Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tottenham May Have Found Their Goalkeeper Of The Future

Texas Tech Football Offseason Theorems | Do Not Expect a True Freshman to Make an Immediate Impact | Reworking the Defensive Line

The offseason is filled with questions, especially this year. Rather than ask those questions and not offer any solutions, I thought it would be interesting to offer theorems, i.e. all right angles are congruent, and you tell me if you think they're true or not. Here are your previous Texas Tech Football Offseason Theorems:

All Players Need to Contribute | Finding a Tight End and Utilizing Roster Spots

Theorem: Do Not Expect a True Freshman to Make an Immediate Impact | Reworking the Defensive Line

I somewhat just mentioned this in passing, but I think that there may not be a bigger job on the football staff than to rework the defensive line. We'll do a full positional review and preview later, but I wanted to try to bounce some things off of you all and figure out how this might work.

What we do know is that new defensive coordinator and the other assistant coaches all ran the 4-3 defense. I think you're going to see a relatively basic approach and I don't think that new defensive coordinator Art Kaufman is going to try to get too complicated.

One of the things that I recall after watching the games was that the defensive line was just getting blown off of the line of scrimmage. At the time, and I still believe this to an extend, I argued that to my eyes, it looked like the defensive line lacked talent. I know the argument about how the stars and everything else was relatively same to prior years, but to my eyes (I'm trying to stress that this is my opinion) the line looked overwhelmed physically. I'll be going into this later in the spring and summer, but a lot of the fact that there was no depth along the line was because guys like Myles Wade, Lawrence Rumph and Pearlie Graves weren't on the roster. Again, we'll get into that later. The purpose of this article is to focus on who is here and how you might try to re-work the defensive line.

Lots of Options at Defensive End

There are seemingly a lot of good options at defensive end, but the problem is that they didn't necessarily perform last year, evidenced by the lack of pass rush and the awful running defense. Granted, defensive ends aren't primarily necessarily responsible for stopping the run, but they're part of the equation and have to play better. Here are your returning defensive ends:

DE Aundrey Barr (6-2/246)
DE Dartwan Bush (6-1/247)
DE Kindred Evans (6-3/223)
DE Christopher Knighton (6-1/248)
DE Leon Mackey (6-5/256)
DE Branden Jackson (6-4/225)
DE Jackson Richards (6-3/249)

That's six players to play two spots. The problem, as stated above, was that the defensive line wasn't good overall. I think that you can guess that Mackey will get the start at one defensive end and the rest is up for grabs with Bush, Barr and Richards all being very usable players. This is one of those deals where if you have any expectation that this defense will be marginally better, the same players that didn't play well overall, will have to be better players.

There are two defensive end types coming in, one has already signed his LOI, Lee Adams, and the other is Robison, and he has apparently received more than a handful of offers from some new programs, including Tennessee, North Carolina, and Colorado.

DE Chase Robison (6-4/225)
DE Lee Adams (6-3/265)

Robison will redshirt, or at least that's my guess. If it were up to me, I'd like to see Adams at the defensive end spot. Keep in mind that Adams played as a true freshman while at Arizona St. and went back to JUCO after getting in some alleged theft issues. I think Adams is going to contribute next year. Rather, he's going to have to contribute because I'm not sold that Jackson and Evans are going to ready. There's the thought that they will have matured, but I'm not holding my breath. If Adams can play at defensive end, then he would immediately make the line significantly bigger with Mackey or Richards at another end spot.

More after the jump.

Star-divide

What About the Guys Up Front?

This is where the pickings are slim and it's not encouraging. This is why I say that the line or something is going to have to be reworked and the very distinct possibility that Adams doesn't play at defensive end. There are virtually no defensive tackles on this team:

DT Kerry Hyder (6-2/260)
DT Donte Phillips (6-2/256)
DT Delvon Simmons (6-5/265)
DT Dennell Wesley (6-2/310)

This is not a lot of options. You could expect that Hyder, Simmons and Wesley will compete to start, but that's just three defensive tackles. The only other options will be from the high school ranks:

DT J.J. Bynum (6-3/275)
DT Michael Starts (6-5/285)
DT Anthony Smith (6-0/291)

The positives are that Bynum, Starts and Smith are all over 275. But those may be completely fake weights. So assuming the weights are somewhat accurate, they have size, more size that what is currently on the Texas Tech roster, which makes me think that the staff most likely knew that Hyder was worn down by the end of the year last year, playing an undersized 260 at defensive tackle and being asked to sometimes being asked to do too much, most likely because the other options weren't any better than a tired Hyder. This most likely means that Hyder will still have to see time at defensive tackle because there aren't any other options except for very young options.

If we learned anything last year, it's that despite how highly ranked a player may be, do not expect a true freshman to live up to the hype immediately. You should have no expectations that Bynum or Smith are ready to play right now. I know that Bynum is getting a lot of comparisons to Colby Whitlock, but I don't think that's fair or accurate. Whitlock did play as a true freshman, but what Whitlock did is rare and exceptional. It would be spectacular if Bynum or Smith could do the same, but, again, it's not fair to have that type of expectation.

The same could be said for Starts and he and Simmons could be thought of as similar players. They were both essentially 4-star players coming out of high school and I know that I thought that Simmons might have been able to make an immediate impact, but truthfully, his impact was relatively minimal. That doesn't mean that the experience that Simmons got last year won't have a significant impact next year, but he has to be in better shape and he has to have added some weight.

Conclusion

The theorem is that you should not expect a true freshman to make an immediate impact and I still believe that, but since there are only four true defensive tackles on the team, five if you throw in Adams, that's very little depth. Right now, I think that the incoming freshmen will have to contribute, because there aren't any other options. The one consistent about all of the freshmen defensive linemen is that they all have size that isn't currently on the team. It's still to be determined if they have the requisite strength, but they all have size and I think that was intentional. The staff could not afford to take on players that were almost assured of a redshirt, like Phillips last year, who was obviously undersized last year.

I'm going out on a limb here because I think the freshman that will see the most time is Anthony Smith rather than Bynum and Starts, even though Bynum and Starts are more highly rated prospects. Smith is a nose guard, while I think that Bynum played at the 3 and 5 technique, while Smith was largely a 1 and 3 technique guy. What that means is that Smith played a lot over the opposing center (shaded to one side or another) and was more of a true nose guard where Bynum did play a lot over the opposing tackle. Starts is supposedly the highest rated and wants to play defense, but I'm not sure where he'll eventually play, but I'm guessing he'll be like Simmons, a three technique defensive tackle in this scheme rather than a 1 technique. Starts is supposedly incredibly strong, but I still can't find any film on him, so it's tough for me to comment. And because I think that Smith is more likely to play doesn't mean that Bynum won't play. I think he has as good a shot as anyone right now and I think he can play multiple positions along the line, but there is a real need at nose guard with Wesley being the only nose guard on the team.

Comment 49 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good write up Seth and I feel your pain re: DT's

just remember it’s not the size of the dog in the fight, its the size of the fight in the dog. I’d like to see three step up and stop the run or at least slow it down, create obvious passing situations, then rotate to pass rushers.

"you just need to find your inner pirate" ML

by blackbeard on Jan 24, 2012 11:17 AM CST reply actions  

Ranked 120th in run defense

in 2011, means that there’s only one way to go for the 2012 version of the Tech defense. But after looking at your analysis, I’m not so sure. My gut tells me that we just don’t have the right players lined up to compete, and further, to compete in depth.

I can only hope that these guys can get bigger and stronger in the off-season. Absent that effort, I see more of the same for 2012….I hope I’m wrong.

An IQ test shows you how smart you would have been not to have taken it.

by candyroll on Jan 24, 2012 11:18 AM CST reply actions  

I'm going to choose to be positive...

…if only because I’m not prepared to take a defeated attitude this early in the offseason. I think Tuberville was experimenting in a lot of ways his first two years with staff, formations, and overall style. His staff and formation experiments have been well documented, but I think we are overlooking what I believe to be his biggest failed experiment. I admit I don’t remember when/where, but Tuberville discussed his vision for the defense having speed everywhere, including the line. He was initially willing to sacrifice size for speed/athleticism. The benefit, he seemed to believe, was two-fold for the line; 1) spread offenses are only defeated by speed; and 2) it gives us an opportunity to pick up athletic linemen that other schools over-looked because they were undersized. Obviously, hindsight tells us that this experiment failed as spread teams just ran through the heart of our small line.

However, there is room for optimism. Just as the staff and formation changes have been changed to fit his experience, so have the type of defensive linemen recruits we are going after.

I don’t fault Tuberville for experimenting, but I’m glad that these recruits signal his understanding that his experiment failed.

by Raider Legacy on Jan 24, 2012 11:31 AM CST reply actions  

The "speed everywhere" idea

sounded plausible to me, though I’m no student of the game. Some noted (perhaps in hindsight, I can’t recall) that 40-yd. times and such weren’t so relevant for interior linemen.

My expectation for a B12 coaching staff is to come to the correct conclusion on this issue without lengthy experimentation.

by rednblackET on Jan 24, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions  

260-310 Lbs

We have maybe 3 guys that are close to 300 Lbs, the rest are not really servicable in this league. With the talent of Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and dare I say Baylor we need more beef.

I really think that tuBS mis-precieved the XII, thnking we needed to be running all over the field chasing passes, but the reality is if you have gaping holes the offenses are going to exploit them

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 24, 2012 11:42 AM CST reply actions  

How much of our problems at DE were really caused by the DTs last year?

Smith, et al would push really far upfield on the pass rush… and that’s a good thing! The problem was that there wasn’t an equal push from the interior, and the result was a gaping hole between the DTs and the DEs – a convenient escape route for all but the most statuesque QBs.

What our defense has lacked the most (from a personnel standpoint) is a big MF at DT. Get one or two three hundred pound bodies in there (with strength to match) and I guarantee we jump 30-40 spots in the defensive rankings

by battledome on Jan 24, 2012 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Terrance (Mt) Cody

Is all I can think when you say that, close to 400lbs, in Saban’s doghouse about half the time, but occupied at least two blockers on every play.

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 24, 2012 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Not even Smith... how about Suh...

you don’t need a guy who necessitates a double-team when running the 4-3, like you do when you run the 3-4… just two guys who can get some push

by battledome on Jan 24, 2012 7:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Speaking of Suh

How about Carter, no really Suh was awesome and he made Jared Crick look like a superstar too

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 25, 2012 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Carter got signed to Dallas along with Dylan Gandy.

I think it was Gandy. Correct me if I’m wrong.

" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...

by KWashburn on Jan 25, 2012 4:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Scott Smith

not to mention, when you cant stop the run, the opponent never gets in those “must pass” situations, I really fell Smith will be vindicated with a long fruitful career in the NFL

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 24, 2012 1:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Frosh players

Seth your correct even Javedon Clowney (DE- South Carolina) (Rivals 100 #1 player in 2011) heralded as one of the best high school athletes at any position, for like decades

He didn’t really get his steam going until later in the season, and still looked undersized

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 24, 2012 11:45 AM CST reply actions  

Good thoughts, Seth, thank you.

For DT it can take on a likely for the 3 new guys based soley on numbers….no analysis required.

For DE: We have the makings of a reasonable DE corps. I am going to erase everything I saw last season and start anew with what ever the nother-new DC brings to the game.
(I am dead weary of seeing another new DC…I don’t care who he is, I am weary of it.)
I do hope that Art K is the bees knees of DC’s.

For TE: We have one guy on the roster who looks like a TE…that makes the position, IMHO, a so what.

I have seen this before, we had that kind of scenario with the three guys who have actually played the spot in the past 12 years. They came in to play certain circumstances, make the defenses think a little bit, and rotated out while Y continued to Y.

Admittedly I was really excited with the thought of the 3 guys we had on roster last season because I like what the postion can bring to an offense. Currently there is no depth and none being recruited as far as I can tell. It is a so what.

It looks like that our TE is going to be more of a big ole Y…Jace Amaro can do that, he looks as much like a tall Y as he does a thin TE. Not an issue with me.

Living large in Texas...Texas forever.

by TallMike on Jan 24, 2012 12:13 PM CST reply actions  

Isn't the objective of a 4-3 to get Sacks not "stop the run" ....

Jevon Kearse 6-4 265

This problem looks like nothing a little HGH couldn’t cure ?

"we did a lot of things well, but there are several areas that need improving, our idea of moving forward is to do things that make you improve" - Jason Garrett

by chuck_TT on Jan 24, 2012 1:12 PM CST reply actions  

Chase Robinson

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2012/jan/24/cbhs-defender-rethinks-decision/

"Appreciate the target you put on my back. Last time you did that, you almost got me fired." Tommy Tuberville 2006

by jdhud on Jan 24, 2012 1:45 PM CST reply actions  

DT’s need to hit the all you can eat for the next 7 months. Throw in working out as well. We are too light to stop the run present day IMO.

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Jan 24, 2012 2:11 PM CST reply actions  

J.J. Bynum {Lollar}

I think this kid can definitely contribute at DT this year. Read somewhere that he recently squatted 700 lbs. That much leg and back strength should be able to handle some big boys on the OL.

by Red and Black 71 on Jan 24, 2012 2:15 PM CST reply actions  

DE to LB??

Some of the guys you listed at DE could be moved to LB, especially now that we need 3 of those guys on the field, not 2.

Seth, I know you are taking this step-wise, but the LB situation is really linked to the Defensive End situation. Maybe we can discuss and reconsider some of these guys when you post your theorem on the LB corps.

"When your work speaks for itself, don't interrupt."

by candyroll on Jan 24, 2012 2:39 PM CST reply actions  

Yes, have been thinking about that, but we’re going to switch gears next week to the offensive side of the ball. Just something to consider, there are 9 linebackers on the roster right now, with 4 new players (Smith and Payne are already on campus I think while Flannigan and Williams to sign next week). I have a suspicion that Bullitt could flip to linebacker, so there’s 14 linebackers right there.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 24, 2012 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I recall seeing a tweet somewhere talking about bullit moving to linebacker.
Ive seen a few tweets from defensive players talking about gaining 20lbs. Hmm.
I wouldn’t be suprised to see everyone on the D-Roster 10-30lbs. heavier next season.

by Techcuz on Jan 24, 2012 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Commitment to Strength

I do think Tommy is pushing his strength staff as hard as he can to get the players at the right weights and in the best physical shape possible. I’ve heard this numerous times in his interviews (radio/tv), including the recent one posted here yesterday Lubbock 104.3. This gives me hope that the obvious weight disadvantage we have among our peers OL’s will somewhat balance out. Yes – weight is a huge factor, but so is technique and leverage. The new defensive staff will fix this.
It’s also very possible that some DE’s could move to LB, however the numbers don’t work, so I forsee some of the DE’s moving over to DT spots. Which in turn hopefully, will allow us to have some sort of rotation, keeping guys fresh.
On a side note – does anyone know anything about Tommy getting approval (boosters/fund raising) for an indoor practice facility? It’s obvious it’s needed based on the weather in Lubbock and it’s pretty pathetic we don’t have one.

"They name hurricanes after winds like we have in Lubbock." Coach Tommy Tuberville

by artgar3 on Jan 24, 2012 4:08 PM CST up reply actions  

IMO, we have a very fine indoor practice facility

It’s that big bubble just south of the Jones. I find it hard to believe that this facility is not adequate.

"you just need to find your inner pirate" ML

by blackbeard on Jan 25, 2012 6:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Bubble is kind of old and small... sure a new one could have some advantages...

But it’s really a matter of whether you are looking for excuses…
Or taking what you have and making the best of it…

"Transition is hard." - TT

by Houston Raider on Jan 25, 2012 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Bubble Plan

was to renovate the bubble, and install adequate HVAC. As well as building or keeping ? the indoor track so this could be a multi-sport facility. Basically spending more than it would take to build a new one, but due to space, and other obligations of the building just upgrading

I think the bubble is cool and kind of unique.

I have also heard that some schools indoor facilities have the ability to adjust to projected game day conditions (Temp & Humidity) so maybe that’s where the extra expense comes from

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 25, 2012 3:39 PM CST up reply actions  

if we are going to "adjust to game day conditions"

why not practice outside. wtf? are we freakin pansies now that we can’t go outside on a rainy day, a windy day? too hot? too cold? It’s fuckin football. It’s supposed to be played outdoors. Grow a pair and toughen up. Fuck

"you just need to find your inner pirate" ML

by blackbeard on Jan 25, 2012 3:51 PM CST up reply actions  

what about Kindred Evans at TE?

He’s long and lean enough… if he can run and catch, he might be a good option…

by battledome on Jan 24, 2012 7:03 PM CST up reply actions  

That sounds workable to me !

Living large in Texas...Texas forever.

by TallMike on Jan 24, 2012 9:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I had suggested that last week ( http://www.doubletnation.com/2012/1/19/2706787/texas-tech-football-offseason-theorems-finding-a-tight-end-and ), both he and Branden Jackson, but I thought that I’d hate to take away two young players from the defense. The defense needs so much more help than the offense.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 25, 2012 5:10 AM CST up reply actions  

let him play both ways

A few TE plays can’t be so difficult.

Living large in Texas...Texas forever.

by TallMike on Jan 25, 2012 8:43 AM CST up reply actions  

2008 Auburn DL DE Depth Chart

DE
52 Antonio Coleman (6-2, 252, Jr.)
45 Antoine Carter (6-4, 254, So.)
DT
91 Jake Ricks (6-4, 300, Jr.)
98 Zach Clayton (6-3, 288, So.)
64 Luke Farmer (5-11, 247, RFr.)
DT
94 Sen’Derrick Marks (6-1, 294, Jr.)
93 Mike Blanc (6-4, 290, So.)
41 Darrell Roseman (6-4, 279, So.)
DE
49 Michael Goggans (6-3, 252, So.)
90 A.J. Greene (6-5, 269, RFr.)
43 Raven Gray (6-5, 253, Jr.)

Very simular to what we have only about 10 pounds difference .. I think its reasonable to gain 10 pounds muscle in offseason …..

"we did a lot of things well, but there are several areas that need improving, our idea of moving forward is to do things that make you improve" - Jason Garrett

by chuck_TT on Jan 24, 2012 4:21 PM CST reply actions  

Auburn went 5-7 in 2008.

Simple rule of thumb: Everything before the but is BS.

by FriscoRaider on Jan 24, 2012 4:52 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

And tuBS was paid 5.1 million to just go away.

Simple rule of thumb: Everything before the but is BS.

by FriscoRaider on Jan 24, 2012 4:53 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

You get a high five for that.

I don’t wanna pay tubs a dime when he sucks it up.

i like lose women

by freakinout on Jan 24, 2012 7:27 PM CST up reply actions  

don't have to worry about that we don't pay coaches to leave, soverign immunity

"Oh, yeah. We don't even talk about Bowls much. We're so far away from being a team right now that can have a chance to compete in a Bowl." HC Tommy Tuberville.

by Btech on Jan 25, 2012 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

What was that bad eighties Costner movie ? Diplomatic Immunity, as the foreign guy pulls the trigger

College Football: "Our Traditions are now for Sale"
.....................................................................................

"Well the ball just didnt bounce our way today" Tommy Tubervile, after decades of coaching experience, the best he can do ....................................................................................................................................
Blaze a trail, spend some time in West Texas, feel the sand sting your skin and burn your eyes, let the winter dry your hands, learn that its there only because our ancestors didn’t want to be around other people … that’s West Texas

by Gus Mitchem on Jan 25, 2012 3:41 PM CST up reply actions  

not Costner......Mel Gibson

one of the Leathal Weapon movies

"you just need to find your inner pirate" ML

by blackbeard on Jan 25, 2012 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Size isn't everything

but it can sure make up for some things. We’re pretty small across the board on the DL. I think part of what you (Seth) observed in 2011 was a function of the size disadvantage and opposing offenses taking advantage.

I think the other thing observed in 2011 was that the defensive staff was not on the same page with regards to scheme. Your (Seth’s) preview of the 4-2-5 last summer was not the 4-2-5 that was implemented. My theorem: Glasgow was the only guy who understood the 4-2-5 scheme, but he was unable to get the rest of the staff to understand it and on board. Consequently, it was treated like a nickel package or a 4-3 with a Safety as the 3rd LB. BY the end, the consensus in the office was it was a failed experiment, Glasgow was marginalized, and decided to leave.

Our problem in 2012 may be related to trying to tool up to play a 3-4 two years ago. We have few true DL and a number of hybrid OLB/rush-end types. I think this makes it more likely that one of the incoming guys sees playing time early, if there physical stats are even close to reality. Whoever it is may not be a huge difference maker, but a big body is nice to give the little (relatively speaking) guys a breather.

by NM99 on Jan 24, 2012 6:53 PM CST reply actions  

If we where tooling up for 3-4, wouldn’t there been at least 1 or maybe 2 guys two years ago picked up that are 325 + … who was going to be in the middle of the 3 – 4?

"we did a lot of things well, but there are several areas that need improving, our idea of moving forward is to do things that make you improve" - Jason Garrett

by chuck_TT on Jan 24, 2012 9:57 PM CST up reply actions  

As Pilk said, attrition among the group hurt as well., but it was attrition from an already smaller group. If the ideal is to have at least 3 deep at every position, that means 9 DL and 16 LB in a 3-4 and 12 DL and 9 LB in a 4-3. Going from 3-4 to 4-3, you all of the sudden are at least 3 DL short on the roster and 3 LB too many.

by NM99 on Jan 25, 2012 5:32 AM CST up reply actions  

sounds like excuses are already in order for next season;

Tommy will steal your post and say it was his.

"Oh, yeah. We don't even talk about Bowls much. We're so far away from being a team right now that can have a chance to compete in a Bowl." HC Tommy Tuberville.

by Btech on Jan 25, 2012 3:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I don’t think that these are excuses, I think it’s the reality of the situation. Rumph and Wade would have been gone anyway due to graduation and the only guy that would still be around was Graves, so that still only gives the team 5 DT’s. This next year was going to be a problem with the DT’s no matter how you cut it unless Tuberville would have loaded up on JUCO’s DT’s in his first year (2011) recruiting. It’s tough saying that something is an excuse or a reason, and I think that right now, I think that what I’m doing in my mind is the thought that significant improvement on the defense is going to be incredibly difficult, unless some players really step up and make a significant difference, you’re going to see much of the same as last year, and it doesn’t matter if it’s the 4-3 or the 4-2-5 or the 3-4.

So, I don’t know if I’m giving a reason or excuse, but that’s what I think is going to happen.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 25, 2012 4:16 PM CST up reply actions  

No excuses

Just realistic expectations. Against average to above average competition, this will be an issue going into the second half as lack of rotation results in guys wearing down. Early in the season, not so much. The solution is to game plan around it, start out fast on offense and control the clock in the second half. This is the typical OU game plan.

by NM99 on Jan 25, 2012 7:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I should add that this is not by any means the root cause of the shortage we find ourselves in. Retooling for a different scheme usually takes a couple of years. Now we find ourselves in a situation where we have changed direction 3 times and are tooled for nothing. If we stick with one thing, 2014 is looking better.

by NM99 on Jan 25, 2012 7:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I still think that the plan, right now, is to play a traditional 4-3 because I think that’s what these coaches do, but as you mention, the personnel may dictate otherwise. I found how the staff is going after another DT from California (Jordan Tavai). I hope the line is bigger, although I realize that being bigger, by itself, doesn’t mean anything, as it creates such a better situation for the linebackers, who were just killed last year.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Jan 25, 2012 5:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree. They will more than likely run a 4-3. That is the scheme most guys are familiar with from high school, and it is easier to adjust to at the college level. 3-4 and 4-2-5 are not typical schemes. Walking on the field and playing a completely new scheme the next season is tough even in the NFL where their job is to do nothing but football all day. You don’t have that luxury in college, so changing schemes requires a couple of years for the players to really get the new system.

by NM99 on Jan 25, 2012 5:39 AM CST up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Texas Tech Red Raiders.

Site Editor

Uniwatch_sethc_jersey_small Seth C

Contributing Authors

Doubletface_cropped_small djollie111

Marioche_small kayakyakr

Bossfight_small Skin Patrol

444_small Tech92

Will_rogers_small NM99

Texaslondon_small LondonRaider

150px-redraiderlogo_small DanSwany

100_0016_small RndRckTTU