Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

Texas Tech Football Offseason Theorems | All Players Need to Contribute | Finding a Tight End and Utilizing Roster Spots

LUBBOCK, TX - NOVEMBER 12:  Justin Blackmon #81 of the Oklahoma State Cowboys is tackled by Zach Winbush #27 and Cody Davis #16 of the Texas Tech Red Raiders at Jones AT&T Stadium on November 12, 2011 in Lubbock, Texas.  (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

The offseason is filled with questions, especially this year. Rather than ask those questions and not offer any solutions, I thought it would be interesting to offer theorems, i.e. all right angles are congruent, and you tell me if you think they're true or not.

Theorem: All Players Need to Contribute | Finding a Tight End

It's becoming fairly apparent that Texas Tech will have just one scholarship tight end, Jace Amaro. A few weeks ago, there was a non-scholarship tight end on the roster, but he apparently isn't on the any more. The current group of commits for the 2010 class do not include a tight end and I wouldn't expect any sort of tight end commitment this late in the recruiting year.

First and foremost, I think it's imperative that players contribute as much as possible. And yes, I realize that theorems are absolutes, they are true, however, this first one, "All Players Need To Contribute" isn't so much of a theorem as much as it is maybe my own personal opinion. You're just going to have to go with me on this. The thought struck me as I considered the tight end position and the thought that there may be players that are burried in the depth chart, that will have no legitimate chance to play at their spot, but could find utility on the team. So I thought it would be an interesting exercise to take a look at the roster and figure out if there are any other players on the roster, at some other position that isn't contributing at all, that might be able to contribute at tight end. Heck, we've already seen how this staff is willing to take a look at players at positions other than where they were recruited, including Shawn Corker and Cornelius Douglas. So, let's take a look.

The Undersized Offensive Lineman

Seems like there are a couple of options here. Up first is Matt Wilson, who was a part of the 2011 class. Interestingly, when Wilson was listed by the services, it was generally regarded that he was 6'7" and 270, however, after an official weigh-in, he's listed at 6'6" and 254. When Wilson committed he said that he was a good athlete, that he played basketball all of his life and he was pretty athletic. His main concern heading into college was putting on some weight. I've never been able to find any video of Wilson, so I don't know how athletic he is, but this seems like a really good option if we're looking for a blocking tight end for the somewhat rare occasion that Texas Tech lines up in 12 personnel or 22 personnel. It would somewhat mimic what Texas Tech did in 2010 with Chris Olson who would line up at tight end. One other note is that Wilson is an engineering major, which means that if he was asked to learn two different positions, perhaps a tackle spot and/or tight end, that he'd be able to handle it.

Hardly Used Linebackers

There are a coule of things to consider here. First, I don't know if it was Tuberville or Glasgow that believed so much in the young linebackers last year, Blake Dees and Sam Eguavoen, as well as Pete Robertson, who saw some action early in the year before being injured. In any event, what that effectively did was push some older players down and literally off the depth chart. Players like Zach Winbush and Dion Chidozie are now afterthoughts when it comes to playing time on the defense.

More after the jump.

Star-divide

I've never gotten to really see either of these players play so the mere thought of thinking that either of them could contribute at tight end might be far-fetched, but at the end of the day, these are football players. They have played offense and defense for most of their football careers and it still comes down to whipping the man in front of you. I'm not writing either of them off in terms of never playing linebacker, but there were three linebackers in the 2011 class, Dees, Eguavoen and Justin Cooper. The 2012 class has four linebackers, Ryan Flannigan, Kris Williams, Will Smith and Chris Payne. Smith and Payne are JUCO players so you'd somewhat expect them to maybe get some opportunity to play sooner rather than later.

Chidozie is obviously a little light to be considered a tight end at 6'1" and 192. In fact, just for a bit of comparison, Cornelius Douglas out-weighs Chidozie, so he would have to put on some weight. But to give you an idea as to playing time, Chidozie redshirted in 2009, played in 1 game in 2010 and was a scout team member in 2011. That's regression.

Winbush is a bit different in that he did actually get in six games in 2011, registering three tackles and one fumble recovery. Winbush has decent size, 6'1' and 219, so he's much closer to being able to be along the line that Chidozie.

One other option is Tanner Foster. Foster (I think) is a non-scholarship player, but he actually played a bit in 2011, 5 game and 6 tackles. I think he's mainly a special teams player, but Foster has good enough size to play along the line right now at 6'3" and 230, although I think he was injured in the Nevada game, which cut his season short, but again, with so many linebackers on the way, I know the staff liked Foster, but if Foster plays at linebacker, something has gone horribly wrong.

What About Some Defensive Ends?

I don't know that I'm ready to start thinking that the defensive ends should or could be switched to a different position. Seems like this team needs a lot of help along the line and could use every body to spare. The only options would really maybe be Christopher Knighton (6-1/248) who didn't get any time from what I can remember. I'm also not willing or ready to move Branden Jackson (6-4/225) or Kindred Evans (6-3/223) to the offense, although I think they have excellent athleticism and could be good at tight end, but I don't want to rob from the defensive side of the field when the defense needs so much help.

Concluding Thoughts

At this point, I think it's imperative to utilize as many roster spots as possible. And what I really mean is that if there is a player at a position that is blocked or just isn't going to play, then I think that you try to get all of that talent that may not be playing involved in some form or fashion. It seems that in the NFL, players are kept or cut based on how much they can contribute in one of the few remaining roster spots. Players that can do more than one thing, playing their position and being on special teams are worth their weight in gold. This is my concept here, which is that players that aren't contributing in any meaningful way find spots on the roster that need some assistance.

Comment 81 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Now we are getting somewhere.....

theorems, thinking outside of convention, SARR is back. It’s all coming together.
It’s interesting to consider who besides Amaro could line up on the strong side. If you will remember way back, Mickey Peters was the IR. He was 6’3" and 210, decent speed and great hands. He was also one hell of a blocker.
It really depends on what the IR/TE is supposed to do. Last year our beloved TE was lining up about 8 yards wide of the Tackle 90+% of the time…….more of an IR. When he did come in tight, it was usually another dead giveaway that we were going to run. I think I would prefer to have the IR about 4 to 5 yards wide EVERY time so as to reduce the number of “tells” we give the defense. Your idea about Foster could be the ticket, as long as Amaro gets most of the game time as Foster develops.
This and getting rid of white helmets should get us back to the Alamo bowl anyway.

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 7:20 AM CST reply actions  

Wilson might also be a good move, especially if Doege remains QB

I’d like to know what his weight is now. If he has not beefed up, a 6’6" TE with blocking skills and basketball quickness could very well be valuable. Again, it comes down to what are the responsiblities.

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 7:46 AM CST up reply actions  

I would gladly accept and Alamo Bowl invitation every year;

mainly because I live in San Antonio, but more importantly because it beats the heck out of sitting home non engaged over the holdiay. This was the least amount of bowl watching for me in the last 20 years.

Seth, I think you might be onto something witht the TE position. Clearly, Amaro needed a red shirt year. I felt that the best two players out of the 2011 class were Brewer and Amaro. It just shows you how hard it is for a player to make an impact right out of high school. I wish Tommy had red shirtted him. I hope his confidence is not blown.

Any way, I have never been much on TE’s, but watching what New England has done using two TE sets has been enlightening to say the least. Gronkowski, who is 6-6 and weighs 265, and Hernandez who is more the normal size at 6-1 and 245, have proven that you can really move the ball. I know these guys are NFL players, but I like the scheme.

I think you line up anyone who is 6-6, and weighs 240 or better and put them in a foot race, then you take the top 10 and see who can catch, then you take the top 5 and see who can block, and then you take the top two that best run routes, and there you have it, a TE. Kind of like you start at little league. You line everyone up at shortstop and anyone who can make the throw makes the first cut.

But this is where we get back to Tommy ball. This means you actually have to coach and make decisions. I think this is what is wrong with this staff. They don’t know how to utilize talent and put players in the right position to be successful. Maybe the new coaches will be able to do this.

Maybe after Tommy reads your posts, he will get right on it.

"Oh, yeah. We don't even talk about Bowls much. We're so far away from being a team right now that can have a chance to compete in a Bowl." HC Tommy Tuberville.

by Btech on Jan 19, 2012 7:57 AM CST up reply actions  

This

is the requirement. Can they run, but more imprtantly, can they catch? Put the “candidates” in a football catching contest, and the best are “promoted” to TE.

An IQ test shows you how smart you would have been not to have taken it.

by candyroll on Jan 19, 2012 9:11 AM CST up reply actions  

that makes sense to me

"Oh, yeah. We don't even talk about Bowls much. We're so far away from being a team right now that can have a chance to compete in a Bowl." HC Tommy Tuberville.

by Btech on Jan 19, 2012 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Even better

How about, at halftime of the first game, we set up this contest for all these “candidates”, maybe even bring back ol’ Taylor Potts to throw to them, have it sponsored maybe by a local Townhome company with the lure being the winner gets a free month’s rent! Nah…too far fetched.

by Dr-Cane on Jan 19, 2012 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I was thinking

about the drill with 4 football machines, where the receiver faces one, catches the ball, turns quickly 90 degrees, and has to catch a second one, etc., etc. for about 8-10 footballs. That shows hand-eye coordination, evidence of “soft” hands, quickness, and reaction time.

And yeah, why not open it up to walk-ons? Anybody that is taller than 6-2, and is about 240-250 would “qualify”. Find out is they can catch first, run second. They can be taught and conditioned to block if they can run.

An IQ test shows you how smart you would have been not to have taken it.

by candyroll on Jan 19, 2012 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Hernandez

Was killing the Broncos, that crazy Bill lining up the TE as a RB, that was fun watching that big dude run !

If Amaro does pan out then we have one big inside guy and one small inside guy, I think that makes for a very interesting match up with the LBs

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 19, 2012 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Lining up TEs all over the field is one of those deceptively simple things

that you can’t believe didn’t happen earlier in football. “So you’re saying it’s hard for slower linebackers and smaller defensive backs to cover these ideal mixtures of size, strength and receiving skills? Preposterous, those shenanigans might play in Division 2 but it’ll never work in the NFL”

by mojavereject on Jan 19, 2012 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

both of which are in the NFL

I believe

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 19, 2012 4:47 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah, Rucker and Coffman were scary-good

and I think Egnew should be going out for the draft this offseason? Mizzou almost always seems to have a couple good ones in the pipeline.

by mojavereject on Jan 20, 2012 9:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I looked at the Tech athletic site media guide for tight end receivers mentioned as holding

records. I was surpised that Peters was not mentioned which to me indicates thoughout Tech’s football history, Tight Ends have not played a dominant role over the course of a season. At least to extent that they generate huge receiving numbers.

Note: It was fun though to names of past Tech players though. Man – we’ve had some great players at Tech.

That said, it will be interesting to see how the coaching staff develops Jace Amaro. He certainly has the physical tools.

by oldguyred on Jan 19, 2012 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

In the years when we did not play football, the TE was not a factor.

Peters, I believe was termed IR.
The best there ever was in these here parts was Andre Tillman. He was a beast.

I'm not the King of Porn,
but I know who is.

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 4:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Great write up Seth

I agree that Amaro should have not had his redshirt burned this past season and that in itself leads me to believe the TE position is in limbo. It all boils down to what the assignments are going to be for the TE. Is he a blocking TE or utilized as a receiver? I think Amaro would be great at both. A two TE set would also create some interesting offense.
The last think I want to see is a good defensive player being reassigned to the offense. We need the most help defensively. For now I’d be happy if we could just get the best out of our players and coach them up.

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Jan 19, 2012 8:34 AM CST reply actions  

A good TE is either a

Match up problem for the secondary or a great blocker or both. If you not getting some of this out of the position, then don’t force it. Amaro can be a good, if not great TE. Not sure about some of these other options. There’s a reason why they are playing defense or OT. If we’re seriously moving toward more of a power running game, then I suppose big, blocking TEs are necessary. Just feels to me like we keep shrinking the field and I don’t think we have the players yet who can be successful with that approach. Stanford and Wisconsin do it well, but they consistently have NFL caliber road-graders in the OL and some pretty decent power runners.

"When you are right no one remembers, when you are wrong no one forgets."

by snc915 on Jan 19, 2012 9:37 AM CST reply actions  

Still not convinced Tech needs a "power" running game.

Did we not lead the nation back when we did not play football in scoring and total offense?

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 10:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree

a power running game = fewer fans in the seats.

by Leacherhere on Jan 19, 2012 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

for me, it's not so much that it might not be as exciting....it's just that

it requires almost a total makeover from our exisitng player list.

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 10:52 AM CST up reply actions  

That’s why I think that a power running game isn’t what’s going to happen. It just can’t happen, not this year or next year or next, just based off of the roster. If Tuberville had signed 3 tight ends last year, then maybe, but that didn’t happen and he doesn’t have any committed this year.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 19, 2012 11:03 AM CST up reply actions  

I almost posted that angle (note the math reference)

that perhaps we move Amaro to DE because we really do not need a TE

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

I think that Amaro is such a unique player that he’s better off being used at TE because he can line up outside and at some point, he’s going to figure out how to use his body and dominate 5’9" nickel backs that try to cover him or out run linebackers that aren’t adept in coverage.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 19, 2012 11:18 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I would like to see that.

That’s another place where I differed from tubs’ thinking last year. If the redshirt was to be burned, at least get the guy some reps. But NO, we had to succum to the ballerina.

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 11:27 AM CST up reply actions  

This is one of the other theorems I’m working on, which is that if a player even sees a little bit of time during a true freshman year, does it make a significant difference in their sophomore year, or is it better to just redshirt?

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 19, 2012 11:36 AM CST up reply actions  

You mean we didn't

dominate with Nancy last year?!

(sarcasm- old wounds still leave a mark sometimes).

by oldguyred on Jan 19, 2012 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

careful

young adam was all Big 12-2 last year………..and at least one former ESPN analyst predicts him to high in the draft.

I'm not the King of Porn,
but I know who is.

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 1:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Power Running Game

I missed the days when our short yardage game was a near automatic quick slant, against a CB playing 8 yrds deep when we only needed three sure worked alot better than trying to blow those 5-star sooner and LH DEs off the ball.

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 19, 2012 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Long as we get the W, I don't care how it looks.

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 19, 2012 12:33 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I really hope that everyone enjoys this little diversion. Would love to know if anyone has any other position moves with anyone else on the roster that they would like to see. Again, this is all hypothetical and intended to think about what can be done to try to maybe fix the situation.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 19, 2012 11:04 AM CST reply actions  

sorry,

alleged porn.

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Then why bring it up?

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 19, 2012 12:31 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Not just them

Me too!

"...Fight for the school we love so dearly"

by mbrown603 on Jan 19, 2012 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

don't sell yourself short....

you are the coolest kid at your computer.

We ought to Haboob his ass

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 1:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Or in your case being dismissive of questionable conduct of a former coach.

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 19, 2012 3:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Does Craig James

have any other daughters we could recruit?

And I say, "Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consiousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice."

by dryroastedsean on Jan 19, 2012 12:08 PM CST reply actions  

Great Post --

I had a hard time believing we had only a handful of serviceable players last year.

Everyone on our roster was a high school stud. Sure, maybe not all have top flight talent, but I think the coaching staff did a disservice by making public statements about having no players and insufficient talent.

Regarding the Tight-end position, I wouldn’t be afraid to occasionally line up Eric Ward at Tight-end and slide another wide receiver into his spot. I’m sure we would refer to this as a 4 receiver set, but Ward can block.

by Tn Raider on Jan 19, 2012 12:19 PM CST reply actions  

Hey all, I’m going to be busy for the rest of the day, but I’d really appreciate it if you all could let me have these football posts to actually talk about football and stuff. It’s kinda my sanctuary. Feel free to leave off-hand comments elsewhere. This is not a rule, but would make me happy.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 19, 2012 2:14 PM CST reply actions  

I was just going to complement you on the straight football lately.

It’s easy to have a dead off season, and its nice that we are still dabbling in the football.

EDSBS is doing full page math equations.

You know, the ones that make you start off with an indignant “ohhh” but then your eyes glaze over and the last part of the “ohhhh” is more of a whimper. The next thing you say is “OWW!” and then, if you already have a nasty headache you conclude with your standard “malebovinefornicatingwithexcrementexclamationpoint”
(is it better to just say it or spell it out like that and look like an aggie? Meh.)

by Raider289 on Jan 19, 2012 2:44 PM CST up reply actions  

When I said that I would appreciate any off-hand comments in other places, I kinda meant it. This goes for everyone. oldguyred, westtxscrub, mbrown603, blackbeard, whoever. The next step is a ban, most likely for as long as I’m the moderator of this site. I’m really not in the mood.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 19, 2012 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

My apologies.

I didn’t realize I crossed the line.

by oldguyred on Jan 19, 2012 3:23 PM CST up reply actions  

I think he means oldschoolraider.

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 19, 2012 4:14 PM CST up reply actions  

You have a problem assuming what people are thinking.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 20, 2012 5:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Oldguyred was never involved in the thread so I don't think I was assuming?

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 20, 2012 8:51 AM CST up reply actions  

http://www.sbnation.com/users/oldguyred

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 20, 2012 8:54 AM CST up reply actions  

I think you still have a hard time assuming what I am thinking.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 20, 2012 8:59 AM CST via Android app up reply actions  

Let just agree that we are both making to many assumptions about one another.

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 20, 2012 9:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Nope. I am pretty sure I know what I am thinking.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 20, 2012 9:05 AM CST via Android app up reply actions  

Then why do you assume what I am thinking?

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 20, 2012 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Heh. This is rich. You are okay making assumptions about others. I am not making any assumptions about you. You have assumed you know what I am thinking. I think you need to let this go.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 20, 2012 9:13 AM CST via Android app up reply actions  

Is that a new logo in the upper left hand corner?

I do not remember being a side profile but rather a straight on shot. Anyway, I like it!

by TexasTechForever on Jan 19, 2012 3:14 PM CST reply actions  

Japanese empire lasted 80yrs … we got the defeat part down when do we surrender …

"we did a lot of things well, but there are several areas that need improving, our idea of moving forward is to do things that make you improve" - Jason Garrett

by chuck_TT on Jan 19, 2012 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Ahhh...come on.

True, we’re down, but we’ll never be out.

Banzai Will Rogers!!!

by ForestFlyer on Jan 19, 2012 4:02 PM CST up reply actions  

DANG!

I thought it was ROY Rogers!

TTpilk
"Never, never, never give up." Winston Churchill

by TTpilk645 on Jan 19, 2012 10:23 PM CST up reply actions  

On a positive note ....

Nobody is on this list

"we did a lot of things well, but there are several areas that need improving, our idea of moving forward is to do things that make you improve" - Jason Garrett

by chuck_TT on Jan 19, 2012 3:26 PM CST reply actions  

ooops forgot the link

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_college/2012/01/record-65-underclassmen-set-for-nfl-draft.html

"we did a lot of things well, but there are several areas that need improving, our idea of moving forward is to do things that make you improve" - Jason Garrett

by chuck_TT on Jan 19, 2012 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Next position on the list.......

How about guessing which of the OLB recruits will play at ILB instead?

by RRaider5355 on Jan 19, 2012 3:32 PM CST reply actions  

You mean MLB

Going back to the 4-3. Ruff would be proud.

An IQ test shows you how smart you would have been not to have taken it.

by candyroll on Jan 19, 2012 3:41 PM CST up reply actions  

needs to be heady and the

meanest SOB in the pen.

I'm not the King of Porn,
but I know who is.

by blackbeard on Jan 19, 2012 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I would love to see another Mickey Peters type player at TE.

That kid had hands.

"Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; A stranger, and not your own lips."

by westtxscrub on Jan 19, 2012 4:13 PM CST reply actions  

On these undersized O-lineman and what it means for an offense.

I have been thinking about this, I could never explain how it could just happen accidentally and then need to be fixed.
It won’t be fixed. It is a shift, for a reason, but not as explained by anyone so far really.

If we design an O-line for guys who are undersized, what assumptions do we make and what is their purpose?
(A big hammer and a small hammer are different tools for different purposes.)

First if we are going to do this, we have to assume that under-sizing an o-line must work in theory somehow.
Because in the real world, the big guy throws the little guy all over the field, all day long.

That’s fine, because with this approach, they are really pawns with no other purpose than to buy or make time for your quarterback to get (the ball) out of there. They aren’t supposed to really stop much of anybody, or protect much of anybody because that aint ever gonna happen with an undersized o-line being thrown around by those meat-mountians from the other team.

DingDingDing! Those of you who have buzzed in and said “well that means we need a stinking fast quarterback” would be right. You undersize that o-line and you change the whole pace of the offense, and therefore the pace of the whole game. (Fits in nicely with nascar, huh?) Will it be one who has time to sit back and read the field, then twist and fire off the ball? Or the guy who just gets the heck outta there asap?

Now second, what we don’t want is a bunch of tall thin basketball players, mmkay? it’s just physics.
High centers of gravity , combined with maneuvering from the foot means that they cannot move through space AND change direction at the same time with any good effect. They can do one or the other, but not both at the same time. Basketball players twist while stationary quite often, but watch them lean and put their arms out as they grasp at aerodynamics and balance their way through long, drawn out gentle turns. They also block the quarterback’s view wherever they stand, so that is no help either.

Okay then, now we know that if you are going to undersize an O-lineman you want them to be short. Instantly, we have advantages: They are below the line of sight of the defense. They can change direction quicker than the meat mountain in front of them. They can accelerate faster than some 8 foot tall clydesdale. BUT they need to be durable- because they aren’t designed to dominate much of anybody, but simply get to the defender and be abused long enough to for the ball to advance and be done with it fast- thanks, coach. They also have smaller feet, typically – less rubber, meeting less road, and seeing one heck of a lot of force. it should all be over soon though, or not.

As you can see, the philosophy of the whole offense is different. You don’t just accidentally design something like this.
Nobody lost too much weight to be effective accidentally. They lost weight to be effective for the air raid, but not the run. Johny golden arm aint gonna have time to pick his nose and draw a picture. The O-line is set up more for the run, and probably a lightning speed run right up the middle.

So how about those dual-threat guys we discussed earlier?
All this is coming together for me now that I have had months and months to think about it and it is looking more and more deliberate.

Here is what bothers me:
The thing is this is a terrible way to play the air-raid, and a terrible way to even pretend the air-raid.

The O-line is going to get mangled, because you are asking them to do something they are not designed for.
The quarterback is going to have hell with it because he doesn’t have time to do his job.
It’s not only rough on players, but abuse of philosophy.

Have these little guys stand there and find, invent, or steal more, and more, and more time before theAWWCRAP.
Maybe this is why Dodge always looked rattled. His o-line wasn’t designed to protect him, or his style of play.

The timing is incompatible for a thinking quarterback who needs to actually have a feel for what the heck is going on before the ball goes anywhere. He has time to go flying headfirst up the middle, but that’s about it.

Now, often enough, he had plenty of time, you say- and that’s right, but I bet he averaged a sooner release than previous quarterbacks, and I bet his average window of time was smaller. He would be just that much more crowded in time and space and awareness. The O-line is not undersized for much of anything BUT AIR RAID- and that’s what we have not noticed and put a fine point on till today.

If we are going to have an air-raid quarterback, we need an o-line that can stop the big boys, not just delay them.
The current o-line can’t sit there and lose for long enough to support the air-raid style.

This is what you get when you hire the grand champion of the SEC to play air ball. He gave away essential elements to the success of it.

Why didn’t we see it sooner? Why am I the dummy that figured this out?
This is crazy, and a terrible mismatch in philosophy.

Actually, I like the term abuse of philosophy – because that’s really what it is- Using the wrong tool for the job.

by Raider289 on Jan 19, 2012 6:28 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Call me crazy...

but I think Jace handles this spot perfectly. I really do think this kid will end up being an All-Big 12 TE, and it’s just a matter of time. He showed some flashes this year and will continue to develop. He can be our TE for a few years.

by J.Brown5 on Jan 19, 2012 6:36 PM CST reply actions  

I'll piggyback on "chipping in" theorem

Do we not have any kids on campus built like Vince Wilfork? Raji? Are there some guard types on the team that could play 2 tech/nose guard? There’s gotta be some really big boys, who may be “overweight” yet still very strong. Coach em up and rotate them in to keep the damn O Guards off our linebackers.

Give 'Em Hell Tech!!!!!

by Plano Jeff on Jan 19, 2012 8:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Yes, the topic of the defensive line and the nose guard is ready to go next week.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 20, 2012 5:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Amaro

Will be the best tight end in the conference….IF the coaching staff will just put him out on the field and have the QB throw the ball to him 5 to 10 times a game. Despite the fact we have had just a few legit top flight TEs (Parks & Tillman were the best), I think Amaro may turn out the best of the bunch. It all depends on whether this staff is any good at all and can actually recognize Amaro’s abilities AND use them effectively.

TTpilk
"Never, never, never give up." Winston Churchill

by TTpilk645 on Jan 19, 2012 10:33 PM CST reply actions  

If Amaro....

Is anything close to Dave Parks, he needs to be on the field. I was there when DP caught that pass against aTm between two defensive backs, outstretched across the goal line. Unbelievable. Still one of the best catches I have ever seen. Man love to Dave Parks.

by chuckvan on Jan 20, 2012 8:47 PM CST up reply actions  

This is an interesting line of discussion... but I'm kind of confused...

If we really needed or wanted a tight end… Why wouldn’t we make sure to recruit and sign one?
What really happened to Tony Trahan?
It sounds like Wilson would be the best candidate to block and even potentially catch a pass every now & then…
I also agree with the idea of trying to get some contribution out of every upper classman’s roster spot… at least on special teams or some significant scount team role… otherwise, I’m afraid those guys are going to get churned out of this program…

"Transition is hard." - TT

by Houston Raider on Jan 20, 2012 3:56 PM CST reply actions  

I don’t know about the recruiting stuff. I’m somewhat assuming that the staff missed out on the guys that they wanted and decided not to just offer a player to offer a player? I really don’t know.

Trahan left the team in September ( http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2011-09-28/tech-notes-trahan-leaves-team#.TxqhZPnLi1w ). I don’t know anything else about the situation other than Trahan has left two programs, Rutgers and Texas Tech.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 21, 2012 5:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Texas-tech_small
Reasons to be excited about the 2012 football season
Small
Tommy Tuberville & Mike Leach Coaching Comparison
Small
Craig James has a son in Arkansas!
Texaslondon_small
Not our favorite topic, but its out there
68108_10150348560555521_631660520_15960719_5048910_n_small
UT trio faces misdemeanor charges
170px-mrstatue_small
So Far Away Yet Not Too Far
Small
Is the arrow going up or down?
Small
Texas Tech Football # 8 of 20 football programs on the decline.
Small
7 years ago today...
Small
This used to be us....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU