Nevada Wolf Pack vs. Texas Tech Red Raiders | Q&A With Silver and Blue Sports

Much thanks to Andrew Maurins of Silver and Blue Sports for taking the time to answer some questions about the Nevada Wolf Pack. Make sure and check them out for my questions (to be published soon) and for your Wolf Pack news.
It's still early in the season, but grade Nevada's performance thus far in terms of preseason expectations and your expectations moving forward.
Outside of the ground game, the offense has been wildly unpredictable and unable to consistently capitalize on the scoring opportunities they earn. Same for special teams, which went from poor play in one area (shanked punts in week one) to poor play in another (muffed punt returns the following week). The ambush at Oregon aside, the defense has played about as well as we could expect them to.
In spite of all of that, however, 1-1 is still where the majority of us figured the team would be sitting at this point. The first two games haven't revealed all that much about them, and it's unclear what the immediate future has in store.
Nevada graduated QB Colin Kaepernick along with RB Vai Taua, what are your thoughts about their replacements, QB Tyler Lantrip and RB Mike Ball?
Thus far, Lantrip (#16) has shown a fairly good command of the offense, making effective reads on his receivers' routes and calling audibles at the right times. However, several weaknesses show up after the snap, including tendencies to stare down receivers and not put enough touch on his passes. And when you throw in his inability to make opponents respect the read option as much as they did when Kaepernick ran it, the offense's tempo and efficiency have taken big hits from last year to this year.
Ball (#5) has been the offense's main attraction, and is one of the only skill players in that unit who's shown any kind of consistency. He's averaging about 5.2 yards per carry and has a balance of speed, strength and lateral quickness that make him a perfect pistol running back.
Lantrip and Ball are just two pieces to the puzzle, talk a bit about some of the other offensive players for Nevada.
Rishard Matthews (#15) is Nevada's leading receiver, averaging about 11.8 yards per catch. This week would not be a bad time for him to finally break out and have a huge game. Stefphon Jefferson (#25), the running back playing behind Ball, has also garnered a lot of praise from Coach Ault, including some early comparisons to Vai Taua. Finally, as with all Nevada offenses, the unit's success will depend heavily upon how well their offensive line -- nicknamed the Union -- performs. Chris Barker (#75) is the best of these linemen, and will likely play in the NFL after next year.
More after the jump.
Nevada has had one poor performance defensively against Oregon and one tremendous performance against San Jose St. What Nevada defense should Texas Tech fans expect on Saturday and who are some players to watch?
Oregon is one of the very best offensive teams in the nation and San Jose State is...not. With that in mind, we're unsure what to expect out of the defense this week. They're going to be lining up against an offense that, while not boasting nearly the kind of personnel Oregon has, could be every bit as challenging to overcome if Nevada's own offense continues to flounder.
Linebacker James-Michael Johnson (#52) is the unit's unquestioned leader. He plays the way you'd expect a senior captain to play: confident, fearless and always finding a way to get involved on seemingly every play. Safety Duke Williams (#20) made the game-saving interception last week and will also be showcasing his speed on kick returns. Finally, Brett Roy (#47) had eight sacks last year -- not an easy feat for a tackle -- and must have a big game if Nevada's defense is to succeed.
Nevada started the season with four straight road games. Do you think this has taken a toll on Nevada and do you expect there to be an impact for Nevada given that this will be the third game on the road thus far?
It's not clear right now how many of the team's various problems can be attributed to playing on the road for so long, nor are they the kinds of players who would trot that out as an excuse, anyway. But the schedule is an undeniable handicap working against them, and week-to-week improvements will be that much more difficult to ascertain for all the reasons you'd expect -- not being able to play younger players as often as you'd like for fear of squandering momentum, the general intimidation of always having the crowd against you and so on.
Predict final score.
Before the season started, I described this game as "difficult, but very much winnable." After last week, though, that 20-point spread seems mostly justified. At some point before WAC play starts, I believe the offense will improve markedly in balance and scoring output. But I'm just not sure they can improve enough from last week to this week to come out of Lubbock with a win.
Texas Tech 42, Nevada 24
Make sure and check out Silver and Blue Sports for the latest on the Nevada Wolf Pack.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very honest evaluation by Maurins
The fact is that the Wolfpack is not even close to where they were last year. Meanwhile, Tech’s offense is on a par, if not better than last year and the defense is much more solid. His score prediction could be the actual outcome, but this could get messy if Tech continues to play well across the board, making the final score even bigger in Tech’s favor.
TTpilk
"Never, never, never give up." Winston Churchill
You don't get anything like this anywhere else;
Seth, thanks for some football news. This realignment stuff was about to drive me crazy, and I’m already there anyway.
"I feel sorry for the guys," Tech head coach Tommy Tuberville said. "They fought hard tonight. We didn't look good on offense or defense at times, and at times we looked pretty good. It's just, I don't know. Weird game.
by Btech on Sep 23, 2011 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I want solid offense and improved defense.
Around here football is bigger than the state of Texas!
by Distant Raider on Sep 23, 2011 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions
exactly
which then results in a bloodbath
by kevinkinsler on Sep 23, 2011 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions
I think its fairly naive
for any WAC writer to think that coming to the Jones will ever be a “difficult, but very winnable” game. We may have a young team, but really?
Last year
I think Nevada would have beaten Tech, regardless of where it was played. That was a very VERY good team a year ago.
by RedRaiderForLife95 on Sep 23, 2011 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Question: who do you think your most Doege player on the team is?
"Trust your gut....mine always finds good Mexican food"
-Me
by oldschoolraider on Sep 23, 2011 2:40 PM CDT reply actions
Oh! You meant that Q for Maurins....he, he...sorry.
TTpilk
"Never, never, never give up." Winston Churchill
Not nearly the personnel on offense that Oregon has???
Oregon’s O is amazing but we trot out a solid stable of four star QB’s, RB’s, and WR’s. Sure last year I wouldn’t have said this, and certainly I wouldn’t come close to saying this on defense, but I wouldn’t say our O doesn’t have “nearly the kind of personnel Oregon has”.
We are 3rd in the nation in offense right now correct? Maybe their O line is way better (I don’t know). Of course that is the most important position group on offense besides QB, but still. If Nevada thinks they are going to see a big drop in offensive production and talent from Oregon to Tech, they may be sorely disappointed.
Or maybe I just don’t pay attention to Oregon…
As An Oregon Resident
I can tell you Oregon’s WRs are far inferior to Tech’s WRs. LaMichael of last year is better than Tech’s stable but after gaining weight, he is plodding and slow. At QB, Doege is a much better passer. Oregon’s o-line is somewhat better, especially on the right side.
On D, Oregon has more overall team speed, but Tech has a better d-line imo.
Oregon has the edge on experience but they play in a weaker conference this season.
I’d actually love to see the bowl matchup.
I would agree with all of that
However, whether it’s Chip Kelly or Mark Helfrich, whoever runs that offense does a better job at it than our coaching staff.
by RedRaiderForLife95 on Sep 23, 2011 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions
+1
thought the same thing when I read this. Hope they really do think we are step down. This whole “Doege” thing starting to feel a bit “Ditka” to me. So in honor of that great SNL skit:
Doege 212 – Nevada 3
And I say, "Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consiousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
by dryroastedsean on Sep 23, 2011 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Gotta hit the road to Lubbock. Here are my answers.
http://www.silverandbluesports.com/2011/09/23/six-questions-with-a-red-raider/
In short, I think it’s a closer game than we want, but I’m always a nervous predictor and usually wrong. Go check it out!
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
I wen there and read your responses.
While you gave some great information, the main thing I noticed was that there were NO replies. Absolutely no one there bothered to leave any remarks. Maybe it is too early, but that is kind of wierd. I know that the replies here can become overwhelming on a normal post. This site gets a lot of traffic. Other blogs I have visited, though briefly, are no where near as popular to tthe fans of the other sites as we Tech fans are here. Just another exanple of the “Doegeness” of Seth.
TTpilk
"Never, never, never give up." Winston Churchill
I meant to say
I said “are no where near as popular to tthe fans of the other sites as we Tech fans are here”. But I meant to say “are no where near as popular to the fans of the other siteas as is DTN to its fans.”
TTpilk
"Never, never, never give up." Winston Churchill
I enjoyed those posts.
And I hope they know their team well enough to be correct on their final scores.
Review of a review
- That was a fair review of Red Raider fan expectation.
- I would never compare anything Tech to Craig James. Tacky question.
- Key match-up is whoever tries to cover Moore and our Defense stopping the run.
- Fifty percent quality of teams and fifty percent Doege awesomeness.
- I agree. Nevada should try to run the ball and control the clock.
- Tech 45 Nevada 17
Around here football is bigger than the state of Texas!

by 



















