Sturm would be appreciative, especially since he doesn’t have to think about other formations like the Pistol.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
can you?
Teach me how to Doege, teach teach me how to Doege? While I might be in NY watching every game I can, I completely expect to see this sign in one of the upcoming games, so do it current students, and make this alumni proud!

by 


















