I didn’t understand this when this came out in December. Greedy is not the right adjective. Tuberville may very well be over-paid by the time it is all said and done, but greed is a desire to acquire stuff and keep it for yourself, which we don’t know what Tuberville does with his money. Forbes is going for a shocking title, but this is about potentially a bad contract, and to have a contract, both sides have to agree.

Tuberville was given a pay raise, he didn’t demand it. But then again who knows? He may end up being worth every penny???

I do not like the premise of the headline, Tuberville or no.

I bet every coach in the nation who are not paid as well would have as much desire as anyone to be so.

We have contracted a guy who looked like he could do the job and are playing him well to do it. We will see soon enough whether the contract worked. That has little to do with greed per se, if a guy is not ambitious, I cannot see how we would want him.

Seth again makes good words to help with the perspective.

Boo Forbes !!

He was paid $420K for each win, but it only cost Tech $300K for each loss. All about the silver-lining.
(sarc font).